master
simon 5 years ago
parent 18c46f9060
commit 4c7e85b4fb

BIN
pages/.DS_Store vendored

Binary file not shown.

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
</head>
<body>
<main>
<img id="line" src="../archive/gps_drawings/beetroot_to_ciao.svg">
<img id="line" src="gps_drawings/beetroot_to_ciao.svg">
<div class="text">
<h2>Unravelling knots</h2>
<p>The map I've been making by tracking myself over GPS does not display scale, or landmarks, or street names. It doesn't show which way is north, south, east or west.The map I've been making by tracking myself over GPS does not display scale, or landmarks, or street names. It doesn't show which way is north, south, east or west. I use geographic information system software that allows me to accurately position all the .gpx files I upload from my GPS tracker app on my phone.</p>

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
</head>
<body>
<main>
<img id="line" src="../archive/gps_drawings/beetroot_to_p_lions_es.svg">
<img id="line" src="gps_drawings/beetroot_to_p_lions_es.svg">
<div class="text">
</div>
</main>

@ -8,9 +8,19 @@
</head>
<body>
<main>
<img id="line" src="../archive/gps_drawings/beetroot_to_wijnhaven.svg">
<img id="line" src="gps_drawings/beetroot_to_wijnhaven.svg">
<div class="text">
</div>
<div>
<img class="drawing" src="img/contrail_2_1.jpg">
<img class="drawing" src="img/contrail_2_2.jpg">
<img class="drawing" src="img/contrail_2_3.jpg">
<img class="drawing" src="img/contrail_2_4.jpg">
<img class="drawing" src="img/contrail_2_5.jpg">
<img class="drawing" src="img/contrail_2_6.jpg">
<img class="drawing" src="img/contrail_2_7.jpg">
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>beyond the internet and all control diagrams</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<h1>Beyond the Internet and All Control Diagrams<br>
Simone Browne and Zach Blas, January 24, 2017</h1>
<br>
Conversation between Simone Browne and Zach Blas<br>
First published at <a href="https://thenewinquiry.com/beyond-the-internet-and-all-control-diagrams/" target="_blank"> https://thenewinquiry.com/beyond-the-internet-and-all-control-diagrams/</a></p>
<p><i>In an exclusive conversation, surveillance scholar Simone Browne and artist Zach Blas critique various forms of “control diagrams” and imagine a new commons in the space between the Internets network nodes.</i></p>
<p>
<div class="indent">
<i>Contra-Internet Inversion Practice #3: Modeling Paranodal Space</i>(2016)
<br>
<br>
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/188310716?color=ffffff&amp;title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="383" height="215" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
</div>
<p>SIMONE BROWNE: The soundtrack for artist Zach Blas's “Contra-Internet Inversion Practice #3: Modeling Paranodal Space” comes from the corresponding title track to Joe Meek and The Blue Mens 1960 concept album “I Hear a New World.” The album, Meek wrote, is a deliberately “strange record” meant to conjure up rockets, science fiction, moon landings before the first moon landing, as well as “whatever could be up there in outer space.”</p>
<p>Zach, there's a lot that you are questioning and <a href="http://www.e-flux.com/journal/74/59816/contra-internet/" target="_blank">putting forward in this piece</a>: The disappearance of the Internet, the killability of the Internet, Paul Preciados queer concept of constrasexuality, dildotectronics, and a commons to come.</p>
<p>Tell me, Zach, what motivations went into creating the project? Why Meek and The Blue Mens “I Hear a New World,” and how will the contra-Internet get us to the commons to come?</p>
<p>ZACH BLAS: <a href="http://www.zachblas.info/works/contra-internet/" target="_blank"><i>Contra-Internet</i></a> is a series of artworks and writings that I've been working on since 2014. Spanning video, sculpture, installation, and performance, the project confronts the Internet as an instrument for control, state oppression, and accelerated capitalism. Over the next several months, I will be focusing on a video centerpiece, which turns to alternative Internet infrastructures that activists are building around the world. In September 2017, <i>Contra-Internet</i> will premiere as a solo exhibition at Gasworks in London. That said, I began the <i>Contra-Internet</i> project with two questions to use as a basis for research and experimentation:</p>
<p>1) When and how did the Internet transition from a site of immense political potentiality to a premiere arena of control, surveillance, and hegemony?</p>
<p>2) Why is it so difficult to conceive of an alternative or outside to the Internet today?</p>
<p>It seems, on the one hand, that the Internet operates as a kind of totalized condition, constricting what is possible for communicating, gathering, and being together. Popular concepts like “post-Internet” propagate this sentiment: there can no longer be an outside to the Internet when it has already seeped into the very material fabric of contemporary existence. Prophecies of the Internet of things to come promise to secure this understanding of the Internet, as the world itself and the Internet become more and more indistinguishable. That said, it strikes me as queer to desire to fracture this Internet totality, and in fact, on the other hand, many people around the world are practically doing just that, by building infrastructural alternatives to the Internet. These include certain tools that activists, hackers, and artists around the world are building to avoid control and surveillance. Mesh-networking is a powerful example to consider, as it is a networking technology that can function autonomously with no reliance on “the Internet,” and has been used to constitute political alternatives in cities such as Detroit, New York, and Hong Kong.</p>
<p>A working definition of contra-Internet is the refusal of Internet totality, but this is not a simple outright refusal. Rather, it is a refusal of naturalizations, hegemonies, and normalizations of the Internet that have contributed to its transformation into a locus of policing and control. Supplementing this, contra-Internet is also the search for and constitution of Internet alternatives. I consider the examples of alternative infrastructure outlined above as crucial to the contra-Internet because they reveal that social movements no longer necessarily see the Internet as a political horizon;it is, rather, about finding something else. This is where the commons comes in for me, as a collective and open project of thinking, imagining, and building something other than “the Internet.” From an artistic perspective, I would like <i>Contra-Internet</i> to give a particularly queer consistency to this activity, and this must happen not only by documenting Internet alternatives but also by imagining beyond the network form itself.</p>
<p>
<div class="indent">
<i>Contra-Internet Inversion Practice #1: Constituting an Outside (Utopian Plagiarism)</i> (2015)
<br>
<br>
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/121035772?color=ffffff&amp;title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="383" height="215" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
</div>
<p>I have developed this idea through a reworking of Paul Preciados theory of the contrasexual, which takes a similar aim at sexuality. This move from the contrasexual to the contra-Internet could be described as “utopian plagiarism,” which Critical Art Ensemble theorized about in the early 1990s (and which I learned from one of the most important art mentors in my life, Ricardo Dominguez). At the beginnings of a recombinant Internet culture, Critical Art Ensemble imagined a networked mode of sharing and re-writings ideas;of remixing words and images to unearth alternate and minor meanings. This is exactly what the group did with one of their most well known concepts;electronic civil disobedience, created by taking Thoreaus theory of civil disobedience and making it electronic. That said, its not that contra-Internet is a radical break with the contrasexual; rather, it extends that concept and (hopefully) makes something new comprehensible. While Preciado has been a starting point, Ive been quite interested in developing the broader conceptual framework for <i>Contra-Internet</i> out of queer, feminist, and minoritarian thinkers and artists, be it J. K. Gibson-Grahams post capitalist politics, Le Tigres “Get Off the Internet,” or Stefano Harney and Fred Motens undercommons. I believe their teachings in seeking alternatives to domination and control are of the utmost importance here.</p>
<p>This brings me to the video you mentioned. I am in the process of making a series of videos for the <i>Contra-Internet</i> project that take place within the technical, material, and visual confines of the computer;namely, the computer I use, a Mac laptop. These videos are kind of like performances, and they attempt to invert the logics, visualities, and software environments that condition and delimit the discursive, practical, and creative possibilities of the computer (again, this idea of inversion comes from Preciados “inversion practices” in his <i>Manifiesto Contrasexual</i>). The computer is a starting point for writing, imagining, and experimenting, so it felt crucial to literally start here. In the <i>Contra-Internet Inversion Practice #3</i>, I am exploring what going beyond the network form looks like.</p>
<p>To do this, I import a well-known distributed network diagram;the kind of network diagram often used to describe the Internet;into three-dimensional modeling software, and then I peel away and discard the network diagram, in order to liberate the space bound to this configuration. Several ideas led me to this point: I have been very taken by Preciados figuring of the dildo. For Preciado, the dildo is a diagrammatic form that can practically guide us to contrasexuality (the dildo is not a phallus or anything patriarchal for Preciado). My question here is what might the dildotectonics of the Internet be? What I mean by this is: if the dildo is an adequate form to unleash contrasexuality, what form might this be for the Internet? Certainly not the network form.</p>
<div class="indent">
<img src="images/paranode-line.jpg" alt="paranode-line" width="383" height="400"/>
<p>Paul Barans 1964 distributed network diagram, with a paranode pointed out.</p>
</div>
<p>In a recent conversation with digital humanities scholar David Berry, media theorist Alexander Galloway proposes the idea of reticular pessimism, a criticism of the network as a dominant model for interpreting reality. Galloway suggests that today the network, through its dominance and ubiquity, forecloses the utopian. The reticular pessimist is unable to grasp the world and its potentialities as something other than a network. As an artist, this is a provocative claim to consider, as it evokes the beyond-or-other-than the network as something needed but not yet fully known. For me, this is where imagination must begin. Network theorist Ulises Ali Mejias offers the second step to this disavowal of the network form through his concept of the paranode, which he explains as the space that networks leave out or exclude. I have a hunch that the paranodal is one way to conceptualize the dildotectonics of the Internet. I am attracted to the concept of the paranode because it calls forth at least two militancies: the practical work of building infrastructural alternatives (which are often still network alternatives), and the intellectual or artistic task of making comprehensible and imaginable that which is beyond the network form.</p>
<div class="indent">
<i>Contra-Internet Inversion Practice #2: Social Media Exodus (Response)</i> (2015)
<br>
<br>
<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/121057237?color=ffffff&amp;title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="383" height="215" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
</div>
<p>So finally, the 1960 song “I Hear a New World” by Joe Meek, which plays throughout <i>Practice #3</i>. It has always struck me as inextricably queer, before I even knew anything about Meek. Of course, theres his biography: a gifted sound engineer and closeted gay man whose life ended in suicide and murder (he lived in England during a time when homosexuality was illegal, and he also killed the proprietor of his flat before he shot himself). The song;and the entire album it appears on;is an outer space fantasy, one that projects outer space, it can be inferred, as outside the confines of Meeks difficult present on Earth. The music is futuristic, a bit kitschy, haunting, and filled with desire. Its the anticipation and longing that really gets me in this song;the hearing a new world but not yet there, sensing something to come and not fully knowing what that might be; being attuned to another possibility. When the paranodal space is freed from the distributed network diagram, all of these sentiments and feelings of Meeks music really coming rushing in for me. It is Meeks haunting of the paranodal space that makes me hear a new (queer) world.</p>
<p>SIMONE BROWNE: I also want to talk about a different project of yours, <i>Face Cages</i>, as another moment of this queer consistency. But first a primer of sorts on biometric technology, which we can think of as code or a set of instructions employed to render the body, living or otherwise, as machine-readable information.</p>
<p>This information; abstracted from parts, pieces, and performances of the human body;is then put to work in the service of consumer products, military applications, gaming, identification documents, and a variety of other applications. Biometrics, as the computational representation of the physical, behavioral and, more recently, affective attributes of the human body, are of many types: the face, for example, and the variety of biometric modalities when it comes to measures of the human face, including retina scans, iris recognition, thermal face imaging that detects the supposedly unique emission of a faces heat pattern, and the more commonly known facial recognition that measures the spacing between the eyes, nose bridge, and more.</p>
<p>Your video installation <i>Face Cages</i> is the structure of the algorithm rendered as a three-dimensional metal cage. <i>Face Cages</i> makes it so that facial recognition cant be reconciled with its use to ban, expel, and account for certain humans bodies at borders, in prisons, or on kill lists. I see the metal work of the cages and I think of iron masks, copper fastenings, and metal collars used to torture, gag, muzzle, and restrict enslaved people when it came to breathing, speaking, eating, or escape.</p>
<div class="indent">
<p>Featuring Elle Mehrmand, micha cárdenas, Paul Mpagi Sepuya, and ZACH BLAS:</p>
<img src="http://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-1-zach-blas_portrait-383x575.jpg" width="383" height="575"></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-73802" src="http://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-2-elle-mehrmand_portrait-383x575.jpg" alt="face-cage-2-elle-mehrmand_portrait-383x575" width="383" height="575" srcset="https://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-2-elle-mehrmand_portrait-383x575.jpg 733w, https://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-2-elle-mehrmand_portrait-383x575-533x800.jpg 533w" sizes="(max-width: 383px) 100vw, 383px" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-73803" src="http://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-3-micha-cardenas_portrait-383x575.jpg" alt="face-cage-3-micha-cardenas_portrait-383x575" width="383" height="575" srcset="https://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-3-micha-cardenas_portrait-383x575.jpg 733w, https://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-3-micha-cardenas_portrait-383x575-533x800.jpg 533w" sizes="(max-width: 383px) 100vw, 383px" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-73804" src="http://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-4-paul-mpagi-sepuya_portrait-383x575.jpg" alt="face-cage-4-paul-mpagi-sepuya_portrait-383x575" width="383" height="575" srcset="https://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-4-paul-mpagi-sepuya_portrait-383x575.jpg 733w, https://thenewinquiry.com/app/uploads/2017/01/face-cage-4-paul-mpagi-sepuya_portrait-383x575-533x800.jpg 533w" sizes="(max-width: 383px) 100vw, 383px" /></p>
</div>
<br>
<p>This was especially so when I watched the four <i>Face Cages</i> performance <a href="“http://www.zachblas.info/works/face-cages/“" target="_blank">videos</a>. The masks restricted their breathing so that it was labored. Each inhalation seemed tense. Each exhalation the same. You call this installation an endurance performance, and for me it brings to mind Frantz Fanons “combat breathing” that he writes about in <i>A Dying Colonialism</i>. The suffocating corporeal effect of colonization is one felt not only at the site of occupied territory, but experienced physiologically on the body as what Fanon names “occupied breathing.” It is respiration as unfreedom.</p>
<p>The endurance performance work of <i>Face Cages</i> is that of four queer artists: you, micha cárdenas, Elle Mehrmand and Paul Mpagi Sepuya. This makes the endurance work of <i>Face Cages</i> a form of combat breathing in an anti-queer and transantagonistic world, where biometric technologies enable the growth of mass surveillance and incarceration. How do you see <i>Face Cages</i> and your other projects that critique surveillance technologies as part of an anti-colonial queer politics? As undoing, in some way, enduring and ongoing settler-colonial structures?</p>
<p>ZACH BLAS: The central question of <i>Face Cages</i> is how to intensify and dramatize the violence of biometrics. I chose to pursue this through the ways in which biometrics abstracts bodies. This can technically (and I would argue politically) be defined as capture. I particularly focused on the landmark plotting technique of facial analysis that generates bright, colorful, and minimal geometries over the face, as a seemingly perfect calculation of its specificities. I call this a biometric diagram, and it appears as something primarily aesthetic. Yet, I wanted to make explicit that this diagram is not just an aesthetic abstraction of body parts but also a diagram of control. Thus, I think of the biometric diagram in a Foucauldian sense, as a mapping of power. While Foucault once described the panopticon as a major diagram of power in the 19th century, I think biometrics is one of todays major control diagrams. As such, this mode of abstraction has an explicit and unavoidable collusion with global surveillance and the prison-industrial complex.</p>
<p>I decided to recast the biometric diagram as a face cage, which I developed from the <a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/when-biometrics-fail" target="_blank">writings</a> of feminist communications scholar Shoshana Amielle Magnet, particularly her phrase “a cage of information.” Biometrics as a cage of information highlights two key points: 1) criminalization, as biometrics are first and foremost a technology of policing, and 2) disembodiment, because biometrics promotes a conception of identity that can be digitally extracted from the surface of the body. Alternately, embodiment, as media theorist Kate Hayles has argued, is not algorithmic.</p>
<p>In <i>Face Cages</i>, I took four biometric diagrams of faces and transformed them into metal cages. Metal intensifies, makes heavy, the physicality of biometric abstraction, but I also used metal to evoke aspects of policing, such as handcuffs and prison bars. I worked with three other artists that currently embody those persons most vulnerable to biometric scrutiny, in terms of ethnicity, gender, nationality, and race. I produced face cages based on our biometric data, and when worn, they were remarkably ill-fitting, causing pain and discomfort, even though these cages should sit perfectly on the surfaces of our faces, following biometric logic.</p>
<p>We wore our face cages in endurance performances for a video camera;the prompt being to wear it until you cant bear it any longer. These performances aim to dramatize the struggle between embodiment and biometric capture, as algorithmic abstraction becomes hyperphysical, felt, violent, painful, and endured over time. Your reference to Fanons occupied breathing is important here, because I made <i>Face Cages</i> with the hope that it would expose the long histories of colonialism, oppression, and violence inherent to biometric technologies. Here, I am reminded of another concept Im doing much work around these days, which is feminist science and technology studies scholar Donna Haraways “informatics of domination.” In her “A Cyborg Manifesto,” Haraway renames white capitalist patriarchy as the informatics of domination, “the scary new networks” that are united by “a common move;the translation of the world into a problem of coding.” I think one of the goals of recent queer, feminist, anti-racist, and anti-colonial work that addresses technologies like biometrics (in critical writing and the arts) is to demonstrate how this informatic coding impacts, violates, and destroys minoritarian lives.</p>
<p>Another way to explain how biometric capture dominates is through its attempt to obliterate opacity. For a number of years, I have been taken with opacity as an anti-biometric concept that is particularly sensitive to minoritarian lives;I am even currently writing a book titled <i>Informatic Opacity</i>. I have developed such an idea from the writings of Édouard Glissant, whose claim that we must “clamor for the right to opacity for everyone” could be a slogan for biometric times. Opacity, for Glissant, is a vast and robust conception; it is at once ethical, political, aesthetic, and even ontological. Glissant gives us multiple definitions and tendencies to consider: “Opaqueness is a positive value to be opposed to any pseudo-humanist attempt to reduce us to the scale of some universal model” (how can this not bring to mind biometrics?); “that which protects the Diverse we call opacity”; and he even states that opacity is the very aesthetics of the Other. Glissant also distinguishes opacity from difference, in that opacity exceeds the terrain of identity and identification.</p>
<p>With a concept like “informatic opacity,” I am interested in addressing how current struggles for opacity must confront both humans and machines. I explored what informatic opacity might look like in an earlier artwork titled <i>Facial Weaponization Suite</i>, in which I produced masks in public workshops based on the aggregated facial data of participants. The resultant masks;a kind of collectivization of the face in data;could not be detected by biometric facial recognition technologies as human faces. Of course, there are other theoretical ways to think about opacity today: queerness as a mode of escape, feminist imperceptibility, black fugitivity, or your own term “dark sousveillance” all come to mind.</p>
<p>SIMONE BROWNE: Yes, there is a part in Glissants “For Opacity” from his <i>Poetics of Relation</i> where he argues that Western thoughts pathological demand for understanding is underwritten by hierarchies and a “requirement of transparency.” He writes that “in order to understand and thus accept you, I have to measure your solidity with the ideal scale providing me with grounds to make comparisons and, perhaps, judgments, I have to reduce.” He says we must do away with “the scale.”</p>
<p>Theres another part of <i>Poetics of Relation</i> that I want to cite here, as a way to close. It comes from its beginnings, “The Open Boat.” In it, Glissant speaks of metal balls and chains gone green and what the slave ship left in its wake. Importantly, he reminds us of why we must stay with poetry, with that which expresses our freedoms. So I like that you mentioned earlier about being attuned to another possibility. I think thats what Glissant left us with: the places, the means and the ways to start looking for other possibilities.</p>
<p>ZACH BLAS: Thanks for highlighting Glissants critique of scale, which, as you indicate, can also refer to measure, classification, and categorization. I am currently at work on a few new art projects that continue to expand upon the political implications of algorithmic measure in capture technologies and security apparatuses.</p>
<p>I have returned to biometrics after recently moving to the United Kingdom. Before arriving in London, I had to apply for a “Biometric Residence Permit,” which is the U.K.s official title for a work visa, and as part of this process I was required to attend a “biometric enrolment” appointment where facial and fingerprint data is gathered. When I received the online notification to attend my biometrics appointment in New York City, I was struck by the following statement:</p>
<p>“This is either to submit documentation and/or to enable us to collect your biometrics, unless you are bio-exempt.”</p>
<p><i>Unless you are bio-exempt</i>. What a fantastical, impossible category! If you look through more official literature on biometrics from the U.K. Home Office, you will come to understand that children and amputees with one or no fingers are bio-exempt, but so are diplomats. If you look more closely at this material, you will also notice that Home Office alternates between the term bio-exempt and the phrase “exempt from control.” I am finding my way towards a work titled bio-exempt, in which I aim to pull out all the terms various meanings, such as biopolitical control: who has the legal right to be exempt from their embodied self and who has the right to remain unmarked, not indexed.</p>
<p>In a second work titled <i>The Prison-House</i>, I am reimagining Fredric Jamesons conception of “the prison-house of language” as the prison-house of capture. I want to ask something like: If the architectural diagrams of Jeremy Benthams panopticon broadly mapped power and discipline in a previous era, what might such architectural renderings and diagrams look like now? To do this, I am making a series of immersive installations that collapse secret interrogation rooms, torture chambers, and the world of machine vision into one another to dramatize a “prison-house” structure that is mobile, flexible, often invisible, and thoroughly informatic.</p>
<p>Lastly, and perhaps of a more utopian sentiment, Im working on a video-essay and installation (and collective!) titled <i>The Outside</i>. The outside is an idea often evoked today by speculative realism, object-oriented ontology, and others focused on the nonhuman turn, united in their pursuit to get out of what philosopher Quentin Meillassoux describes as the correlationist trap, that is, understanding the world only through the human ability to grasp, know, and perceive it. The other side of correlationism, Meillassoux proclaims, is “the great outdoors.” Yet, there is a more minoritarian outside that has been operative and at work before the rise of these other intellectual endeavors, oriented towards undoing totalities, making alternatives, and combating domination. Consider “the black outdoors,” discussed by Fred Moten and Saidiya Hartman; the post-capitalist politics in J. K. Gibson-Grahams writings, when they argue that there is an outside to capitalism; Donna Haraways insistence that “there might indeed be a feminist science”; or even George Michaels sex-positive “Outside,” when he sings, “Lets go outside.” This outside might return us to Glissant again; as a way of being outside of “the ideal scale,” which goes to your point Simone, about freedoms and relation.</p>
<p>
<div class="indent">
<p>George Michael “Outside”</p>
<br>
<iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gwZAYdHcDtU" width="383" height="215" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>biotopology</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial=scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<h1>Biotopology 1972<br>
Warren Brodey</h1>
<br>
First published in <em>Radical Software</em>, Volume 1, Issue no. 4, pp 4-7, 1970<br>
<div class="indent">
<p>The following are excerpts from </p>
<p>1) a manuscript/letter recently received from Warren Brodey on the topology of klein form systems and </p>
<p>2) a transcription of the audio portion of a two-hour video tape made by Andy Mann and Darcy Umstedter in which Warren relates klein form systems to bioptemes (biological optimizing systems) and contrasts these with mechy max (mechanical maximizing systems) which he thinks predominates in the mismanagement of the earth's ecology in ignorance or disregard of context [the extent to which all things (systems) are related].</p>
</div>
<p>TOPOLOGY is a non-metric elastic geometry. It is concerned with transformation of shapes and properties such as nearness, inside and outside. (Paul Ryan, <em>Radical Software</em> 3).</p>
<p>Compare the kind of space people are in who ask "Do you follow my line of reasoning?" and the space of those who ask, "Can you get into the space I am in?"</p>
<p>"Can you get into the space I am in" means asking the other people to loop through your style, your information arrangements, your habits, your epistemology, your language, and how you deal with the unanticipated.</p>
<p>Infolding: Imagine working through into depths with the help of a media that provides instantaneous feedback and thereby allows infolding with time, memory, energy, relation, no longer in the image of print. "Do you follow my line of reasoning?"</p>
<p>I am not a TV freak. I am a person engaged with a group in synthesizing actual plastic materials that use the <em>ecothink</em> in their working. The going is slow but the space is now clear in my head. We taped a discussion — each of us trying to catch what we thought had meaning, I might catch your face when you registered surprise at what your hands had just built. On the next infolding we would discuss what you expected and your surprise. We would use the TV to penetrate in depth the experience even as it happened and to penetrate the experience of the experience—the meta experience.</p>
<p>Paul talked about this in the last issue of <em>Radical Software</em>:</p>
<div class="indent">
<p>Taping something new with yourself is a part uncontained</p>
<p>To replay the tape for yourself is to contain it in your perceptual system</p>
<p>Taping yourself playing with the replay is to contain both on a new tape</p>
<p>To replay for oneself tape of self with tape of self is to contain that process in a new dimension</p>
<p>Parts left out of that process are parts uncontained</p>
<p>All of this is mapable on computer graphic terminals!</p>
</div>
<p>Infolding as it is described by many creators of <em>Radical Software</em> is really a radical, a powerful, a timely, and a materially significant happening. It takes us into a new space. Some of the readers, particularly Paul, would look at the tape we were making if this were an infolding session and show me my stubbornness in not seeing what they were telling me a year ago or more. But our group has been working in the same space with different media in hand — a responsive touch media instead of a visual one. Our child has asked for its launching. It is a frail being, almost unborn...</p>
<p>Now I would like you to take the trip into our space...</p>
<p>Do you anticipate enough value in this trip to sacrifice a sock of a stocking... for the sake of finding a way to stream through our new space? Do you? If you do peel off a stocking and move with me.</p>
<p>We can make a simple, soft klein bottle or klein form, and it will provide us with a simplex with which to synthesize complex structures which are "lively" — like living structures.</p>
<br>
<picture class="drawing">
<source media="(max-width: 1280px)" srcset="readings_images/klein_form_640.jpg">
<!-- image for screens below 1280px wide -->
<img class="drawing" src="readings_images/klein_form_640.jpg" />
<!-- fallback: used in PDF-->
</picture>
<br>
<p>First, cut the toe out of a stocking, stretch hose is better. Cut a slit near the knee; make it about the diameter of the toe. Fold the stocking over back on itself; put the toe in through the slit. Pull the toe free edge through (but not all the way through) til the free edge at the toe and thigh are adjacent. Now get a needle and thread. Sew the slit to the stocking coming through it. Sew the toe free edge to the thigh free edge. (See diagram of klein form)</p>
<p>Reach down the double tube. Your hand will go down the contained tube (what was the toe) through the slit to where it is uncontained and then around into the containing space between the toe and the thigh of the garment.</p>
<p>We are in very different territory.</p>
<p>In the past you started out with points; points went to lines; lines swept a surface in two dimensional forms. When you went to three dimensional forms the first form was a sphere, because that's the simplest; then from a sphere [you can make a hole in a sphere and stretch the sphere out (as far as topology is concerned, you're allowed to stretch everything)] you went to a donut; a donut to be a donut had to have a hole in the middle, and you could stretch it as much as you wanted but it still had a hole in it.</p>
