identity

projects/soup2/documentation.md

@@ -59,3 +59,10 @@ This could be interesting but maybe lead to obnoxious repetition of contents for
 Projects could have two different modes: one for annotate the process and one to publish the outcome. If im writing a log of development such as the [OOC @summer session](../ooc-summer-session/) page is something totally different from [SI17 Visual Identity](../postit-identity/), that is a final outcome.
 
 This could be made with a tag system for example, stating what page is a WIP and what is an outcome, but a different and more interesting approach could be something like the [text intensity of the textoscope](../textoscope/). Here something could be tagged directly while writing, with the possibility for the reader to modulate different levels of detail and polishing.
+
+### new identity
+
+Some sketches for a new visual identity i've done before summer, but im not sure I still like them ew. There is also a prototype for the auto-draw thumbnail preview. The real question is: are there energies to finish it or will it just remain a proof of concept? (the latter prob)
+
+![identity blu](identity.jpg)
+![identity blu](identity2.jpg)