|
|
|
|
|
<DOCTYPE html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<title></title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<meta charset="utf-8">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../style.css">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" href="/img/red.png">
|
|
|
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Nav bar -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
<nav>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h1><a href="../index.html" class="title">vulnerable <br>interfaces</a></h1>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="gummies">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="gummy">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="../ada/index.html"><img src="../img/purple.png" class="img2"></a>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="caption">ada</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="gummy">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="../aglaia/index.html"><img src="../img/green.png" class="img2"></a>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="caption">aglaia</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="gummy">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="../irmak/index.html"><img src="../img/yellow.png" class="img2"></a>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="caption">irmak</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="gummy">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="../stephen/index.html"><img src="../img/red.png" class="img2"></a>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="caption">stephen</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</nav>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div id="content"><h1 id="water-bodies"><?water bodies></h1>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="a-narrative-exploration-of-divergent-digital-intimacies">A
|
|
|
|
|
|
narrative exploration of divergent digital intimacies</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Water, stories, the body,<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
all the things we do, are<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
mediums<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
that hide and show what’s<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
hidden.<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Rumi, 1995 translation)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="for-you">꙳for you</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>All intimacy is about bodies. Is this true? Does it matter? I doubt
|
|
|
|
|
|
it. Do you know? Let’s find out, maybe.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Once, I thought that everything in the world was either one or zero
|
|
|
|
|
|
and that there was a harsh straight line between them. Then I found out
|
|
|
|
|
|
you could step or hop across the line, back and forth, if others showed
|
|
|
|
|
|
you how. Today, I am no less binary, no less interested in dichotomies,
|
|
|
|
|
|
but I am willing to dance through them if you are too. Can we dance
|
|
|
|
|
|
these dichotomies together, embracing the contradictions of the virtual
|
|
|
|
|
|
and physical, the comfortable and uncomfortable, intimate and
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-intimate? I can’t do it alone, the subject is too heavy and the
|
|
|
|
|
|
binary is too 1011000. I won’t ask you to resolve these contradictions,
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have no desire to. Instead, I hope we can cultivate the tension and
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenderness inherent in holding together incompatible truths because both
|
|
|
|
|
|
prove necessary.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>To dance through these dichotomies I will start in a specific
|
|
|
|
|
|
position, growing from Donna Haraway’s in ’A Cyborg Manifesto”. In her
|
|
|
|
|
|
essay, Haraway explores the concept of a cyborg as a rejection of
|
|
|
|
|
|
boundaries between humans, animals, and machines. A symbol for a
|
|
|
|
|
|
feminist posthuman theory that embraces the plasticity of identity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before she does all this dancing, however, she takes a strong stance of
|
|
|
|
|
|
blasphemy. She engages seriously with traditional notions of feminism
|
|
|
|
|
|
and identity but with irony, not apostasy, which is to say without full
|
|
|
|
|
|
rejection—without unbelief. My position as I jump will be the same as
|
|
|
|
|
|
hers, ironic faith. My mocking is grave but caring and my primary aim is
|
|
|
|
|
|
for us only to spin fast enough not to see the line anymore, while still
|
|
|
|
|
|
being able to see the binaries. It won’t be an easy dance for us but I
|
|
|
|
|
|
will do my best to keep softening for you, I promise.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>I will show you a digital body, make it comfortable and then
|
|
|
|
|
|
uncomfortable, lightly intimate, and richly intimate. I have my own
|
|
|
|
|
|
story, my own digital body, of course. This is where I take my second
|
|
|
|
|
|
stance, however. This time, the position is Lauren Berlant’s, from ‘The
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female Complaint’. The book places individual stories as inescapable
|
|
|
|
|
|
autobiographies of a collective experience and uses the personal to
|
|
|
|
|
|
explain an intimate general experience. In our story, the difference
|
|
|
|
|
|
between my body and the collective digital body is unimportant, I hope
|
|
|
|
|
|
you see that. I will tell you my story if you know how to look, but I
|
|
|
|
|
|
will tell you through the stories of many others who shared them with
|
|
|
|
|
|
me. I have no other choice, every time I have tried to tell this story a
|
|
|
|
|
|
chorus of voices has come out.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Some of the stories I will tell you will carry memories of pain;
|
|
|
|
|
|
physical and emotional. I will keep holding you while you hear this, but
|
|
|
|
|
|
your limbs may still feel too heavy to dance. In that case, I give you
|
|
|
|
|
|
my full permission to skip, jump, or lay down completely. This is not
|
|
|
|
|
|
choreographed and I care deeply for you.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>I love you and hope you see what I saw in these stories.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Safe dreams now, I will talk to you soon.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="digital-bodies">0. DIGITAL BODIES</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>“I think the worst must be finished.<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whether I am right, don’t tell me.<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don’t tell me.<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
No ringlet of bruise,<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
no animal face, the waters salt me<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
and I leave it barefoot. I leave you, season<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
of still tongues, of roses on nightstands<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
beside crushed beer cans. I leave you<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
white sand and scraped knees. I leave<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
this myth in which I am pig, whose<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
death is empty allegory. I leave, I leave—<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of this story,<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