<p>The klein form is different. There's no inside; there's no outside. Instead you have a contained tube and an uncontained tube, a contained hole and an uncontained hole from which you can make interlocking klein forms in a chain ... Any part of the form can touch, contact, communicate with, flow with any other part, and the parts, the whole, in time flow through each other in a way the donut and sphere cannot. We have a quality of continuousness in the form and at the same time intracontainment or infolding; we have intrinsic to the form identifiable relationships that are not diadic (inside, outside) but are always at least triadic (context). There is no central governance or cooperative communication. There is enormous variation — the basic structure is so informationally rich that no two systems are sufficiently similar to value a same "thing" at the same time — indeed there are no "things" except as special cases.</p>
<p>The beauty about the klein form is that for the first time you are not captured by spheres or donuts, You can talk about a jet of air that goes up through the part of the klein form that is in contact with the external environment (where it is uncontained) and then becomes contained within itself and continues. For the first time you have a form which allows you to talk about something contained within itself ... if I put my hand on my knee it forms a kind of hole where the "outside" is in complete contact with the arm and where the energy from my hand goes back through my body and <em>alters</em> what happens "outside" again as it passes from within my body down through my shoulder ... I start to have a loop which is partly uncontained that is, really senses that which is outside itself, and partly contained, that is, it senses itself wilhin itself. It is a form that begins to have the capacity to know about its own behavior as it behaves "outside," that is, in simple connection with the environment, and as it behaves "inside," as informational representation to the environment within itself.</p>
<p>Paul spoke of how the klein worm has a capacity for anticipation and we find that anticipation has meaning only if we are considering a time-form geometry, a
geometry of relations rather than things (no longer Newtonian geometry but an Einsteinian time-space form, a form that does not define time but is time that is
by definition) ... ("Taping something new with yourself is a part uncontained. To replay the tape for yourself is to contain it in your perceptual system ...")</p>
<p>When you model with a klein form you have to change your head around, because for the first time you can talk about time as influencing behavior. Consider the
klein forms as being able to breathe. Let us say it is made of material with local energy that allows it to expand and contract. Image waves of contraction flowing in this material. The part that loops out into the environment — the unanticipated context — recurs through itself comparing the return with the rhythmic response on adjacent recursions. It changes its waveform to better maintain its intentional behavior. It is permeated by context. It has no walls. Yet it uses its structural infolding for maintaining itself changing in a sufficiently regular way to find new relations.</p>
<p>In biological systems rhythms pass through themselves interfering, augmenting, amplifying by setting resonant rhythms going which soak up energy which would otherwise be lost to relevant work. Rhythms that are more intracontained will tend to null out rhythms that are not convergent or that cannot find energies at the time they are needed...</p>
<p>To put it another way: Let's say you have a colony of birds and this colon) of birds is in a mountain valley almost filling up I he mountain valley, and the birds behave in the colony in a particular way that allows them to propagate so there are many more birds. The colon) then becomes crowded, and individual birds start to behave in a crowded way; the colony is then changed. The way the colony changes influences the way the birds change. The way the birds change influences the way the colony changes, but the birds change and the colon) s change are not simple additions; the colony is not made up of a million birds, nor is a bird made up of a colony, because there now starts to be in time an interaction, an active dynamic interaction between the single unit and the mass unit. The dynamic is not simply dividing the mass into the units. All of our theory and governmentology has been that the individual is simply a member of the class called mass. Now, however, we start to move to what the interaction is between the individual and the mass in a way that takes in the context which is beyond either the individual or the mass, that is, that which is contained around that totality; so we have always a system of three at least. You always have a context.</p>
<p>In the past all of our logic in all of our theory, in all of our ways of thinking, has been bound up with systems of two, systems basically true and false. But we know now that there's no such thing as high holy eternal noon, the time when all things are pure, because <em>things are always changing, because time always exists</em>. The klein form helps you get your head into a space where time starts to exist and where (lungs are constantly in dynamic motion with a different kind of dynamic relationship than you get if you're talking about spheres. The concern used to be: how do you get the mass contained in the single member; how do you get the class contained in a member of the class. You could talk about how members made up the class but you could never talk about how the class made up the members; you were never able to talk about it with any geometric representation. But now people can talk about this in terms of triadic logic (the man who taught me what I know is Warren McCulloch. and Warren was searching for triadic logic in asking questions about things); that is, how do you set up a contexual logic so that your experiments aren't for the purpose of destroying context. Usually experiments are done so as to eliminate context ... Now, if you eliminate context you're then into what I call <em>mechy max</em> systems. Mechy max systems are mechanical maximizing systems which operate by Newtonian physics, which operate like a cluck with its clockworks. This is what Buckminster Fuller was talking about. There is for the clock a winder which is the energy source and there is the energv sync which is the fact that the hands of the clock go around; between the source and the sync are a number of levers of various sorts: wheels, ratchets, the great dumpers and the like, but the output never effects the input; there is always infinite source and infinite sync, infinite beginning and infinite end, and we find now that this is no longer a reasonable way to think. Now Bucky talks about spaceship earth and how man has to take it over, and I say bullshit, because man doesn't want to take anything over, because man is a part of the universe but he is not controller of the universe. Once you start to think that you must take it over it becomes like a Japanese garden. A Japanese garden is a garden that is arranged for man's purposes and basically has none of the mystery, none of the uncertainty ... (literally I have talked with people from NASA, people who are high up in government who think of our taking over the whole earth, artificial climate, artificial creation of environments ... of mechy max corning in, destroying the environment, and then recreating it ...</p>
<p>The thing that you learn when you start to play the game of building biological systems (what I call <em>biological optimizing systems or bioptemes</em>) is that there is a context which man has nothing to do with and is not in any way in control of. There's no way to recreate biological systems, because in the recreation you do what you did with hybrid corn; you make a better com except that all the corn is exactly the same as the next; if any disease comes along it wipes out everything. There's no flexibility; <em>man-made ecology is of necessity a low variety system because it only contains that variety which man can conceive of. An ecological system is a high variety system</em> ... We're making "toys" which help us to think about ecology. In these biological systems that we're trying to create, however, we don't have control of the total system — we don't have control of the tools that we've built. "They" have a life of their own which is insensitive to the life that forms around them; each one is different from the next and if some part doesn't work it doesn't stop operating.</p>
<p>However, in a mechy max system, which is a clockwork, if one wheel stops turning the whole thing, because it's like a simple chain, and there's a weakest link, stops. If you have a densely interconnected system within itself where all the parts are connected with all the other parts, then all ihese parts are less densely connected with that which is outside which is the context; no two systems, then, are alike, and if any part dies, which it will, inevitably (because in some ways you try to make them as improperly, as inaccurately, as sloppily as you're able} ... if any part dies then the thing just has a different way of going about its behaviors — it may not have the same behaviors, it may not have the same purposes, it may not achieve the same purposes, it may have different purposes ... but death has occured naturally and in one clump which leaves a hole, and that hole is taken up by the regeneration and evolution of other species which fill the hole.</p>
<p>In mechy max systems there are no holes because everything is as uniform as possible.</p>
<p>I started out as a physician and with mechy max biology, the biology of low information systems, the biology of vision: you see something, but you're not aware of the <em>effect</em> of your seeing; you smell something and you're not aware of the effect of your smelling; you hear something and you're not aware of the <em>effect</em> of your hearing - your hearing is not active (you're not aware of its activity though actually it is active), but with touch and the sensuous world you start to get into if you touch something, then you touch it, it touches you; you move it, it moves you; you change it, it changes you, and it's happening simultaneously. You are no longer in the world of weak interconnection — when you're into densely connected systems you're into everything that happens effecting everything else that happens; when you're talking about densely interconnected systems you're talking always about <em>effect</em>. ... In eastern philosophy you talk about breathing out as well as breathing in; in western philosophy you talk about breathing in — everything is in; everything is need, everything is desire. And <em>effect</em>, breathing out and the sense of breathing, the whole sense of rhythming is something that eastern philosophy brings us close to. Western philosophy is the world of things ...</p>
<p>In mechy max systems, low variety systems, you have as I said toys which operate like clockwork. There are carnivore mechy max's that eat people and eat animals — military machines of all sorts; and there are herbivore mechy max's — the tractors and the cranes and the giant earth movers which cat up all the greenery and spit out lines of sugar cane, of corn, fields of cultivated plants that are domesticated plants. You have a whole field of one kind like a whole group of people of one kind. The herbivores also stack up mud into houses and into new apartment buildings and they proliferate more mechy max within this; washing machines, heaters; the mechy max have gradually been taking over the people and we have what we call plastic people, mechy max people. Biological systems become like Newtonian machines. People become like Newtonian machines. Their logic is like that.</p>
<p>Now the way this happened mostly is by the omnivores: the omnivores eat the herbivores, eat the carnivores. The omnivores are mostly made out of paper, out of form: they are called Internal Revenue Service, Social Security, health insurance, health center, mental health center. They are places where people are conditioned to act in mechy max ways; they are places where plants are conditioned so they will all be exactly the same as each other. Simplification in the mechy max style occurs by reducing the information to as low a level as possible by reducing the consequences of the environment as much as possible. The clock is so set up that the metals all counterbalance each other so that the heat changes <em>will not effect</em> the movement of the wheels and is not context or environment sensitive in any respect, that is, to reduce context sensitive. Biological systems operate quite to the contrary. Whatever happens, they have within them the capacity to cope so the animal is not taught, or he is not genetically made up to deal with a particular streaming of water; he's brought up to cope in such away as to loop again the behavior of that which is outside himself, and go back and reconsider what was outside himself <em>in terms</em> of his behavior, and <em>recycle</em> his own behavior through himself <em>altering</em> it in such a way so as to maintain survival, or to evolve survival so as to relate to the external world.</p>
<p>Biological systems are not all made the same. People may seem in many ways more like each other than they are like monkeys or rabbits, but even person has entirely different characteristics from the next, except that these differences coalesce or converge each in its own recipe to mate people who are somewhat similar. Inherently though there are enormous differences between people. Some of that difference is not obvious. Some of the flexibility in any natural system is not apparent because it's not being used. It's stored, like with wild wheat. Wild wheat looks like wheat but all the different kinds of wild wheat have a different genetic structure, more different than wheat that s been carefully selected like the wheat we see in mechy max books — <em>quality controlled</em>. Everyone knows exactly what kind of wheat they're going to get. In real wild systems there is enormous flexibility because many different kinds of components mix in such a way that the mixture is convergent towards a product or towards a creature which is sort of naturally similar — the manifest behavior and rhythms and identity is similar, but what makes it up is different. The wildness is not used and is non-apparent, but if something happens to the environment the wild potential still allows changes to occur because the flexibility is there available. A kind of wild system has a capacity for maintaining itself that a domesticated system does not.</p>
<p>In the mechy max system you try to maximize particular behavior, simplistic behavior so as to accomplish the one simple purpose which may be for instance to scrape up earth; scraping up earth in such a way so as In destroy all of the green things; all of the worms and ants; the earth boring mechy max truck or scraping thing doesn't pay any attention to what it picks up It tries to plant but it always replants in such a way as to destroy the variety: a meadow is not like a grassy lawn. There were meadows, meadows had bushes, the bushes lived by trees, and all of these, each part, was related to all other parts, and if anything came along, a big wind came along, it might destroy some of the trees but the bushes and the small trees would grow up again and if some grass eating thing came alone well, there are other forms of grass, but now you build lawns ...</p>
<p>One cannot talk about genetics, Gregory Bateson's point, in terms of classes of animals and creatures, you can't talk about the genetics of deer or the evolution of deer you have to talk about the evolution or genetics of deer in relation to grass and the evolution of plants. You can't separate the evolution of one particular aspect of life from another because when you think biologically then the whole world becomes interconnected and everything effects everything else, and everything contains evervthing else, and even beyond the world if you want to be spiritual about it, so that all things are in contact with everything else.</p>
<p>We are trying to develop a language of becoming; not a language of explaining which is what science has done, but a language of describing becoming which is what ecology's about, and not even explaining becoming, since everyone has within them the sense of the whole world in all of its parts. Our intuitive sense of becoming can be very rich provided we give up the mythology of the mechy max.</p>
<p>We're developing systems now that operate by touch, so if you touch them you intervene in their loops. They are not paying attention to you. They're paying attention to that you've interfered with their usual mode of operation. To reestablish their mode of operations they have to behave in particular ways that allow them to continue to exist in their style which is very different from their sensing you. They don't sense you as you, as a plant doesn't sense a tree as a tree. It senses that it has more shade and it must grow in a different way to find its sun. The other plant, the tree, in a way presses upon it. it becomes environment to it just as we are environment to each other and for the first time we can now talk about humans as environments to the rest of the world, or humans as environments to animals — we don't think of ourselves as the center of the world anymore; we're just environment, and there are many environments.</p>
<p>Mechy max organizations are doomed at this point because thev're not capable of managing the high information level that people want and need in order to survive. We have to accept that we are continuous with biological systems and have never been otherwise. In biological systems control is explicit. The mechy max myth is government control of the people and the government is a set of forms (I'm not talking about human people — they lost control of the government); the government is a mechy max system like a great earth moving device that now moves people about like a big clock that has all sorts of ratchets and all the people have to fit into ratchet position; literally in government the positions you have are not related to the people — they're related to the positions in the forms and forms do not have power. People have power, so power to the people is a joke because the people already have the power, but they haven't exercised it ...</p>
<p>Fuller is trying to reprogram the mechy max system to make it work better and my statement goes this way — the system is self-destructing now and the myth that the mechy max have power must now be destructed rather quickly among people. It's this attitude, that the mechy max have ultimate power, that the big machines
have ultimate power, that has put us where we have been eating up all sorts of garbage, the machines put out in order to keep the system going ... so we eat chicklets ...</p>
<p>I went through the stores and through the city recently (I've been living and working in the country lately and getting along on very little money) and looked at the whole city in terms of the destruct that's going on because all the products that are made are really just a bi-product of talk — the mechy max omnivores is a paper system and its single purpose is tally; tally is money; money is just keeping tally; mechy max operates by keeping tally; the game has been how you maintain the tally as gross national product for example, population rate for example, interest rates for example — these are all tally forms, banking, insurance ... all parasitic operations are tally systems of the mechy max— the money sy stem. This is not wealth. Wealth is the capacity of any organism to obtain that which is necessary for its own survival, and more than that to obtain that which is necessary to optimize its evolution and to maintain a kind of evolutionary stability that allows everything the whole world over to continue to prosper in a way that's healthy ...</p>
<p>I'm not talking about getting rid of all mechy max, however; (man's controlling nature was perfectly fine as long as he didn't have too much influence; it is just that the proliferation of the mechy max has become so enormous that the destruct not only of the mechy max but of the total earth is now possible); we are talking about biological optimizing systems, A maximum is where you try and get more and more and more; it grows and grows and grows; the bigger it is the better it is. If you don't think of optimal size, schooling is to pour more and more into your head and you no longer think of optimal pouring into your head in relationship to experience. There <em>are</em> optimal positions where you would have some mechy max but they wouldn't have grown like a cancer. Cancers kill their host and after a while the cancer dies because the person who has the cancer dies. Well the met In max at this point, the industrial system, the tally svstem, is like cancer. It is now proceeding to kill its host which is the earth ...</p>
<p>Up until now we haven't had anything to take the place of the mechy max mythology. We haven't had a sense of living systems, biological systems, being a totality; that the earth is a biological system; that the rocks are biological systems; that they're alive; that everything is alive but there are some things that seem much less alive; those are the rocks, the air. We must talk about these as special cases of living things which man basically has very little connection with because they're so different from man and he hardly comprehends their aliveness just as we don't comprehend really the aliveness of crickets. We comprehend better the aliveness of mice because mice are more like us — thev re mammals: we don't comprehend reptiles; we don't comprehend birds as well as we do monkeys, because the metaphor of any biological system is itself, because it is self-referent and self-organizing ... We were talking alwut the klein form; about effects at a distance returning to be infolded. That is, any biological system makes noise — it does things which are sort of trial and error and which don't get anywhere; that are fairly random. Those things which are random by definition don't persist: those things which converge into a behavior help to maintain the particular "thing" that has been going through trial and error behavior. If these converge, then the resultant behavior persists and we don't call it random anymore. Randomness or noise is the trial and error of biological systems.</p>
<p>Mechy max people proceed by considering things in a modular form — houses are ticky tack all like each other — or in uniform form. That is, all the ocean is like all the rest of the ocean. It's possible to dump atomic waste into the ocean because you know it will be diluted by the total ocean — but this does not occur. Atomic waste that's been dumped moves around in <em>clumps</em> in the ocean. It maintains its integrity; it stays together. The fish are alive. They concentrate the mercury and the mercury goes up the food chain and gets concentrated. Atomic waste gets concentrated. The world is of clumps and all the chimps are different — clumps of people are just different kinds of people.</p>
<p>The idea of clumps is very important because part of the mechy max mythology is that things start off as uniform and then develop into highly differentiated sets. This is not so. Everything starts out as highly differentiated from the outset though there are holes, discontinuities, which may be invaded by one set or another. Life processes operate against things becoming uniform and operate towards things becoming more highly differentiated.</p>
<p>One of the most fascinating problems is what happens when there is no leadership. In our cells there is no leader, but mechy max thinks of genetics as a great leadership system (as if genetics operates separately from what happens in the womb — what the mother ate, what kind of life she was leading).</p>
<p>You must start out with the fact that there are clumps. (Only God could organize from zero with everything uniform — that was in the mind of the religious people who organized from zero ... it's interesting he organized in seven days, in rhythms.) ...</p>
<p>Let's say you have a group of people together who are not together because there is a leader, but <em>are</em> a leaderless group. After a while they'll organize so that they get jobs done and sometimes they'll organize without a leader; sometimes they'll have a leader for a particular function — sometimes for a day or a month; all of this is different depending on the different kinds of people who happen to be in that group, so there's a natural type of organization that happens among a group of people, but it's not uniform. The rules are not the same across many cultures. Each culture has its own style. You don't start with randomness. Randomness and infinity are mechy max terms. Randomness as a continuous state can only be created with great difficulty; it's a mathematical state which doesn't occur in nature at all. What happens in nature is you get things grouping together in clumps which behave over time in such a way as they may continue to exist as a group ...</p>
<p>... and these clumps can only come in contact with those things which are physically adjacent or that are informationally adjacent or rhythmically adjacent. If you have two systems which have similar rhythms and if the rhythms are slightly different they'll start to rhythm together ... to form simpler rhythms. There may
be many different kinds of instruments but the rhythms tend to group in clumps. If you think of our communication process then those things which have similar rhythms are able to speak to each other; those which are very different rhythms are not able to speak to each other. So there are different communications that occur between elements of a system which are of different rhythms ... There's a certain kind of self-organization that occurs with a rock group making music together, or with two people making love. You may start when you're making love a new rhythm, but whether it'll catch on depends on where your partner's at and whether it's a random rhythm that has meaning and catches other random rhythms. What may start out as noise — that which does not have meaning, that which is not information, that which does not produce change — because at that point you're in transition, may be a rhythm your partner picks up on and plays back, and plays back again until a new rhythm is organized. You've gone through the transition into a new rhythm. What was noise becomes information, because it <em>did</em> have effect, it was that change which produced an effect. Rhythms tend to organize so that that which is relatively random and meaningless drops out, and that which was meaningless may be the very thing that sets off the next transition.</p>
<p>I have moved finally into the space which I call <em>eco-space</em>. Eco-space is self-referencing such that the existence of time and space and size and materials and energy are all in constant rhythmic motion so there is no way to repeat behavior. Eco-space is triadic. Eco-space is recursive. It is not a place of beginnings and endings, of inputs and outputs discreet from each other. Eco-space is auto-correlating ... self-organizing ... I have moved into rhythms, ecological rhythms. <em>The thing that's most constant when you're talking about nature and biology is rhythms and time things</em>; that's where the most important information lies, information being denied by in large by science. In our kleinform sponge there can be many currents and rhythms looping themselves and each other, spreading and flowing like a meadow or forest or like the living sponge in the sea, or the sea as a sponge: a current of water moves swiftly between two coral heads; it hits a back flow and is turned back, like the stocking looping outside then across through the flow jetting intra-contained through its own streaming. It intervenes in its own becoming. Dive into the water and surface through the bubbles you made and dive again. Wind back through yourself a tape of yourself talking and behaving so that you can relate to yourself as you will be when you watch the tape, then infold again.</p>
A topology that uses rhythms intermingling and flowing around and through each other would let us build walls secondarily, rather than as categorical dividers. TV networks do not have walls ... Swim in its currents, feel them, where the activity of the space changes abruptly, sediment — slower changing stuff — is laid
down. The slow rhythm — a "now" memory, infolds and gives context to faster events which in turn give the slow rhythm meaning.</p>
<p>Scuba swimming deep in the ocean one can feel the eddys and rhythms of fluid filling the holes which one would have called cells. Coral reefs grow in slow time — slow rhythms wearing volcanic rivulets into bridges of sponge, volcanic bubbles and the sea twisting and turning <em>rhythms</em> the sand into ripples — and these ripples and sand spits rhythm the sea and the growing of coral and the wearing of rock — and all these are rhythms. Swimming below one knows one's own rhythms and the rhythms of breathing and blood and that nothing is still. Putting one's face mask close to the ripples of sand one can watch the grains flowing. But to sense that flow of slow things like sand, or equipment or hard wired programming — the flow of these walls, we must change our rhythm and swim in their time and size grain. Ten year interval time; equipment distribution size.</p>
<p>Time lapse in 10 year intervals. Focus for large size objects. "Now" is a 10 year duration.</p>
<p>Infolded time lapse taping will show the rapid change of events ordinarily called unchangeable. Time taping can be tailored to find patterns. When I was with Bateson in Hawaii we both longed for a scries of time lapse shots of Honolulu showing the cancerously money producing developments destroying the cities'
survival environment. Month by month one can see the cancer growing. Day by day it is hidden. By changing time grain of the taping appropriately, complex rhythms are simplified. Then one can feel the repititiousness and code the kind of information/materials/energy flow that follows one to glue into our new biotopology conceptions.</p>
<p>But here I must leave off. If you have followed me into this space you may lead me through the enormous holes I see all around me filling them with energy/information/materials/time which as it resonates, converges or dies, or provides the surprises which may evolve the means of survival.</p>
<p>We must leave the old space. There is no life there.</p>
<p>A 1-hour tape from which the above transcription was made is available. See inside back cover for tape offering.</p>
<p>Special credit and thanks from Warren to Paul, Gregory Bateson, Avery Johnson,
Lita Osmundsen, Judy Johnson, Frank Gillette, Beryl and many others ...</p>
<br>
<p>See article by Avery Johnson entitled <em>Infolding Paul Ryan</em>.</p>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>software</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<h1>SOFTWARE<br>
R. Buckminster Fuller</h1>
<br>
<p>Pirated transcription of interview videotaped by Raindance Corporation<br>
First published in <em>Radical Software</em>, pg. 5, Vol.1, Issue 1, 1970</p>
<br>
<img class="drawing" src="readings_images/software.png">
<br>
<p>... and so we find what man's real function is, is sorting out his experience, developing what we call the normale, and being useful ... we hear people talk about technology as something very threatening, but <b>we are technology, the universe is technology</b> ... it's simply a matter of our understanding these things ... that nature has these beautiful exchanges ... and what's happened was this shortsighted - really scared - fear of man about whether he's going to survive ... he's been told there's nowhere nearly enough to go around ... therefore you've got to go out and look out for your side, look out for your family - he's got to hold this thing and make the short move ...</p>
<p>... so when our young world, like that young girl talking so superbly on earth day, eight year old kid, pure wisdom pouting out, her eyes could see as clear, when she said we ought not to throw away, we ought to reuse, and things like that ... that little girl was seeing that ... and so the net from all of our extraordinary earth day is that we have all of humanity catching on to things that need to be attended to when they were assuming yesterday someone else was attending to ... the fact that they were in such poverty ... they had so little time ... they had to work 12 hours or 14 hours a day ... my first job i really was working 18 hours a day ... you can't get anything done, you go home, i really didn't hardly have enough left to eat my supper before i fell down on the bed to sleep ... so i find man didn't even have time to think, nor did he have the vocabulary ... he didn't have the literacy ...<b> the literacy did not come as much out of school as out of radio </b>... the people who had the radio jobs had good diction, good vocabulary necessary for it, so the kid could listen to a good vocabulary that papa didn't have ... and so we really proliferated the capability to communicate ...
