@ -59,13 +59,15 @@ A very fast process from the people using the available tools. And the companies
Relation of private and public (to be exposed to the public). On the other hand privacy and public domain online (exposure of private data) exploiting and supressing users and citizens. Surveillance in the public space but also in online public domains.
###what
I want to organise group sessions with conversations on public speech and live-streaming that connect the public space with the private, the digital with the physical and explores the possibilities of these processes in both spaces and the potentials for a more active/agonistic public domain. They will be similar to the previous idea, with conversations on privacy and claiming rights in the public with our own voice. At the same time engagament with the tools and practices that are related to these phenomenon. I would try these sessions in physical public spaces, where the exploitation of citizens data and their restriction and control is present. Explore the esges of it. The relation of a private space(and all the things that involve, the private life of the contemporary user) with a low_tech public space. Reflecting the issues arisen on the rights on speech and open use of public spaces.
It’s somehow controversial when the citizens have to ask for the use of technology in public spaces but the states install surveillance devices in the streets and squares and gather data of them without their concent. Creating a low_tech physical public space for the citizens. I found several restrictions regarding public assemblies here. In Rotterdam, in a specific area where a market of immigrants, Afrikaandermarkt, is being held, there is a ban on public assembly, previously for anti-hooliganism, it is now enforced due to anti-terrorist concerns. In some cases surveillance with several technologies and devices is applied. The installation of these devices in the public space conflicts with the constitution for privacy rights. Examples of such technologies and practices that surveil public assemblies are the operation of CCTV cameras and the collection of personal data through videotaping and photographing.
I want to organise group sessions with conversations on public speech and live-streaming that connect the public space with the private, the digital with the physical and explores the possibilities of these processes in both spaces and the potentials for a more active/agonistic public domain. They will be similar to the previous idea, with conversations on privacy and claiming rights in the public with our own voice. At the same I will engage with the tools and practices that are related to these phenomenon. The sessions could take the form of workshops and lead to the development of a media object [interface]. I would try these sessions in physical public spaces, where the exploitation of citizens data and their restriction and control is present. Explore the edges of it. The relation of a private space (and all the things that involve, the private life of the contemporary user) with a low_tech public space.
It’s somehow controversial when the citizens have to ask for the use of technology in public spaces but the states install surveillance devices in the streets and squares and gather data of them without their concent. Creating a low_tech physical public space for the citizens. I found several restrictions regarding public assemblies here. In Rotterdam, in a specific area where a market of immigrants, Afrikaandermarkt, is being held, there is a ban on public assembly, previously for anti-hooliganism, it is now enforced due to anti-terrorist concerns. In some cases surveillance with several technologies and devices is applied [CCTV,photographing for data collectoin]. The installation of these devices in the public space conflicts with the constitution for privacy rights.
###How
####Example of workshop. //Explain the blue//
A workshop discussion on public speech and assemblies and privacy in Leeszaal:
- Reflecting the issues arisen on the rights on speech and open use of public spaces.
- I will bring texts related to that, we will figure out laws in their country and this country, what is the situation with women? Able to speak in public? what are the public spaces for immigrants? What streaming tools are used for emergent publishing
- Prototyping with devices- live streaming- archive our speeches-what is their experience with these tools?
- Using pad iframe in a website, git (my writing practice will affact that), human microphone, collective editing, transcription, collective live streaming--speech and assemblies, pad-Transcription}
@ -78,10 +80,9 @@ how: workshops with inhabitants (daily expression in rotterdam public) and exper
###Why
Coming from a country were the public presence and resistance is common, gender inequalities are reflected in the public and the engagememt with the technology is divided in the male expert and the other amateur, I felt the need to embrace this side of technology and awaken it and the demand for presence through my own eyes. Now coming to a country were the public presence is highly controlled and surveilled. But also the use of technology for controling the crowd that is not expressed in public but online or in beraucratic procedures. The bodily representation and face to face communication not on priority in matters of democracy and agonistic arena. Interrogating the contribution of daily technologies like livestraming and their exploitation by social media companies. Surveillance with personal assistants, listening to the crowd.
Coming from a country were the public presence and resistance is on stake, gender inequalities are reflected in the public and the engagememt with the technology is divided in the male expert and the other amateur, I felt the need to embrace this side of technology and awaken it and the demand for presence through my own eyes. Now coming to a country were the public presence is highly controlled and surveilled. But also the use of technology for controling the crowd that is not expressed in public but online or in beraucratic procedures. The physical representation and face to face communication not on priority in matters of democracy and agonistic arena. Interrogating the contribution of daily technologies like livestreaming and their exploitation by social media companies. Eavesdropping, listening to the crowd.
why: occupy public space and the contribution of media, externilize the private the need for presence for democratic processes to happen, the conflict with the powerful.
Liveness that the medium provides and engagement with the technology
why: occupy public space and the contribution of media, externilize the private the need for presence for democratic processes to happen, the conflict with the powerful. Liveness that the medium provides and engagement with the technology in an aspect of the conscious user [apos]
intentions: division and exclusion in private and public
Angeliki
6 years ago