I walk into the sea<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
and it chooses<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
not to drown me.”<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Yun, 2020)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="a.-what-is-a-digital-body">a. what is a digital body?</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>A digital body is a body on the Internet. A body outside the internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
is simply a body. On the internet, discussions about corporeality
|
|
|
|
|
|
transcend the limitations of physicality, shaping and reshaping
|
|
|
|
|
|
narratives surrounding the self. This text explores the intricate
|
|
|
|
|
|
dynamics within these conversations, dancing at the interplay between
|
|
|
|
|
|
tangible bodies and their digital counterparts. The construction of a
|
|
|
|
|
|
digital body is intricately intertwined with these online dialogues,
|
|
|
|
|
|
necessitating engaged reconstructions of the narratives surrounding
|
|
|
|
|
|
physical existence. Yet, the resulting digital body is a complex and
|
|
|
|
|
|
contradictory entity, embodying the nuances of both its virtual and
|
|
|
|
|
|
tangible origins.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>There is a specific metaphor that would allow us to better carry
|
|
|
|
|
|
these contradictions as we further explore digital bodies. Do you
|
|
|
|
|
|
remember that dream you had about deep ocean pie? Allow me to remind
|
|
|
|
|
|
you.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>You were walking on the shore, slowly, during a summer that happened
|
|
|
|
|
|
a long time ago. Your skin was warm and you could feel the wet cool sand
|
|
|
|
|
|
sticking to your feet. The gentle lapping of the waves washed the sand
|
|
|
|
|
|
away as you walked towards the ocean. You stepped, stepped. Then dove.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwater, the sea unfolded deeper than you remembered. It was a
|
|
|
|
|
|
vibrant display of life: bright schools of small fish, and tall
|
|
|
|
|
|
colorful, waving corals. It looked like that aquarium you saw once as a
|
|
|
|
|
|
kid. Your arms moved confusingly through the water as if you were wading
|
|
|
|
|
|
through a soup or were terribly tired. On the sandy ocean floor, you saw
|
|
|
|
|
|
a dining table. It had a floating white tablecloth, one plate, a fork,
|
|
|
|
|
|
and a pie in the center of it, on a serving dish. You sat on a chair but
|
|
|
|
|
|
could not feel it underneath you. You ate a heaping slice of pie. It had
|
|
|
|
|
|
a buttery-cooked carrots filling. You woke up. In the world, the sun was
|
|
|
|
|
|
still timid and your bedroom thick with sleep. What a weird dream. You
|
|
|
|
|
|
rubbed your face, sat up on your bed, and drank the glass of water next
|
|
|
|
|
|
to you. You felt full, as if you just ate a plateful of carrot pie.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>There were two bodies in this story. An awake one and a dream one, an
|
|
|
|
|
|
ocean one. In dreams, bodies have their own set of rules, often blurring
|
|
|
|
|
|
the boundaries between waking and sleeping, wanting and fearing. Digital
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies are very similar to dream bodies. They exhibit a similar fluidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
and abstraction, a defiance of traditional notions of physicality. They
|
|
|
|
|
|
share the blurring and inherent potential nature of dream bodies. They
|
|
|
|
|
|
are slower, stronger, and different. They switch and change and melt
|
|
|
|
|
|
into each other, they lose and regrow limbs, they run sluggishly and fly
|
|
|
|
|
|
smoothly. If we scream in our dreams, we sometimes wake up still
|
|
|
|
|
|
screaming. Our waking bodies react to our dream bodies, they have the
|
|
|
|
|
|
same tears, the same orgasms, the same drives.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>This is a story of two bodies, same but different, influenced but not
|
|
|
|
|
|
driven. A tangible body, full of fluids and organs, emotions and
|
|
|
|
|
|
feelings. Cartilage, bacteria, bones, and nerve endings. A digital body,
|
|
|
|
|
|
cable-veined and loud-vented, shiny and loading.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The digital body is ethereal and abstracted, embarrassing, graphic,
|
|
|
|
|
|
and real but not physical.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>This is the beginning.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="b.-body-vs.-computer">b. body vs. computer</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Framing the discourse around bodies on the internet as a clear-cut
|
|
|
|
|
|
dichotomy feels clunky in today’s internet landscape. The web is today
|
|
|
|
|
|
available by body, cyborg dimensions of the internet of bodies, or
|
|
|
|
|
|
virtual and augmented realities, creating a complex interplay between
|
|
|
|
|
|
having a body and existing online.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>As intricate as this dance is now, it certainly did not begin that
|
|
|
|
|
|
way. It started with what felt like a very serious and tangible line
|
|
|
|
|
|
drawn by very serious tangible people; this is real life and this is
|
|
|
|
|
|
virtual life. Even people like Howard Rheingold, pioneers who approached
|
|
|
|
|
|
early virtual life with enthusiasm and care, couldn’t escape
|
|
|
|
|
|
characterizing it as a “bloodless technological ritual” (1993).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rheingold was an early member of The Whole Earth ’Lectronic Link (Well),
|
|
|
|
|
|
a seminal virtual community built in the 1980s that was renowned for its
|
|
|
|
|
|
impact on digital culture and played a pivotal role in shaping what
|
|
|
|
|
|
would become the landscape of the Internet. Rheingold’s reflections on
|
|
|
|
|
|
his experience on this primordial soup of the Internet offer insight
|
|
|
|
|
|
into the initial conceptualizations of online life by those joyfully
|
|
|
|
|
|
participating.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In “The Virtual Community”, Rheingold offers a heartfelt tribute to
|
|
|
|
|
|
intimacy and affection through web- based interactions which, at the
|
|
|
|
|
|
time, were unheard of. He struggles in his efforts to highlight the
|
|
|
|
|
|
legitimacy of his connections, finding no way to do so except by
|
|
|
|
|
|
emphasizing their tangible bodily experiences. The community’s claim to
|
|
|
|
|
|
authenticity thus had to lie in the physical experiences of its members—
|
|
|
|
|
|
the visible bodies and hearable voices, the weddings, births, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
funerals (1993).<sup><span class="margin-note">You’re dreaming again,
|
|
|
|
|
|
good. Would you feel closer to me if you could hear my voice? Is my
|
|
|
|
|
|
voice a sound? Could it be a feeling?</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Even then, and even by people with no interest in undermining the
|
|
|
|
|
|
value of the virtual, the distinction between physical and virtual was
|
|
|
|
|
|
confusing. Rheingold himself reinforces the boundary of body relations
|
|
|
|
|
|
and computer relations by referring to his family as a “flesh-and-blood
|
|
|
|
|
|
family’ and his close online friends as “unfamiliar faces” (1993).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constantly interplaying digital connections with the physical
|
|
|
|
|
|
characteristics of the kind of connections people valued before the