<b>and now that we know how to communicate, we know there are many nuances of information </b>... that little child, impressive beyond her wisdom was the beautiful resource of words that she had which came so spontaneously to her ... when i was a little kid all that kids would say was "i don't like it" or "wow" ... just make a noise because they didn't have the resources to express it ... the same wisdom ...</p>
<p>... i think the great beautiful thing that's happening in evolution here is that quite clearly we have gone through a great historical sequence of events ... from man as so ignorant and his hunger so great, his needs so great, he doesn't know how to satisfy them so he goes through starvation and he goes through pain and disease ... go back to the earliest pharoah time ... life was so bad that nobody thought of life as worthwhile in its own right ... therefore the only way you could explain your having such experience was getting yourself ready for afterlife ... so everybody thought about afterlife but the fact is part of the experience with so little to go around is that you could only think of the pharoah having an afterlife ... so the great economic drive, all the great ingenuity of the man who could see anything - artist, conceiver - was patronized by the afterlife of the pharoah ... then in getting ready for the afterlife of the pharoah you incidentally discover the levers ... (in order to take care of the pharoahs what are you going to do? ... you know there are thieves everywhere and he's going to need tools after his life so you've got to get all of these fine things under a great stone mountain so it couldn't be stolen and that's why you've got your pyramids ... ) so the Leonardo type, good-thinker, realizes the lever ... he gets an army of prisoners and they use their levers to move those stones around and build that mountain ... however, after the pharoah dies, the leonardo type dies, the people still remember about the lever ... they still remember that the leonardo type saw these people falling at the road ... they needed food, quite clearly, connected food, so there's the nile that would bring water into those side layers ... and we have fertilization ... when the pharoah dies and that thinker dies, the ditches are still there and the levers are still there, and the people remember there's an accumulation of technical capability so when another man comes along he adds to the inventory of tools ... what we may call the scaffolding to make ready for afterlife ... finally there's such accumulation of tools and capability and a little more know-how everywhere - advancement ... well, we may be able to take care of the afterlife of the nobles as well as the pharoahs ... then the tools increase some more, as they did then, and we say, well, we can take care of the afterlife of the middleclass ... and that is exactly where you come into roman and greek history - the individual family mausoleums ... finally there's got to be so much tooling around that we've a buddha and a christ and a muhammad coming around saying, you know, i think we can take care of the afterlife of everybody ... and so really the great christian era of 1500 is getting ready for the afterlife of everybody ... the great cathedrals, fantastic things, and you should see the real pathos of that little human being going in there ... the great joy that they're going to have afterlife ... suddenly there's so much tools accumulated here and the know-how keeps accumulating, and man knows a little bit more about nature and what it can do, and so he says, you know, we can take care of the afterlife of the king, as well as his living life, and still take care of everybody's afterlife ... that is what we call the beginning of the divine right of kings ... then the tools accumulate some more, and so now we can take care of the nobles in their present life, as well as the afterlife for everybody - the magna carta days ... then we have so much more proliferation of tools that we know we can take care of the afterlife of everybody, and the king, and the nobles, and the middle class ... that's the great victorian era right up to all the brownstones in new york here ... then suddenly the tools accumulated so much that henry ford said, you know, we can take care of the afterlife of everybody and we can take care of the living life of everybody ... that's the beginning of the new era, but at this point the leonardo artist-type says, up to now we were using our own hands to make end-products for the patron ... so in the victorian era you'll find the beautiful cabinet maker, and you'll find the beautiful shoemaker and tailor ... fantastic craftsmen everywhere ... but now he says, i can't make end-products for everybody ... there aren't enough artists to make end-products for everybody ... therefore, we'll have to have an entirely new kind of thing which is our industrial tools, our mass production ... and that's what is really come to all of humanity ... ... so what we've got to really come to now is developing awareness in that little child ... <p>
<b>we've got to proliferate the right kind of information </b>... industrialization and technology is not something new ... you and i are technology, so superior to any we've ever devised ... that camera looks pretty crude along side of my eye, and my eye has always had its own light meter - it's got the whole works ...
<b>and so i simply say, if you had that camera so it could also rebuild itself and keep itself going and improving itself for the next 70 years then you have something approximating the technology you and i really consist of ... technology's not new ... we've just been a little too crude at it ... our society's got to be sure not to let somebody mislead us ... not let our own ignorance mislead us into making the wrong moves ...</b>
<p>... in your picture of earth day, if the young people go out with a broom and start collecting, and if they went further than picking out the paper from it and the metal and said we're going to find out how to get those recirculated, then we're really getting somewhere ... each one of us is process ... we're not things ... and so it's fantastic - there's no scientist been asked to look at the plumbing ... the best flushing toilet you have is so inefficient that we use 65 volumes of water to get rid of one volume of human waste - but it is waste, and it's very, very valueable chemistry ... at the university of illinois way back in 1929 we found that the human excrement in one farm family has in it enough energy to run all the farm machinery ... so these are the things - i hope your young world first is getting aware, and then getting to be critical and picking out things ... and now we're really beginning to understand this need of a greater understanding of nature ...</p>
<p>... it's very important for me to tell you that the word failure is invented by man just like the word pollution ... it's a word of ignorance because nature can't fail ... nature knows exactly what she's doing ... but when man doesn't understand nature and thinks that this is the way nature behaves, and he tries to make it do this and that's not in her program then it frustrates him and he calls it a failure ... but nature doesn't intend to have anything go on for very long ... she's always transforming so she has a way of terminating, and when man wants her to go on beyond that termination point then he calls it failure, but it's not so ... </p>
<p><b>nature is intent on trying to make man a success despite himself</b>, and despite his long, long history of his great ignorance where i'm trying to give you the way the breakthrough is occuring ... we're still assuming fallaciously there's not enough to go around ... you have to prove your right leave; you have to earn a living ... was the old statement ... the young world really feels now that's wrong ... that the information we can get to the moon and do all this is very important because i think it tells man he can do anything he needs to do and he can make man work ...</p>
<p>... he's got to learn that the space program is not something - (never mind that space stuff, let's get back on earth, let's be practical, let's be blaise about the moon shoot ... ) the fact is our earth is a little spaceship ... unless we catch on to the fact we are a space program ourselves and that we have just so much supply and we've got to learn how to run that big spaceship which we are onboard ... to send off little spaceships to find out exactly what we need to be able to keep human beings doing ... this is the only way we will ever find out about ecology ...</p>
<p>... on earth day i spoke at 4 universities ... i asked each one of the audiences of kids if they could tell me how much of the earth was necessary to support each life ... when you talk ecology that is a pattern of the science of the total process in life ... what's necessary to regenerate it ... each species is a relationship to the environment ... we're not really qualified to use the word ecology until we get into that ... but i'll tell you the way we'll find out is to send a man off into space ... get him outside where there's no air to be breathed; no water available; no foods ... what do we have to have on board to keep him out there for a year? ... we've literally found now that it is possible - there are two space program researches where we have teams of six men each, sealed up in cylinders (completely different operations, really quite remote from one another, the russians are doing one and the same thing too) ... those men are sealed for a year, and we give them preliminary equipment which you did learn by having scientists who are good ecologists and good chemists ... putting everything in there necessary, they hope to keep the men going ... they're connected by telephone (really very easy to talk in now - you have a window) ... but they are now operating six men for one year on 350 pounds of apparatus and the whole apparatus being able to put in an airplane suitcase ... that we could get everything you need to regenerate life ... there is entropy so the system in the end has to have something added but you're able to have it sufficiently so you only have to add but once a year ... this is really getting somewhere ... so we come back on earth - we have 350 pounds suitcase size; even at the most expensive mass production for $2 a pound; that's $700 and you do away with sewers, all the water supply lines; all you need is a milk bottle or so a year to add into the system ... on a rental basis per six men for $700 you're down to $200 a year capital cost; maybe $1 a year you've got the equipment, and you go on any mountain top and really start living the highest standard ... and this equipment when it gets first used by those men off in space due to the television relay system around the world you'll have <b>possibly a billion people watching those six men all year round and you'll have every kid really catching on to this </b> ... here would be <b>the great educational system </b>about what the chemistry changes really are ... </p>
<p>... at any rate i simply say we must be very careful ... and we must not cut off things simply because the wrong people, with short and selfish and non-thinking motives have used tools ... a pencil is a beautiful thing but you could literally jab it into a man's heart and it would kill him ... so don't say that a pencil is lethal ... we must not blame the universe ... it would be like saying the universe is used in the wrong way, therefore it's better we not have any universe ... if we accept universe at all, if we accept life, and really would like to have something best for it, then we've simply got to learn how to use our universe in the best way ... and the universe is technology, and it's always evoluting, it's always complex, it's not repeating, so we have to be catching on to our new technology and realize we really do have a machinery of mutual regeneration around the world which has been for the moment - it's so powerful, so confident - very highly exploitable by the ignorant man who happens to get to monopolize it ... but in itself it's getting out from under him ... because he has sovereign claims - well, look, you can't stop the radio waves from going out of the sovereign limits ...</p>
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
</head>
<body>
<main>
<img id="line" src="../archive/gps_drawings/ciao_to_wijnhaven.svg">
<img id="line" src="gps_drawings/ciao_to_wijnhaven.svg">
<div class="text">
</div>
</main>

@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Cybernetic Guerilla Warfare</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<h1>Cybernetic Guerilla Warfare<br>Paul Ryan<br></h1>
<br>
<p>First published in <em>Radical Software</em>, Vol.1, Issue 3, pp. 1-2, 1971
<br>
Klein worm illustrations adapted from originals by Claude Ponsot
</p>
<div class="indent">
<p><em>To fight a hundred times and win a hundred times is not the blessing of blessings. The blessing of blessings is to beat the other man's army without getting into the fight yourself.</em></p>
<p>The Art of War</em><br>
— Sun Tzu</p>
</div>
<p>Part I <br>
GUERILLA STRATEGY AND CYBERNETIC THEORY</p>
<p>Traditional guerilla activity such as bombing, snipings, and kidnappings complete with printed manifestos seems like so many ecologically risky short change feedback devices compared with the real possibilities of portable video, maverick data banks, acid metaprogramming, Cable TV, satellites, cybernetic craft industries, and alternate life styles. Yet the guerilla tradition is highly relevant in the current information environment. Guerilla warfare is by nature irregular and non-repetitive. Like information theory, it recognizes that redundancy can easily become reactionary and result in entropy and defeat. The juxtaposition of cybernetics and guerilla strategy suggests a way of moving that is a genuine alternative to the film scenario of NYC urban guerilla warfare "Ice". Using machine guns to round up people in an apartment house for a revolutionary teach-in is not what the information environment is about. All power does not proceed from the end of a gun.</p>
<p>We suffer the violence of the entropy of old forms; nuclear family, educational institutions, supermarketing, cities, the oil slick complex, etc., etc. They are running us down, running down on us and with us. How do we get out of the way? This ship of state continues to oscillate into runaway from its people and its planetary responsibilities, while efforts continue to seduce us into boarding this sinking ship; educational loans, fellowships, lowering the voting age. Where did Nixon come from anyway? How did that leftover from the old days of Elvis get to be Captain of our ship, Master of our fate?</p>
<p>How many Americans once horrified by thermonuclear war are now thinking the unthinkable in ecological terms with a certain spiteful glee of relief at the prospect of a white hell for all?</p>
<div class="indent">
<p>
<em>Psychedelic my ass: Children of A-Bomb.</em>
<br>— Bob Lenox</p>
</div>
<p>Nobody with any wisdom is looking for a straight out fight. We have come to understand that in fighting you too easily become what you behold. Yet there is no way on this planet to get out of the way. Strategy and tactics need to be developed so the establishment in its entropy does not use up our budgets of flexibility. The efforts to enlist the young in the traditional parties by '72 will be gross. Relative to the establishment and its cultural automatons, we need to move from pure Weiner wise Augustinian Cybernetics into the realm of war game theory and practice in the information environment.</p>
<p>The most elegant piece of earth technology remains the human biocomputer; the most important data banks are in our brain cells. Inherent in cybernetic warfare is the absolute necessity of having the people participate as fully as possible. This can be done in an information environment by insisting on ways of feeding back for human enhancement rather than feeding off people for the sake of concentration of power through captial, psuedo mythologies or withheld information. The information economy that begins in a guerilla mode accepts, cultivates and depends on living thinking flesh for its success. People are not information coolies rickashawing around the perceptions of the privileged, the well paid, or the past. People can and do process information according to the uniqueness of their perceptual systems. Uniqueness is premium in a noospheric culture that thrives on high variety. Information is here understood as a difference that makes a difference. The difficulties of a negentropic or information culture are in our transformations: how do we manage transformation of differences without exploitation, jam or corruption that sucks power from people.</p>
<p>I am not talking about the cultivation of perceptual systems at the expense of emotional cadences. Faster is not always better. Doing it all ways sometimes means slowing down. Internal syncing of all facets is critical to the maintenance of a flexibiity and avoidance of a non-cybernetic "hang-up" and "drag".</p>
<p>The bulk of the work done on cybernetics from Weiner's guided missiles through the work at IBM and Bell Labs along with the various academic spin-offs has been big budget establishment supported and conditioned by the relation of those intellectuals to the powers that be distinctly non-cybernetic and unresponsive to people. The concept of entropy itself may be so conditioned. Witness the parallel between Weiner's theoretical statements about enclaves and the enclave theory of withdrawal from Vietnam. One of the grosses results of this situation is the preoccupation of the phone company and others with making "foolproof teminals" since many potential users are assumed to be fools who can only give the most dumb-dumb answers. So fools are created.</p>
<p>The Japanese, the people we dropped the A-Bomb on in '45, introduced the portable video system to this country in 1967, at a price low enough so that independent and semi-independent users could get their hands on it and begin to experiment. This experimentation, this experience, carries within it the logic of cybernetic guerilla warfare.</p>
<p><em>Warfare</em> ... because having total control over the processing of video puts you in direct conflict with that system of perceptual imperialism called broadcast television that puts a terminal in your home and thereby controls your access to information. This situation of conflict also exists as a matter of fact between people using portable video for feedback and in situations such as schools that operate through withholding and controlling the flow of information.</p>
<p><em>Guerilla warfare</em> ... because the portable video tool only enables you to fight on a small scale in an irregular way at this time. Running to the networks with portable video material seems rear view mirror at best, reactionary at worst. What is critical is to develop an infrastructure to cable in situations where feedback and relevant access routes can be set up as part of the process.</p>
