<p>What follows are some observations about the manner in which discourses around liberation technology are used to imagine a utopian model of activism in which digitally networked communities are capable of changing their political realities through mediated participation facilitated by corporations. Specifically, I want to do three things: 1) to examine how the utopian discourse of liberation technology circumvents any discussion of the market structure of digital information and communication technologies; 2) to explore how this utopian discourse normalises the role of digital networks as platforms that increase participation while simultaneously increasing inequality, and 3) to propose responses to the utopian discourse of liberation technology that provide alternative imaginings of social participation. I should clarify that my objective is not to provide a detailed account of the unfolding of the Arab Spring movements or their continuing repercussions; rather, my goal is to describe how the assumptions behind the rhetoric of liberation technology correlate to the practice of civic disobedience, and to delineate a theoretical framework for understanding the contrast between the two. Hence, I do not believe my argument is limited to a North African or Middle Eastern context. Events since the Arab Spring such as the England riots in August of 2011, or the emergence of the Occupy movement in September (which happened after this text was originally submitted for publication, and are therefore not discussed in detail) serve to extend the validity and application of my argument.</p>
<p>What follows are some observations about the manner in which discourses around liberation technology are used to imagine a utopian model of activism in which digitally networked communities are capable of changing their political realities through mediated participation facilitated by corporations. Specifically, I want to do three things: 1) to examine how the utopian discourse of liberation technology circumvents any discussion of the market structure of digital information and communication technologies; 2) to explore how this utopian discourse normalises the role of digital networks as platforms that increase participation while simultaneously increasing inequality, and 3) to propose responses to the utopian discourse of liberation technology that provide alternative imaginings of social participation. I should clarify that my objective is not to provide a detailed account of the unfolding of the Arab Spring movements or their continuing repercussions; rather, my goal is to describe how the assumptions behind the rhetoric of liberation technology correlate to the practice of civic disobedience, and to delineate a theoretical framework for understanding the contrast between the two. Hence, I do not believe my argument is limited to a North African or Middle Eastern context. Events since the Arab Spring such as the England riots in August of 2011, or the emergence of the Occupy movement in September (which happened after this text was originally submitted for publication, and are therefore not discussed in detail) serve to extend the validity and application of my argument.</p>
<p>It would be adequate to begin by expanding the constrictive parameters set forth by the concept of utopia. Here, I will take a page from McKenzie Wark (2007) and augment this idea with the concepts of heterotopia and atopia. While a utopia is a nowhere that exists in a theoretical realm, a heterotopia is an actual but different space, an elsewhere where exceptional conditions from those that usually apply exist. Thus, while a utopia can only exist in the imagination, a heterotopia is an “island” (such as a school, a prison, a stadium or a hospital) where people are allowed — or forced — to follow different social rules. Lastly, an atopia is similarly an alternative site with different social norms, except that in this case, the site can be located anywhere or everywhere; it is borderless. In the remainder of this paper, I will be sometimes alluding to how the discourses of digital networks, participatory media, and mobilisation inscribe social participation in the different topological planes of utopia, heterotopia and atopia. Although these concepts are not central to my argument <em>per se</em>, they will help me frame a critique of liberation technology.</p>