|
|
|
|
|
|
internet.<sup><span class="margin-note">I will be honest with you, I
|
|
|
|
|
|
have little patience for this recurring line of thought that seeks to
|
|
|
|
|
|
distinguish people’s noses from their hearts, as if there was a physical
|
|
|
|
|
|
love that is the valuable one and a virtual imaginary one that is feeble
|
|
|
|
|
|
and unworthy.</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In any case, his primary interest seemed to be to emphasize computer
|
|
|
|
|
|
relations as valid forms of connection between bodies, not to talk of
|
|
|
|
|
|
any distinction quite yet. It’s the eighties, the internet is still
|
|
|
|
|
|
fresh and new and the possibility to form close relations with strangers
|
|
|
|
|
|
online seems fragile and concerning yet exciting. This is the clearest
|
|
|
|
|
|
the distinction between in-real-life and online has ever been and it’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
still fuzzy and unclear.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>At the same time and in the same digital space as Rheingold, there
|
|
|
|
|
|
was another man, a digital body being formed. This is our second story,
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ocean body we dreamt of earlier is now in a digital primordial soup,
|
|
|
|
|
|
questioning itself and stuck between staying and leaving. In this story,
|
|
|
|
|
|
its name is Tom Mandel and when he died, he did so on the Well.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Mandel was a controversial and popular figure in this pioneering
|
|
|
|
|
|
virtual community. According to many other members, Tom Mandel embodied
|
|
|
|
|
|
the essence of the Well—its history, its voice, its attitude. Mandel’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
snarky and verbose provocations started heated discussions, earning him
|
|
|
|
|
|
warnings such as “Don’t Feed The Mandel!” (Leonard, 1995). His sharp
|
|
|
|
|
|
comments often stirred emotions that reminded people of family
|
|
|
|
|
|
arguments, fuelling an intimacy that was characteristic of the Well:
|
|
|
|
|
|
both public and solitary (Hafner, 1997).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Until 1995, Mandel had done a quite rigorous job of keeping his body
|
|
|
|
|
|
separate from The Well and had never attended any of the physical
|
|
|
|
|
|
in-person meetings from the community. His only references to being a
|
|
|
|
|
|
body had been on the “health” online conference, where he often talked
|
|
|
|
|
|
about his illnesses. One day, after nearly a decade of daily
|
|
|
|
|
|
interaction, he posted he had got the flu and that he felt quite ill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When people wished for him to get well soon, he replied he had gone to
|
|
|
|
|
|
get tested and was waiting for a diagnosis. This way, when cancer was
|
|
|
|
|
|
found in his lungs, the community was first to know. In the following
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months, as his illness progressed, the community followed closely
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Hafner, 1997). They were first to know when Nana, a community member
|
|
|
|
|
|
with whom he had had a publicly turbulent relationship, flew to
|
|
|
|
|
|
California to marry him. The community was a witness and is now an
|
|
|
|
|
|
archive of his declining wit as cancer spread to his brain and his
|
|
|
|
|
|
famously articulate and scathing comments got shorter, fearful, and more
|
|
|
|
|
|
tender.<sup><span class="margin-note">Initially, when a member he often
|
|
|
|
|
|
argued with offered to pray for him Mandel had replied: “You can shovel
|
|
|
|
|
|
your self-aggrandizing sentiments up you wide ass sideways for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
duration as far as I’m concerned.” Later, as the cancer progressed: “I
|
|
|
|
|
|
ain’t nearly as brave as you all think. I am scared silly of the pain of
|
|
|
|
|
|
dying this way. I am not very good at playing saint. Pray for me,
|
|
|
|
|
|
please.</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Before he posted his final goodbye, he chose to do one last thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Together with another member, they programmed a bot that posted randomly
|
|
|
|
|
|
characteristic comments from Mandel on The Well—the Mandelbot. In the
|
|
|
|
|
|
topic he had opened to say goodbye, he posted this message about the
|
|
|
|
|
|
bot:</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>“I had another motive in opening this topic to tell the truth, one
|
|
|
|
|
|
that winds its way through almost everything I’ve done online in the
|
|
|
|
|
|
five months since my cancer was diagnosed. I figured that, like everyone
|
|
|
|
|
|
else, my physical self wasn’t going to survive forever and I guess I was
|
|
|
|
|
|
going to have less time than actuarials allocateus [actually allocated].
|
|
|
|
|
|
But if I could reach out and touch everyone I knew on-line… I could toss
|
|
|
|
|
|
out bits and pieces of my virtual self and the memes that make up Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandel, and then when my body died, I wouldn’t really have to leave…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large chunks of me would also be here, part of this new space.” (Hafner,
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>With the Mandelbot, Mandel found a way to deal with what he later
|
|
|
|
|
|
called his grieving for the community, with which he could not play
|
|
|
|
|
|
anymore once his own body died. By doing so, he was starting to blend
|
|
|
|
|
|
the boundaries of intimacy through computers and bodies, driven by his
|
|
|
|
|
|
love and grief.<sup><span class="margin-note">It’s out of care and not
|
|
|
|
|
|
lack of relevance that I am not showing you Mandel’s goodbye message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It’s enough to know he was deep in the grief of having to leave a
|
|
|
|
|
|
community he loved and cared for and that pain was felt in every
|
|
|
|
|
|
word.</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>When he talked about the bot in previous messages, it sounded almost
|
|
|
|
|
|
like a joke. A caring haunting of the platform, to keep his persona
|
|
|
|
|
|
alive for the community in a way that could be quite horrific for those
|
|
|
|
|
|
grieving. In his admission though it becomes clear that this was closer
|
|
|
|
|
|
to an attempt to deal with his grief around losing the community, his
|
|
|
|
|
|
unreadiness to let go of a place he loved so dearly. A place just as
|
|
|
|
|
|
real in emotion, that was built in part by Mandel’s digital body and its
|
|
|
|
|
|
persona.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In a tribute posted after his death, fellow Well member and
|
|
|
|
|
|
journalist Andrew Leonard tried to convey his own sense of blended
|
|
|
|
|
|
physicality and emotion.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>“Sneer all you want at the fleshlessness of online community, but on
|
|
|
|
|
|
this night, as tears stream down my face for the third straight evening,
|
|
|
|
|
|
it feels all too real.” (Andrew Leonard, 1995)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="c.-bot-feelings">c. bot-feelings</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>An internet body has bot-feelings if allowed to. Let me explain.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>A bot functions as a different entity from a cyborg, as it does not
|
|
|
|
|
|