<p><em>Cybernetic guerilla warfare</em> ... because the tool of portable video is a cybernetic extension of man and because cybernetics is the only language of intelligence and power that is ecologically viable. Guerilla warfare as the Weathermen have been engaging in up to now and revolution as they have articulated it is simply play acting on the stage of history in an ahistoric context. Guerilla theatre, doing it for the hell of it on their stage doesn't make it either. We need to develop biologically viable information structures on a planetary scale. Nothing short of that will work. We move now inthis present information environment in a phase that finds its best analogue in those stages of human struggle called guerila warfare.</p>
<p>Yet this is not China in the 1930's. Though there is much to learn from Mao and traditional guerilla warfare this is not the same. Critically, for instance, in an economy that operates on the transformation of differences a hundred flowers must bloom from the beginning. In order to "win" in cybernetic guerilla warfare, differences must be cherished, not temporarily suppressed for the sake of "victory". A la McLuhan, war is education. Conflict defines differences. We need to know <em>what not to be</em> enough to internally calculate our own becoming earth-alive noosphere. The more we are able to internally process differences among us the more we will be able to process "spoils" of conflict with the entropic establishment-i.e., understanding the significant differences between us and them in such a way as to avoid processing what is dangerous and death producing. Learn what you can from the Egyptians, the exodus is cybernetic.</p>
<p>Traditional guerilla warfare is concerned with climate and weather. We must concern ourselves with decoding the information contours of the culture. How does power function here? How is this system of communications and control maintained? What information is habitually withheld and how? Ought it to be jammed? How do we jam it? How do we keep the action small enough so it is relevant to real people? How do we build up an indiginous data base? Where do we rove and strike next?</p>
<p>Traditional guerilla warfare is concerned with knowing the terrain. We must expand this to a full understanding of the ecological thresholds within which we move. We must know ourselves in a cybernetic way, know the enemy in a cybernetic way, and know the ecology so that we can take and take care of the planet intact.</p>
<p>The traditional concern is for good generals. What's desirable for us is adhoc heterarchies of power which have their logistics down. Cybernetics understands that power is distributed throughout the system. Relevant pathways shift and change with the conditions. The navy has developed war plans where the command is a fleet moves from ship to ship every fifteen minutes. It is near impossible to knock out the command vessel.</p>
<div class="indent">
<p><b>The traditional tricks of guerilla warfare are remarkably suited for cybernetic action in an information environment. To scan briefly:</b></p>
<p><b>Mixing "straight" moves with "freak" moves. Using straight moves to engage the enemy, freak moves to beat him and not letting the enemy know which is which.</b></p>
<p><b>Running away when it's just too heavy. Leave the enemy's strong places and seek the weak. Go where you can make a difference.</b></p>
<p><b>Shaping the enemy's forces and keeping our own unshaped, thereby beating the many with the few.</b></p>
<p><b>Faking the enemy out. Surprise attacks.</b></p>
</div>
<p>The business of deception in guerilla warfare is a turn off for most people in this relatively open culture. This is simply an area that need be better understood, if we are to be successful. People feel that concealing is unethical. Yet overexposure means underdevelopment. Many projects die of too much publicity. There is a sense in which we are information junkies feeding off each others unlived hopes. The media repeatedly stuns the growth of alternate culture in this country through saturation coverage. It is hard for an American to just keep his mouth shut and get something cooking. You are what you reveal. The start system renders impotent by overexposure and keeps others impotent through no exposure. Seeming different is more important that making a difference. Deception in guerilla tactics is an active way of avoiding control by an alien, alienating intelligence. When a policeman takes your name, he takes over. I know a guy who is inventing another identity for the computer. There is a virtue of mistrust and wisdom in knowing significantly more about yourself than you reveal. <em>Love Thy label as thyself.</em></p>
<div class="indent">
<p><em>We retreat in space, but we advance in time.</em>
<br>— Mao</p>
<p><b>Count the Cost. We need develop an information accounting system, a cultural calculus.</b>
</p>
<p><b>Use the enemies supply. With portable video one can take the Amerikan mythology right off the air and use it as part of a new perceptual collage.</b></p>
<p><b>Be flexible. In cybernetics, flexibility, the maintenance of a good guessing way is critical.</b>
</p>
<p><b>Patience. Cybernetics is inherently concerned with timing and time design. It is a protracted war.</b>
</p>
<p><em>Do not repeat a tactic which has gained you victory, but shape your actions in an infinite variety. Water sets its flow according to the ground below; set your victories according to the enemy against you. War has no constant aspect as water has no constant shape.</em><br>— Sun Tzu</p>
</div>
<p>Part II<br>ATTEMPTING A CALCULUS OF INTENTION</p>
<div class="indent">
<p><em>Calculus of intention was a concept developed over many years by the cybernetic wizard, Warren McCulloch. He was in the business of brain circuits. McCulloch felt that dialogue breakdowns occured largely because we lacked a logic that could handle triadic relationships. Here is his description of the problem of the calculus of intention.</em></p>
<p><em>The relations we need are triadic, not diadic. Once you give me triadic relations, I can make N-adic relations; but out of diadic relations I can't go anywhere. I can build strings and I can build circles, and there it ends.</em></p>
<p><em>The great problem of the nervous system is the one concerning its core, the so-called reticular formation ... This reticular core is that things that decided whether you'd better run of whether you'd better fight, whether you should wait, whether you should sleep, whether you should make love. This is its business and it has never relinquished that business. It is a structure incredibly simple when you look at it, but the problem of organization of many components, each of which is a living thing, each of which in some sense, senses the world, each of which tells others what it has sensed, and somehow a couple million of these cells get themselves organised enough to commit the whole organism. We do not yet have any theory that is capable of handling such a structure.</em></p>
<p><em>Communication: Theory and Research </em>ed Thayer, Lee, Thomas, Springfield, 1967. McCulloch's commentary on "Logical Structure of the Mind."</p>
</div>
<p>I have not made a thorough study of McCulloch. It would take years. I do not know if what follows satisfies that criterion he established for such a calculus. I have maintained a certain organization of ignorance relative to formal cybernetics and formal topology. In fact, what follow would not, it seems, satisfy the kind of discreteness, one-two-three, that McCulloch seemed to want. However, such discreteness may not be necessary.</p>
<p>My approach stems from work with McLuhan that preoccpied me with the problem of how to maintain congruence between our intentions and our extensions. McLuhan talked of orchestration of media and sense ratios. Neither cut it. Orchestras just aren't around and sense ratios or <em>sensus communis </em>is a medieval model, essentially a simile of meta touch. Gibson's book on the senses considered as percetual systems is richer in description of the process. It includes McLuhan's personal probing ability as an active part of the perceptual system.</p>
<p>While the following formulations may not in fact work as a calculus of intention I put them forth both because they have been exciting and useful for me and because the calculus itself seems a critical problem in terms of cybernetic guerilla warfare. Dialogue degenrates and moves to conflict without an understanding of mutual intent and non-intent. While it does not seem that we can work out such a common language of intent with the people pursuing the established entropic way of increasingly dedifferentiated ways of eating bullshit; it is critical we develop such a language with each other. The high variety of self organizing social systems we are working toward will be unable to co-cybernate re each other re the ecology without such a calculus of intent.</p>
<p>This calculus of intention is done in mathematical topology.<b> Topology is a non-metric elastic geometry. It is concerned with transformations of shapes and properties such as nearness, inside and outside.</b><p> Topologists have been able to describe the birth of a baby in terms of topological necessity. There is a feeling among some topologists that while fixed math has failed to describe the world quantitatively, it may be able to describe the world qualitatively. Work is being done on topological description of verbs that seem commmon to all languages. Piaget felt that topology was close to the core of the way children think. Truck drivers have been found to be the people who are most able to learn new jobs. While driving truck for Ballantine one summer, it became apparent to me why. Hand an experienced driver a stack of delivery tickets and he could route in five minutes what would take you an hour. It was a recurring problem of mapping topologically how to get through this network in the shortest amount of time given one way streets etc.</p>
<p>I should say that my own topological explorations have a lot to do with a personal perspective system that never learned phonetics, can't spell or sing, and took to topology the way many people seem to take to music. The strangest explicit experience with toplogy I've had came via a painter friend, Claude Ponsot, whose handling of complex topological patterns on canvas convinced me that a non-verbal coherent graphic thing was possible. The following transformations on the klein bottle - klein worms, if you will - came in the context of working with Warren Brody on soft control systems using plastic membranes. Behind that are three years of experience infolding videotape. I checked these formulations with a Ph.D topologist. He had not seen them before, questioned whether they were strictly topological. As far as I know, they are original.</p>
<img src="readings_images/klein_worm_01.jpg"><br>
<img src="readings_images/klein_worm_02.jpg"><br>
<img src="readings_images/klein_worm_03.jpg"><br>
<img src="readings_images/klein_worm_04.jpg"><br>
<img src="readings_images/klein_worm_05.jpg"><br>
<img src="readings_images/klein_worm_06.jpg"><br>
<p>There are three specific areas where I think this topological calculus of invention can be of use: acid metaprogramming, a grammar of video infolding and perceptual sharing, and in soft control structures using plastic membranes.</p>
<p>Relative to acid metaprogramming I am not recommending LSD-25 to anyone nor am I endorsing Leary's approach. I am simply looking at some of the work John Lilly has done and suggesting that this calculus might be useful in that context. Both in <em>Programming and MetaProgramming in the Human Biosphere</em> and in <em>Mind of the Dolphin </em>Lilly uses the notion of interlock to describe communication between people and between species. In <em>Programming and MetaProgramming</em> he describes a personal experience with acid that in some way undercuts the metaphor of interlock, and to me suggests that the klein worms might be a better way to describe the process he calls "interlock". Here is Lilly's description of that experience he titles "the key is no key".</p>
<div class="indent">
<p><em>Mathematical transformations were next tried in the approach to the locked rooms. The concept of the key fitting into the lock and the necessity of finding the key were abandoned and the rooms were approached as "topological puzzles". In the multidimensional cognitional and visual space the rooms were now manipluated without the necessity of the key in the lock.</em></p>
<p><em>Using the transitional concept that the lock is a hole in the door through which one can exert an effort for a topological transformation, one could turn the room into another topological form other than a closed box. The room in effect was turned inside out through the hole, through the lock leaving the contents outside and the room now a collapsed balloon placed farther from the self metaprogrammer. Room after room was thus defined as turned inside out with the contents spewed forth for use by the self-metaprogrammer. Once this control "key" worked, it continued automatically to its own limits.</em></p>
<p><em>With this sort of an "intellectual crutch" as it were, entire new areas of basic beliefs were entered upon. Most of the rooms which before had appeared as strong rooms with big powerful walls, doors and locks now ended up as empty baloons. The greatly defended contents of the rooms in many cases turned out to be relatively trivial programs and episodes from childhood which had been over-generalized and over-valued by this particular human computer. The devaluation of the general purpose properties of the human biocomputer was one such room. In childhood the many episodes which led to the self-programmer not remaining general purpose but becoming more and more limited and "specialized" were entered upon. Several levels of the supra-self-metaprograms laid down in childhood were opened up.</em></p>
<p><em>The mathematical operation which took place in the computer was the movement of energies and masses of data from the supra-self-metaprogram down to the self metaprogrammatic level and below. At the same time there was the knowledge that programmatic materials had been moved from the "supra-self position" to the "under self-control position" at the programmatic level. These operations were all filed in meta-program storage under the title "the key is no key".</em></p>
<p><em>Programming and MetaProgramming</em>,
<br>Lilly, pp. 42-43</p>
</div>
<p>Relative to video infolding it is near impossible to describe in words even using klein worm graphs what I'm talking about. The following will mean little to anyone except those who have had some experience of taping with themselves at different levels.</p>
<div class="indent">
<p><b>Taping something new with yourself is a part contained.</b></p>
<p><b>To replay the tape for yourself is to contain it in your perceptual system.</b></p>
<p><b>Taping yourself playing with the replay is to contain both on a new tape.</b></p>
<p><b>To replay for oneself tape of self with tape of self is to contain the process in a new dimension.</b></p>
<p><b>Parts left out of that process are parts uncontained.</b></p>
<p><b>All of this is mapable on computer graphic terminals.</b></p>
<p><b>At one level that of reality that is left off the tape is the part contained.</b></p>
<p><b>Raw tape replayed is part contained in the head.</b></p>
<p><b>If it is somebody else's tape you are watching you can to an extent share in this live perceptual system via the tape he took.</b></p>
<p><b>To watch another's edited tape is to share in the way he thinks about the relation between his various perceptions in a real time mode. This enters the realm of his intention.</b></p>
<p><b>If you are editing some of your tape along with tape somebody else shot and he is doing the same thing using some of your tape then it is possible to see how one's perceptions relate to another's intentions and vice versa.</b></p>
</div>
<p>Relative to sharing perceptual systems it is somewhat easier to talk about since there are parallels with photography and film.</p>
<p>The most explicit experience of this mode of perceptual sharing came in the early days of Raindance when Frank Gillette, Ira Schneider, Michael Shamberg and myself "shot" twelve rolls of tape on earth day. Both in replay that evening (we laughed our heads off digging each others tape while the old perceptual imperialist, Walter Cronkite, explained Earth Day for us) and in the edits that followed each of us got a good idea of how each saw and thought about the events vis-a-vis the others.</p>
<p>Relative to soft control systems using plastic membranes I am thinking mostly of the soft cybernetic work being done by Warren Brody, Avery Johnson and Bill Carrigan. The sense of the sacred and the transcendental that surrounds some of the inflatable subculture is to me a kind of pseudomythology. Conciousness might be better invested in designing self-referencing structures where awareness is imminent in the structure and its relation to the users; not by being invested in a religious way to a "special" structure that does not relate intelligently to the users.</p>
<p>A Klein Worm couch is a suggestion of a possible way of moving in that direction. It could be built of strong polyurethane, filled with air, perhaps by a constant flow from a pump. People might interrelate kinetically through the changes in the air pressure. Design of the actual couch could be arrived at experimentally by combinations and transformations of the structures described above.</p>
</div>
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 936.7 731.2" style="enable-background:new 0 0 936.7 731.2;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-miterlimit:1;}
.st1{fill:#221E20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:14.4px;}
</style>
<g>
<polyline class="st0" points="858.6,38 858.6,38 859.7,37.6 858.3,37 858.6,37.2 859.1,38.7 858.1,39.7 858.1,40.7 859.1,42.6
858.1,43.4 855.7,44.1 852.6,44.2 851.3,44.1 844.5,44.8 841.5,46.8 840.3,46.9 839.4,47.4 839.4,48.1 839.8,49 838.1,51.4
836.9,52 836.7,52.2 836.4,52.4 831.7,55.5 826.3,57.9 825.5,57.7 824.2,57.8 823.7,57.5 823.1,56.7 822.2,56.1 821.1,55.9
819.8,56.1 814,57.2 812.7,57.9 811.1,59.5 810.8,60.6 810.2,61.3 806.4,61.3 804.8,61.3 800.5,61.6 797.4,61.1 794.4,61.5
791.4,62.2 789,61.9 786.3,61.2 785.3,60.8 782.5,61.2 782,61.4 779.6,62 777.8,61.7 767.3,59.9 766.4,60.7 765.6,61.3 764.7,61.9
752.6,70.5 751.2,71.4 747.3,74.5 745.5,76.2 742.9,77.9 736.5,84.6 735.5,85.2 733.7,85.3 733.3,85.3 732.2,85.8 728.8,88.3
727.3,88.5 726.3,88.5 724.8,88.4 721.5,87.8 721.1,87.5 720,87.3 719.4,87.6 717.5,88.6 717.1,89.4 718.8,95.1 720.1,97.6
721.2,101.1 726.7,115.1 735.2,136.9 735.2,137.2 735.6,138.5 736.5,140.5 734.9,146.2 732.8,147.9 732.3,151.1 732.1,154.5
731.1,155.5 730,155.9 727.4,156 725.3,156.2 723.6,156.5 706.4,158.9 701.1,158.9 697.5,159.8 695.7,159.9 675.1,162.7
672.7,162.4 668.7,163.1 665.9,163.8 656.1,165.2 653.1,165.3 641.7,168.7 641.9,169.2 641.7,169.6 641.5,169.6 641.4,169.7
641.3,170 641.4,170.3 642.5,171.8 643.6,173.1 644,173.8 645.2,176.3 644.9,176.7 644.4,176.8 643.7,177.3 643.6,177.5
