In this chapter I will elaborate on the right on public speech and media practice of transcribing and live streaming that facilitate it. Since the beginning of the human culture the auditory experiences were important for communication and sharing of knowledge. The sound of voice has a strong impact on the people and the spaces where is projected. It is very related to sharing and participating on present time. Speech-making workshops and public assemblies are some examples of the use of voice in public for resistance or empower of the voiceless. Today even though our communication is mediated the need for the embodied voice in public is still important. But how the media technologies influence that?
Body
essay 1- The freedom of speech in public is a common right among most of the democratized countries. Though social, cultural and political restrictions are clamming up groups of people. The physical presence of assemblies and speakers enables this right and the creation of political speheres in public spaces.
point A: the importance of voice and body in the public. Movements of women. gossiping-microphonic
point B: laws and restrictions in NL and european countries publis spaces about public assemblies. The relation to surveillance and digital space. surveillance on speech in public. listening to conversations-- sneaking
conclusion eavesdropping against presence and developement in public. Cleaning the traces. Collective gatherings and manipulation of tools.
While the speech can be "amplified" online the use of any sound equipment amplifying it in the physical space is not always permitted. "The crowd repeats--or attempts to repeat--the words of the speaker for the benefit of those located in the rear of the crowd who may have difficulty hearing what the speaker is saying. Why not use microphones, or megaphones, you say? In NYC, a sound permit is required in order to use these devices in public, and the police may, or may not grant the permit" (NewYorkRawVideos, 2011, note).
essay2- Keep records of big or not speeches-Transcribing: from a witness tool, to training a tool. What is the importance of this parallel and hidden practice, existing in the writing cultures.
Point A: Trascribing as a witnessing object [write down what will be lost in trials or moments before recording the voice/ political speeches then and today/listening and simultaneous transcribing and then re-edit. Effects and importance of those transcriptions. The content is intense political speeches
evidence1: Nixon, Sojourner Truth, political speeches today, important events written down
evidence2: workshop with first years
evidence3: scripts of music/Clara
Point B: Today's leisure: People transcribing recordings for the tool - open source approaches [random data from novels or random neutral sentences] and companies approaches- exploitation of data]. The content is novels or other random sentences from blogspots or online databases
evidence1: platforms of Google, Mozilla and others/ examples of speech recognition
evidence2: Youtube transcribing. [Possible subtitles in different languages/ live political events and speeches]....listening to conversations
Point C-conclusion? Transcribing as listening to each other and our own voices. contemporary approaches like reading rooms on transcription and possiblities of cultural and social applications. Possible futures [subverting the technology/errors and distortions of the tools/poetical implementations ].
evidence1: read-in
evidence2: ttssr
essay3: live streaming
read_me "streamed generative radio"
The ‘secondary orality’. “At the same time, with telephone, radio, television and various kinds of sound tape, electronic technology has brought us into the age of 'secondary orality'.” (Ong, p.13)
As it can be seen from the Youtube videos of the Occupy Movements the crowd is using a lot of
Conclusion
De-constructing labor/ Radicalize/re-humanize these processes of a mechanical body that has being seen disconnected from its vulnerabilites. Being engaged with the tool and open the process. example: work of lebanese artist
In this chapter I will elaborate on the right on public speech and media practice of transcribing and live streaming that facilitate it. Since the beginning of the human culture the auditory experiences were important for communication and sharing of knowledge. The sound of voice has a strong impact on the people and the spaces where is projected. It is very related to sharing and participating on present time. Speech-making workshops and public assemblies are some examples of the use of voice in public for resistance or empower of the voiceless. Today even though our communication is mediated the need for the embodied voice in public is still important. But how the media technologies influence that?
Body
essay 1- The freedom of speech in public is a common right among most of the democratized countries. Though social, cultural and political restrictions are clamming up groups of people. The physical presence of assemblies and speakers enables this right and the creation of political speheres in public spaces.
point A: the importance of voice and body in the public. Movements of women. gossiping-microphonic
point B: laws and restrictions in NL and european countries publis spaces about public assemblies. The relation to surveillance and digital space. surveillance on speech in public. listening to conversations-- sneaking
conclusion eavesdropping against presence and developement in public. Cleaning the traces. Collective gatherings and manipulation of tools.
While the speech can be "amplified" online the use of any sound equipment amplifying it in the physical space is not always permitted. "The crowd repeats--or attempts to repeat--the words of the speaker for the benefit of those located in the rear of the crowd who may have difficulty hearing what the speaker is saying. Why not use microphones, or megaphones, you say? In NYC, a sound permit is required in order to use these devices in public, and the police may, or may not grant the permit" (NewYorkRawVideos, 2011, note).
essay2- Keep records of big or not speeches-Transcribing: from a witness tool, to training a tool. What is the importance of this parallel and hidden practice, existing in the writing cultures.
Point A: Trascribing as a witnessing object [write down what will be lost in trials or moments before recording the voice/ political speeches then and today/listening and simultaneous transcribing and then re-edit. Effects and importance of those transcriptions. The content is intense political speeches
evidence1: Nixon, Sojourner Truth, political speeches today, important events written down
evidence2: workshop with first years
evidence3: scripts of music/Clara
Point B: Today's leisure: People transcribing recordings for the tool - open source approaches [random data from novels or random neutral sentences] and companies approaches- exploitation of data]. The content is novels or other random sentences from blogspots or online databases
evidence1: platforms of Google, Mozilla and others/ examples of speech recognition
evidence2: Youtube transcribing. [Possible subtitles in different languages/ live political events and speeches]....listening to conversations
Point C-conclusion? Transcribing as listening to each other and our own voices. contemporary approaches like reading rooms on transcription and possiblities of cultural and social applications. Possible futures [subverting the technology/errors and distortions of the tools/poetical implementations ].
evidence1: read-in
evidence2: ttssr
essay3: live streaming
read_me "streamed generative radio"
The ‘secondary orality’. “At the same time, with telephone, radio, television and various kinds of sound tape, electronic technology has brought us into the age of 'secondary orality'.” (Ong, p.13)
As it can be seen from the Youtube videos of the Occupy Movements the crowd is using a lot of
Conclusion
De-constructing labor/ Radicalize/re-humanize these processes of a mechanical body that has being seen disconnected from its vulnerabilites. Being engaged with the tool and open the process. example: work of lebanese artist