attempt to emulate a human body but rather human action and readiness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its role is to mirror human behavior online, simulating how a physical
|
|
|
|
|
|
body might act, what it would click on, and what would it say. On social
|
|
|
|
|
|
media, bots engage in a kind of interpretative dance of human
|
|
|
|
|
|
interaction, performing based on instructions provided by
|
|
|
|
|
|
humans.<sup><span class="margin-note">The first bot communities on the
|
|
|
|
|
|
internet are now born, half- mistakenly. They are always spiritual
|
|
|
|
|
|
communities posting religious images created by artificial intelligence,
|
|
|
|
|
|
all the comments echoing choirs of bots praising. Amen, amen, amen. I am
|
|
|
|
|
|
not naive, I know they are built by humans but it is this performance of
|
|
|
|
|
|
religiosity that I am interested in, and how little humanity is shown in
|
|
|
|
|
|
it. It is something else.</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Unlike an internet body, which represents the virtual embodiment of a
|
|
|
|
|
|
person, a bot doesn’t seek to be a person. It comments under posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
alongside many other bots, all under a fake name and photo but nothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
else to give the illusion of humanity. When an internet body has
|
|
|
|
|
|
bot-feelings, it is a disruptive performance. They are feelings that do
|
|
|
|
|
|
not attempt to be human body feelings, they exist as their own genuine
|
|
|
|
|
|
virtual expression.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In “Virtual Intimacies”, McGlotten also incidentally argued that a
|
|
|
|
|
|
virtual body has bot-feelings (2013). He described the virtual as
|
|
|
|
|
|
potential, as a transcendent process of actualization, making it into,
|
|
|
|
|
|
generally, a description of bots. Internet bodies, as virtual, would be
|
|
|
|
|
|
by this understanding also charged with the constant immanent power to
|
|
|
|
|
|
act and to feel like a human body. It is a constant state of becoming,
|
|
|
|
|
|
of not- quite-pretending but never fully being anything either.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Most of the time we can tell disembodied bots online from tangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
people and as such they have the potential to be bodies, without ever
|
|
|
|
|
|
trying to be.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Of course, when McGlotten described the virtual as such he placed it
|
|
|
|
|
|
in a dichotomy, once again, against the “Intimacies” which are the other
|
|
|
|
|
|
side of his book. The emphasis here lies in intimacy being an embodied
|
|
|
|
|
|
feeling and sense and a carnal one at that. Virtual intimacies are, by
|
|
|
|
|
|
this definition, an inherent failed contradiction. However, McGlotten
|
|
|
|
|
|
plays with the real and non-real in new ways, using the text to
|
|
|
|
|
|
highlight how virtual intimacy is similar to physical intimacy and then,
|
|
|
|
|
|
even more, blurring as he shows the already virtual in physical
|
|
|
|
|
|
intimacies. Applying this to a body, rather than an affective
|
|
|
|
|
|
experience, works just the same.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>McGlotten uses a conceptualization of the virtual based on the
|
|
|
|
|
|
philosopher Deleuze’s,<sup><span class="margin-note">A step in a step in
|
|
|
|
|
|
a step, sorry.</span></sup> which can be used to refer to a virtual body
|
|
|
|
|
|
as well. The virtual is in this case a cluster of waiting, dreaming, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
remembering, embodying potential. Something that is constantly becoming,
|
|
|
|
|
|
an object and also the subject attributed to it (2001). An internet body
|
|
|
|
|
|
with its bot-feelings is a body in the process of being one, acting as
|
|
|
|
|
|
one, an ideal of one beyond what is physical but including its
|
|
|
|
|
|
possibility.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Going a step further in McGlotten’s interpretation of Deleuze, this
|
|
|
|
|
|
also plays into how virtual intimacies mirror queer intimacies as they
|
|
|
|
|
|
approach normative ideals but “can never arrive at them”. Both queer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
virtual relations are imagined by a greater narrative as fantastical,
|
|
|
|
|
|
simulated, immaterial, and artificial—poor imitations and perversions of
|
|
|
|
|
|
a heterosexual, monogamous, and procreative marital partnership (2013).
|
|
|
|
|
|
A virtual body is similarly immanent, with both potential and corruption
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the same time. It carries all the neoliberal normative power of
|
|
|
|
|
|
freedom that a queer body can carry today but also reflects the unseemly
|
|
|
|
|
|
fleshly reality of having one.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>This is where the story continues. The body from the dream ocean
|
|
|
|
|
|
leaves the primordial soup of the internet to stage a disruptive
|
|
|
|
|
|
performance. It moves from potential creation to a wild spring river. A
|
|
|
|
|
|
fluid being, that exists simultaneously inside and outside normative
|
|
|
|
|
|
constructions. It channels deviant feelings and transcendental opinions
|
|
|
|
|
|
about the collective’s physical form genuinely as people use it to
|
|
|
|
|
|
navigate their physicality. Both virtual and queer intimacies highlight
|
|
|
|
|
|
the constructed nature of identity and desire. They disrupt the notion
|
|
|
|
|
|
of a fixed, essential self, instead embracing the multiplicity and
|
|
|
|
|
|
complexity inherent in human experience. This destabilization of
|
|
|
|
|
|
identity opens up possibilities for self-expression and connection,
|
|
|
|
|
|
creating spaces where individuals can redefine themselves beyond the
|
|
|
|
|
|
constraints of societal expectations while still technically under its
|
|
|
|
|
|
watchful eye. In essence, the parallels between virtual and queer
|
|
|
|
|
|
intimacies underscore the radical potential of both to disrupt and
|
|
|
|
|
|
reimagine the norms that govern our understanding of relationships,
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies, and identity. They invite us to question the rigid binaries and
|
|
|
|
|
|
hierarchies that structure our society and to embrace the fluidity and
|
|
|
|
|
|
possibility inherent in the human experience.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="digital-comfort">1.DIGITAL COMFORT</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The only laws: Be radiant. Be heavy. Be green.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Tonight, the dead light up your mind like an image of your mind on a
|
|
|
|
|
|
scientist’s screen. ‘The scientists don’t know – and too much.’</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>“In the town square, in the heart of night (a delicacy like the heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
of an artichoke), a man dances cheek-to-cheek with the infinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
blue.”<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Schwartz, 2022)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="a.-comfort-care">a. comfort care</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Let’s care for this digital body. I’ll feed it virtual vegetables
|
|
|
|
|
|
while you wipe away the wear of battery fatigue. And why not encourage
|
|
|
|
|
|
it to take strolls through the network, it might be good for it.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>But what if it falls ill? What if its sickness is inherent, designed