643.9,178.4 645.1,182.6 646.9,184.5 648.5,185.8 649.2,186.7 649,188.4 648.2,189.6 648.7,190.4 649.4,191.2 650.7,192.7
651,194.3 650.6,195.2 649.8,195.8 649.8,196.8 649.9,197.1 650.1,197.8 650.5,199.9 649.9,201.1 649.7,202.1 648.1,205.6
648.7,208 648.3,208.9 648,209.5 647.9,209.8 647.7,210.1 647.6,210.3 647,210.7 646.9,210.8 645.9,210.8 643.8,211.1 642.2,210.9
641,210.7 639.6,211 634.2,211.9 630.6,212.4 629.7,213.3 629.5,214.1 629.5,217.6 629.8,218.7 630,219.6 629.9,222.4 629.6,225.5
633.1,229.3 633,229.8 632.2,231.3 631.1,233.3 631.3,235.7 631.1,235.9 631.2,237.1 632.1,238.4 632.8,239.8 634.3,242.3
634.8,243.8 634.4,244.7 634.3,246 635.1,247 635.7,248 635.4,253.8 630.4,256.5 623.4,259.7 621.1,259.7 619.9,260 616.1,260.1
615.6,260.1 614.2,260.2 612.1,260.1 604.1,262.3 601.9,262.7 601,263.4 597,265.1 595.3,265.8 594.8,266.8 593.8,269.2
592.8,269.2 591.7,269.6 591.3,269.7 590.8,269.7 587.3,270.4 586.8,270.6 586.4,271 585.7,271.1 585.4,270.9 584.1,271.1
572.6,275.8 571,276.5 567.4,277.3 565.8,277.5 564.8,277.4 562.9,277.4 561.5,277.6 557.4,278.5 556.1,278.8 555.1,279.2
553.4,279.6 550.4,280 548.9,280.3 547.6,280.4 545.9,280.6 544.3,281.1 541,282 539.7,282.3 532.6,284.4 529.7,286.3 527,288.5
517.5,290.3 514.9,290.7 509.4,293 505.5,295.3 505,295.5 504.4,295.7 502.6,296.6 501.4,297.3 499.4,298.1 498.1,299 496,300.3
494.9,300.8 493.9,301.3 492.4,302.1 488.9,303.1 487,303.6 484,304.4 478.3,306.7 477.3,307.3 471.5,309.2 471,309.3 469.6,309.5
468.1,309.7 465.8,310.6 459.9,311.8 451.3,313.2 434.8,320.1 431.2,321.7 428.6,322.4 423.1,325 417.5,326.6 415.1,326.8
405.3,328.7 403.5,328.9 401.9,329.5 396.3,331.2 393.8,331.4 391.1,333 388.7,334.9 386.7,336.2 383.2,338.1 382.9,338.3
381.5,338.7 380.1,339.1 379.6,339.3 378.1,339.6 376.4,339.8 374.2,340.5 370.7,342.6 371.4,343.8 372,344.5 377,348.5 376.9,349
376.9,349.5 377.1,350.3 378.3,351.4 379.1,352.1 379.3,352.2 379.3,352.2 379.3,352.1 379.6,352.5 380.8,354 384.9,358.8
388.5,363.6 388.9,364.1 388.7,364.3 388.8,364.9 388.4,365.3 387.9,365.8 388.5,366.8 389.2,367.9 395.6,375.7 396.5,376.1
396.8,376.2 397,376.2 397,376 397.6,375.3 400.4,375.1 401.4,375.6 402.3,376.2 402.9,376.9 403.4,377.6 406.9,382.1 419,391
419.2,392 421.9,395.6 421.9,395.6 421.5,395.6 421.3,395.6 421,395.5 420.8,395.4 420.7,395.4 420.8,395.4 420.7,395.6
420.9,396.4 421.5,398.8 420.6,399.4 419.4,399.7 417.9,400 416,400.4 411,402.6 403.4,403 401.5,403.2 399.8,403.5 397.9,403.7
392.7,404.9 390.7,405.6 379.1,411.8 367.3,414.9 358.8,417.9 357.8,418.5 356.7,419.3 344.6,423.8 343.8,425.9 341.5,438.7
340.2,440.3 337.9,442.4 337.3,444.1 336.8,446.9 337.2,448.9 336.4,452.3 332.6,458 332.4,458.9 331.9,459.7 331.3,461.4
330.6,464 331.3,464.9 332,466.1 331.5,467.7 328.7,472.7 328.1,477.3 326.8,480.2 327.1,481.6 322,499.9 319.7,513.5 320.5,514.8
321.8,517.7 323,520.6 323.9,523.7 324.2,529.8 323.9,530.8 324.9,532.1 325.3,534.4 326,538.4 328.4,543.1 329.3,544.8
330.1,547.9 331.3,553.2 331.5,554.3 332.9,556 333.7,556.7 333.6,557.4 333,558.4 332.5,559.1 332.3,559.4 331.1,561.6
328.5,561.9 327.5,561.5 325.2,560.5 332.2,625.2 332,632.7 320.7,610.5 318.4,599 330.9,591.2 350.1,582.2 347,580.3 347.5,580.2
337.5,586.9 336.6,588.1 335.5,589.1 333.6,590.9 333.7,593 334,594.3 335.3,597.8 337,600.8 340,604.5 340.5,609.7 339,628.3
337.4,628.5 336.2,628.4 327.8,627.6 326.6,628.2 322,631.4 311.8,634.8 311.1,635.3 310.8,635.4 310.5,635.6 310,635.8 309.5,636
309.4,636.1 309.4,636.2 308.3,636.5 307.6,637.4 306.8,638.2 305.2,638.4 300.5,639.6 300.3,639.8 299.4,640.4 297.7,640.8
290.2,641.6 290.1,641.6 289.6,641.8 288,642.2 287.2,642.2 286.6,642.2 286,642.1 284.3,642.3 281.7,642.6 280.4,642.6
279.7,642.7 275.7,642.7 275.3,642.7 274.9,642.8 273.9,643.1 273.2,643.3 266.3,645.2 265.9,645.3 265.4,645.4 265,645.6
264.3,646 263.5,646.2 262.1,646.7 260.4,647.3 255.1,649.3 253,650.1 248.1,654.2 247.2,654.7 246.1,654.6 245.3,654.1
243.7,653.3 242.9,653.3 241.4,653.4 239.9,653.7 238.2,654.8 236.7,655.4 231.8,657 228.9,658 225,659.5 223,660 219.3,660.9
215.3,661.8 213,662.3 211.6,662.9 209.3,663.9 207.8,664.5 205.3,665.3 204.5,665.8 203.5,666.6 201.3,667 199.8,666.4
199.4,666.2 199,666.1 198.2,665.8 197.2,665.5 196.3,665 195,664.7 193.9,664.3 191.2,663.8 189.9,664.4 188.3,664.8 186,665.8
184.4,666.8 182.8,667.8 179.2,669.2 174.3,672.3 173.4,672.9 172.9,673 172.5,673.1 172,673.2 170.8,673.6 166.7,674.1
165.2,673.5 164.6,673.3 160.2,672.9 157.8,673.1 156.2,673.3 152.2,673.4 150.9,674 148.5,676.4 148.5,676.7 148.1,676.8
146.5,676.7 145,676.7 142.9,676.5 141.6,676.1 138.5,675.6 137,675.2 136.7,675.2 136.6,675.1 136.5,675 136.4,674.8 136.2,674.5
136,674.4 136.5,674.2 137.7,675.2 136.5,676.2 137.5,675.2 137.5,674.2 137.2,673.8 137,673.2 136.9,672.1 136.1,672 133.9,672.4
134.2,673.4 134.5,674.9 135.5,675.9 137,675.5 138.5,675.3 139.6,674.9 138.6,674.1 136.7,673.5 135.2,673.4 133.1,673.6
129.4,673.4 129.5,673.6 130.1,673.3 131.1,674.4 132.5,674.4 133.1,674.2 132.7,674.1 132,674.1 132.2,674 132.1,673.8 132,673.7
132.8,673.8 131.8,672.5 131.8,673.1 130.7,672.2 128.9,671.8 128.7,671.7 128.5,672.2 128.9,672.6 129.2,672.8 129.4,673.3
128.6,673.4 127.9,673.5 128.8,672.8 129.3,673 130.6,673.6 131.3,673.4 131.2,672.9 132.6,673 133.4,673 133.7,673.4 134.8,674.2
135.7,675.8 136.3,674 136.8,673 137.2,673 137.4,673.1 137.9,673.6 137,673.5 134.1,672.4 135,672.2 140,672.2 142.7,673
142.8,673 142.2,673.6 141.9,672.9 141.7,674.5 139.5,673.8 137.7,674.8 138,675.6 137.6,675.9 136.8,677.8 137.8,678.5
138.2,677.7 138.6,676.6 139.4,676 139.6,675.8 139.6,676 139.6,676.3 139.3,677.1 138.4,677.8 138.1,678.3 138,679.7 138.4,681.5
137.3,683.1 135.8,683.3 133.1,683.5 130.9,683.2 129.4,683.3 128.1,684 127.5,684.6 125.3,685.2 124.9,685.5 123.8,686.1
122.7,687.2 122.1,688.5 121.3,689.5 120.8,690.2 119.5,691 117.9,691.4 116.6,692 116,693.4 115.8,694.4 115.3,695.4 "/>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 22.3325 692.0518)"><tspan x="0" y="0" class="st1 st2 st3">ciao.urca.tv</tspan><tspan x="0" y="17.3" class="st1 st2 st3">richfolks.club</tspan></text>
</g>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 813.8967 29.4421)" class="st1 st2 st3">b-e-e-t.r-o-o-t.net</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 7.9 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 616.5 410.9" style="enable-background:new 0 0 616.5 410.9;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-miterlimit:1;}
.st1{fill:#221E20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:14.4px;}
</style>
<polyline class="st0" points="48.3,25 51.2,25.7 51,26.2 50.7,26.6 50.8,28.2 53.5,31 53.9,31.7 54.3,31.8 56.6,32.4 58.1,32.6
59.8,32.6 62.8,31.8 67,30.9 77.6,29.9 78.5,31 79,35.8 81.3,49.5 82.8,53.9 83.1,56.2 83.6,57.8 85.1,60.3 86.2,64 86.1,65.1
86.7,66.1 87.8,66.4 92,66.8 93.6,66.6 95.4,66.1 109.3,63.9 110.4,63.1 111.7,62.8 116.6,62.5 118.8,62 126.9,62 127.8,61.5
128.2,60.7 129.1,60.2 131,60.3 135.5,60.5 136.9,60.3 145.6,59.9 152.8,57.8 158.4,57.7 162.6,57.2 163.8,57.1 165,56.6 166,55.5
167.9,55.7 173.7,56.3 175.7,56.2 179.4,56.2 182.7,56.2 187.8,55.9 189.6,55.9 193.1,55.7 193.9,56.2 194.1,56.4 194.7,56.9
196.2,57.3 203.6,58 208.2,57.4 209.2,58.1 209.8,59.4 210.7,60 211.8,60.5 213.6,62.5 213.4,64.3 213,65.2 211.6,66.2 206.9,68.5
198.2,72.5 198.1,72.6 196.8,73.4 195.7,74.2 194.4,75.3 193.1,76.5 191.3,78 190.9,78.9 189.9,80.5 188.1,80.9 185.8,82.1
184.1,85.2 183.6,86 177.7,90.5 176,91.2 173.5,94.2 164.2,103.7 164.4,104.6 164.4,104.9 165.3,104.8 165,104.7 163.9,104.8
164.2,105.7 164.3,106.2 164.5,106.4 164.5,106.7 165.1,108 167.4,110.9 169,111.8 169.8,112.8 169.9,113.5 171.5,120.7
177.2,140.3 178.3,145.6 182.8,154.6 183.2,156.1 185.5,161.3 186.6,165.8 184.2,172.4 185.2,173.2 186.1,173.9 187.3,174.8
188.5,175.2 191.3,175.4 194.6,175.1 194.9,175.8 194.1,176.9 192.4,179.8 192.9,180.6 194,182.4 194.2,183.7 195.2,186.7
194.9,187.5 193.9,188.5 193.5,189.3 192.1,191.7 192.7,195.6 190.8,200.5 190.4,201.5 189.9,202.2 189.5,203.1 189.7,203.9
190.6,204.6 191.1,205.5 190.9,206.3 190.3,210.6 189.1,213.1 186.7,217.4 184.4,222.7 184.5,223.3 185.4,223.6 185.5,225.3
182.3,237.4 182.1,238 181.2,238.5 180.5,239.6 180.7,243.6 179.2,246.6 180.1,249.3 179.5,249.8 179.8,250.8 179.6,252
177.1,256.1 176.1,257.4 175.7,258.4 176.6,260.5 176.4,262.8 176.1,263.6 176.5,267 175.5,275.8 173.2,278.6 172.3,279.2
170.7,280 169.8,280.8 169.5,280.9 168.3,281.3 167.2,282.1 166.3,283 162.8,284.5 159,287.4 150.6,296.9 151.8,297.7 163,302
170.6,305 172.1,305.3 173.2,305.6 174.2,306.6 178,307.9 181.7,309.3 186.6,309.4 187.8,310.3 194,312.5 197.1,313.2 198.8,314.4
204.1,317.2 205.3,318.7 206.4,319 207.8,319.5 217.1,322.6 218.8,323.8 218.4,324.8 216.8,326.8 214.3,330.4 212.1,331.9
211.1,332.9 207.3,340.1 203.8,346.1 203.2,347.2 198.9,349.7 195.5,350.6 186.6,360.7 184.4,361.8 180.8,365.9 177.2,369.9
176.5,370.5 176.2,371 176.3,371 177,371.2 177.9,372 178.1,373 178.5,374 180.7,375.1 186.5,377 187.5,377.7 187.8,378.1
188.8,378.6 190.3,379.1 191.5,379.4 193.3,380.2 200.3,381.7 201.9,382.3 223.9,393.4 225.2,393.8 229.6,394.8 231.5,394.5
234.1,394.1 235.6,394.5 236.7,395.2 239.6,396.1 244.6,396.7 247.8,396.8 252.6,398.4 253.6,399.2 256,400.8 262.7,402.5
264.9,401.9 269.5,401.8 278.8,403.8 287.2,396.3 291.9,393.2 292.6,392.4 296,390 299.8,389.4 301.2,389.5 305.2,389.8
316.1,389.9 325.4,391.5 329.6,392.5 329.7,392.6 330.1,392.6 334.5,393.6 336.8,394.4 338.4,394.4 342.3,393.8 343.4,393.3
345.6,391.5 348,389.7 350.2,389 358.7,388.4 363.5,388 364.3,387.3 365.3,385.9 366.5,384 368.1,383.6 375.6,383.2 380.6,383.4
381.1,383.5 381.7,383.6 382,383.7 382.5,383.6 383.7,383.9 385,384.7 385.4,384.6 386,384.6 387.3,385 388.4,385.3 388.8,385.4
389.1,385.5 389.4,385.6 391,386 394,386.6 396.5,387 397.9,386.9 403.1,387 406.8,387.9 407.6,388.2 408.4,388.5 410,389
412.7,389.8 414.4,390.6 415.2,390.7 417.1,390.7 418.9,391 421.8,391.9 422.1,392.2 422.2,393.2 423.3,394.9 424.9,395.4
426.8,395.2 429.3,395.3 437.2,395.8 442,396.7 453,396 459,394.2 461,393.6 467.1,392.4 468.4,392.1 490,388.2 495.5,386.5
499.2,387.1 504,388 506.7,386.9 507.2,386.8 512.5,386.7 513.8,386.5 516.6,386 519.6,386.1 522.6,385.3 524.2,385.2 528.1,386.5
533.9,387 535.5,386.9 537.9,386.7 538.1,386.7 539.1,387.1 541.2,386.7 543.4,385.6 543.8,384.7 543.9,384.4 543.9,383.6
543.7,382.9 543.8,381.9 543.7,380.4 544.7,379.7 545.6,379.4 545.4,379.2 545.3,378.8 "/>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 552.4548 372.7199)" class="st1 st2 st3">p.lions.es</text>
</g>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 8.9548 18.2775)" class="st1 st2 st3">b-e-e-t.r-o-o-t.net</text>
</g>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.5 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 534 737" style="enable-background:new 0 0 534 737;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-linecap:square;stroke-linejoin:bevel;stroke-miterlimit:10;}
.st1{fill:#221E20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:14.4px;}
</style>
<polyline class="st0" points="127,24 135,20.4 136.2,20.4 136.7,20.6 137.2,20.8 137.5,20.7 137.7,20.2 138,19.4 138.2,19.4
138.1,19.3 138,19.2 137.9,19.9 138.7,21.3 139.3,22.3 139,23.2 138.4,24.9 139.8,25.5 140.7,26 141.4,26.2 141.7,26.2 142.7,26.2
143.6,26.1 151,25.3 155.5,24.5 160.2,24.1 162,23.2 165.1,22.5 166.2,22.9 166.3,23.8 166,25.1 165.4,26.9 165.8,29.2 165.9,29.6
166.4,31 166.5,31.3 166.6,31.6 166.8,31.8 166.8,32 166.5,33 167.4,36.9 168.1,37.7 168.2,42.6 167.3,46.2 168,46.7 168.4,46.8
168.5,46.9 168.6,46.8 168.9,46.9 170.1,47.8 170.6,48.5 170.7,49.3 171.7,52 172.1,52.7 173,57.2 175,59.9 176.5,60.2 177.3,60.2
178,60.2 178.8,60.4 178.8,60.8 179.1,60.9 179.5,60.8 180.8,60 181.5,59.5 182.7,58.9 186.4,58.4 188.3,57.8 197.9,57.3
199.2,56.3 199.6,56.3 201,56.5 202.9,56.6 204.5,56.6 209.3,57 211.7,57 214.7,55.9 216,55.5 216.4,55.4 217.4,55.3 221.6,55.3
222.3,55.3 222.8,55.2 225.4,54.6 230.8,53.2 235,52.4 238.2,52.5 239.9,52.5 241.8,52.5 244.5,52.6 245.7,52.5 247.6,52.2
249.9,51.5 250.2,51.5 250.5,51.5 250.6,50.7 250.7,49.6 251.9,48.9 257.2,47.8 259.1,48.1 261.9,48.1 263.2,47.9 264.4,48
272.7,48.4 275.4,48.3 278.2,48.6 283.6,49 284.1,49.2 286.1,50.5 287.9,51 289.1,51.4 290.3,51.7 291.9,51.3 293.5,50.7
294.2,51.3 297.1,56.2 297.3,56.2 297.5,56.3 297.6,56.6 297.1,57.5 295.7,59.5 294.5,61.2 293.2,62.2 283.3,69 280.4,71 280,72.7
279.2,74.2 277.3,75.8 276.8,76.1 275.5,77.3 275,79.5 275.2,79.7 275.2,79.5 274,80 267.4,83.2 259.6,91.4 255.4,93.9 254.7,94.6
252.5,97 252.9,98.9 253.4,98.9 253.4,99.2 264.8,115.5 263.7,116.9 263.2,117.8 263.2,119.3 263.3,120.7 263.9,126 264.4,129
265.6,132.2 265,134.5 265.4,135.5 267.1,139.6 267,141.5 269.1,146.9 269.4,148 269.9,150.2 270.1,151.3 272.6,160.1 270.8,162.9
270.3,164 270.6,165.3 271.1,166.1 272.5,167.6 272.9,168.4 273.9,169 275.3,169.4 276.7,171 276.8,171 276.8,171 276.9,171.2
277.9,172.4 278.7,172.5 279,172.6 279,172.8 281.1,175.9 281.1,176.9 280.8,179 281.1,180.9 281.3,188.7 281.5,189.6 281.3,192.5
281,193.6 278.6,199 278.6,209.9 267.9,228.7 267.8,233.8 267.1,235.8 268,237.2 267.9,238.2 267.8,238.4 266.4,238.6 265.2,238.7
264.3,239.3 263.8,243.5 264.2,243.7 264.1,244.2 264,246.1 264.7,248.9 264.6,252.7 263.7,255.9 251,274 250.5,274.8 243.2,286.3
243,286.4 242.4,287.3 241.5,288.5 240.8,289.1 240,289.7 239.2,291.8 239.3,292.8 239.3,293.2 239.4,293.4 240.2,294.2
241.3,295.3 245.6,296.9 266,303 267.1,304.2 278.3,308.7 279.4,309.1 280.5,309.9 280.4,310.9 279.8,311.7 274.5,317.1
272.7,318.3 267,323.2 266.9,323.3 266.5,324.3 266,324.9 259.8,332.1 257,333.9 256.2,334.7 254.6,338.2 254.2,339.4 252.4,342.3
252.6,342.4 252.5,342.5 251.1,342.8 249.9,343.2 247.6,345.3 246.4,345.3 244.7,345.6 243.4,347.3 239,353.5 238.7,353.8
237.6,355.7 238,356.7 236.4,357.2 234,358.3 231.2,360.6 226.2,364.5 225.9,365.7 224.8,368.3 224.8,369 224.4,372.3 220.2,376.8
218.5,377.3 218.2,377.7 215.6,380.4 214,380.5 209,383.4 208.8,384.4 206.4,386.8 206,387.2 203.5,389.4 202.9,390.4 201.7,391.1
201.5,391.4 195.3,397.7 193.7,398 192.4,398.4 191.5,398.9 190.5,399.3 189.9,400.1 189.6,400.4 189.1,401.3 188.7,401.9
188.5,402.1 188.1,402.4 187.7,402.7 187.7,402.9 188.5,403.7 195.2,408.5 197.4,408.7 198.1,408.8 199.8,409 205.7,411.9
208.4,412.4 211,412.6 211.9,413.2 213.2,414.2 216.8,416.4 220.5,418.8 221.2,419.2 222.8,420 223.4,420.6 226.5,424 230.6,426.5
234.9,429.6 235.3,431.3 235.2,432.2 235.4,433.1 236.9,436.1 237.4,437.3 237.5,437.5 238.2,438 238.6,438.3 245.8,445.4
245.7,446.1 246,447.2 246.9,448 251.2,453 251.2,453.2 250.1,454 249.8,454 249.5,454.7 249.5,455.3 249.4,455.8 249,458.7
249.3,460.6 248.9,461.4 248.7,461.7 260.8,462.1 262.2,462.2 269.5,462.2 266.2,461.8 249.3,466.3 249.4,467.8 247.6,469.7
247.5,469.6 247.9,469.7 247.8,469.6 247.8,469.6 247.5,469.8 247.4,470 247.1,470.5 246.9,470.8 246.9,471.6 246.6,472.3
246.7,473.4 247.6,474.4 249.9,479.2 247.7,487.2 247.5,487.4 247.2,487.5 246.7,488.2 247,489.1 246.6,490.4 245.7,493.9
246.1,494.9 246.6,496 247.5,497.1 248.7,497.8 249.5,498.8 251.3,500.5 252.8,500.3 256.4,498.9 257.8,498.7 258.9,499.1
272.7,502.7 273.7,503.6 275,505.5 275,505.7 275.1,506.4 274.8,506.6 274.9,506.7 275.9,507 277.9,506.6 278,506.7 277.9,506.7
277,507.3 276.4,508.9 277.3,510.4 280.3,513.2 281.5,513.4 283.3,514.4 286.9,518.8 287.7,519.6 289.1,520.5 289.3,520.7
289.3,520.6 289.3,519.9 289.5,519.5 289.6,519.3 289.6,519.3 289.5,519.4 289.3,519.9 289.2,520.2 289.1,520.2 290.3,520.2
290.5,521 290.4,521.8 290.6,522.5 291.3,523.3 293.5,523.5 295.1,523.4 296.5,523.4 298,523.2 302.4,522.4 311.1,519.1
312.1,518.7 317.4,517 321,515.7 327.9,513.9 329.5,513.4 331.6,512.9 335.4,512.6 337.5,512.5 355.1,522.3 355.9,523.3 356.9,524
365.2,529.5 372.7,534.5 373.7,534.9 375.8,536.2 377.5,537 377.8,537.5 378.2,537.7 383,541.7 383.8,543.4 396,554.1 396,555.8
395.1,557.4 397.3,559 398.4,560 399.5,561 403.8,564.1 403.7,564.1 403.8,563.9 405.2,564.5 413.5,569.1 413.9,570.2 413.9,570.3
414.2,570.4 422.8,574.6 430.2,579.7 430.7,580.2 445.9,592.1 447.5,593.2 467.5,609.2 468.5,609.7 479.2,617.5 480.2,618
480.6,618.7 481.8,619.5 485.2,622.2 487.1,625.5 487.6,626.2 488.5,628 488.2,631.6 481.6,633.7 478.3,634.9 475.2,636.6
474,637.2 472.8,637.8 472.4,638.1 472.1,637.8 471.8,637.6 471.6,637.7 471.9,637.6 473.1,637.4 474.3,638.2 484.5,646.5 483,645
482.7,644.6 482,643.5 481.6,643.1 480.8,642.4 481.9,642.9 480.8,645 481.7,645.6 471.1,647.4 469.5,647.4 470,647.1 470.5,647
471.4,647.1 472.2,647 487.5,648.9 484.9,650.9 482.8,652.6 486.9,641.3 486.8,641.6 486.5,642.4 486.6,643.3 487.1,645.4
487.9,646.4 488.9,647.8 489.3,648.1 490,648.1 492.7,646.6 494.3,645.3 504.9,639.9 504.9,641.1 507.2,642 508,642.7 509.2,643.5
509,643.6 508.3,643 507.6,643.1 506.5,643.3 506.1,643.5 506.1,643.7 507.3,642.3 506.9,642.5 507,643.5 505.9,644.7 504.5,649.1
503.8,653.6 505.2,658.7 509.2,666.4 509.6,666.9 509.8,667.2 510.5,668 515.7,675 515.3,675.2 514.7,675.3 513.8,675.5
513.7,675.8 513.4,676 511.7,676.1 509.9,676.4 508.9,676.9 506.7,678 506.2,678.3 505.8,678.5 504.8,679.1 504.2,679.3
503.3,679.6 502.8,679.5 502.3,679.5 501.5,679.5 500.3,679.5 499.1,679.8 497.8,680.1 495.8,680.3 495.5,680.4 494.6,680.7
494.5,681.4 494.7,681.9 494.7,681.7 494.9,681.5 495,681.2 494.6,681.1 492.4,680 491.3,680.6 490.4,681.7 490,682.6 488,689
485.6,694.6 486.1,695.7 486.6,696.5 487.9,697.5 489.8,698.5 490.3,698.4 491,698.4 491.5,699.3 494.2,704 494.3,704.3
495.2,705.9 496.6,706.6 497,707 497.1,707.2 498.2,709.4 498.7,709.8 500,708.9 500.1,708.6 500.2,708.6 500.7,708.8 502,709.4
503.2,709.9 504.6,710.4 505.7,710.2 507,709.2 509.2,707.4 512.8,706.1 514.3,705 516.4,703.9 516.9,703.8 517.4,703.7
517.7,703.6 517.9,703.6 518,703.5 518.1,703.6 519.6,704.6 520.3,705 520.9,705 521.3,704.7 521.8,700.6 515.4,692.3 515.6,693.2
515.5,694.1 514.3,696.6 513.7,697.9 514.2,696.7 516.3,695.5 514.1,703.4 513.6,704.2 512.8,705.3 511.4,705.7 510.3,705.7
508,705.7 506,705.6 504,705.5 503,705.5 501.7,703.1 "/>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 402.5183 720.4057)" class="st1 st2 st3">Wijnhaven 61</text>
</g>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 12.2865 24.1459)" class="st1 st2 st3">b-e-e-t.r-o-o-t.net</text>
</g>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 7.6 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 595.3 841.9" style="enable-background:new 0 0 595.3 841.9;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#221E20;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-miterlimit:10;}
.st1{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-miterlimit:10;}
</style>
<g>
<g>
<path class="st0" d="M348.6,777.2v0.9c-0.8,0-1.5,0.1-2,0.4s-1,0.9-1.5,1.7c-0.3,0.5-0.8,1.9-1.5,3.9l-8.9,25.6h-0.9l-7.2-20.3
l-7.2,20.3h-0.8l-9.4-26.4c-0.7-2-1.1-3.1-1.3-3.5c-0.3-0.6-0.7-1-1.3-1.3s-1.3-0.4-2.2-0.4v-0.9h11.8v0.9h-0.6
c-0.8,0-1.5,0.2-1.9,0.6s-0.7,0.8-0.7,1.4c0,0.5,0.3,1.8,1,3.8l6.3,17.8l5.3-15.2l-0.9-2.7l-0.8-2.1c-0.3-0.8-0.7-1.5-1.1-2.1
c-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.8-0.8c-0.4-0.3-0.8-0.5-1.2-0.6c-0.3-0.1-0.8-0.1-1.4-0.1v-0.9h12.4v0.9H331c-0.9,0-1.5,0.2-1.9,0.6
s-0.6,0.9-0.6,1.5c0,0.8,0.4,2.2,1.1,4.2l6.1,17.3l6-17.5c0.7-1.9,1-3.3,1-4c0-0.4-0.1-0.7-0.3-1s-0.5-0.5-0.9-0.7
c-0.6-0.2-1.4-0.3-2.3-0.3v-0.9H348.6z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M356,786.9v17.2c0,1.3,0.1,2.2,0.3,2.7s0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.4v-0.8c1,0,1.8-0.1,2.1-0.3
s0.6-0.5,0.9-1s0.3-1.4,0.3-2.7v-8.3c0-2.3-0.1-3.8-0.2-4.5c-0.1-0.5-0.3-0.8-0.5-1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.3-0.8