<p>It would be adequate to begin by expanding the constrictive parameters set forth by the concept of utopia. Here, I will take a page from McKenzie Wark (2007) and augment this idea with the concepts of heterotopia and atopia. While a utopia is a nowhere that exists in a theoretical realm, a heterotopia is an actual but different space, an elsewhere where exceptional conditions from those that usually apply exist. Thus, while a utopia can only exist in the imagination, a heterotopia is an “island” (such as a school, a prison, a stadium or a hospital) where people are allowed — or forced — to follow different social rules. Lastly, an atopia is similarly an alternative site with different social norms, except that in this case, the site can be located anywhere or everywhere; it is borderless. In the remainder of this paper, I will be sometimes alluding to how the discourses of digital networks, participatory media, and mobilisation inscribe social participation in the different topological planes of utopia, heterotopia and atopia. Although these concepts are not central to my argument per se, they will help me frame a critique of liberation technology.</p>
<p>There is, indeed, much utopianism around the discourse of social media and recent protest movements. Even before the so-called Twitter Revolution, we can point to a growing trend, particularly within mainstream and even alternative journalism, that suggested that protest movements all over the world were transformed by participatory media (examples include statements about the revolutionary impact of cell phones in the Philippines, YouTube in Iran, Facebook in Moldova, and so on). I am choosing to collect this particular brand of techno-utopianism under the rubric of “liberation technology,” not because this is a term that is readily recognisable in popular or academic discourses, but because of its rich semiotic meaning. One noticeable place where a definition of liberation technology is attempted is the Web site for the <em>Program on Liberation Technology</em> at Stanford University. There, we are informed that the goal of the program is to research ‘how information technology can be used to defend human rights, improve governance, empower the poor, promote economic development, and pursue a variety of other social goods’ (‘Program on Liberation Technology’).</p>
<p>There is, indeed, much utopianism around the discourse of social media and recent protest movements. Even before the so-called Twitter Revolution, we can point to a growing trend, particularly within mainstream and even alternative journalism, that suggested that protest movements all over the world were transformed by participatory media (examples include statements about the revolutionary impact of cell phones in the Philippines, YouTube in Iran, Facebook in Moldova, and so on). I am choosing to collect this particular brand of techno-utopianism under the rubric of “liberation technology,” not because this is a term that is readily recognisable in popular or academic discourses, but because of its rich semiotic meaning. One noticeable place where a definition of liberation technology is attempted is the Web site for the <em>Program on Liberation Technology</em> at Stanford University. There, we are informed that the goal of the program is to research ‘how information technology can be used to defend human rights, improve governance, empower the poor, promote economic development, and pursue a variety of other social goods’ (‘Program on Liberation Technology’).</p>
@ -86,51 +86,80 @@
<p>While the study of resistance movements as networks continues and will continue to be useful, a framework for opposing the nodocentric ordering of these movements into privatised templates for participation is necessary. As activists continue to demonstrate to liberation technologists, the struggle must go on after the internet and other digital networks are shut off — if the fight can’t continue without Facebook and Twitter, then it is doomed. This means that the struggle is in part against those who own and control the privatised networks of participation (and can thus switch them off). Consequently, we have to turn to the paranodal for the emergence of corresponding models of activism. Since the peripheries represent the only sites from which to unthink the network, it is in the paranodal where new strategies will emerge: strategies of obstruction, interference, and disassembly of privatised networks; strategies of leaking information or circulating misinformation in networks; and strategies of intensification: transforming action that begins in one kind of network into resistance and engagement with alternative forms of networks.</p>
<p>While the study of resistance movements as networks continues and will continue to be useful, a framework for opposing the nodocentric ordering of these movements into privatised templates for participation is necessary. As activists continue to demonstrate to liberation technologists, the struggle must go on after the internet and other digital networks are shut off — if the fight can’t continue without Facebook and Twitter, then it is doomed. This means that the struggle is in part against those who own and control the privatised networks of participation (and can thus switch them off). Consequently, we have to turn to the paranodal for the emergence of corresponding models of activism. Since the peripheries represent the only sites from which to unthink the network, it is in the paranodal where new strategies will emerge: strategies of obstruction, interference, and disassembly of privatised networks; strategies of leaking information or circulating misinformation in networks; and strategies of intensification: transforming action that begins in one kind of network into resistance and engagement with alternative forms of networks.</p>