|
|
|
|
|
|
to echo like the distorted reflection of rippling water a corrupted,
|
|
|
|
|
|
isolated, and repulsive physical form? Then we must comfort care for
|
|
|
|
|
|
it.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Comfort care is a key concept in healthcare, described as an art. It
|
|
|
|
|
|
is the simple but not easy art of performing comforting actions by a
|
|
|
|
|
|
nurse for a patient (Kolcaba, 1995). The nurse is in this story an
|
|
|
|
|
|
artist full of intention, using the medium of comforting actions to
|
|
|
|
|
|
produce the artwork of comfort for the uncomfortable. Subtle,
|
|
|
|
|
|
subjective, and thorough. However, achieving comfort for another is far
|
|
|
|
|
|
from straightforward. It demands addressing not only the physical but
|
|
|
|
|
|
also the psychospiritual, environmental, and socio-cultural dimensions
|
|
|
|
|
|
of distress, each requiring its blend of relief, ease, and transcendence
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Kolcaba, 1995).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In moments of need, digital comfort may become the only care certain
|
|
|
|
|
|
digressive bodies receive. When the distress a body is in becomes too
|
|
|
|
|
|
culturally uncomfortable, no nurse will come to check on it.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>If care is offered, it’s often only with a desire to assimilate the
|
|
|
|
|
|
divergent body back into expected standards of normalcy and ability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This leaves those with non-conforming bodies isolated, ashamed, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
yearning for connection and acceptance.<sup><span class="margin-note">I
|
|
|
|
|
|
am talking here about the distress caused by mental health issues that
|
|
|
|
|
|
have direct connections to physicality—self- injuring in any direct
|
|
|
|
|
|
form; food, drugs, pain. The culturally uncomfortable diseases, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
it’s- personal- responsibility, and just-stop disorders. This is a
|
|
|
|
|
|
hidden topic of this text because I cared more about the pain
|
|
|
|
|
|
surrounding them and the reasons to hide rather than the grim
|
|
|
|
|
|
physicality of them all.</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In the depths of isolation and confusion, marginalized bodies often
|
|
|
|
|
|
look for belonging and understanding online. Gravitating towards one
|
|
|
|
|
|
another with a hunger born of desperation, forming intimate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
through shared pain. Through a shared sense of unwillingness, a lack of
|
|
|
|
|
|
desire, and a desperate need for physical assimilation with the
|
|
|
|
|
|
norm.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The healthy body, the normal body, the loved body.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>On the internet, these digital bodies claw onto each other, holding
|
|
|
|
|
|
each other close and comfort-caring for one another. The spaces where
|
|
|
|
|
|
this happens are rooms, or corners of the internet that I’ll call back
|
|
|
|
|
|
places. Back places were initially defined by the sociologist Goffman as
|
|
|
|
|
|
symbolic spaces where stigmatized people did not need to hide their
|
|
|
|
|
|
stigma(1963). In our story, backplaces are small rooms online, tender
|
|
|
|
|
|
soft spaces reserved by those in terrible psychological pain themselves,
|
|
|
|
|
|
where they can find relief, ease, and transcendence.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Of course, when we speak of digital bodies, their physicality is not
|
|
|
|
|
|
relevant. To comfort care for a digital body one would thus need to
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide relief, ease, and transcendence for the mental, emotional, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
spiritual; through the digital environment of the body and the
|
|
|
|
|
|
interpersonal cultural relations of the individual. As with any place of
|
|
|
|
|
|
healing, however, it is a transient place. It is an achy place, for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
last step of the journey will see them leave the community and
|
|
|
|
|
|
compassion that saw and sustained them.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>There is no other way for divergent people.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="b.-uncomfortable-comfort">b. uncomfortable comfort</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In the past and the present, social scientists have studied the
|
|
|
|
|
|
people in the corners of the internet, characterizing these spaces
|
|
|
|
|
|
between people as deviant. Like children lifting stones to look at the
|
|
|
|
|
|
bugs underneath— simultaneously repulsed and fascinated by the coherence
|
|
|
|
|
|
discovered where once was separation. A partition that was then
|
|
|
|
|
|
reinforced by the scientists themselves as they began documenting the
|
|
|
|
|
|
bugs’ behavior. They eavesdropped on conversations, captured intimate
|
|
|
|
|
|
moments, and asked again and again what made them so different. The more
|
|
|
|
|
|
they probed, the more they made sure to separate their behavior from the
|
|
|
|
|
|
norm to place the deviants against (Adler and Adler, 2005, 2008; Smith,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wickes & Underwood, 2013).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The concept of deviance, particularly concerning what people do with
|
|
|
|
|
|
their bodies and how their bodies behave, I find inherently flawed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observing from an artificial external standpoint only serves to further
|
|
|
|
|
|
alienate those already marginalized. I like to approach my research into
|
|
|
|
|
|
the intimacy and comfort care expressed in marginalized digital
|
|
|
|
|
|
communities without the alienation of social science. There are many
|
|
|
|
|
|
approaches one can take if one wishes to avoid this, and the one I am
|
|
|
|
|
|
choosing to borrow is a mathematical approach to anthropology. I would
|
|
|
|
|
|
like to borrow from mathematician Jörn Dunkel’s work in pattern
|
|
|
|
|
|
formation. It’s a conscious choice to approach divergences in bodily
|
|
|
|
|
|
behavior through their similarities, not differences. This includes
|
|
|
|
|
|
specificities in atypicality, of course, but also the distinctions
|
|
|
|
|
|
between me as the writer and them as the writer. You as the reader and
|
|
|
|
|
|
you as the community. Me and you, as a whole. Both exist, both separate
|
|
|
|
|
|
but in what is not of such importance.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>“Though many of these systems are different, fundamentally, we can
|
|
|
|
|
|
see similarities in the structure of their data. It’s very easy to find
|
|
|
|
|
|
differences. What’s more interesting is to find out what’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
similar.”<br />
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Chu & Dunkel, 2021)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Individuals who forge and inhabit these communities, fostering
|
|
|
|
|
|
tender, intimate connections amongst themselves, are not deviant but
|
|
|
|
|
|
rather divergent. Deviance involves bifurcation, a split estuary from
|
|
|
|
|
|
the river of appropriate cultural behavior.<sup><span
|
|
|
|
|
|
class="margin-note">Of course, the river itself is not a river; it’s
|
|
|
|
|
|
many confused streams that believe themselves both the same and