l6.5-2.6H356z M354,775.6c0.7,0,1.2,0.2,1.7,0.7s0.7,1,0.7,1.7s-0.2,1.2-0.7,1.7s-1,0.7-1.7,0.7s-1.2-0.2-1.7-0.7s-0.7-1-0.7-1.7
s0.2-1.2,0.7-1.7S353.4,775.6,354,775.6z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M369.4,786.9v21.6c0,3.7-0.8,6.4-2.3,8.2s-3.6,2.7-6.1,2.7c-1.4,0-2.5-0.3-3.2-0.8s-1-1-1-1.6s0.2-1,0.6-1.4
s0.8-0.6,1.3-0.6c0.4,0,0.8,0.1,1.2,0.3c0.3,0.1,0.8,0.5,1.5,1.2s1.4,1,1.9,1c0.4,0,0.7-0.1,1.1-0.4s0.6-0.8,0.8-1.5
s0.3-2.2,0.3-4.4v-15.3c0-2.4-0.1-3.9-0.2-4.5c-0.1-0.5-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.3-0.8l6.5-2.6
H369.4z M367.4,775.6c0.7,0,1.2,0.2,1.7,0.7s0.7,1,0.7,1.7c0,0.7-0.2,1.2-0.7,1.7s-1,0.7-1.7,0.7c-0.7,0-1.2-0.2-1.7-0.7
s-0.7-1-0.7-1.7c0-0.7,0.2-1.2,0.7-1.7S366.7,775.6,367.4,775.6z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M381.5,791.4c2.5-3,4.9-4.5,7.2-4.5c1.2,0,2.2,0.3,3,0.9s1.5,1.6,2,2.9c0.3,0.9,0.5,2.4,0.5,4.3v9.2
c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.4c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3
c0.1-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-8.8c0-2-0.3-3.4-0.8-4.3s-1.4-1.3-2.6-1.3c-1.9,0-3.7,1-5.6,3v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.3,2.7
c0.2,0.5,0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.2,0.3,2.3,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.5c1.1,0,1.8-0.3,2.2-0.8s0.6-1.6,0.6-3.2v-8c0-2.6-0.1-4.1-0.2-4.7
s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.4-0.8l6.5-2.6h1V791.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M405.6,775.6v15.7c1.7-1.9,3.1-3.1,4.1-3.7s2-0.8,3-0.8c1.2,0,2.3,0.3,3.1,1s1.5,1.7,1.9,3.2
c0.3,1,0.4,2.8,0.4,5.5v7.6c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.5v-0.8h0.5
c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3c0-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-7.6c0-2.3-0.1-3.9-0.4-4.6s-0.6-1.3-1.2-1.7s-1.2-0.6-1.9-0.6
c-0.8,0-1.6,0.2-2.4,0.6s-1.8,1.2-3,2.5v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.2,2.7s0.5,0.7,0.9,0.9s1.2,0.4,2.3,0.4v0.8h-10.6v-0.8
c1,0,1.7-0.1,2.2-0.4c0.3-0.2,0.6-0.5,0.8-0.9s0.3-1.3,0.3-2.7v-19.4c0-2.5-0.1-4-0.2-4.5s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3
c-0.3,0-0.9,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.3-0.8l6.4-2.6H405.6z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M435.4,805.9c-2.2,1.7-3.6,2.7-4.1,3c-0.8,0.4-1.7,0.6-2.7,0.6c-1.5,0-2.7-0.5-3.7-1.5s-1.4-2.4-1.4-4
c0-1,0.2-2,0.7-2.7c0.6-1.1,1.8-2.1,3.3-3s4.2-2.1,7.9-3.4v-0.8c0-2.1-0.3-3.6-1-4.4s-1.7-1.2-3-1.2c-1,0-1.8,0.3-2.3,0.8
c-0.6,0.5-0.9,1.1-0.9,1.8l0,1.4c0,0.7-0.2,1.3-0.6,1.7s-0.8,0.6-1.4,0.6c-0.6,0-1.1-0.2-1.4-0.6s-0.6-1-0.6-1.7
c0-1.3,0.7-2.6,2.1-3.7s3.3-1.7,5.8-1.7c1.9,0,3.5,0.3,4.7,1c0.9,0.5,1.6,1.2,2,2.3c0.3,0.7,0.4,2,0.4,4.1v7.3c0,2,0,3.3,0.1,3.8
s0.2,0.8,0.4,0.9s0.4,0.2,0.6,0.2c0.2,0,0.5-0.1,0.7-0.2c0.3-0.2,1-0.8,1.9-1.7v1.3c-1.8,2.3-3.4,3.5-5,3.5
c-0.8,0-1.4-0.3-1.8-0.8S435.4,807.2,435.4,805.9z M435.4,804.4v-8.2c-2.4,0.9-3.9,1.6-4.6,2c-1.2,0.7-2.1,1.4-2.6,2.2
s-0.8,1.6-0.8,2.5c0,1.1,0.3,2.1,1,2.8s1.4,1.1,2.3,1.1C431.9,806.7,433.5,805.9,435.4,804.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M443.5,787.5h10.1v0.9h-0.7c-0.6,0-1.1,0.1-1.4,0.4s-0.5,0.7-0.5,1.2c0,0.5,0.2,1.2,0.5,1.9l5,11.9l5-12.3
c0.4-0.9,0.5-1.5,0.5-2c0-0.2-0.1-0.4-0.2-0.5c-0.2-0.2-0.4-0.4-0.7-0.5s-0.8-0.1-1.6-0.1v-0.9h7v0.9c-0.8,0.1-1.4,0.2-1.7,0.5
c-0.5,0.5-1,1.2-1.5,2.3l-7.6,18.4h-1l-7.7-18.1c-0.3-0.8-0.7-1.4-1-1.8s-0.7-0.7-1.2-0.9c-0.3-0.1-0.8-0.3-1.6-0.4V787.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M472.2,795.6c0,3.2,0.8,5.7,2.3,7.5s3.4,2.7,5.5,2.7c1.4,0,2.6-0.4,3.7-1.2s1.9-2.1,2.6-4l0.7,0.5
c-0.3,2.1-1.3,4.1-2.9,5.8s-3.6,2.6-5.9,2.6c-2.6,0-4.8-1-6.6-3s-2.8-4.7-2.8-8.1c0-3.7,0.9-6.5,2.8-8.6s4.2-3.1,7.1-3.1
c2.4,0,4.4,0.8,5.9,2.4s2.3,3.7,2.3,6.4H472.2z M472.2,794.2h9.9c-0.1-1.4-0.2-2.3-0.5-2.9c-0.4-0.9-1-1.6-1.7-2.1
s-1.6-0.8-2.4-0.8c-1.3,0-2.5,0.5-3.5,1.5S472.3,792.4,472.2,794.2z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M496.1,791.4c2.5-3,4.9-4.5,7.2-4.5c1.2,0,2.2,0.3,3,0.9s1.5,1.6,2,2.9c0.3,0.9,0.5,2.4,0.5,4.3v9.2
c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.4c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3
c0.1-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-8.8c0-2-0.3-3.4-0.8-4.3s-1.4-1.3-2.6-1.3c-1.9,0-3.7,1-5.6,3v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.3,2.7
c0.2,0.5,0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.2,0.3,2.3,0.3v0.8H489v-0.8h0.5c1.1,0,1.8-0.3,2.2-0.8s0.6-1.6,0.6-3.2v-8c0-2.6-0.1-4.1-0.2-4.7
s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.4-0.8l6.5-2.6h1V791.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M545.9,776.5v0.9c-2.1,0.2-3.7,0.6-5.1,1.2s-2.6,1.6-3.9,2.8s-2.3,2.7-3.2,4.2s-1.5,3.4-2.1,5.5
c2.2-1.5,4.5-2.3,6.8-2.3c2.2,0,4.1,0.9,5.6,2.6s2.4,4,2.4,6.8c0,2.7-0.8,5.1-2.4,7.3c-1.9,2.7-4.5,4-7.7,4c-2.2,0-4-0.7-5.5-2.2
c-3-2.8-4.5-6.4-4.5-10.9c0-2.8,0.6-5.5,1.7-8.1s2.8-4.8,4.9-6.8s4.1-3.3,6.1-4s3.7-1,5.4-1H545.9z M531.3,792.9
c-0.3,2.1-0.4,3.8-0.4,5.1c0,1.5,0.3,3.1,0.8,4.9s1.4,3.2,2.5,4.2c0.8,0.7,1.8,1.1,2.9,1.1c1.4,0,2.6-0.6,3.6-1.9s1.6-3.1,1.6-5.5
c0-2.7-0.5-5-1.6-6.9s-2.6-2.9-4.5-2.9c-0.6,0-1.2,0.1-1.9,0.4S532.6,792.1,531.3,792.9z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M554,780.3l7.7-3.8h0.8v26.8c0,1.8,0.1,2.9,0.2,3.3s0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.4,0.4,2.9,0.4v0.9h-12v-0.9
c1.5,0,2.5-0.2,2.9-0.4s0.7-0.5,0.9-0.9s0.3-1.5,0.3-3.4v-17.2c0-2.3-0.1-3.8-0.2-4.5c-0.1-0.5-0.3-0.9-0.6-1.1s-0.6-0.4-1-0.4
c-0.6,0-1.4,0.2-2.4,0.7L554,780.3z"/>
</g>
</g>
<g>
<g>
<path class="st0" d="M30.4,40.3c2.1-2.9,4.3-4.3,6.7-4.3c2.2,0,4.1,0.9,5.8,2.8s2.5,4.5,2.5,7.7c0,3.8-1.3,6.9-3.8,9.2
c-2.2,2-4.6,3-7.3,3c-1.2,0-2.5-0.2-3.8-0.7s-2.6-1.1-3.9-2V33.8c0-2.4-0.1-3.9-0.2-4.5s-0.3-0.9-0.6-1.1s-0.6-0.3-0.9-0.3
c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.3-0.8l6.4-2.6h1.1V40.3z M30.4,41.8v12.8c0.8,0.8,1.6,1.4,2.5,1.8s1.7,0.6,2.6,0.6c1.4,0,2.7-0.8,4-2.3
s1.8-3.8,1.8-6.8c0-2.8-0.6-4.9-1.8-6.3s-2.6-2.2-4.2-2.2c-0.8,0-1.7,0.2-2.5,0.6C32.2,40.3,31.4,40.9,30.4,41.8z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M49,45.5h12.1v3.5H49V45.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M68.1,44.7c0,3.2,0.8,5.7,2.3,7.5s3.4,2.7,5.5,2.7c1.4,0,2.6-0.4,3.7-1.2s1.9-2.1,2.6-4l0.7,0.5
c-0.3,2.1-1.3,4.1-2.9,5.8s-3.6,2.6-5.9,2.6c-2.6,0-4.8-1-6.6-3s-2.8-4.7-2.8-8.1c0-3.7,0.9-6.5,2.8-8.6s4.2-3.1,7.1-3.1
c2.4,0,4.4,0.8,5.9,2.4S83,42,83,44.7H68.1z M68.1,43.3h9.9C78,42,77.8,41,77.6,40.4c-0.4-0.9-1-1.6-1.7-2.1s-1.6-0.8-2.4-0.8
c-1.3,0-2.5,0.5-3.5,1.5S68.3,41.5,68.1,43.3z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M86.3,45.5h12.1v3.5H86.3V45.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M105.4,44.7c0,3.2,0.8,5.7,2.3,7.5s3.4,2.7,5.5,2.7c1.4,0,2.6-0.4,3.7-1.2s1.9-2.1,2.6-4l0.7,0.5
c-0.3,2.1-1.3,4.1-2.9,5.8s-3.6,2.6-5.9,2.6c-2.6,0-4.8-1-6.6-3s-2.8-4.7-2.8-8.1c0-3.7,0.9-6.5,2.8-8.6s4.2-3.1,7.1-3.1
c2.4,0,4.4,0.8,5.9,2.4s2.3,3.7,2.3,6.4H105.4z M105.4,43.3h9.9c-0.1-1.4-0.2-2.3-0.5-2.9c-0.4-0.9-1-1.6-1.7-2.1
s-1.6-0.8-2.4-0.8c-1.3,0-2.5,0.5-3.5,1.5S105.6,41.5,105.4,43.3z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M123.6,45.5h12.1v3.5h-12.1V45.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M145.3,29.6v7.1h5v1.6h-5v13.9c0,1.4,0.2,2.3,0.6,2.8s0.9,0.7,1.5,0.7c0.5,0,1-0.2,1.5-0.5s0.9-0.8,1.1-1.4
h0.9c-0.5,1.5-1.3,2.7-2.3,3.5s-2,1.2-3.1,1.2c-0.7,0-1.4-0.2-2.1-0.6s-1.2-1-1.5-1.7s-0.5-1.9-0.5-3.4V38.3h-3.4v-0.8
c0.9-0.3,1.7-0.9,2.6-1.7s1.7-1.8,2.4-2.9c0.4-0.6,0.9-1.7,1.5-3.3H145.3z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M156.9,53.5c0.7,0,1.4,0.3,1.9,0.8s0.8,1.1,0.8,1.8s-0.3,1.3-0.8,1.8s-1.1,0.8-1.8,0.8s-1.3-0.3-1.8-0.8
s-0.8-1.1-0.8-1.8c0-0.7,0.3-1.4,0.8-1.9S156.2,53.5,156.9,53.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M170.7,36v4.8c1.8-3.2,3.6-4.8,5.5-4.8c0.9,0,1.6,0.3,2.1,0.8s0.8,1.1,0.8,1.8c0,0.6-0.2,1.1-0.6,1.5
s-0.9,0.6-1.5,0.6c-0.5,0-1.2-0.3-1.8-0.8s-1.2-0.8-1.5-0.8c-0.3,0-0.6,0.2-0.9,0.5c-0.7,0.6-1.4,1.7-2.2,3.2v10.3
c0,1.2,0.1,2.1,0.4,2.7c0.2,0.4,0.6,0.8,1.1,1.1s1.3,0.4,2.2,0.4v0.8h-11v-0.8c1.1,0,1.9-0.2,2.4-0.5c0.4-0.2,0.7-0.6,0.8-1.2
c0.1-0.3,0.1-1,0.1-2.3v-8.3c0-2.5-0.1-4-0.2-4.5s-0.3-0.8-0.6-1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.5,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.2-0.8l6.5-2.6H170.7z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M179.9,45.5H192v3.5h-12.1V45.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M206,36c3.2,0,5.9,1.2,7.8,3.7c1.7,2.1,2.5,4.5,2.5,7.3c0,1.9-0.5,3.9-1.4,5.8s-2.2,3.5-3.8,4.5
s-3.4,1.5-5.4,1.5c-3.2,0-5.8-1.3-7.7-3.9c-1.6-2.2-2.4-4.6-2.4-7.3c0-2,0.5-3.9,1.5-5.9s2.3-3.4,3.9-4.3S204.2,36,206,36z
M205.2,37.5c-0.8,0-1.7,0.2-2.5,0.7s-1.5,1.4-2,2.6s-0.8,2.8-0.8,4.8c0,3.1,0.6,5.8,1.9,8.1s2.9,3.4,4.9,3.4
c1.5,0,2.8-0.6,3.8-1.9s1.5-3.4,1.5-6.4c0-3.8-0.8-6.8-2.5-9C208.4,38.3,206.9,37.5,205.2,37.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M219.9,45.5H232v3.5h-12.1V45.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M245.9,36c3.2,0,5.9,1.2,7.8,3.7c1.7,2.1,2.5,4.5,2.5,7.3c0,1.9-0.5,3.9-1.4,5.8s-2.2,3.5-3.8,4.5
s-3.4,1.5-5.4,1.5c-3.2,0-5.8-1.3-7.7-3.9c-1.6-2.2-2.4-4.6-2.4-7.3c0-2,0.5-3.9,1.5-5.9s2.3-3.4,3.9-4.3S244.2,36,245.9,36z
M245.2,37.5c-0.8,0-1.7,0.2-2.5,0.7s-1.5,1.4-2,2.6s-0.8,2.8-0.8,4.8c0,3.1,0.6,5.8,1.9,8.1s2.9,3.4,4.9,3.4
c1.5,0,2.8-0.6,3.8-1.9s1.5-3.4,1.5-6.4c0-3.8-0.8-6.8-2.5-9C248.3,38.3,246.9,37.5,245.2,37.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M259.9,45.5H272v3.5h-12.1V45.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M281.7,29.6v7.1h5v1.6h-5v13.9c0,1.4,0.2,2.3,0.6,2.8s0.9,0.7,1.5,0.7c0.5,0,1-0.2,1.5-0.5s0.9-0.8,1.1-1.4
h0.9c-0.5,1.5-1.3,2.7-2.3,3.5s-2,1.2-3.1,1.2c-0.7,0-1.4-0.2-2.1-0.6s-1.2-1-1.5-1.7s-0.5-1.9-0.5-3.4V38.3h-3.4v-0.8
c0.9-0.3,1.7-0.9,2.6-1.7s1.7-1.8,2.4-2.9c0.4-0.6,0.9-1.7,1.5-3.3H281.7z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M293.3,53.5c0.7,0,1.4,0.3,1.9,0.8s0.8,1.1,0.8,1.8s-0.3,1.3-0.8,1.8s-1.1,0.8-1.8,0.8s-1.3-0.3-1.8-0.8
s-0.8-1.1-0.8-1.8c0-0.7,0.3-1.4,0.8-1.9S292.5,53.5,293.3,53.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M307,40.5c2.5-3,4.9-4.5,7.2-4.5c1.2,0,2.2,0.3,3,0.9s1.5,1.6,2,2.9c0.3,0.9,0.5,2.4,0.5,4.3v9.2
c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.4c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3
c0.1-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-8.8c0-2-0.3-3.4-0.8-4.3s-1.4-1.3-2.6-1.3c-1.9,0-3.7,1-5.6,3v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.3,2.7
c0.2,0.5,0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.2,0.3,2.3,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.5c1.1,0,1.8-0.3,2.2-0.8s0.6-1.6,0.6-3.2v-8c0-2.6-0.1-4.1-0.2-4.7
s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.4-0.8L306,36h1V40.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M328.4,44.7c0,3.2,0.8,5.7,2.3,7.5s3.4,2.7,5.5,2.7c1.4,0,2.6-0.4,3.7-1.2s1.9-2.1,2.6-4l0.7,0.5
c-0.3,2.1-1.3,4.1-2.9,5.8s-3.6,2.6-5.9,2.6c-2.6,0-4.8-1-6.6-3S325,51,325,47.6c0-3.7,0.9-6.5,2.8-8.6s4.2-3.1,7.1-3.1
c2.4,0,4.4,0.8,5.9,2.4s2.3,3.7,2.3,6.4H328.4z M328.4,43.3h9.9c-0.1-1.4-0.2-2.3-0.5-2.9c-0.4-0.9-1-1.6-1.7-2.1
s-1.6-0.8-2.4-0.8c-1.3,0-2.5,0.5-3.5,1.5S328.5,41.5,328.4,43.3z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M352.3,29.6v7.1h5v1.6h-5v13.9c0,1.4,0.2,2.3,0.6,2.8s0.9,0.7,1.5,0.7c0.5,0,1-0.2,1.5-0.5s0.9-0.8,1.1-1.4
h0.9c-0.5,1.5-1.3,2.7-2.3,3.5s-2,1.2-3.1,1.2c-0.7,0-1.4-0.2-2.1-0.6s-1.2-1-1.5-1.7s-0.5-1.9-0.5-3.4V38.3H345v-0.8
c0.9-0.3,1.7-0.9,2.6-1.7s1.7-1.8,2.4-2.9c0.4-0.6,0.9-1.7,1.5-3.3H352.3z"/>
</g>
</g>
<polyline class="st1" points="64.5,78 72.5,74.3 73.7,74.3 74.2,74.6 74.7,74.7 74.9,74.7 75.2,74.2 75.5,73.4 75.7,73.4 75.6,73.3
75.5,73.1 75.4,73.9 76.2,75.3 76.8,76.2 76.4,77.1 75.9,78.9 77.2,79.5 78.1,80 78.9,80.2 79.1,80.2 80.2,80.2 81.1,80.1
88.4,79.3 93,78.4 97.6,78 99.5,77.1 102.6,76.5 103.7,76.9 103.8,77.8 103.5,79.1 102.9,80.9 103.3,83.2 103.4,83.6 103.9,85
103.9,85.2 104.1,85.6 104.2,85.8 104.2,86 104,86.9 104.9,90.9 105.6,91.6 105.6,96.6 104.8,100.2 105.4,100.7 105.9,100.8
106,100.8 106.1,100.8 106.4,100.9 107.6,101.8 108,102.5 108.1,103.3 109.2,106 109.6,106.7 110.5,111.2 112.5,113.9 114,114.2
114.7,114.2 115.4,114.2 116.2,114.4 116.2,114.8 116.5,114.9 117,114.8 118.3,114 119,113.5 120.1,112.9 123.9,112.3 125.8,111.8
135.4,111.2 136.7,110.3 137.1,110.3 138.5,110.5 140.4,110.6 141.9,110.6 146.8,110.9 149.2,110.9 152.2,109.9 153.5,109.5
153.8,109.4 154.9,109.3 159.1,109.2 159.8,109.2 160.3,109.2 162.9,108.6 168.3,107.2 172.4,106.3 175.7,106.5 177.4,106.5
179.2,106.5 182,106.6 183.2,106.5 185,106.2 187.4,105.5 187.7,105.5 187.9,105.5 188.1,104.7 188.2,103.6 189.4,102.9
194.7,101.8 196.6,102 199.4,102.1 200.7,101.9 201.9,102 210.2,102.3 212.9,102.2 215.7,102.6 221.1,103 221.5,103.2 223.6,104.5
225.4,105 226.6,105.4 227.8,105.7 229.4,105.3 231,104.7 231.7,105.3 234.6,110.2 234.8,110.2 235,110.3 235.1,110.5 234.6,111.5
233.2,113.5 232,115.2 230.7,116.2 220.8,123 217.9,125 217.5,126.7 216.7,128.2 214.8,129.7 214.2,130.1 213,131.3 212.5,133.5
212.7,133.6 212.7,133.5 211.5,134 204.9,137.2 197.1,145.4 192.8,147.9 192.1,148.6 190,151 190.3,152.9 190.9,152.9 190.9,153.2
202.3,169.5 201.1,170.9 200.7,171.7 200.7,173.3 200.8,174.7 201.3,179.9 201.9,183 203.1,186.2 202.5,188.5 202.8,189.4
204.6,193.6 204.4,195.5 206.6,200.9 206.9,202 207.3,204.2 207.6,205.3 210.1,214.1 208.3,216.9 207.8,218 208.1,219.3
208.6,220.1 210,221.5 210.4,222.4 211.4,223 212.8,223.4 214.2,225 214.2,225 214.2,225 214.4,225.2 215.3,226.4 216.1,226.5
216.4,226.6 216.5,226.8 218.6,229.9 218.5,230.9 218.3,233 218.6,234.8 218.7,242.6 219,243.6 218.7,246.5 218.4,247.6 216.1,253
216.1,263.9 205.4,282.7 205.2,287.8 204.6,289.8 205.4,291.2 205.4,292.1 205.2,292.4 203.8,292.5 202.7,292.7 201.8,293.3
201.3,297.5 201.7,297.7 201.6,298.2 201.5,300.1 202.1,302.8 202.1,306.7 201.2,309.9 188.5,328 187.9,328.7 180.6,340.3
180.5,340.4 179.9,341.3 179,342.4 178.3,343.1 177.5,343.7 176.7,345.7 176.8,346.8 176.8,347.2 176.9,347.4 177.7,348.2
178.8,349.3 183.1,350.9 203.5,357 204.6,358.1 215.8,362.7 216.9,363 218,363.9 217.9,364.8 217.2,365.6 212,371.1 210.2,372.2
204.5,377.2 204.4,377.3 204,378.2 203.5,378.9 197.3,386.1 194.5,387.9 193.7,388.6 192.1,392.2 191.7,393.4 189.9,396.3
190,396.4 190,396.5 188.6,396.8 187.4,397.2 185.1,399.3 183.9,399.3 182.1,399.6 180.8,401.3 176.5,407.5 176.2,407.8 175,409.7
175.5,410.7 173.8,411.1 171.5,412.3 168.6,414.6 163.7,418.5 163.4,419.7 162.2,422.3 162.3,423 161.9,426.2 157.7,430.7
155.9,431.3 155.7,431.6 153,434.3 151.5,434.5 146.5,437.3 146.3,438.3 143.9,440.8 143.5,441.2 141,443.4 140.4,444.4
139.2,445.1 139,445.3 132.8,451.6 131.2,452 129.9,452.4 128.9,452.8 128,453.3 127.4,454.1 127.1,454.4 126.6,455.3 126.2,455.9
126,456.1 125.6,456.4 125.2,456.7 125.2,456.8 126,457.6 132.7,462.5 134.9,462.7 135.6,462.7 137.3,463 143.1,465.9 145.9,466.4
148.5,466.5 149.3,467.2 150.7,468.2 154.3,470.4 157.9,472.8 158.7,473.2 160.3,474 160.9,474.6 164,478 168,480.5 172.3,483.5
172.8,485.3 172.7,486.2 172.8,487.1 174.4,490.1 174.9,491.3 175,491.5 175.7,491.9 176.1,492.2 183.3,499.3 183.2,500.1
183.4,501.2 184.3,502 188.7,507 188.6,507.2 187.6,508 187.2,508 187,508.7 186.9,509.2 186.9,509.8 186.4,512.6 186.8,514.6
186.4,515.4 186.2,515.7 198.3,516.1 199.7,516.2 207,516.2 203.7,515.8 186.8,520.3 186.9,521.8 185.1,523.6 185,523.6
185.3,523.6 185.2,523.6 185.3,523.6 185,523.8 184.8,524 184.5,524.5 184.4,524.8 184.4,525.5 184.1,526.3 184.2,527.4
185.1,528.4 187.4,533.2 185.2,541.1 184.9,541.4 184.6,541.5 184.1,542.1 184.5,543.1 184,544.4 183.2,547.9 183.6,548.9 184,550
185,551 186.2,551.8 186.9,552.8 188.7,554.5 190.3,554.2 193.9,552.9 195.3,552.7 196.4,553.1 210.1,556.7 211.1,557.6
212.4,559.5 212.4,559.7 212.5,560.4 212.2,560.6 212.3,560.7 213.4,561 215.3,560.6 215.5,560.7 215.4,560.7 214.5,561.2
213.9,562.9 214.8,564.4 217.8,567.2 219,567.4 220.8,568.4 224.4,572.8 225.1,573.6 226.6,574.5 226.8,574.6 226.8,574.6
226.7,573.8 227,573.5 227,573.3 227.1,573.3 226.9,573.4 226.7,573.9 226.6,574.2 226.6,574.2 227.8,574.2 227.9,575 227.9,575.8
228.1,576.5 228.8,577.3 230.9,577.5 232.6,577.3 234,577.3 235.4,577.2 239.9,576.4 248.6,573.1 249.6,572.7 254.9,571
258.4,569.7 265.4,567.9 266.9,567.4 269.1,566.9 272.9,566.5 274.9,566.4 292.6,576.3 293.3,577.2 294.3,578 302.7,583.5
310.2,588.5 311.2,588.9 313.3,590.2 315,591 315.3,591.5 315.7,591.6 320.4,595.7 321.3,597.4 333.5,608.1 333.4,609.7
332.6,611.4 334.8,613 335.8,614 337,614.9 341.3,618.1 341.2,618.1 341.3,617.8 342.6,618.5 351,623.1 351.4,624.1 351.4,624.3
351.6,624.4 360.3,628.6 367.7,633.6 368.2,634.2 383.4,646.1 385,647.2 404.9,663.1 405.9,663.7 416.6,671.5 417.6,672 418,672.7
419.3,673.5 422.7,676.2 424.6,679.5 425.1,680.2 425.9,682 425.7,685.6 419.1,687.7 415.8,688.9 412.6,690.6 411.4,691.2
410.2,691.7 409.9,692.1 409.6,691.8 409.3,691.6 409.1,691.6 409.4,691.6 410.6,691.4 411.8,692.2 422,700.5 420.5,699
420.2,698.6 419.4,697.5 419.1,697.1 418.3,696.4 419.3,696.9 418.3,699 419.2,699.6 408.6,701.4 407,701.4 407.5,701 408,701
408.8,701 409.7,701 424.9,702.8 422.4,704.9 420.3,706.5 424.4,695.3 424.2,695.6 424,696.4 424.1,697.2 424.5,699.4 425.3,700.4
426.4,701.8 426.8,702.1 427.5,702.1 430.2,700.6 431.7,699.3 442.4,693.9 442.4,695 444.7,696 445.5,696.7 446.7,697.5
446.5,697.6 445.7,697 445.1,697.1 443.9,697.3 443.5,697.5 443.6,697.6 444.8,696.2 444.4,696.5 444.5,697.5 443.4,698.7
442,703.1 441.2,707.6 442.7,712.7 446.6,720.4 447.1,720.9 447.3,721.1 448,721.9 453.1,728.9 452.8,729.2 452.2,729.3
451.2,729.5 451.2,729.8 450.8,730 449.2,730.1 447.4,730.4 446.4,730.9 444.2,732 443.7,732.2 443.3,732.5 442.2,733.1
441.7,733.3 440.8,733.6 440.3,733.5 439.8,733.5 439,733.5 437.7,733.4 436.6,733.8 435.3,734.1 433.2,734.3 432.9,734.4
432.1,734.7 432,735.3 432.1,735.9 432.2,735.7 432.4,735.5 432.4,735.2 432.1,735.1 429.9,734 428.8,734.6 427.9,735.7
427.5,736.6 425.5,742.9 423.1,748.5 423.5,749.7 424.1,750.4 425.4,751.5 427.3,752.5 427.8,752.3 428.5,752.4 429,753.2
431.7,758 431.8,758.3 432.6,759.9 434,760.6 434.5,761 434.5,761.2 435.7,763.3 436.2,763.8 437.5,762.9 437.6,762.6 437.7,762.6
438.2,762.8 439.5,763.4 440.7,763.9 442.1,764.4 443.2,764.1 444.4,763.2 446.7,761.4 450.3,760.1 451.8,758.9 453.9,757.9
454.4,757.8 454.9,757.7 455.1,757.6 455.3,757.6 455.5,757.5 455.6,757.6 457.1,758.6 457.8,759 458.4,759 458.8,758.7
459.2,754.6 452.9,746.3 453.1,747.2 453,748.1 451.8,750.6 451.2,751.8 451.6,750.7 453.8,749.5 451.6,757.4 451.1,758.2
450.3,759.3 448.9,759.7 447.8,759.6 445.5,759.6 443.5,759.5 441.5,759.5 440.4,759.5 439.2,757.1 "/>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 18 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 1330.2 246.3" style="enable-background:new 0 0 1330.2 246.3;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-miterlimit:1;}
.st1{fill:#221E20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:14.4px;}
</style>
<polyline class="st0" points="93.6,128.7 93.6,128.7 92.3,125.4 95.8,127 96.4,127.1 100.8,129.2 104.6,130.7 103.3,129.8
103,129.2 102.8,128.1 103.3,127.3 104.5,127.1 106.7,127.2 108,126.6 112.5,123.4 114.9,121.2 116.2,120.7 119.3,119.8
120.4,119.4 132.7,112.1 134.3,112.1 137.6,113.3 140.3,113.6 141.6,113.6 145.1,113.3 148.7,112.3 150.3,111.5 152.5,110.2
153.9,107.6 154.2,105.2 155.4,104.8 156.9,104.3 158.5,103.7 160.2,103.5 164,103 171.5,99.7 171.7,99.3 172.2,99.1 176.5,97.7
178.3,97.2 180.4,96.5 183.7,95.1 195.5,91.8 208.2,88.4 236.8,81.7 244.3,80.3 270.6,75 273.4,75.3 311.2,67.8 313.5,67.8