<p>As we realise that many-to-many communication is becoming impossible without a for-profit many-to-one infrastructure, we must abandon the utopian fantasy that liberation technology, as currently envisioned, can increase democratic participation. Participation managed by monopsony can only increase inequality. In response, paranodality must provide an atopian way to challenge the network by serving as a method for thinking and acting outside the monopsony. As networks have become not just metaphors for describing sociality, but templates that organise and shape social realities, we must question our investment in corporate technologies as the agents of liberation.</p>
<p>As we realise that many-to-many communication is becoming impossible without a for-profit many-to-one infrastructure, we must abandon the utopian fantasy that liberation technology, as currently envisioned, can increase democratic participation. Participation managed by monopsony can only increase inequality. In response, paranodality must provide an atopian way to challenge the network by serving as a method for thinking and acting outside the monopsony. As networks have become not just metaphors for describing sociality, but templates that organise and shape social realities, we must question our investment in corporate technologies as the agents of liberation.</p><br>
<br>
<p>Biographical Note</p>
<h2>Biographical Note</h2>
<p>Ulises A. Mejias is assistant professor in the Communication Studies Department at SUNY Oswego. His research interests include network studies, critical theory, philosophy and social studies of technology, and political economy of new media. His book on critical network theory is scheduled for publication in 2012 by University of Minnesota Press. For more information, see <ahref="http://ulisesmejias.com"target="_blank">http://ulisesmejias.com<a></p>
<p>Ulises A. Mejias is assistant professor in the Communication Studies Department at SUNY Oswego. His research interests include network studies, critical theory, philosophy and social studies of technology, and political economy of new media. His book on critical network theory is scheduled for publication in 2012 by University of Minnesota Press. For more information, see <ahref="http://ulisesmejias.com"target="_blank">http://ulisesmejias.com</a></p>
<br>
<br>
<p>References</p>
<p>Abbott, Ryan. <ahref="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/06/10/37266.htm"target="_blank">Torture Victims Say Cisco Systems Helped China Hound and Surveil</a>, Courthouse News Service, 10 June (2011)</p>
<h2class="pageBreak">References</h2>
<p>Abbott, Ryan. <ahref="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/06/10/37266.htm"target="_blank">'Torture Victims Say Cisco Systems Helped China Hound and Surveil'</a>, Courthouse News Service, 10 June (2011)</p>
<p>Britton, Daniel B., and McGonegal, Stephen. The Digital Economy Fact Book, Ninth Edition (Washington DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 2007).</p>
<p>Britton, Daniel B., and McGonegal, Stephen. The Digital Economy Fact Book, Ninth Edition (Washington DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 2007).</p>
<p>Dean, Jodi. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2009).</p>
<p>Dean, Jodi. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2009).</p>
<p>Deleuze, Gilles. Negotiations 1972-1990 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).</p>
<p>Deleuze, Gilles. Negotiations 1972-1990 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).</p>
<p>Eskelsen, Grant, Marcus, Adam, and Ferree, W. Kenneth. The Digital Economy Fact Book, Tenth Edition (Washington DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 2009).</p>
<p>Eskelsen, Grant, Marcus, Adam, and Ferree, W. Kenneth. The Digital Economy Fact Book, Tenth Edition (Washington DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 2009).</p>
<p><ahref="http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22"target="_blank">Facebook Company Info</a></p>
<p><ahref="http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22"target="_blank">Facebook Company Info</a></p>
<p>Fielding, Nick, and Cobain, Ian. <ahref="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks."target="_blank">Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media</a>, The Guardian. 17 March (2011)</p>