|
|
|
|
|
|
separate. I don’t know where I’m going with this, I just don’t love the
|
|
|
|
|
|
river of normativity and I’d rather go swim in the ocean of dreams with
|
|
|
|
|
|
you.</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Divergence can be so much more than that. In mathematics, a divergent
|
|
|
|
|
|
series extends infinitely without converging to a finite limit. A
|
|
|
|
|
|
repetition of partial sums with no clear ending, never reaching zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mathematician Niels Abel once said that “divergent series are in general
|
|
|
|
|
|
something fatal and it is a shame to base any proof on them. [..] The
|
|
|
|
|
|
most essential part of mathematics has no foundation”(1826). Drawing a
|
|
|
|
|
|
parallel to social relations would then imply that there is no end to
|
|
|
|
|
|
divergence, too many paradoxes in the foundation of normativeness to
|
|
|
|
|
|
base anything on it.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Harmonic series are, on the other hand, also divergent series. They
|
|
|
|
|
|
are infinite series formed by the summation of all positive unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
fractions, named after music harmonics. The wavelengths of a vibrating
|
|
|
|
|
|
string are a harmonic series. These series also find application in
|
|
|
|
|
|
architecture, establishing harmonious relationships. Despite their
|
|
|
|
|
|
integral role in human aesthetics, all harmonic series diverge,
|
|
|
|
|
|
perpetually expanding without ever concluding. They embody a richness
|
|
|
|
|
|
that transcends conventional boundaries, blending into one another
|
|
|
|
|
|
infinitely.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<figure>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<img src="../images/Harmonic-series.png"
|
|
|
|
|
|
alt="Figure 1 - Harmonic Series to 32 (Hyacint,2017)." />
|
|
|
|
|
|
<figcaption aria-hidden="true">Figure 1 - Harmonic Series to 32
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Hyacint,2017).</figcaption>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</figure>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>By likening digital bodies to divergent series, we embrace the
|
|
|
|
|
|
complexity and infinite possibilities arising from their
|
|
|
|
|
|
interconnectedness and deviation from the norm. However, it’s crucial to
|
|
|
|
|
|
note that the divergence I’m discussing here carries a halo of pain,
|
|
|
|
|
|
accompanied by the requirement of bodily discomfort. There are other
|
|
|
|
|
|
forms of divergence, ways to have different bodies that necessitate
|
|
|
|
|
|
creating spaciousness around normativity to allow them grace to
|
|
|
|
|
|
grow.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The divergent digital bodies we are dancing with and caring for,
|
|
|
|
|
|
however, are of a particular type. If we were to go back to our water
|
|
|
|
|
|
stories, we’d see that the digital bodies we are following are painful
|
|
|
|
|
|
ones. Cold, deep streams, hard to follow, hard to swim in. Their
|
|
|
|
|
|
divergence from the norm makes them so.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>They have intricate relationships with themselves, existing in
|
|
|
|
|
|
unstainable forms devoid of comfort, nourishment, or thriving. What does
|
|
|
|
|
|
comfort mean for a body whose whole existence is uncomfortable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, what if the comfort care performed for these divergent bodies
|
|
|
|
|
|
makes them too comfortable being in their pained state of self? Could
|
|
|
|
|
|
they be?<sup><span class="margin-note">I heard the idea of living
|
|
|
|
|
|
questions for the first time in “Letters to A Young Poet” by Rainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maria Rilke and then again on the podcast On Being with Krista Tippet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It may be a bit transparent but this entire text is informed by the
|
|
|
|
|
|
concept of keeping the unsolved in your heart and learning to love it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not searching for the answers for we cannot live them yet. The point is
|
|
|
|
|
|
to live it all. It could be that at some point we will live our way to
|
|
|
|
|
|
an answer but it is feeling the questions alive within us that is
|
|
|
|
|
|
important. Do you?</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Caring for a digital body involves providing it with space to live,
|
|
|
|
|
|
giving its experimental bot-feelings tender attention, and revealing
|
|
|
|
|
|
your own vulnerable digital body in response. It’s about giving it an
|
|
|
|
|
|
audience, hands to hold, eyes that meet theirs in understanding. A
|
|
|
|
|
|
rehearsal room, a pillow, a mirror. These rooms, backplaces scattered
|
|
|
|
|
|
across the internet, are hidden enough to allow the divergent to
|
|
|
|
|
|
comfort- care for one another, sometimes to the point where it is only
|
|
|
|
|
|
the same type of divergent digital bodies reflecting back at each
|
|
|
|
|
|
other.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>So far I have talked fondly of divergence and the harmony of
|
|
|
|
|
|
divergent series, and the need to have no finite ending. I’d like to
|
|
|
|
|
|
tell you a different story now. Divergent digital bodies are, by this
|
|
|
|
|
|
point in our text, built and alive as they can be. They are many, they
|
|
|
|
|
|
are together and seeing each other, producing harmonic waves. They are
|
|
|
|
|
|
in backplaces on the internet, but they are less safe than they seem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are themselves resonant echo chambers, with an ongoing risk of
|
|
|
|
|
|
catastrophic acoustic resonance.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Acoustic resonance is what happens when an acoustic system amplifies
|
|
|
|
|
|
sound waves whose frequency matches one of its natural frequencies of
|
|
|
|
|
|
vibration. The instrument of amplification is important for the harmonic
|
|
|
|
|
|
series, for the music must not match exactly. An exact match will break
|
|
|
|
|
|
it for the object seeks out its resonance. Resonating at the precise
|
|
|
|
|
|
resonant frequency of a glass will shatter it. Digital bodies meet in
|
|
|
|
|
|
these rooms, amplifying their own waves seeking resonance but the risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
of an exact match is that it may shatter them. These spaces full of
|
|
|
|
|
|
divergent digital bodies quickly grow unstable, tethering echo chambers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooms full of reflections, transforming what was once individual pain
|
|
|
|
|
|
into a mirrored loop of anguish. Caring for your own and others’ bodies
|
|
|
|
|
|
becomes increasingly difficult, making permanent residence in the mirror
|
|
|
|
|
|
room unbearable. You all know you must leave before you meet your exact
|
|
|
|
|
|
resonance.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h3 id="c.-unbearable-intimacy">c. unbearable intimacy</h3>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>This is the end of the story. Our digital bodies have a shape, a
|
|
|
|
|
|
sense of life and death, and someone to care for us and to care for. We
|
|
|
|
|
|
are alive and have found intimacy with each other.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>We live in the backplaces, hiding and being hidden online as we have
|
|
|
|
|
|
been for years. We used to be on invitation-only forums,
|
|
|
|
|
|
