|
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
|
|
|
|
we
|
|
|
|
|
i we h
|
|
|
|
|
m we ’
|
|
|
|
|
ce we des
|
|
|
|
|
inua we deny
|
|
|
|
|
, we we descr
|
|
|
|
|
inuity we descri
|
|
|
|
|
’ d lik we display
|
|
|
|
|
one per we need to
|
|
|
|
|
talist Ru we speak abo
|
|
|
|
|
often use We see this w
|
|
|
|
|
of ‘ arriv we will later
|
|
|
|
|
later ‘ arri we arrive at a
|
|
|
|
|
omething real We tend to forge
|
|
|
|
|
t ‘ home. ’ We we understand as
|
|
|
|
|
[ i ] only is we feel ‘ unheimis
|
|
|
|
|
gnized it . Or s we are accustomed t
|
|
|
|
|
would state , ‘ we think about progr
|
|
|
|
|
that one will ‘ ar We can not arrive in
|
|
|
|
|
d , as worlds are c We need continuous lan
|
|
|
|
|
or mode awaiting you we give to a future tha
|
|
|
|
|
i ] presence [ i ] , We need a language that
|
|
|
|
|
you about him I love all my heart and my soul W
|
|
|
|
|
elative as no genitals all adjectives that she fi
|
|
|
|
|
‘ discovered ’ the Am all the life that was ther
|
|
|
|
|
onsidered meaningful o all . It was no life . It
|
|
|
|
|
ave – in some way or a all along . Those who arri
|
|
|
|
|
common , inspirationa all about the journey ’ fo
|
|
|
|
|
d arrival , unless one all is journey. ’ When we
|
|
|
|
|
air you are given by T All of these factors helpe
|
|
|
|
|
nd upon my arrival I c all worlds and all sides t
|
|
|
|
|
val I could forget tha all sides that are always
|
|
|
|
|
asonable wealthy and e All would be fine as the s
|
|
|
|
|
speaking , but an ete all , allowing everything
|
|
|
|
|
eminist practise . Que embrace of what ’ s described
|
|
|
|
|
straight one , it is a embrace in which it is unclear
|
|
|
|
|
at embraces what : does embrace the listener , does the
|
|
|
|
|
ace the listener , does t embrace the description , does th
|
|
|
|
|
scription , does the event embrace the continuous language th
|
|
|
|
|
gage the event ? It ’ s an embrace with few coordinates . It ’
|
|
|
|
|
ace with few coordinates . I embrace of which it is unsure whethe
|
|
|
|
|
which it is unsure whether i embrace . It is moving , taking form
|
|
|
|
|
ne and seizable , instead of a continuous thinking she is trying to surf
|
|
|
|
|
w attention to ? How can we di continuous time while using language ? La
|
|
|
|
|
at is described . It means tha continuous ( well- ) being of what is des
|
|
|
|
|
ecause of your positionality . continuous noticing is necessary to re-di
|
|
|
|
|
oes the event described embrac continuous language that is trying to lin
|
|
|
|
|
, but to acknowledge the world continuous place , instead of believing t
|
|
|
|
|
s are constantly arriving . We continuous language . There is no platfor
|
|
|
|
|
untered with [ i ] presence [ continuous life . We need a language that
|
|
|
|
|
I understood that it was her language that displayed , inhabited , s
|
|
|
|
|
ted her love and trust for him language wasn ’ t just a true account of
|
|
|
|
|
a true account of her worship , language generated and endorsed the love
|
|
|
|
|
the content of this message . I l language . I love language so much that I
|
|
|
|
|
s message . I love language . I lo language so much that I can sound very conv
|
|
|
|
|
eling submission . In this convince language , by expressing surrender I would e
|
|
|
|
|
uld experience surrender because the language of worship and submission is not des
|
|
|
|
|
words , but I ’ m very much aimed at language ’ s shortcomings . One of the diffic
|
|
|
|
|
comings . One of the difficulties of language I have recently been involved with ,
|
|
|
|
|
thinking she is trying to surface . Language kills continuation . When we describ
|
|
|
|
|
display continuous time while using language ? Language itself is constantly draw
|
|
|
|
|
ntinuous time while using language ? Language itself is constantly drawing from th
|
|
|
|
|
I was experiencing continuousness of language when I was having sex and feeling my
|
|
|
|
|
m a moment in time and space . While language kills what is being described , it e
|
|
|
|
|
ng a few dominant narratives – using language to create proximity can just as well
|
|
|
|
|
nclear what embraces what : does the language embrace the listener , does the list
|
|
|
|
|
ent described embrace the continuous language that is trying to linguistically eng
|
|
|
|
|
tantly arriving . We need continuous language . There is no platform waiting for y
|
|
|
|
|
ing our arrival ? The future needs a language that does not identify the future as
|
|
|
|
|
uture as a separate era . It needs a language in which the deadening force of word
|
|
|
|
|
[ i ] , continuous life . We need a language that is not old , nor presents itsel
|
|
|
|
|
gitimatize its existence . What does language need ? It needs faith . It needs spe
|
|
|
|
|
ivity , who recognize the effects of language , understanding that the expression
|
|
|
|
|
the conversation . A feminist queer language may well be that : God-language . A
|