<p>Fielding, Nick, and Cobain, Ian. <ahref="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks."target="_blank">'Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media'</a>, The Guardian. 17 March (2011)</p>
<p>Frank, Andre Gunder. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil (Monthly Review Press, 1967).</p>
<p>Frank, Andre Gunder. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil (Monthly Review Press, 1967).</p>
<p>Glanz, James, and Markoff, John. <ahref="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/world/12internet.html"target="_blank">U.S. Underwrites Internet Detour Around Censors Abroad</a>, The New York Times, 12 June (2011), sec. World</a></p>
<p>Green, Zacqary Adam. <ahref="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBO5dh9qrIQ"target="_blank"> Hitler reacts to the Hitler parodies being removed from YouTube</a>, April 20 (2010)</p>
<p>Glanz, James, and Markoff, John. <ahref="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/world/12internet.html"target="_blank">'U.S. Underwrites Internet Detour Around Censors Abroad'</a>, The New York Times, 12 June (2011), sec. World</a></p>
<p>Green, Zacqary Adam. <ahref="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBO5dh9qrIQ"target="_blank">'Hitler reacts to the Hitler parodies being removed from YouTube'</a>, April 20 (2010)</p>
<p>‘Harper’s Index.’ Harper’s Magazine, August 2010.</p>
<p>‘Harper’s Index.’ Harper’s Magazine, August 2010.</p>
<p>Khatri, Shabina. <ahref="http://dohanews.co/post/5792813904/facebook-usage-falls-in-gcc-including-in-qatar-saudi"target="_blank">‘Facebook usage falls in GCC, including in Qatar, Saudi Arabia,’ Doha News, May (2011)</a></p>
<p>Mack, Eric. <ahref="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20068404-1/apple-patent-suggests-infrared-sensors-for-iphone/"target="_blank">‘Apple patent suggests infrared sensors for iPhone.’ CNet News, 2 June (2011)</a></p>
<p>Khatri, Shabina. <ahref="http://dohanews.co/post/5792813904/facebook-usage-falls-in-gcc-including-in-qatar-saudi"target="_blank">‘Facebook usage falls in GCC, including in Qatar, Saudi Arabia’</a>, Doha News, May (2011)</p>
<p>Mack, Eric. <ahref="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20068404-1/apple-patent-suggests-infrared-sensors-for-iphone/"target="_blank">‘Apple patent suggests infrared sensors for iPhone’</a>, CNet News, 2 June (2011)</p>
<p>MacKinnon, Rebecca. <ahref="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20068404-1/apple-patent-suggests-infrared-sensors-for-iphone/"target="_blank">‘Internet Freedom’ in the Age of Assange</a>, Foreign Policy, 17 February (2011).</p>
<p>MacKinnon, Rebecca. <ahref="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20068404-1/apple-patent-suggests-infrared-sensors-for-iphone/"target="_blank">‘Internet Freedom’ in the Age of Assange</a>, Foreign Policy, 17 February (2011).</p>
<p>Malik, Shiv. <ahref="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/29/facebook-accused-removing-activists-pages"target="_blank">Facebook accused of removing activists’ pages</a>, The Guardian, 29 April (2011)</p>
<p>Malik, Shiv. <ahref="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/29/facebook-accused-removing-activists-pages"target="_blank">'Facebook accused of removing activists’ pages'</a>, The Guardian, 29 April (2011)</p>
<p>Mayton, Joseph. <ahref="http://www.itnewsafrica.com/2011/02/us-company-may-have-helped-egypt-spy-on-citizens/.">US company may have helped Egypt spy on citizens</a>, IT News Africa, 10 February (2011)</p>
<p>Mayton, Joseph. <ahref="http://www.itnewsafrica.com/2011/02/us-company-may-have-helped-egypt-spy-on-citizens/.">'US company may have helped Egypt spy on citizens'</a>, IT News Africa, 10 February (2011)</p>
<p>McCullagh, Declan, and Broache, Anne. <ahref="http://news.cnet.com/FBI-taps-cell-phone-mic-as-eavesdropping-tool/2100-1029_3-6140191.html?http://www.dailytech.com.">FBI taps cell phone mic as eavesdropping tool</a>, Cnet News, 1 December (2006)</p>
<p>McCullagh, Declan, and Broache, Anne. <ahref="http://news.cnet.com/FBI-taps-cell-phone-mic-as-eavesdropping-tool/2100-1029_3-6140191.html?http://www.dailytech.com.">'FBI taps cell phone mic as eavesdropping tool'</a>, Cnet News, 1 December (2006)</p>
<p>Mejias, Ulises A. ‘The limits of networks as models for organizing the social,’ New Media & Society 12.4 (2010): 603-617.</p>
<p>Mejias, Ulises A. ‘The limits of networks as models for organizing the social,’ New Media & Society 12.4 (2010): 603-617.</p>
<p>Morozov, Evgeny. <ahref="http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewWitness&ContentRecord_id=1192&ContentType=D&ContentRecordType=D&ParentType=B&CFID=22840109&CFTOKEN=35893979.">Testimony to the US Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe</a>, Washington DC, 22 October 22 (2009)</p>
