master
Max Lehmann 5 years ago
parent 86adefb758
commit bbaac9bf99

@ -156,21 +156,21 @@
<div class="annotatedreader1">
<div class="filterDiv Ar Swarm1" id="propertyknowledgepower"><div class="sectiontitles" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="140">Property x Knowledge x Power<hr class="line1"></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>To own and share the knowledge is to own the power.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Archiving comes from, and gives, a position of power.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>The archivist always holds the power to frame the material.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>The archive is affiliated with the institution or power, which is never neutral.</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70">"…with this archic, in truth patriarchic function, without which no archive would ever come into play or appear as such."</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>"Archon" also has a negative, tyrannical connotation.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>The "archive" (mostly considered as a neutral instance) actually comes from a rather authoritarian history/concept.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Archiving as a very patriarchal practice.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li> The patriarch refers to the material/book/law text, as if he was a servant of it, and says "it's not my fault whats in it". lol.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li> The arrogance of power.</li></div><br>
<div class="glossary" data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260">Supremacy :<br>Supreme authority or power.</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Content must be categorized in order to be called an archive. It has a particular set of procedures, it strives for a permanence.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>The link between the right to archive and power, as well as the right for people in power to select and interpret, doesnt sound like a good idea.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Don't we all strive for permanence? </li></div><br>
<div class="filterDiv Ar Swarm1" id="propertyknowledgepower"><div class="sectiontitles"><!-- data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="140"-->Property x Knowledge x Power<hr class="line1"></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints"><!-- data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>To own and share the knowledge is to own the power.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Archiving comes from, and gives, a position of power.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>The archivist always holds the power to frame the material.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>The archive is affiliated with the institution or power, which is never neutral.</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"-->"…with this archic, in truth patriarchic function, without which no archive would ever come into play or appear as such."</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>"Archon" also has a negative, tyrannical connotation.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>The "archive" (mostly considered as a neutral instance) actually comes from a rather authoritarian history/concept.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Archiving as a very patriarchal practice.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li> The patriarch refers to the material/book/law text, as if he was a servant of it, and says "it's not my fault whats in it". lol.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li> The arrogance of power.</li></div><br>
<div class="glossary" ><!--data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260"-->Supremacy :<br>Supreme authority or power.</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Content must be categorized in order to be called an archive. It has a particular set of procedures, it strives for a permanence.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>The link between the right to archive and power, as well as the right for people in power to select and interpret, doesnt sound like a good idea.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Don't we all strive for permanence? </li></div><br>
</div>
<div class="checkbox">
<input type="checkbox" id="print" name="print">
@ -181,37 +181,37 @@
<div class="annotatedreader1">
<div class="filterDiv Ar Swarm1" id="afreudianimpression"><div class="sectiontitles" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="140">A freudian Impression<hr class="line1"></div><br>
<div class="glossary" data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260">Topography :<br>A description or an analysis<br>of a structured entity,<br>showing the relations among its components.</div><br>
<div class="quote" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70">"A science of the archive must include the theory of this institutionalization, that is to say, at once of the law which begins by inscribing itself there and of the right which authorizes it." </div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>History does not write itself, its written by people - almost exclusively by a dominant population.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Could it be co-written?</li></div><br>
<div class="glossary" data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260">Demystify :<br>To rid of mystery<br>or obscurity,clarify.</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Psychoanalysis as a tool to look at the non-disclosed processes of interpretation.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>By questioning a system of belief, you can come closer to its origin, and its conditions of interpretation, of curation.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Through gaining understanding, some of its power transfers to you.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Power can be taken (from whom?) if you raise awareness towards these said conditions of interpretation, of curation, contextual and hermeneutic circumstances ... </li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>It's a subversive act: Instead of focusing only on the content of the archive, one interprets the maker, therefore, undermines/questions their authority.</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70">"This right imposes or supposes a bundle of limits which have a history, a deconstructable history."</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Things can be understood contextually and historically, in relation to power structures and institutions that shaped their own concepts.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>We cant detach the archive from politics and the long history behind it.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>History, for example, being so very masculine and therefore the archive being so biased and excluding.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Also, the concept of the archive is biased towards written cultures and languages.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>The fact that for a really long time, and still today, it is harder to archive oral cultures, and therefore cultures that archive themselves in text are usually dominant.</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70">"Should one rely on what Freud says about this to classify his works? Should one for example take him at his word when he presents his Moses as a 'historical novel'?"</div><br>
