From 796a28b9a6e33baca164a885190d0c9efade60a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: martin Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:04:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Bestanden uploaden naar 'Concordance_Patches' --- .../V2_WE_ALL_EMBRACE_CONTINUOUS_LANGAUGE.txt | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Concordance_Patches/V2_WE_ALL_EMBRACE_CONTINUOUS_LANGAUGE.txt diff --git a/Concordance_Patches/V2_WE_ALL_EMBRACE_CONTINUOUS_LANGAUGE.txt b/Concordance_Patches/V2_WE_ALL_EMBRACE_CONTINUOUS_LANGAUGE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..667bca8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Concordance_Patches/V2_WE_ALL_EMBRACE_CONTINUOUS_LANGAUGE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ + we +i we h + m we ’ +ce we des +inua we deny + , we we descr +inuity we descri +’ d lik we display +one per we need to +talist Ru we speak abo + often use We see this w + of ‘ arriv we will later +later ‘ arri we arrive at a +omething real We tend to forge +t ‘ home. ’ We we understand as + [ i ] only is we feel ‘ unheimis +gnized it . Or s we are accustomed t + would state , ‘ we think about progr +that one will ‘ ar We can not arrive in +d , as worlds are c We need continuous lan +or mode awaiting you we give to a future tha + i ] presence [ i ] , We need a language that + you about him I love all my heart and my soul W +elative as no genitals all adjectives that she fi + ‘ discovered ’ the Am all the life that was ther +onsidered meaningful o all . It was no life . It +ave – in some way or a all along . Those who arri + common , inspirationa all about the journey ’ fo +d arrival , unless one all is journey. ’ When we +air you are given by T All of these factors helpe +nd upon my arrival I c all worlds and all sides t +val I could forget tha all sides that are always +asonable wealthy and e All would be fine as the s + speaking , but an ete all , allowing everything +eminist practise . Que embrace of what ’ s described +straight one , it is a embrace in which it is unclear +at embraces what : does embrace the listener , does the +ace the listener , does t embrace the description , does th +scription , does the event embrace the continuous language th +gage the event ? It ’ s an embrace with few coordinates . It ’ +ace with few coordinates . I embrace of which it is unsure whethe + which it is unsure whether i embrace . It is moving , taking form +ne and seizable , instead of a continuous thinking she is trying to surf +w attention to ? How can we di continuous time while using language ? La +at is described . It means tha continuous ( well- ) being of what is des +ecause of your positionality . continuous noticing is necessary to re-di +oes the event described embrac continuous language that is trying to lin +, but to acknowledge the world continuous place , instead of believing t +s are constantly arriving . We continuous language . There is no platfor +untered with [ i ] presence [ continuous life . We need a language that + I understood that it was her language that displayed , inhabited , s +ted her love and trust for him language wasn ’ t just a true account of + a true account of her worship , language generated and endorsed the love +the content of this message . I l language . I love language so much that I +s message . I love language . I lo language so much that I can sound very conv +eling submission . In this convince language , by expressing surrender I would e +uld experience surrender because the language of worship and submission is not des +words , but I ’ m very much aimed at language ’ s shortcomings . One of the diffic +comings . One of the difficulties of language I have recently been involved with , + thinking she is trying to surface . Language kills continuation . When we describ + display continuous time while using language ? Language itself is constantly draw +ntinuous time while using language ? Language itself is constantly drawing from th +I was experiencing continuousness of language when I was having sex and feeling my +m a moment in time and space . While language kills what is being described , it e +ng a few dominant narratives – using language to create proximity can just as well +nclear what embraces what : does the language embrace the listener , does the list +ent described embrace the continuous language that is trying to linguistically eng +tantly arriving . We need continuous language . There is no platform waiting for y +ing our arrival ? The future needs a language that does not identify the future as +uture as a separate era . It needs a language in which the deadening force of word + [ i ] , continuous life . We need a language that is not old , nor presents itsel +gitimatize its existence . What does language need ? It needs faith . It needs spe +ivity , who recognize the effects of language , understanding that the expression + the conversation . A feminist queer language may well be that : God-language . A