<p>Morozov, Evgeny. <ahref="http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewWitness&ContentRecord_id=1192&ContentType=D&ContentRecordType=D&ParentType=B&CFID=22840109&CFTOKEN=35893979.">'Testimony to the US Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe'</a>, Washington DC, 22 October 22 (2009)</p>
<p>——. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (PublicAffairs, 2011).</p>
<p>——. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (PublicAffairs, 2011).</p>
<p>Neubauer, Robert. <ahref="http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/viewArticle/238">Neoliberalism in the Information Age, or Vice Versa? Global Citizenship, Technology, and Hegemonic Ideology</a>, Triple C 9.2 (2011): 190-225</p>
<p>Norman, Helmi, and York, Jillian C. <ahref="http://opennet.net/west-censoring-east-the-use-western-technologies-middle-east-censors-2010-2011#footnoteref1_7ua5bg2.">West Censoring East: The Use of Western Technologies by Middle East Censors, 2010-2011</a>, OpenNet Initiative (2010)</p>
<p>Neubauer, Robert. <ahref="http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/viewArticle/238">'Neoliberalism in the Information Age, or Vice Versa? Global Citizenship, Technology, and Hegemonic Ideology'</a>, Triple C 9.2 (2011): 190-225</p>
<p>Norman, Helmi, and York, Jillian C. <ahref="http://opennet.net/west-censoring-east-the-use-western-technologies-middle-east-censors-2010-2011#footnoteref1_7ua5bg2.">'West Censoring East: The Use of Western Technologies by Middle East Censors, 2010-2011'</a>, OpenNet Initiative (2010)</p>
<p><ahref="http://liberationtechnology.stanford.edu/">Program on Liberation Technology</a>, Stanford University</p>
<p><ahref="http://liberationtechnology.stanford.edu/">Program on Liberation Technology</a>, Stanford University</p>
<p>Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).</p>
<p>Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).</p>
<p>Shenker, Jack. <ahref="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/03/vodafone-egypt-advert-claims-revolution.">Fury over advert claiming Egypt revolution as Vodafone’s</a>, The Guardian, 3 June (2011)</p>
<p>Smith, Aaron. <ahref="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Access-2010.aspx.">Mobile Access 2010</a>, Pew Internet and American Life Project, 7 July (2010)</p>
<p>Shenker, Jack. <ahref="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/03/vodafone-egypt-advert-claims-revolution.">'Fury over advert claiming Egypt revolution as Vodafone’s'</a>, The Guardian, 3 June (2011)</p>
<p><ahref="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online/.">Social Networks/Blogs Now Account for One in Every Four and a Half Minutes Online</a>, Nielsen Wire, 15 June (2010)</p>
<p>Tehrani, Hamid. <ahref="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/06/27/iranian-officials-crowd-source-protester-identities-online/.">Iranian officials ‘crowd-source’ protester identities</a>, Global Voices, 27 June 27 (2009)</p>
<p>Smith, Aaron. <ahref="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Access-2010.aspx.">'Mobile Access 2010'</a>, Pew Internet and American Life Project, 7 July (2010)</p>
<p>Wong, Queenie. <ahref="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015343735_vancouversocial17m.html.">Social media play big role in riot probe</a>, The Seattle Times, 16 June (2011)</p>
<p>York, Jillian C. <ahref="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/21/syria-twitter-spambots-pro-revolution.">Syria’s Twitter spambots</a>, The Guardian, 21 April (2011)</p>
<p><ahref="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online/.">'Social Networks/Blogs Now Account for One in Every Four and a Half Minutes Online'</a>, Nielsen Wire, 15 June (2010)</p>
<p>———. <ahref="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/06/week-internet-censorship.">This Week in Internet Censorship</a>, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 15 June (2011)</p>
<p>Tehrani, Hamid. <ahref="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/06/27/iranian-officials-crowd-source-protester-identities-online/.">'Iranian officials ‘crowd-source’ protester identities'</a>, Global Voices, 27 June 27 (2009)</p>
<p>Wong, Queenie. <ahref="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015343735_vancouversocial17m.html.">'Social media play big role in riot probe'</a>, The Seattle Times, 16 June (2011)</p>
<p>York, Jillian C. <ahref="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/21/syria-twitter-spambots-pro-revolution.">'Syria’s Twitter spambots'</a>, The Guardian, 21 April (2011)</p>
<p>———. <ahref="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/06/week-internet-censorship.">'This Week in Internet Censorship'</a>, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 15 June (2011)</p>
Simon Browne
6 years ago