<div class="glossary" data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260">Covenant :<br>A usually formal, solemn,<br>and binding agreement.<br>A written agreement or promise</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>The intentions behind an archive can be dangerous if their objectivity is taken for granted.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Is the perpetually reflexive state of a human being possible?</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Cognitive philosophy + post-structuralism = clash boom boom!</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70">"The limits, the borders, and the distinctions have been shaken by an earthquake from which no classificational concept and no implementation of the archive can be sheltered."</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>To question a dominant archives legitimacy can threaten its authority.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>It exposes its subjectivities.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>It challenges its supremacy.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>What are the desires at stake? Who are/is the archivist.s? What are their motives? Political views? Class? Where are they from?</li></div><br>
<div class="glossary" data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260">Dissemination : <br>To scatter widely.<br>The opening of a subject to<br>widespread discussion<br>and debate.</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Don't take information for granted - question their context and the reasons behind the process of selection.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><li>Disseminate - consider all possible influences.</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70">"Order is no longer assured."</div><br>
<div class="filterDiv Ar Swarm1" id="afreudianimpression"><div class="sectiontitles"><!-- data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="140"-->A freudian Impression<hr class="line1"></div><br>
<div class="glossary" ><!--data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260"-->Topography :<br>A description or an analysis<br>of a structured entity,<br>showing the relations among its components.</div><br>
<div class="quote" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"-->"A science of the archive must include the theory of this institutionalization, that is to say, at once of the law which begins by inscribing itself there and of the right which authorizes it." </div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>History does not write itself, its written by people - almost exclusively by a dominant population.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Could it be co-written?</li></div><br>
<div class="glossary" ><!--data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260"-->Demystify :<br>To rid of mystery<br>or obscurity,clarify.</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints"><!-- data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Psychoanalysis as a tool to look at the non-disclosed processes of interpretation.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>By questioning a system of belief, you can come closer to its origin, and its conditions of interpretation, of curation.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Through gaining understanding, some of its power transfers to you.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Power can be taken (from whom?) if you raise awareness towards these said conditions of interpretation, of curation, contextual and hermeneutic circumstances ... </li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>It's a subversive act: Instead of focusing only on the content of the archive, one interprets the maker, therefore, undermines/questions their authority.</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"-->"This right imposes or supposes a bundle of limits which have a history, a deconstructable history."</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Things can be understood contextually and historically, in relation to power structures and institutions that shaped their own concepts.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>We cant detach the archive from politics and the long history behind it.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>History, for example, being so very masculine and therefore the archive being so biased and excluding.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Also, the concept of the archive is biased towards written cultures and languages.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints"><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"><!--><li>The fact that for a really long time, and still today, it is harder to archive oral cultures, and therefore cultures that archive themselves in text are usually dominant.</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"-->"Should one rely on what Freud says about this to classify his works? Should one for example take him at his word when he presents his Moses as a 'historical novel'?"</div><br>
<div class="glossary" ><!--data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260"-->Covenant :<br>A usually formal, solemn,<br>and binding agreement.<br>A written agreement or promise</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>The intentions behind an archive can be dangerous if their objectivity is taken for granted.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Is the perpetually reflexive state of a human being possible?</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Cognitive philosophy + post-structuralism = clash boom boom!</li></div><br>
<div class="quote" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"-->"The limits, the borders, and the distinctions have been shaken by an earthquake from which no classificational concept and no implementation of the archive can be sheltered."</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>To question a dominant archives legitimacy can threaten its authority.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>It exposes its subjectivities.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>It challenges its supremacy.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>What are the desires at stake? Who are/is the archivist.s? What are their motives? Political views? Class? Where are they from?</li></div><br>
<div class="glossary" ><!--data-aos="slide-left" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="260"-->Dissemination : <br>To scatter widely.<br>The opening of a subject to<br>widespread discussion<br>and debate.</div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Don't take information for granted - question their context and the reasons behind the process of selection.</li></div><br>
<div class="bulletpoints" ><!--data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"--><li>Disseminate - consider all possible influences.</li></div><br>
<div class="quote"><!-- data-aos="fade-down" data-aos-duration="800" data-aos-offset="70"-->"Order is no longer assured."</div><br>
</div></div>

Loading…
Cancel
Save