321,68.5 325.2,68.6 326.9,67.8 329.1,66.8 329.8,66.1 330.5,65.4 332.2,65.3 339.5,65.3 342.1,64.9 343.9,64.6 354.6,63.9
357.4,63.1 358.7,62.8 362,62.6 365.2,63 402.2,55.4 419.9,52.1 436.9,47.5 438.3,47.6 443.6,47.1 446.2,47 448.2,46.5 453.9,47.4
455.9,47.2 472.9,44.8 476.1,44.1 492.9,42.3 495.3,42.1 514.5,35.6 522.3,32.4 522.5,32.4 522.6,32.5 523.5,32.5 527.3,31
528.2,30.6 529.5,30.1 530.9,29.8 532.9,29.7 534,29.6 551.3,28.4 562.3,27.7 567.1,27.2 568.9,26.8 570.9,26.5 578.7,26.2
587.6,25.6 613.7,32.4 618,33.3 622.9,33.5 650.9,34.1 652.4,34 654,34.1 654.9,34.8 656.5,35.9 656.8,35.8 658.1,35.1 669.9,34
670.1,34 670.4,33.5 670.6,33.2 671,32.7 671.1,32.9 671.3,33 671.5,33 671.8,33 673.5,33 675.3,32.3 680,30.6 682.4,30.2
698.7,26.2 703.2,26.4 715.6,26.6 717.2,26.7 722.5,26.3 723.8,26 725.4,25.7 726,25.6 726.5,26.3 727.8,27.1 728.9,27.7
729.8,27.6 731.8,27.4 736.9,27.6 740.4,27 741.7,26.9 748.4,24.8 751.7,24.4 752.8,23.9 753.9,24.3 754.5,25.2 755.1,26.9
756.8,30.2 757.8,30.7 759.5,31.1 761.2,31.8 762.1,33.1 760.7,36.1 759.9,37.3 759.8,37.6 759.9,38.8 761.1,39.7 763.3,41.1
764.2,42.3 764.9,43.1 764.9,45.8 765,47.9 765.5,48.3 766.7,49.1 767.8,49.5 769.6,50.6 770.7,51.1 772.1,53.9 772.1,54.3
772.7,55.6 772.6,56.8 773.6,60.9 773.7,62 774.5,62.8 777.3,66.8 778.2,72.7 779.4,73.7 780.1,74.6 780.2,75.4 780.6,77.9
781.5,78.4 782.3,79.2 782.2,80.2 782.8,84.5 783,85.9 782.6,88.5 783,94.4 783.1,95.6 783,96.7 782,97.7 781.2,98.5 781.6,99.3
782.2,100 783.4,106.2 784.2,108.5 784.2,108.6 785.1,109.8 785.5,112.6 785.8,113.8 786,114.6 786.8,116.9 786.7,119.3 788.7,122
787.9,124 788.1,127.1 788.8,128.9 789.1,130.2 789.6,132.3 791.4,135.7 793,138.3 792.6,141 793.1,142 793.8,142.9 795.6,144
797.2,144.9 797.3,148.4 795.9,153.1 795.5,155.2 796.4,155.7 797,156.5 796.5,157.4 795.9,158.6 795.4,159.3 794.6,160.5
795.1,161.3 796.1,164.7 796.1,166.5 797.3,167.9 797.9,169.5 797.7,170.9 798.8,173.1 799.4,174.1 801.5,174.9 802.4,175.4
804.5,176.7 808.1,179.8 814.3,185.4 814.5,185.6 816.4,187.1 823.6,191.5 826.7,193.4 827.5,193.9 828.4,195 828.5,195.2
828.8,195.4 829.1,195.7 831.7,198.4 834.3,200.3 842.4,208.3 843.5,209.1 843.9,209.4 847.5,214.6 848.2,215.6 849.7,220.6
850.2,222.6 851.1,223.2 852.4,223.9 854.9,225.9 856.7,225.9 858.2,225.5 862.3,224 866.5,222.6 870,222.2 874.1,221.3
875.4,220.9 879.6,220.1 881.3,219.9 883.3,219.7 885.3,219.6 886.5,219.2 894.9,217.3 896.4,216.8 900.6,216 901.9,216 910,213.8
919.1,210.6 922.7,209.3 923.7,208.3 924.8,206.5 926.4,206.5 930,205.9 931.7,205.5 937.9,205.5 942.4,204.4 942.8,204.3
944.1,204.2 947.3,203.7 947.9,203.4 948.6,203.2 951.3,202.7 954,202 955.3,201.8 956.1,201.7 956.4,201.5 956.4,201.5
957.1,202.5 957.2,202.5 957.3,202.4 957.2,202.5 956.6,202.7 955.5,203.7 953.9,204.1 952.5,203.6 951.6,202.6 951.7,201.3
953.5,200 953.6,199.9 954.3,200.1 954.7,200.5 954.7,200.2 955.2,199.2 955.4,198.7 955.5,198.3 955.7,198 955.9,197.9
957.2,198.3 957.8,198.6 958.6,198.9 959.6,199.6 959.9,199.4 960.3,199.4 960.6,199.6 961,199.7 961.2,199.8 960.7,199.8
959.4,199.8 958.5,199.4 958.1,199.1 957.3,198.9 957.3,199.1 956.8,199.3 956.5,199.2 955.9,198.3 956.1,197.5 956.7,196.9
958.7,198.1 959.1,199.6 958,198.7 957.5,197.9 956.8,196.6 956.5,196.3 956.4,196.1 957.1,196.9 958.8,199.4 958.7,200.3
958.3,200.1 957.7,199.8 957.3,199.6 957.3,199.4 957.7,199.8 957.7,199.6 957.7,199.2 957.8,198.9 957.3,198.3 957.1,198.2
956.8,198.2 956.8,198.1 956.8,197.8 956.8,197.9 956.6,198.2 955.9,198 955.8,197.9 955.4,198 955.1,198.3 955.4,197.7
954.5,197.6 954.4,197.1 954.3,197.4 952.4,196.1 953.1,196.3 954.7,196.8 955,198.1 955.6,199.1 956.2,200.1 956,200.3 956,200.5
956.2,201 956.3,201 956.4,201.1 957,200.9 956.8,200.9 956.9,201 956.8,200.8 956.6,200.6 956,199.9 955.7,199.4 955.4,198.9
955.4,198.5 955.2,198.3 955.4,198.5 958.1,200.1 960.7,201.4 960.1,200.6 960.7,201.7 959.8,201.6 958.2,200.7 957,200.3 955,199
955.8,197.7 955.9,194.6 956.2,195.1 955.8,195.7 955.1,197.2 953.8,197.6 953.2,196.3 953.9,196 955.2,195.6 957.6,194.2
957.9,194 954,193.9 951.2,193.2 947,191.3 946.8,191.6 948,193.2 956.2,201.6 956.9,201.6 957,201.4 957.1,201.1 957.3,200.5
957.2,200.2 957.2,199.8 957.2,198.9 957.2,198.7 958,199.9 958.6,202.2 957.7,201.5 957.3,200.4 956,200.9 954.9,202 954.2,201.4
954,201.2 955.3,201.9 956.3,202.1 957.4,201.7 957.9,201.4 958.2,201.3 958.3,201.6 958.7,202 960.3,202.7 961.7,202.2
961.4,202.2 960.3,202.9 959.3,203.4 959,203.6 957.7,203.8 957.7,204 958,204.2 958.6,204.1 959.3,203.8 960.9,203.1 963.6,201.7
965.1,201.3 966,201.1 966.6,201 977.9,197.9 979.8,197.3 981.8,196.5 982.9,196.1 983.3,196.1 984.7,195.7 984.9,195.5
985.2,195.4 986.7,195.1 988.3,194.7 989.5,194.8 991.2,194.3 992.9,193.6 994.2,193.2 995.6,193.1 998.3,193 1000.6,192.3
1002.7,192.2 1007.2,192.1 1009.9,191.1 1011.6,190.8 1012.7,191.3 1013.9,191.6 1018.8,192.4 1030.8,192.7 1032.3,192.6
1033.1,192 1032.2,191.3 1032.1,191.4 1032.2,191.6 1032.9,191.7 1034.5,191.6 1042.4,191.8 1045.9,192.5 1050.1,193.9
1050.8,195.2 1052.4,195.4 1053.8,195.3 1055.7,194.8 1060.3,192.4 1063.6,190.5 1064.3,189.9 1065.5,189.1 1074.4,184.4
1083.4,180.8 1084.5,179.8 1090.9,178.4 1091.2,178.3 1092.9,177.6 1095.2,176.7 1097,176.2 1105.4,173.2 1112.2,171.9
1125.8,170.7 1135.1,168.7 1144.2,165.9 1146.8,165 1148.5,164.3 1150.4,163.7 1154.3,162.5 1156.4,162.1 1162.6,161.7
1165.1,161.5 1172.3,159.7 1173.7,159.5 1176.3,159.8 1190.5,157.7 1196,156 1199.2,154.3 1200.4,153.8 1203.9,153.2 1204.1,153.6
1204.2,154.2 1204,155.1 1204.7,155.5 1205.5,155.4 1216.9,153.3 1223.8,151.5 1224.5,151.1 1224.7,151.2 1226.1,151.6 "/>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 12.4486 133.7118)" class="st1 st2 st3">ciao.urca.tv</text>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 12.4486 151.0118)" class="st1 st2 st3">richfolks.club</text>
</g>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 1231.9435 151.5294)" class="st1 st2 st3">Wijnhaven 61</text>
</g>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 6.9 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 304 392.6" style="enable-background:new 0 0 304 392.6;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-miterlimit:1;}
.st1{fill:#221E20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:14.4px;}
</style>
<polyline class="st0" points="232.3,31.8 232.3,31.8 226.8,28.9 225.9,28.2 225.9,28.1 225.6,28.8 226.2,29.1 226.1,29.4
226.3,32.3 226.2,32.7 225.7,32.9 224.4,33.1 212,36 211.5,36 208.8,36.1 207.5,37.4 206.1,37.5 204.7,37.3 200,36.7 194.1,36.7
189.5,38.8 188.4,39.3 187.5,40.1 186.5,40.8 186.8,40.9 186.7,41.4 186.5,41.7 186.2,42.1 183.2,45 175.7,50.7 172.5,53.6
170.3,54.9 170,55.3 168.7,56.7 166,59 164.8,59.7 163.2,60.8 162.9,61.1 158.9,66.8 157,68.5 155.8,69.2 153.3,71.6 152,72.2
149.2,74.7 148.3,75.8 148.1,78.1 147.5,78.7 146.2,78.9 145,78.7 141.9,79.4 140.3,80 139.3,80.1 139.3,80 140,79.8 139.7,79.9
122.6,85.4 121.3,85.6 107.5,88.6 99.9,89.1 99.7,89.2 96.8,90.4 94.6,91.1 93.1,91.9 92.8,92.6 93.6,95.8 94.1,96 94.3,96.3
94.5,96.8 94.4,96.9 94.4,97.2 95.8,100.9 99.5,103.4 100.3,105.2 101,106.1 101.1,106.9 101,107.9 100.8,108 100.9,108.2
101.2,108.5 101.6,109.6 102.4,111.3 102.7,111.6 103.6,112.7 104.1,113.7 104.5,114.4 107.9,118.7 108.8,120.8 109.2,121.6
109.4,122.3 109.2,122.7 115.3,134.5 115,137 114.5,138.4 114.3,140.4 113.2,151.9 112.6,153.2 112.5,156.1 112.8,157 112.7,158.1
111.4,162.1 109.2,173.3 110.2,178.4 110.6,179 111.4,179.6 111.5,180.3 110.7,181.1 109.4,182.3 109.1,182.4 108.9,182.3
108.8,182.3 108.8,182.4 108.8,182.6 108.8,182.6 108.5,182.9 107.8,183.3 106.3,185.7 106,186.7 105.3,188 105.4,191.5
107.3,193.8 107.9,194.7 109.9,199.6 115.8,205.5 116.2,205.7 127.6,224.9 128.6,226.2 130.8,229.2 131.5,231.3 133.5,232.8
135.3,235 138.4,237.9 139.8,239.2 143.5,244.4 144.2,245.3 145.1,248.8 146.3,251.8 146.6,252.8 146.4,253.2 145.3,254.4
143.3,254.9 141,254.9 139.9,254.9 139.6,255 139.1,255.2 138.2,255.5 137.5,255.8 136.7,256.4 136.6,256.7 137,256.8 137.5,257.2
138.7,258.5 139.7,260.3 141.1,261 142.3,261.4 143.8,263.1 145.6,264.8 146.2,265.3 146.4,265.5 146.6,265.8 147,266.3
147.3,266.6 147.4,266.8 148.2,267.5 148.7,267.9 155,275.2 155.8,276.4 158.9,278.7 160,279.5 161.1,280.6 161.4,281.3
161.2,281.5 160.9,281.7 160.6,281.8 160.4,282.3 160.5,282.8 160.7,284.1 160.2,284.4 159.2,285.1 158.9,286.9 158.8,287.1
158.8,287.1 158.6,288 158.1,289.1 158.2,290.9 158.3,291.1 158.5,291.2 158.8,291.5 159.1,292 159.9,292.6 160.7,292.7
161.1,292.9 161.8,293.3 162.4,293.7 162.9,294.7 163.5,293.6 165.3,292.8 166.1,292.8 166.7,293 171,294.1 171.9,294.3
172.3,294.3 172.9,294.4 174.2,294.6 176,294.9 177,295 176.8,294.5 176.1,293.9 175.8,294.1 175.8,294.1 175.8,294.4 175.7,295.2
175.2,296 173.7,296.6 172.9,296.4 171.9,295.8 171.3,295.4 170.1,295.3 169.6,296 168.8,302.8 168.3,304.5 167.9,305.3
166.1,305.2 164.1,304.4 161,305.2 159.9,305.5 151,307.2 150.1,307.2 149,306.7 148.5,306.7 146.7,307.1 144.7,307.1 143,307.5
141.2,308.6 139.3,310.2 132.9,316.7 123.5,320.7 122.1,321.8 120.1,324.3 121,324.7 121,324.8 121,325 121.1,325 120.4,325.1
119.8,325.3 119.8,325.5 121.1,326 120.6,326.2 115.1,328.5 113.7,330.1 111.5,332.5 110.2,332.4 109.9,332.3 109.4,332.4
108.5,332.3 106.5,331.6 105.6,331 104,329.1 106.6,329.5 105.9,329.7 104.9,329.9 103.6,329.8 103.1,329.7 102.2,329.5
101.6,329.4 101.3,329.4 99.3,329.6 97.8,330 97.3,330.2 96.7,330.2 96.1,330.2 95.5,330 94.6,330 94,330.2 93.4,330.6 92.7,331.3
90.5,333.9 90.2,334.8 90,336.1 86.6,342.4 86.2,343 85.2,344.7 84.7,347.2 83.5,349.4 84.1,350 85,351.4 85.7,352.1 86,352.4
86.3,353.4 86.3,356.6 86.4,359.5 88.3,359.7 90.7,359.6 91.8,359.3 92.7,359.2 93.1,359.3 93.6,359.7 94.7,360.6 95.1,361
95.7,361.8 95.5,361.8 "/>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 12.5735 377.1927)" class="st1 st2 st3">Wijnhaven 61</text>
</g>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 235.9328 22.7542)" class="st1 st2 st3">p.lions.es</text>
</g>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.1 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 1346.4 1855.7" style="enable-background:new 0 0 1346.4 1855.7;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:3.685;stroke-linecap:square;stroke-linejoin:bevel;stroke-miterlimit:10;}
.st1{fill:#231F20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:60px;}
</style>
<polyline class="st0" points="1060.4,104.5 1060.4,104.5 1032.9,90.3 1028.4,86.7 1028.3,86.3 1026.6,89.8 1029.7,91.2 1029.2,92.7
1030.4,106.9 1029.6,108.9 1027.2,110 1020.7,110.9 958.7,125.6 956.4,125.4 943,126 936.1,132.5 929,133.2 922.5,132 899,129.3
869.2,128.9 846.2,139.5 840.9,142.2 836.1,146.1 831.2,149.6 832.8,150.2 832.1,152.6 831,154 829.7,156.1 814.9,170.6 777.1,199
761.2,213.8 750.3,220.2 748.6,222.4 742.4,229.1 728.9,240.6 722.7,244.2 714.6,249.5 713,251.3 693.5,279.8 683.5,288.1
677.9,291.8 665,303.6 659,306.8 644.9,319.3 640.4,324.8 639.3,335.9 636.3,339.3 629.8,340.1 624,339.1 608.1,342.6 600.3,345.4
595.2,346 595,345.9 598.9,344.8 597.3,345.2 511.7,372.7 505.1,373.6 436.3,388.8 398.4,391.2 397,391.7 382.8,397.5 371.9,401.1
364.4,405.2 362.8,408.9 366.7,424.6 369.4,425.8 370.2,427.4 371.1,429.8 370.7,430.3 370.7,431.4 377.8,450.3 396.2,462.6
400.4,471.9 403.7,476.3 404.4,480.1 403.7,485.2 402.9,485.7 403.3,486.5 404.5,488.1 406.7,493.6 410.8,501.9 412.4,503.7
416.7,509 419.1,514.3 421,517.7 438.3,539.3 442.6,549.8 444.7,553.8 446,557.2 444.9,558.9 475.5,618 473.8,630.6 471.3,637.7
470.1,647.5 465,705.2 461.8,711.6 461.4,726.1 463,730.5 462.4,736 455.7,756.3 444.9,812 450,837.6 451.6,840.6 455.9,843.5
456.1,847.2 452.1,851.1 446,857.1 444.3,857.5 443.1,857.4 442.7,857.1 443,857.8 442.6,858.4 442.7,858.4 441.1,860.3
437.6,862.2 430.1,874.1 428.7,878.9 425.4,885.6 425.7,903.1 435.1,914.6 438.4,918.9 448.4,943.8 478,973.3 479.6,974.1
536.7,1070.3 541.7,1076.4 552.5,1091.6 556.2,1101.9 566.2,1109.6 575.5,1120.7 590.6,1134.9 597.9,1141.5 616.4,1167.6
619.6,1172.3 624.1,1189.9 630,1204.6 631.7,1209.7 630.6,1211.5 625.5,1217.8 615.4,1219.9 603.9,1220 598.3,1220.3 596.9,1220.7
594.2,1221.5 589.7,1223.4 586.3,1224.9 582,1227.7 581.8,1229.2 583.5,1229.8 586.2,1231.4 592.2,1238 597.5,1247 604.3,1250.6
610.3,1252.8 618,1261.2 626.7,1269.6 629.8,1272.2 630.8,1273.1 631.9,1274.7 633.7,1277 635.1,1278.8 635.9,1279.7 640,1282.9
642.1,1285.1 673.9,1321.8 677.6,1327.7 693.1,1339.1 698.7,1343 704.3,1348.8 705.9,1352.2 704.9,1353 703.4,1354 701.9,1354.8
700.7,1356.9 701.5,1359.5 702,1366.2 699.8,1367.7 694.9,1371 693.3,1380 692.7,1381.1 692.7,1381.2 692,1385.9 689.3,1391.1
689.6,1400 690.2,1400.9 691,1401.8 692.5,1403.3 694.1,1405.6 698.4,1408.8 702.2,1409.4 704.2,1410 707.5,1412.2 710.8,1414.3
713.2,1419.3 716.4,1413.5 725.1,1409.9 729.4,1409.9 732.5,1410.4 753.7,1416.3 758.5,1417.1 760.5,1417.1 763.5,1417.4
769.9,1418.5 778.9,1420.3 783.7,1420.6 782.6,1418.1 779.1,1415 777.9,1415.9 777.7,1416.1 777.9,1417.8 777.4,1421.7
774.7,1425.7 767.3,1428.7 763.5,1427.7 758.2,1424.8 755.4,1422.5 749.2,1422 746.7,1425.7 742.7,1459.6 740.4,1468.3 738.1,1472
729.4,1471.6 719.1,1467.8 703.8,1471.4 698.2,1472.9 653.6,1481.6 649.4,1481.6 643.9,1479.3 641.4,1479.1 632.1,1481.1
622.3,1481.1 614,1483.1 605,1488.9 595.3,1496.6 563.4,1529.1 516.5,1549.3 509.2,1554.6 499.2,1567.3 503.7,1568.9 503.7,1569.8
503.9,1570.5 504.1,1570.5 500.7,1571.3 498,1572.3 498,1572.9 504.4,1575.5 501.7,1576.7 474.4,1588.1 467.4,1596.1 456.4,1608.3
449.6,1607.5 448.4,1607.3 446,1607.5 441.4,1607 431.3,1603.6 426.6,1600.7 418.9,1591.2 431.7,1593.3 428.3,1594.1 423.4,1595.3
417,1594.8 414,1594.2 409.8,1593.3 406.9,1592.6 405.1,1592.6 395.3,1593.6 387.6,1595.9 385.2,1596.5 382.1,1596.5 379.1,1596.4
376.4,1595.6 371.9,1595.9 368.7,1596.8 365.9,1598.4 362.2,1602.3 351.4,1615 349.8,1619.5 348.7,1626.3 331.6,1657.7
329.7,1660.5 324.9,1669.2 322.2,1681.7 316,1692.7 319.1,1695.9 323.5,1702.4 327,1705.9 328.6,1707.7 330.5,1712.5 330.5,1728.9
330.6,1743.2 340.3,1744.1 352.1,1743.7 358,1742.1 362.4,1741.7 364.4,1742 366.7,1744 372.1,1748.8 374.2,1750.7 377.2,1754.5
376.2,1754.9 "/>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 33.0708 1820.1949)" class="st1 st2 st3">Wijnhaven 61</text>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 1087.4575 73.1949)" class="st1 st2 st3">p.lions.es</text>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.4 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 369.3 368.9" style="enable-background:new 0 0 369.3 368.9;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-miterlimit:1;}
.st1{fill:#221E20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:14.4px;}
</style>
<polyline class="st0" points="97.3,351.7 97.3,351.7 97.2,351.9 97.2,351.9 97.1,352.1 96.7,352.6 96.2,353.3 94.8,353.7
93.2,353.7 92,353.7 91.7,353.6 91.4,352.9 89.7,353.1 84.2,353.7 80.5,353.5 77.9,353.6 75.4,353.6 64.7,355.5 61.3,356.2
52.6,358.2 51.5,357.6 51,356.6 50.2,355.5 49.2,354.2 49,354 48.3,353.3 47.3,352.1 46,351 45.7,350.7 44.5,350.2 42.8,349.6
39.1,349.1 37.9,349 35.7,348.5 33.1,347.5 31.5,346.3 30.2,345.2 30,344.5 29.2,343.9 27.8,343.9 24.6,343.5 23.9,343.2
23.6,343.1 23.7,343 23.8,342.2 23.8,340.9 23.8,340.7 23.9,340 24.4,321 24.7,320 28.9,304.7 27.6,303.3 11.7,289.3 12.6,288.3
14.6,287.1 20.3,284 22.1,282.9 23.2,282.4 25.5,281.3 26.3,280.7 30.6,278.7 30.8,278.4 31.5,277.7 34.3,276.4 39.7,274.6
44.3,272.1 74.2,258.9 76.1,258 80.2,256.2 87.5,253.1 88.6,252.3 95.9,248.9 120.4,236.9 127,232.1 129.2,230.3 147.7,223
148.4,222.5 164.6,216.3 165.5,215.9 170.4,213.6 171.8,213 172.7,212.4 173.8,211.5 175.4,210.7 177.3,209.7 179.6,207
180.8,206.3 181.4,205.5 181,204.8 180.4,203.1 180.1,202.5 179.2,202 177.9,201.5 177.6,201.4 174.9,200 173.9,199.4 169.5,198.9
165.2,198 163.9,197.7 162.5,197.7 160.7,196.7 160.7,195.8 160.1,194.6 160.5,194.2 162.6,193 170.5,188.1 177.6,181.8
185.9,177.2 187.3,176.4 190.2,175.1 191.4,174.9 197.5,170.4 202.1,168.9 207.8,169.3 211.4,170.2 214.4,171.2 218,171.1
218.1,171.1 218.3,171 218.6,170.8 220.1,170.2 221,169.6 221.7,169 221.6,167.7 222,166.5 222.7,166.2 225.9,164.3 226.3,163.8
226.6,163.3 226.6,162.2 226,161 225.5,160.5 224.9,159.6 225.1,158.6 226.1,155.9 228.7,155.2 241.6,152 251.8,145.6 273.6,125.3
278.3,120.9 279.4,119.3 280.8,117.3 280.7,117.1 281.8,116.2 286.5,113 290.1,109.7 297.2,105.4 298.8,104.7 302.8,101.7
303.5,101 306.6,97.6 317.4,90.3 319.2,89.5 324.1,87.4 326.4,86.3 354,69.2 356.6,67.2 356.7,67.1 357.5,66.1 359.1,63.5
359.2,63.3 359.3,63 359.5,62 358.5,59.8 355.7,57 351.8,54.2 350.3,52.8 350,52.6 349.7,52.6 346.3,49.6 345.6,48.7 340,44.6
338.9,43.9 335.2,42 334,41.4 332.9,40.7 318.5,33.2 317.7,32.5 317.3,32.4 317.2,32.4 317.1,32.3 316.9,32 316.6,31.7 315.2,30.7
314.5,30.5 314.4,29.9 314.6,29.9 313.8,28.6 311.1,27.2 309.4,25.7 306.1,23.4 302.7,20.1 301.9,19.4 301.2,19 300.7,18.7
300.4,18.5 300,18.3 299.1,17.8 298.7,17.6 296.1,15.9 293.3,12.5 291,11.4 285.2,9.6 279.6,10.6 278.1,11 276.1,12.1 272.7,13.3
271.7,13.9 269.5,15.2 268.5,15.8 267.3,16.3 265.8,16.9 260,21.2 "/>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 104.6604 353.8799)" class="st1 st2 st3">foshan.1992.pw</text>
</g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 143.7698 36.1689)"><tspan x="0" y="0" class="st1 st2 st3">please.undo.undo.it</tspan><tspan x="0" y="17.3" class="st1 st2 st3">nothat.bad.mn</tspan><tspan x="0" y="34.6" class="st1 st2 st3">sweetandsour.chickenkiller.com</tspan></text>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 3.2 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 352.3 228.9" style="enable-background:new 0 0 352.3 228.9;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-miterlimit:1;}
.st1{fill:#221E20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:14.4px;}
</style>
<polyline class="st0" points="265.2,167.2 265.2,167.2 265.7,167.7 265.8,167.6 266,167.4 266.6,166.6 267.6,165.9 269.1,165.1
270.6,164.6 273.9,163.1 274.9,162.7 276.3,161.5 277,160.6 277.6,158.9 278.8,158.4 282.5,156.3 288.9,153.1 291.7,151.4
291.1,150.8 288.6,149.4 288,148.7 287.7,148 286.9,147.1 281.5,144.1 280.5,143.5 280,142.8 280.2,141.9 285,137.2 297.4,129.3
297.7,129.2 297.5,129.3 297.3,129.2 298.4,128.3 313.4,119.8 316.4,117.9 322.4,115.7 322.5,115.4 322.6,115.2 323.1,114.9
332.5,111.3 333.9,112.1 334.7,112.8 335.8,113.1 336.3,113.5 336.5,114.2 336.6,114.4 338.3,115 339.6,115 340.6,114.6
339.7,112.5 332.8,106.4 332.3,106.3 331.9,106.4 331.8,106.3 326.6,102.1 303.1,82.8 279.7,63.2 264.3,50.7 256.6,44.2 255,44.1
253.7,44.1 251.4,43.8 248.3,43.8 247,44.1 245.7,43.7 242.9,42.5 241.3,42.3 239.7,42 238.7,41.3 235.3,40.4 234.1,40.5
230.1,40.9 227.1,40.6 225.4,40.8 221.6,41.7 219.3,39.8 216.7,36.4 209.7,33.7 206,30.5 202.9,27.2 202.9,26.7 202.6,27 201.6,27
201,26.8 200.8,26.7 200.6,26.6 199.8,25.8 199,25.2 197.7,23.5 196.1,22.3 187.2,16.5 181.9,14.7 180.6,14.7 170.2,13.3
169.1,13.5 167.6,14 162.1,15.4 161.7,15.3 161.3,15 159.2,13.9 157.8,14 157.6,13.9 157.5,13.6 156.4,12.9 156.3,13.1 156.3,13.2
155.1,13.2 153.9,12.7 153.5,12.5 153.1,11.9 153.1,11.7 153.3,11.6 153.6,12.4 153.4,13 153.4,13 153.3,12.7 152.9,12.3
152.4,11.6 152.2,10.5 151,9.2 149.3,9.1 147.1,9.4 143.9,8.6 124.8,13.4 118.8,16.6 116.8,17.4 114,18.6 112.4,18.2 108.4,17
107.7,16.9 107.6,16.8 107.5,16.6 108.1,16.1 108,16.3 107.8,16.3 108.1,15.8 107.9,15.8 107.9,15.7 107.3,15.4 102.9,30.2
102.7,36 102.2,36 101.6,35.9 100.9,35.8 99.5,35.6 96.1,34.6 92.3,33.7 92.6,33.9 93.5,34.4 94.6,34.7 96.3,34.9 98.3,35.4
99.3,35.7 100,36.1 99.9,36.1 99.8,36.1 99.6,36 104.1,36.3 94,43.8 104.5,43 106.3,44.1 107.8,44.6 106.4,44.1 105.6,43.9