password-protected bulletin boards, or encrypted hashtags. Now we are
|
|
|
|
|
|
alive in the glitches between pixels, in a shared language of numbers
|
|
|
|
|
|
and acronyms and misdirection. Avoiding a content moderation algorithm,
|
|
|
|
|
|
always hunting the dashboards of social media websites for visible pain
|
|
|
|
|
|
it can cure by erasure. We cannot tell you where to find you or it might
|
|
|
|
|
|
too. We try to stay alive, to hold each other, hiding behind code words,
|
|
|
|
|
|
fake names, and photos. We care for each other as best we can, the blind
|
|
|
|
|
|
leading the blind, the sick caring for the sick. We have brought our
|
|
|
|
|
|
unseemliness, our gory gross bodies to each other and found tender
|
|
|
|
|
|
intimacy and understanding.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>On good days, dashboards are full of goodbyes and my heart swells
|
|
|
|
|
|
with hope, for those of us who make it and for the small bright light
|
|
|
|
|
|
telling us that we may be one of them. At the same time, some of us
|
|
|
|
|
|
leave only to come back ghosts of ourselves, hunting threads with the
|
|
|
|
|
|
empty hope of missionaries.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Don’t give up, it’s worth it!</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Most of us scoff at this. The idea of leaving only to come back and
|
|
|
|
|
|
tell people you left is uncomfortable, the failed progress that washes
|
|
|
|
|
|
away hope. A healed patient who regularly comes back to the hospital to
|
|
|
|
|
|
encourage the sick, who wish to be anywhere but there. The genuine love
|
|
|
|
|
|
and care within these communities transpire better under goodbye posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When people do heal and shed their accounts’ skin, they often leave it
|
|
|
|
|
|
surrounded by all those who once cared for the digital body within
|
|
|
|
|
|
it.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>I’m so proud of you! Never come back, we love you so much.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Recover, don’t come back. Recover, don’t come back. Recover, never
|
|
|
|
|
|
come back.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>I had a conversation with a friend who once lived in these spaces
|
|
|
|
|
|
between letters but has since moved outside them. When asked, he
|
|
|
|
|
|
mentioned he could only find recovery by leaving that community. His
|
|
|
|
|
|
body has changed since now it is the spitting image of a standard,
|
|
|
|
|
|
healthy body. I didn’t ask, but he knew I’d wonder. He told me he didn’t
|
|
|
|
|
|
like his new body and preferred the divergent one he once built himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why leave then? Why did you stop?</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Because that was no life.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Now life sparkles, everything feels brighter and more exciting. I got
|
|
|
|
|
|
my will to live back. Before, there was nothing but my body. I was
|
|
|
|
|
|
willing to die for it.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>He pulls up the sleeve of his shirt to show me his shoulder, where he
|
|
|
|
|
|
has tattooed a symbol for a community friend who died.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>I hope I never go back. I miss them every day.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>This is the last dichotomy. For the divergent digital body can’t stay
|
|
|
|
|
|
in a Backplace for very long, the intimacy of it is unbearable. It is an
|
|
|
|
|
|
intimacy that floods, and overruns. In their definition of intimacy in
|
|
|
|
|
|
the context of a public surrounding a cultural phenomenon, the author
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lauren Berlant denotes that intimacy itself always requires hopeful
|
|
|
|
|
|
imagination. It requires belief in the existence of an ideal other who
|
|
|
|
|
|
is emotionally attuned to one’s own experiences and fantasies,
|
|
|
|
|
|
conditioned by the same longings and with willing reciprocity
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2008).<sup><span class="margin-note">If we were to be honest, the
|
|
|
|
|
|
entire exercise of writing this for you requires this very
|
|
|
|
|
|
faith.</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In the context of the intimacy of a Backplace, where divergent
|
|
|
|
|
|
digital bodies have formed a community around existing outside the
|
|
|
|
|
|
healthy and standard, longing and hopeful intimacy becomes a heavy-
|
|
|
|
|
|
hearted and cardinal concept. Being in these rooms and finding care and
|
|
|
|
|
|
love for others like you can be so uncomfortable when the longings,
|
|
|
|
|
|
experiences, and fantasies you are sharing are centered around pain. The
|
|
|
|
|
|
shared cultural experience of existing as a collective divergent digital
|
|
|
|
|
|
body promises a fantasy of belonging, a collective hope, and commitment
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is extremely fragile.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>There is a duality then, if not a dichotomy. As a divergent body,
|
|
|
|
|
|
there is nothing you crave more than to be seen and to be loved in a
|
|
|
|
|
|
space where you are safe, where the faces looking at you are not
|
|
|
|
|
|
repulsed but warm with familiarity. Yet, it is this very warmth that
|
|
|
|
|
|
becomes unbearable and an inherently traumatic intimacy. Being loved at
|
|
|
|
|
|
your worst, at your most embarrassing, cultural borderline self is an
|
|
|
|
|
|
agonizing duality to deal with. McGlotten, who was referenced earlier
|
|
|
|
|
|
concerning the potential of bot-feelings of a digital body, now comes
|
|
|
|
|
|
back to remind us of their impossibility. In his book, he talks of a
|
|
|
|
|
|
digital intimacy that inundates us and is both a source of connection
|
|
|
|
|
|
and disconnection (McGlotten, 2013). We are looking at a smaller scale
|
|
|
|
|
|
than he does, but intimacy in the context of shared vulnerability can be
|
|
|
|
|
|
a need just as intolerable.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Certain kinds of witnessing can become curses, shivers of resonance
|
|
|
|
|
|
so close to an explosion of glass if only you strike the cord that will
|
|
|
|
|
|
keep me going. Certain kinds of divergence can only end with leaving or
|
|
|
|
|
|
death, truth be told. People in these bodies know this, even if the
|
|
|
|
|
|
digital bodies behave as if there is hope in a future where the
|
|
|
|
|
|
divergence brings joy to one’s life consistently. The shared
|
|
|
|
|
|
vulnerability itself then, is unbearable. I need you to see me, I need
|
|
|
|
|
|
you, who are just like me at my worst, to love me. When you do, I can’t
|
|
|
|
|
|
stand it. It ruins both of us to be seen this way and we need it so
|
|
|
|
|
|
desperately. It has to exist and yet it can’t for long.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>I leave even though I love all of your digital bodies. I leave
|
|
|
|
|
|
because I love you, little digital body and you are me.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="a-life-to-be-had">2. A LIFE TO BE HAD</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><sup><span class="margin-note">Was this the end of this story? In the
|
|
|
|
|
|
epilogue, you sit your body down and enter your computer. The air coming
|
|
|
|
|
|
in from the window smells wet and earthy, new. The sun shines low on the
|
|
|
|
|
|
horizon. You log in to the internet and realize you are being told a
|
|
|
|
|
|
