eaiaiaiaoi/presentation201812.md

##Previous proposal
**Shannon_diagram.jpg**

**loop-diagram.JPG**

My project proposal was about the intervention of data practices from Google, Facebook, Amazon and other companies into our communication systems and all the human labor happening behind it. I made an annotated diagram of the Shannon diagram of a general communication system that explains that from my perspective. So for example,....(explain one route with listening and transcribing)

I wanted to highlight the human involvement into the training of speech recognition software on which personal assistants are based on. And to highlight the importance of voice as a unique element of our bodies that is collected into a big pool of trained data. My aim was to make experiments with other people in group sessions where we would discuss about our privacy and at the same time the discussion would become input for a process of human activities. Like transcribing, listening, eavesdropping, speaking, recording, repeating. They would immitate the processes of the training of speech recognition tools. Here is a diagram made by somebody else that explains further the exploitation of user's speech data and the free labor for the Amazon echo. 

**ai-anatomy-map.pdf**

...i am very interested in the sources/databanks that different material (recording, online broadcasting, transcripts, readings online, livestreaming) of voice samples of users is used by Amazon without their consent.

**databanks.png**

My idea for repeat these actions, immitate conversations, transcribing, eavesdroping came from these databanks. There are limitless actions happening from users that produce and publish so much material online.

My purpose was to strengthen our awareness for our involvement in the loop and answer some questions that bother me. Some of these questions is how our bodies are influenced by these systems, what is the control over them and how can we appropriate these new technologies more consciously? It seems to me that in all this process our personal body [cultural, physical, political, gender] disappears. My plan was to organise a workshop at Leeszaal where the visitors and the volunteers are permanent inhabitants of Netherlands and are coming from different countries. I assume that they have different relations to these tools and databanks. 

##Workshop

**pyratechnic3_workshop.pdf**

**video-pyratechnic3.mp4**

My first experiment was the workshop, part of the pyratechnic sessions, with the first years. I wanted to immitate a loop in which a conversation of two people leakes out to another room, through Jitsi, where participants repeat, transcribe and then read the transcription back to them. So their words come back distorted. //Explain the second diagram//


##My research turn - voice in public:

The workshop was missing content and after the feedback I got from the participants and the outcome of it I started researching on transcripts and distribution of public speeches and that led me on my interest on the presence of the voice and the body in public.

**https://pad.xpub.nl/p/chapter1-speech-recognition**

So I started to focus my research on public speeches and assemblies with the aid of media. I am very interested in the voice and its ability to connect people but also to express the uniqueness of the speaker. I looked at specific examples of counter communication for speeches of resistance that I had come accross in a previous research. 

**examples-speeches.jpg**

**diagram-flows.jpg**

I annotated again the Shannon diagram for each example. //Explain the green//

So, in feminists movements speech-making workshops were helping women to express the violence in their private space (their home) to the public domain that was dominated by male voices. They were privatizing listening and horizontal communication. The presence of them in public was very important. There was a strong division between private for women and public for men that keeps up till today. 

In 2011 in occupy movement speech and voice played also an important role. Public assemblies and speeches were held every day by citizens in squares. It was not allowed to use amplifying devices in some public spaces so the crowd became the "human microphone", repeating what the speaker says. Youtube and live streaming was used for the fast communication of the public assemblies in internet and were perfectly fitted in the urgency of those actions. 

//Explain the red one// 

I see streaming as a bottom-up approach for establishing rapid (though temporary) communication of events from the people. 

Similarly radio activists were always broadcasting community radio shows or spreading political speeches again with this need for rapid streaming. 

A very fast process from the people using the available tools. And the companies realised that and developed their own livestreaming like facebook, instagram where people stream live videos from demonstrations, terrorists attacts. An urgent tool without the need for mainstream media.

**streaming-assemblies.jpg**

##New approach in my proposal:

Relation of private and public (to be exposed to the public). On the other hand privacy and public domain online (exposure of private data) exploiting and supressing users and citizens. Surveillance in the public space but also in online public domains.  

###what
I want to organise group sessions with conversations on public speech and live-streaming that connect the public space with the private, the digital with the physical and explores the possibilities of these processes in both spaces and the potentials for a more active/agonistic public domain. They will be similar to the previous idea, with conversations on privacy and claiming rights in the public with our own voice. At the same time engagament with the tools and practices that are related to these phenomenon. I would try these sessions in physical public spaces, where the exploitation of citizens data and their restriction and control is present. Explore the esges of it. The relation of a private space(and all the things that involve, the private life of the contemporary user) with a low_tech public space. Reflecting the issues arisen on the rights on speech and open use of public spaces.
It’s somehow controversial when the citizens have to ask for the use of technology in public spaces but the states install surveillance devices in the streets and squares and gather data of them without their concent. Creating a low_tech physical public space for the citizens. I found several restrictions regarding public assemblies here. In Rotterdam, in a specific area where a market of immigrants, Afrikaandermarkt, is being held, there is a ban on public assembly, previously for anti-hooliganism, it is now enforced due to anti-terrorist concerns. In some cases surveillance with several technologies and devices is applied. The installation of these devices in the public space conflicts with the constitution for privacy rights. Examples of such technologies and practices that surveil public assemblies are the operation of CCTV cameras and the collection of personal data through videotaping and photographing. 


###How
####Example of workshop. //Explain the blue//                                           
A workshop discussion on public speech and assemblies and privacy in Leeszaal:
- I will bring texts related to that, we will figure out laws in their country and this country, what is the situation with women? Able to speak in public? what are the public spaces for immigrants? What streaming tools are used for emergent publishing 
- Prototyping with devices- live streaming- archive our speeches-what is their experience with these tools? 
- Using pad iframe in a website, git (my writing practice will affact that), human microphone, collective editing, transcription, collective live streaming--speech and assemblies, pad-Transcription}

Make public: streaming online, bodily actions in public spaces.

Create public:

how: workshops with inhabitants (daily expression in rotterdam public) and experiments in public spaces, connect with people and communities around patebin, live streaming


###Why
Coming from a country were the public presence and resistance is common, gender inequalities are reflected in the public and the engagememt with the technology is divided in the male expert and the other amateur, I felt the need to embrace this side of technology and awaken it and the demand for presence through my own eyes. Now coming to a country were the public presence is highly controlled and surveilled. But also the use of technology for controling the crowd that is not expressed in public but online or in beraucratic procedures. The bodily representation and face to face communication not on priority in matters of democracy and agonistic arena. Interrogating the contribution of daily technologies like livestraming and their exploitation by social media companies. Surveillance with personal assistants, listening to the crowd.

why: occupy public space and the contribution of media, externilize the private the need for presence for democratic processes to happen, the conflict with the powerful. 
Liveness that the medium provides and engagement with the technology 
    
intentions: division and exclusion in private and public 


**occupy-rotterdam.png**

    
Parts of my previous proposal may come back in the future if they fit my development (the bublic domain of all these databanks where users publish material and the public space ((the voice in public but unconsciously-just using a tool)) with the restrictions where citizens are obliged to listen to spesific rules ((the voice in public to reclaim rights))). I will move between private and public and privacy. My approach may look chaotic but everyting comes together and make sense at the end. I collect and search through the broader context of the topic but then I simplify a lot the whole process. I try small experiments, then I come back to research and then experiments again.