story. You start to listen, carefully and, full of love, touch the story
|
|
|
|
|
|
to let it know you are there. Delicate-fingered, curious like a child
|
|
|
|
|
|
holding a fallen bird. I hold you and the story tentatively.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>I don’t know if I am touching you, to tell you the truth. Digital
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodies are stories, like physical bodies are, like dreams are, and like
|
|
|
|
|
|
water is.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Stories that are hard to tell and hard to hear and even more, maybe,
|
|
|
|
|
|
hard to understand. I have loved these stories and I have loved telling
|
|
|
|
|
|
them to you. I hope you understand that my goal was for you to live
|
|
|
|
|
|
these questions, to feel these stories in their confusion. My digital
|
|
|
|
|
|
body, my bot-feelings, my divergent communities. I have given them to
|
|
|
|
|
|
you, so they may live longer, like an obsolete but beloved cyborg shown
|
|
|
|
|
|
in a museum.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Look: I was here, Look: I was loved, Look: I was saved.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The digital bodies that kept me alive, kept me from becoming fully a
|
|
|
|
|
|
machine are no longer around in these online rooms. They are in
|
|
|
|
|
|
different places, being touched by tentative hands, being loved for more
|
|
|
|
|
|
than their divergence. I am too.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The rooms, the backplaces, however, are still full of others,
|
|
|
|
|
|
divergent digital bodies who did not leave, who keep caring for each
|
|
|
|
|
|
other at the bottom of the whirlpool. There is no happy ending because
|
|
|
|
|
|
there is no ending. They keep typing and hoping, writing their
|
|
|
|
|
|
collective pain down on keyboards that transmit love letters to each
|
|
|
|
|
|
other. I am not embarrassed by my care for you, but you may be so if it
|
|
|
|
|
|
helps. I know how overwhelming intimacy can be.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Telling you these stories was important for me, so much so that I
|
|
|
|
|
|
will tell you so many more in a different place if you wish to listen to
|
|
|
|
|
|
me longer. With this story, I dreamt of a digital body for you. It came
|
|
|
|
|
|
from an ocean of dreams, into a primordial soup that gave it enough
|
|
|
|
|
|
shape to become wild rivers, deep streams, sound waves. It flooded and
|
|
|
|
|
|
now, it leaves. A digital body that grew its own feelings, looked for
|
|
|
|
|
|
others like it, and realized its divergence and the need to leave. A
|
|
|
|
|
|
dream body, a primordial body, a disruptive body, a divergent body, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
now, a leaving body. This last story, however, of the leaving and loving
|
|
|
|
|
|
body, is yet to be told.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The sun is now almost up, and the birds are alive and awake, telling
|
|
|
|
|
|
each other stories just outside the room. We don’t have so much time
|
|
|
|
|
|
left. I have made you something, to tell your digital body the stories
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the leaving and loving body. It is a webpage, the address is
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://vulnerable-interfaces.xpub.nl/backplaces/.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>You open the page, and you are asked to write the characters you see
|
|
|
|
|
|
in a captcha. E5qr7. eSq9p. 8oc8y. Fuck. You try not to panic, but you
|
|
|
|
|
|
know you have been detected.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>You pack up your things: the pie I made you, a love letter, two hands
|
|
|
|
|
|
made out of felt, a star, a door, a stuffed animal; and you leave
|
|
|
|
|
|
again.</span></sup></p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2 id="bibliography">references</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Adler, P.A. and Adler, P. (2008) ‘The Cyber Worlds of self-injurers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deviant communities, relationships, and selves’, Symbolic Interaction,
|
|
|
|
|
|
31(1), pp. 33–56. doi:10.1525/si.2008.31.1.33.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Berlant, L.G. (2008) The female complaint the unfinished business of
|
|
|
|
|
|
sentimentality in American culture. Durham: Duke University Press.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Chu, J. (2021) Looking for similarities across Complex Systems, MIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://news.mit.edu/2021/jorn-dunkel-complex- systems-0627 (Accessed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
08 March 2024).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Deleuze, G., Boyman, A. and Rajchman, J. (2001) Pure immanence:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Essays on a life. New York: Zone Books.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Goffman, E. (2022) Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled
|
|
|
|
|
|
identity. London: Penguin Classics. Hafner, K. (1997) The epic saga of
|
|
|
|
|
|
the well, Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/1997/05/ff-well/
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accessed: 01 February 2024).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Haraway, D.J. (2000) ‘A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and
|
|
|
|
|
|
socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century’, Posthumanism,
|
|
|
|
|
|
pp. 69–84. doi:10.1007/978- 1-137-05194-3_10.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Hyacint (2017) Harmonic series to 32,
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Harmonic_series_to_32.svg.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Kolcaba, K.Y. and Kolcaba, R.J. (1991) ‘An analysis of the concept of
|
|
|
|
|
|
comfort’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(11), pp. 1301–1310.
|
|
|
|
|
|
doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2648.1991.tb01558.x.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Leonard, A. (no date) All Too Real, https://people.well.com/.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available at: https://people.well.com/user/cynsa/tom/tom14.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accessed: 01 April 2024).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>McGlotten, S. (2013) Virtual intimacies: Media, affect, and queer
|
|
|
|
|
|
sociality [Preprint]. doi:10.1353 book27643.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Rumi, J. al-Din and Barks, C. (1995) ‘Story Water’, in The Essential
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rumi. New</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Schwartz, C. (2022) Lecture on Loneliness, Granta. Available at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://granta.com/lecture-on-loneliness/ (Accessed: 08 March 2024).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Smith, N., Wickes, R. and Underwood, M. (2013) ‘Managing a
|
|
|
|
|
|
marginalised identity in pro-anorexia and fat acceptance
|
|
|
|
|
|
cybercommunities’, Journal of Sociology, 51(4), pp. 950–967.
|
|
|
|
|
|
doi:10.1177/1440783313486220.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Yun, J. (2020) ‘The Leaving Season’, in Some Are Always Hungry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
University of Nebraska Press.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h1 id="water-bodies-1"><?/water bodies></h1>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</html>
|