104.9,44 104.7,43.8 104.5,43.8 104.5,43.8 104.5,43.8 104.9,43.1 104.8,42.4 104.2,42.3 102.8,42.2 101.8,42.2 99.8,42.3
99.1,42.8 97.8,43.6 96.5,44.5 95.3,45.7 95,46 94.9,46.3 95,46.3 95.3,46.3 95.6,46.4 95.7,46.4 95.3,47 95.2,47.1 "/>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 8.5248 58.5321)" class="st1 st2 st3">Wijnhaven 61</text>
</g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 151.5968 183.409)" class="st1 st2 st3">please.undo.undo.it</text>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 151.5968 200.709)" class="st1 st2 st3">nothat.bad.mn</text>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 151.5968 218.009)" class="st1 st2 st3">sweetandsour.chickenkiller.com</text>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 2.9 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1" id="Layer_1" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px"
viewBox="0 0 595.3 841.9" style="enable-background:new 0 0 595.3 841.9;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#221E20;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-miterlimit:10;}
.st1{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-width:0.5;stroke-linecap:square;stroke-linejoin:bevel;stroke-miterlimit:10;}
</style>
<g>
<g>
<g>
<path class="st0" d="M345.2,149.2v0.9c-0.8,0-1.5,0.1-2,0.4s-1,0.9-1.5,1.7c-0.3,0.5-0.8,1.9-1.5,3.9l-8.9,25.6h-0.9l-7.2-20.3
l-7.2,20.3h-0.8l-9.4-26.4c-0.7-2-1.1-3.1-1.3-3.5c-0.3-0.6-0.7-1-1.3-1.3s-1.3-0.4-2.2-0.4v-0.9h11.8v0.9h-0.6
c-0.8,0-1.5,0.2-1.9,0.6s-0.7,0.8-0.7,1.4c0,0.5,0.3,1.8,1,3.8l6.3,17.8l5.3-15.2l-0.9-2.7l-0.8-2.1c-0.3-0.8-0.7-1.5-1.1-2.1
c-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.8-0.8c-0.4-0.3-0.8-0.5-1.2-0.6c-0.3-0.1-0.8-0.1-1.4-0.1v-0.9h12.4v0.9h-0.8c-0.9,0-1.5,0.2-1.9,0.6
s-0.6,0.9-0.6,1.5c0,0.8,0.4,2.2,1.1,4.2l6.1,17.3l6-17.5c0.7-1.9,1-3.3,1-4c0-0.4-0.1-0.7-0.3-1s-0.5-0.5-0.9-0.7
c-0.6-0.2-1.4-0.3-2.3-0.3v-0.9H345.2z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M352.5,158.9v17.2c0,1.3,0.1,2.2,0.3,2.7s0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.4v-0.8c1,0,1.8-0.1,2.1-0.3
s0.6-0.5,0.9-1s0.3-1.4,0.3-2.7v-8.3c0-2.3-0.1-3.8-0.2-4.5c-0.1-0.5-0.3-0.8-0.5-1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4
l-0.3-0.8l6.5-2.6H352.5z M350.6,147.7c0.7,0,1.2,0.2,1.7,0.7s0.7,1,0.7,1.7s-0.2,1.2-0.7,1.7s-1,0.7-1.7,0.7s-1.2-0.2-1.7-0.7
s-0.7-1-0.7-1.7s0.2-1.2,0.7-1.7S349.9,147.7,350.6,147.7z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M365.9,158.9v21.6c0,3.7-0.8,6.4-2.3,8.2s-3.6,2.7-6.1,2.7c-1.4,0-2.5-0.3-3.2-0.8s-1-1-1-1.6s0.2-1,0.6-1.4
s0.8-0.6,1.3-0.6c0.4,0,0.8,0.1,1.2,0.3c0.3,0.1,0.8,0.5,1.5,1.2s1.4,1,1.9,1c0.4,0,0.7-0.1,1.1-0.4s0.6-0.8,0.8-1.5
s0.3-2.2,0.3-4.4v-15.3c0-2.4-0.1-3.9-0.2-4.5c-0.1-0.5-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.3-0.8l6.5-2.6
H365.9z M363.9,147.6c0.7,0,1.2,0.2,1.7,0.7s0.7,1,0.7,1.7c0,0.7-0.2,1.2-0.7,1.7s-1,0.7-1.7,0.7c-0.7,0-1.2-0.2-1.7-0.7
s-0.7-1-0.7-1.7c0-0.7,0.2-1.2,0.7-1.7S363.3,147.6,363.9,147.6z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M378.1,163.4c2.5-3,4.9-4.5,7.2-4.5c1.2,0,2.2,0.3,3,0.9s1.5,1.6,2,2.9c0.3,0.9,0.5,2.4,0.5,4.3v9.2
c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.4c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3
c0.1-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-8.8c0-2-0.3-3.4-0.8-4.3s-1.4-1.3-2.6-1.3c-1.9,0-3.7,1-5.6,3v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.3,2.7
c0.2,0.5,0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.2,0.3,2.3,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.5c1.1,0,1.8-0.3,2.2-0.8s0.6-1.6,0.6-3.2v-8c0-2.6-0.1-4.1-0.2-4.7
s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.4-0.8l6.5-2.6h1V163.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M402.1,147.7v15.7c1.7-1.9,3.1-3.1,4.1-3.7s2-0.8,3-0.8c1.2,0,2.3,0.3,3.1,1s1.5,1.7,1.9,3.2
c0.3,1,0.4,2.8,0.4,5.5v7.6c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.5v-0.8h0.5
c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3c0-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-7.6c0-2.3-0.1-3.9-0.4-4.6s-0.6-1.3-1.2-1.7s-1.2-0.6-1.9-0.6
c-0.8,0-1.6,0.2-2.4,0.6s-1.8,1.2-3,2.5v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.2,2.7s0.5,0.7,0.9,0.9s1.2,0.4,2.3,0.4v0.8h-10.6v-0.8
c1,0,1.7-0.1,2.2-0.4c0.3-0.2,0.6-0.5,0.8-0.9s0.3-1.3,0.3-2.7v-19.4c0-2.5-0.1-4-0.2-4.5s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3
c-0.3,0-0.9,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.3-0.8l6.4-2.6H402.1z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M432,177.9c-2.2,1.7-3.6,2.7-4.1,3c-0.8,0.4-1.7,0.6-2.7,0.6c-1.5,0-2.7-0.5-3.7-1.5s-1.4-2.4-1.4-4
c0-1,0.2-2,0.7-2.7c0.6-1.1,1.8-2.1,3.3-3s4.2-2.1,7.9-3.4v-0.8c0-2.1-0.3-3.6-1-4.4s-1.7-1.2-3-1.2c-1,0-1.8,0.3-2.3,0.8
c-0.6,0.5-0.9,1.1-0.9,1.8l0,1.4c0,0.7-0.2,1.3-0.6,1.7s-0.8,0.6-1.4,0.6c-0.6,0-1.1-0.2-1.4-0.6s-0.6-1-0.6-1.7
c0-1.3,0.7-2.6,2.1-3.7s3.3-1.7,5.8-1.7c1.9,0,3.5,0.3,4.7,1c0.9,0.5,1.6,1.2,2,2.3c0.3,0.7,0.4,2,0.4,4.1v7.3c0,2,0,3.3,0.1,3.8
s0.2,0.8,0.4,0.9s0.4,0.2,0.6,0.2c0.2,0,0.5-0.1,0.7-0.2c0.3-0.2,1-0.8,1.9-1.7v1.3c-1.8,2.3-3.4,3.5-5,3.5
c-0.8,0-1.4-0.3-1.8-0.8S432,179.2,432,177.9z M432,176.4v-8.2c-2.4,0.9-3.9,1.6-4.6,2c-1.2,0.7-2.1,1.4-2.6,2.2
s-0.8,1.6-0.8,2.5c0,1.1,0.3,2.1,1,2.8s1.4,1.1,2.3,1.1C428.5,178.7,430,177.9,432,176.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M440,159.5h10.1v0.9h-0.7c-0.6,0-1.1,0.1-1.4,0.4s-0.5,0.7-0.5,1.2c0,0.5,0.2,1.2,0.5,1.9l5,11.9l5-12.3
c0.4-0.9,0.5-1.5,0.5-2c0-0.2-0.1-0.4-0.2-0.5c-0.2-0.2-0.4-0.4-0.7-0.5s-0.8-0.1-1.6-0.1v-0.9h7v0.9c-0.8,0.1-1.4,0.2-1.7,0.5
c-0.5,0.5-1,1.2-1.5,2.3l-7.6,18.4h-1l-7.7-18.1c-0.3-0.8-0.7-1.4-1-1.8s-0.7-0.7-1.2-0.9c-0.3-0.1-0.8-0.3-1.6-0.4V159.5z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M468.7,167.6c0,3.2,0.8,5.7,2.3,7.5s3.4,2.7,5.5,2.7c1.4,0,2.6-0.4,3.7-1.2s1.9-2.1,2.6-4l0.7,0.5
c-0.3,2.1-1.3,4.1-2.9,5.8s-3.6,2.6-5.9,2.6c-2.6,0-4.8-1-6.6-3s-2.8-4.7-2.8-8.1c0-3.7,0.9-6.5,2.8-8.6s4.2-3.1,7.1-3.1
c2.4,0,4.4,0.8,5.9,2.4s2.3,3.7,2.3,6.4H468.7z M468.7,166.3h9.9c-0.1-1.4-0.2-2.3-0.5-2.9c-0.4-0.9-1-1.6-1.7-2.1
s-1.6-0.8-2.4-0.8c-1.3,0-2.5,0.5-3.5,1.5S468.9,164.5,468.7,166.3z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M492.7,163.4c2.5-3,4.9-4.5,7.2-4.5c1.2,0,2.2,0.3,3,0.9s1.5,1.6,2,2.9c0.3,0.9,0.5,2.4,0.5,4.3v9.2
c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.4c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3
c0.1-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-8.8c0-2-0.3-3.4-0.8-4.3s-1.4-1.3-2.6-1.3c-1.9,0-3.7,1-5.6,3v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.3,2.7
c0.2,0.5,0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.2,0.3,2.3,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.5c1.1,0,1.8-0.3,2.2-0.8s0.6-1.6,0.6-3.2v-8c0-2.6-0.1-4.1-0.2-4.7
s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.4-0.8l6.5-2.6h1V163.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M542.4,148.6v0.9c-2.1,0.2-3.7,0.6-5.1,1.2s-2.6,1.6-3.9,2.8s-2.3,2.7-3.2,4.2s-1.5,3.4-2.1,5.5
c2.2-1.5,4.5-2.3,6.8-2.3c2.2,0,4.1,0.9,5.6,2.6s2.4,4,2.4,6.8c0,2.7-0.8,5.1-2.4,7.3c-1.9,2.7-4.5,4-7.7,4c-2.2,0-4-0.7-5.5-2.2
c-3-2.8-4.5-6.4-4.5-10.9c0-2.8,0.6-5.5,1.7-8.1s2.8-4.8,4.9-6.8s4.1-3.3,6.1-4s3.7-1,5.4-1H542.4z M527.9,165
c-0.3,2.1-0.4,3.8-0.4,5.1c0,1.5,0.3,3.1,0.8,4.9s1.4,3.2,2.5,4.2c0.8,0.7,1.8,1.1,2.9,1.1c1.4,0,2.6-0.6,3.6-1.9
s1.6-3.1,1.6-5.5c0-2.7-0.5-5-1.6-6.9s-2.6-2.9-4.5-2.9c-0.6,0-1.2,0.1-1.9,0.4S529.2,164.1,527.9,165z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M550.5,152.3l7.7-3.8h0.8v26.8c0,1.8,0.1,2.9,0.2,3.3s0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.4,0.4,2.9,0.4v0.9h-12v-0.9
c1.5,0,2.5-0.2,2.9-0.4s0.7-0.5,0.9-0.9s0.3-1.5,0.3-3.4v-17.2c0-2.3-0.1-3.8-0.2-4.5c-0.1-0.5-0.3-0.9-0.6-1.1s-0.6-0.4-1-0.4
c-0.6,0-1.4,0.2-2.4,0.7L550.5,152.3z"/>
</g>
</g>
<g>
<g>
<path class="st0" d="M211.3,664.2v14.1c0,2,0.2,3.3,0.7,3.8c0.6,0.7,1.4,1,2.3,1h1.9v0.8h-12.8v-0.8h1c0.6,0,1.2-0.2,1.7-0.5
s0.9-0.7,1.1-1.3s0.3-1.6,0.3-3.1v-14.1h-4.2v-1.7h4.2v-1.4c0-2.1,0.3-4,1-5.4s1.7-2.7,3.2-3.6s3-1.4,4.8-1.4
c1.6,0,3.1,0.5,4.5,1.6c0.9,0.7,1.4,1.5,1.4,2.4c0,0.5-0.2,0.9-0.6,1.3s-0.8,0.6-1.3,0.6c-0.4,0-0.7-0.1-1.1-0.4
s-0.9-0.8-1.5-1.7s-1.1-1.4-1.6-1.7s-1-0.4-1.6-0.4c-0.7,0-1.3,0.2-1.8,0.6s-0.9,1-1.1,1.8s-0.3,2.9-0.3,6.2v1.5h5.5v1.7H211.3z"
/>
<path class="st0" d="M229.4,661.9c3.2,0,5.9,1.2,7.8,3.7c1.7,2.1,2.5,4.5,2.5,7.3c0,1.9-0.5,3.9-1.4,5.8s-2.2,3.5-3.8,4.5
s-3.4,1.5-5.4,1.5c-3.2,0-5.8-1.3-7.7-3.9c-1.6-2.2-2.4-4.6-2.4-7.3c0-2,0.5-3.9,1.5-5.9s2.3-3.4,3.9-4.3
S227.6,661.9,229.4,661.9z M228.6,663.4c-0.8,0-1.7,0.2-2.5,0.7s-1.5,1.4-2,2.6s-0.8,2.8-0.8,4.8c0,3.1,0.6,5.8,1.9,8.1
s2.9,3.4,4.9,3.4c1.5,0,2.8-0.6,3.8-1.9s1.5-3.4,1.5-6.4c0-3.8-0.8-6.8-2.5-9C231.8,664.2,230.4,663.4,228.6,663.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M256.7,661.9v7.3H256c-0.6-2.3-1.4-3.9-2.3-4.7s-2.1-1.2-3.6-1.2c-1.1,0-2,0.3-2.6,0.9s-1,1.2-1,1.9
c0,0.9,0.2,1.6,0.8,2.2c0.5,0.6,1.5,1.3,3,2l3.4,1.7c3.2,1.5,4.8,3.6,4.8,6.1c0,2-0.7,3.5-2.2,4.7c-1.5,1.2-3.1,1.8-5,1.8
c-1.3,0-2.8-0.2-4.5-0.7c-0.5-0.2-0.9-0.2-1.3-0.2c-0.4,0-0.6,0.2-0.8,0.6h-0.8v-7.7h0.8c0.4,2.2,1.3,3.8,2.5,4.9
s2.6,1.7,4.1,1.7c1.1,0,2-0.3,2.6-0.9s1-1.4,1-2.3c0-1.1-0.4-2-1.1-2.7s-2.3-1.7-4.5-2.8s-3.8-2.1-4.5-3c-0.7-0.9-1.1-2-1.1-3.4
c0-1.8,0.6-3.2,1.8-4.4s2.8-1.8,4.7-1.8c0.8,0,1.9,0.2,3.1,0.5c0.8,0.2,1.3,0.4,1.6,0.4c0.2,0,0.4-0.1,0.6-0.2s0.3-0.4,0.5-0.7
H256.7z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M267.8,650.7v15.7c1.7-1.9,3.1-3.1,4.1-3.7s2-0.8,3-0.8c1.2,0,2.3,0.3,3.1,1s1.5,1.7,1.9,3.2
c0.3,1,0.4,2.8,0.4,5.5v7.6c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.5v-0.8h0.5
c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3c0-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-7.6c0-2.3-0.1-3.9-0.4-4.6s-0.6-1.3-1.2-1.7s-1.2-0.6-1.9-0.6
c-0.8,0-1.6,0.2-2.4,0.6s-1.8,1.2-3,2.5v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.2,2.7s0.5,0.7,0.9,0.9s1.2,0.4,2.3,0.4v0.8h-10.6v-0.8
c1,0,1.7-0.1,2.2-0.4c0.3-0.2,0.6-0.5,0.8-0.9s0.3-1.3,0.3-2.7v-19.4c0-2.5-0.1-4-0.2-4.5s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3
c-0.3,0-0.9,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.3-0.8l6.4-2.6H267.8z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M297.7,680.9c-2.2,1.7-3.6,2.7-4.1,3c-0.8,0.4-1.7,0.6-2.7,0.6c-1.5,0-2.7-0.5-3.7-1.5s-1.4-2.4-1.4-4
c0-1,0.2-2,0.7-2.7c0.6-1.1,1.8-2.1,3.3-3s4.2-2.1,7.9-3.4v-0.8c0-2.1-0.3-3.6-1-4.4s-1.7-1.2-3-1.2c-1,0-1.8,0.3-2.3,0.8
c-0.6,0.5-0.9,1.1-0.9,1.8l0,1.4c0,0.7-0.2,1.3-0.6,1.7s-0.8,0.6-1.4,0.6c-0.6,0-1.1-0.2-1.4-0.6s-0.6-1-0.6-1.7
c0-1.3,0.7-2.6,2.1-3.7s3.3-1.7,5.8-1.7c1.9,0,3.5,0.3,4.7,1c0.9,0.5,1.6,1.2,2,2.3c0.3,0.7,0.4,2,0.4,4.1v7.3c0,2,0,3.3,0.1,3.8
s0.2,0.8,0.4,0.9s0.4,0.2,0.6,0.2c0.2,0,0.5-0.1,0.7-0.2c0.3-0.2,1-0.8,1.9-1.7v1.3c-1.8,2.3-3.4,3.5-5,3.5
c-0.8,0-1.4-0.3-1.8-0.8S297.7,682.2,297.7,680.9z M297.7,679.4v-8.2c-2.4,0.9-3.9,1.6-4.6,2c-1.2,0.7-2.1,1.4-2.6,2.2
s-0.8,1.6-0.8,2.5c0,1.1,0.3,2.1,1,2.8s1.4,1.1,2.3,1.1C294.2,681.7,295.8,680.9,297.7,679.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M313.1,666.4c2.5-3,4.9-4.5,7.2-4.5c1.2,0,2.2,0.3,3,0.9s1.5,1.6,2,2.9c0.3,0.9,0.5,2.4,0.5,4.3v9.2
c0,1.4,0.1,2.3,0.3,2.8c0.2,0.4,0.4,0.7,0.8,0.9s1.1,0.3,2.1,0.3v0.8h-10.6v-0.8h0.4c1,0,1.7-0.2,2.1-0.5s0.7-0.8,0.8-1.3
c0.1-0.2,0.1-1,0.1-2.2v-8.8c0-2-0.3-3.4-0.8-4.3s-1.4-1.3-2.6-1.3c-1.9,0-3.7,1-5.6,3v11.3c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.3,2.7
c0.2,0.5,0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.2,0.3,2.3,0.3v0.8H306v-0.8h0.5c1.1,0,1.8-0.3,2.2-0.8s0.6-1.6,0.6-3.2v-8c0-2.6-0.1-4.1-0.2-4.7
s-0.3-0.9-0.5-1.1s-0.6-0.3-1-0.3c-0.4,0-1,0.1-1.6,0.4l-0.4-0.8l6.5-2.6h1V666.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M335.3,679.4c0.7,0,1.4,0.3,1.9,0.8s0.8,1.1,0.8,1.8s-0.3,1.3-0.8,1.8s-1.1,0.8-1.8,0.8s-1.3-0.3-1.8-0.8
s-0.8-1.1-0.8-1.8c0-0.7,0.3-1.4,0.8-1.9S334.6,679.4,335.3,679.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M347,655.3l7.7-3.8h0.8v26.8c0,1.8,0.1,2.9,0.2,3.3s0.5,0.8,0.9,1s1.4,0.4,2.9,0.4v0.9h-12v-0.9
c1.5,0,2.5-0.2,2.9-0.4s0.7-0.5,0.9-0.9s0.3-1.5,0.3-3.4v-17.2c0-2.3-0.1-3.8-0.2-4.5c-0.1-0.5-0.3-0.9-0.6-1.1s-0.6-0.4-1-0.4
c-0.6,0-1.4,0.2-2.4,0.7L347,655.3z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M367.9,684.6v-0.9c2,0,3.9-0.5,5.7-1.4s3.4-2.5,5.1-4.8s2.8-4.8,3.4-7.5c-2.5,1.6-4.7,2.4-6.7,2.4
c-2.2,0-4.1-0.9-5.7-2.6s-2.4-4-2.4-6.9c0-2.8,0.8-5.3,2.4-7.4c1.9-2.6,4.4-4,7.5-4c2.6,0,4.8,1.1,6.7,3.2c2.3,2.7,3.4,6,3.4,9.9
c0,3.5-0.9,6.8-2.6,9.9s-4.1,5.6-7.2,7.6c-2.5,1.7-5.3,2.5-8.2,2.5H367.9z M382.4,668.3c0.3-2,0.4-3.7,0.4-4.9
c0-1.5-0.3-3.2-0.8-4.9s-1.2-3.1-2.2-4s-2-1.4-3.2-1.4c-1.4,0-2.6,0.6-3.7,1.9s-1.6,3.1-1.6,5.6c0,3.3,0.7,5.9,2.1,7.7
c1,1.3,2.3,2,3.8,2c0.7,0,1.6-0.2,2.6-0.5S381.7,668.9,382.4,668.3z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M391.9,684.6v-0.9c2,0,3.9-0.5,5.7-1.4s3.4-2.5,5.1-4.8s2.8-4.8,3.4-7.5c-2.5,1.6-4.7,2.4-6.7,2.4
c-2.2,0-4.1-0.9-5.7-2.6s-2.4-4-2.4-6.9c0-2.8,0.8-5.3,2.4-7.4c1.9-2.6,4.4-4,7.5-4c2.6,0,4.8,1.1,6.7,3.2c2.3,2.7,3.4,6,3.4,9.9
c0,3.5-0.9,6.8-2.6,9.9s-4.1,5.6-7.2,7.6c-2.5,1.7-5.3,2.5-8.2,2.5H391.9z M406.4,668.3c0.3-2,0.4-3.7,0.4-4.9
c0-1.5-0.3-3.2-0.8-4.9s-1.2-3.1-2.2-4s-2-1.4-3.2-1.4c-1.4,0-2.6,0.6-3.7,1.9s-1.6,3.1-1.6,5.6c0,3.3,0.7,5.9,2.1,7.7
c1,1.3,2.3,2,3.8,2c0.7,0,1.6-0.2,2.6-0.5S405.7,668.9,406.4,668.3z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M435.4,677.9l-2.2,6.1h-18.8v-0.9c5.5-5,9.4-9.1,11.6-12.3s3.4-6.1,3.4-8.7c0-2-0.6-3.7-1.9-5
s-2.7-1.9-4.4-1.9c-1.6,0-3,0.5-4.2,1.4s-2.2,2.3-2.8,4h-0.9c0.4-2.9,1.4-5.1,3-6.7s3.6-2.3,6.1-2.3c2.6,0,4.7,0.8,6.5,2.5
s2.6,3.6,2.6,5.9c0,1.6-0.4,3.2-1.1,4.8c-1.2,2.5-3,5.2-5.6,8c-3.9,4.2-6.3,6.8-7.3,7.7h8.3c1.7,0,2.9-0.1,3.6-0.2
s1.3-0.4,1.8-0.8s1-0.9,1.4-1.6H435.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M443.3,679.4c0.7,0,1.4,0.3,1.9,0.8s0.8,1.1,0.8,1.8s-0.3,1.3-0.8,1.8s-1.1,0.8-1.8,0.8s-1.3-0.3-1.8-0.8
s-0.8-1.1-0.8-1.8c0-0.7,0.3-1.4,0.8-1.9S442.6,679.4,443.3,679.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M449.3,664.6l6.6-2.7h0.9v5c1.1-1.9,2.2-3.2,3.3-4s2.3-1.1,3.5-1.1c2.2,0,4,0.8,5.4,2.5
c1.8,2.1,2.6,4.8,2.6,8.1c0,3.7-1.1,6.8-3.2,9.2c-1.8,2-4,3-6.6,3c-1.2,0-2.2-0.2-3-0.5c-0.6-0.2-1.3-0.7-2.1-1.4v6.5
c0,1.5,0.1,2.4,0.3,2.8s0.5,0.7,0.9,0.9s1.3,0.4,2.4,0.4v0.9h-11.2v-0.9h0.6c0.9,0,1.6-0.1,2.2-0.5c0.3-0.2,0.5-0.4,0.7-0.8
s0.2-1.4,0.2-2.9v-20.3c0-1.4-0.1-2.3-0.2-2.6s-0.3-0.7-0.6-0.8s-0.6-0.3-1.1-0.3c-0.4,0-0.9,0.1-1.4,0.3L449.3,664.6z
M456.8,668.4v8c0,1.7,0.1,2.9,0.2,3.4c0.2,0.9,0.8,1.7,1.6,2.4s1.9,1,3.2,1c1.6,0,2.8-0.6,3.8-1.8c1.3-1.6,1.9-3.8,1.9-6.7
c0-3.3-0.7-5.8-2.2-7.6c-1-1.2-2.2-1.8-3.6-1.8c-0.8,0-1.5,0.2-2.2,0.6C459,666.1,458.1,667,456.8,668.4z"/>
<path class="st0" d="M473.6,662.5h9v0.9c-0.8,0.1-1.4,0.2-1.6,0.4s-0.4,0.6-0.4,1c0,0.5,0.1,1.1,0.4,1.8l4.6,12.4l4.6-10.1
l-1.2-3.2c-0.4-0.9-0.9-1.6-1.5-1.9c-0.3-0.2-1-0.4-1.9-0.4v-0.9h10.2v0.9c-1.1,0-1.9,0.2-2.4,0.6c-0.3,0.2-0.5,0.6-0.5,1.2
c0,0.3,0.1,0.6,0.2,1l4.9,12.3l4.5-11.9c0.3-0.8,0.5-1.5,0.5-2c0-0.3-0.2-0.6-0.5-0.8s-0.9-0.4-1.8-0.4v-0.9h6.8v0.9
c-1.4,0.2-2.4,1.1-3,2.8l-7.2,18.5h-1l-5.4-13.7l-6.3,13.7h-0.9l-6.9-18c-0.5-1.1-0.9-1.9-1.3-2.3s-1.1-0.7-2.1-0.9V662.5z"/>
</g>
</g>
<polyline class="st1" points="256.9,181.8 261.4,182.3 259.8,181.7 260,181.5 261.1,180.9 261.3,180.6 262.3,180.3 263.1,180.1
263.9,180.4 264.2,180.5 264.4,180.5 265,180.1 265.2,180.2 265.5,180 265.9,179.1 265.9,178.7 265.9,179 266,179.9 266,180.4
266,180.7 266.2,181.1 266.2,181.3 266,180.8 266,179.7 266.2,178.3 266.6,176.5 266.2,174.4 270.9,173.3 274.7,180.4 275,181.3
276.2,182.5 277.5,182.6 277,181.7 275.9,180.9 275.3,180.3 274.4,179.7 273.4,178.8 273.6,178.3 273.8,178 273.9,178 274,177.9
274.2,178.2 274.5,178.6 274.2,179.7 273.9,180.2 273.7,180.3 273.7,180.3 273.7,180.3 273.7,180.4 273.5,180.7 275.1,183.2
266.8,178 265.8,179 264.9,178.8 266.2,178.6 267.4,178.4 270.1,178.3 278.5,178.2 280.1,178 280.9,177.9 282.7,177.6 286.5,176.7
290.5,176 292,175.2 279.9,181 280.4,181.4 280.5,180.3 280.6,178.8 280.6,178 281.1,177.9 280.5,177 279.5,176.9 276.9,178
276.7,178.1 276.4,178 276.2,178.1 275.6,178.9 275.2,179.1 273.5,178.5 273.8,177.3 274.1,177.2 272.5,177.3 272.7,177.2
273,177.2 273.1,178.2 273,178.3 272.4,179.8 272.9,182.3 278.2,189 279,188.8 279.4,188.9 280.1,189 280.9,188.8 281.7,188.7
282.1,188.7 282.2,188.8 278.3,189.4 272.8,189.9 269.2,190.8 266.3,191.4 265.3,191.5 255,193 253.8,192.9 253.2,192.9 247.7,193
244.6,193.5 242.6,194.1 242.7,194.2 242.7,194.3 243,194.6 243.3,195.9 243.5,197.3 245.9,200.2 246.2,200.4 246.6,200.6
247.5,201.1 247.7,201.2 247.9,201.2 248.1,201.1 248.3,201 248,200.8 246.8,201.3 240.5,205.5 240.2,205.8 237.1,207.6
236.9,207.6 234.5,207.7 232.8,208 231.9,208.5 232.3,211.3 231.7,212.1 231.6,213 232.2,213.9 232.9,214.6 234.3,215.1
238.6,218.5 238.7,219.1 238.6,219.6 238.2,220.9 238.3,221.8 238.4,224.5 239.1,227 240.1,230.9 240.6,231.7 241.1,232.7
238.9,234.9 236.5,236.5 235.5,237.3 235.1,238.1 235,239.2 232.8,240.3 232.4,240.6 231.3,241.4 227.5,243.7 225.7,245.8
220.1,248.2 215,251.2 211.6,251.8 210.1,252.9 210.3,253.8 211.3,255.8 217.8,262.4 219,263 220.5,263.8 221.8,264.5 222.9,264.9
224.2,265.4 225.9,266.2 235,271.7 235.7,272.5 236,273.1 236.2,273.2 236.3,273.1 236.7,273.1 236.8,273.1 236.5,273.1 236,273.4
232.9,275.5 232.6,276.3 232.7,276.4 232.8,276.5 232.6,275.8 232.7,275.8 233,276 233.5,276.3 237.5,279 237.6,280.2 235.9,281.7
235.6,281.8 235.9,281.7 237.7,281.5 240.2,282.8 241.5,283.7 241.3,284.5 235.6,287.9 234.9,288.2 234.7,288.3 233.9,288.6
207.3,306.4 202,308.4 201.7,308.5 201.5,308.5 200.2,309.1 185.1,321.1 162.3,333.5 157.6,335.6 136.9,338.6 120.9,339
117.1,339.3 115.5,339.8 114.3,340.2 107.9,343.4 106.8,345.1 104.2,353.5 108,365.3 108.3,365.1 108.3,365.1 108.4,365.3
113.2,378 114.3,378.9 114.7,379.1 122.4,385.2 133.5,390.2 137.7,391.7 167.6,403.7 169.1,404.3 169.4,404.4 169.8,404.6 171,405
184.1,410.5 185.9,411.3 193,414 197.1,415.6 202,417.3 221.8,424.7 226.2,426.4 230.7,427.9 231.3,428.2 234,429.5 245.5,434.7
246.4,434.8 251,436.7 258.4,439.9 258.5,440 258.9,440.1 284.6,449.9 297.4,454 311.9,459 315,460.5 315.5,461.5 314.6,462.6
314.5,462.7 314.6,463 314.6,463 314.8,462.9 314.9,462.9 315,462.8 314.9,462.8 314.6,462.7 314,463.6 312.2,465.1 303.2,469.4
302.4,472.2 303.5,472.2 304.3,472.2 305,472 307.2,471.5 307.7,471.5 307.7,471.5 308.5,471.8 308.9,471.9 312.1,474.6
312.4,475.5 312.6,475.5 313,475.6 313.2,475.7 313.1,476.1 312.8,476.5 312,477.8 311.6,478.5 308.2,486.1 307.7,488.3
307.3,489.4 307.2,490.1 306.6,490.9 305.7,491.5 305.2,491.7 295.4,498 292.8,498.6 290.9,498.4 289.7,498.1 288.4,497.4
287.7,496.9 286.8,496.6 285.6,497.2 283.2,498.9 282.2,500 281.9,500.5 281.8,500.8 281,501.4 280.5,501.5 279.4,501.9
275.9,502.9 275.5,503 272.2,504.8 268,508.4 267.6,508.7 267.4,509.3 266.9,510.8 265.2,516 264.4,517.7 264.5,518.1 264.5,518.8
264.9,520.1 265,520.4 265,520.7 265.1,520.9 265.2,521.3 265.5,522 265.3,522.9 264.9,522.9 264,522.5 263.5,522.1 263,521.8
261.5,521.5 253.7,523 245.2,526.4 242.4,527.1 237.2,527.2 236.1,527.6 230,528.6 228.8,528.7 226.6,529.3 223,530.3 221,530.5
219.7,530.5 216.1,531.7 216,531.2 215.5,531.1 215.2,531.1 214.7,531.3 210.6,533.6 210.3,534 210.4,534.2 210.6,534.4
209.9,535.2 207.7,535.9 204.8,539.9 204.4,540.3 204.3,541.5 204.2,541.9 203.7,542.4 200.9,545.7 198.6,547.8 196.2,548.9
189.4,551.6 186.4,552.2 184.6,552.6 184.2,553.1 183.6,553.6 183.4,553.9 183.4,554 184.3,554.4 184.1,554.4 183,554.7
176.2,558.3 176.1,559.2 175.6,560.6 173.6,563.1 172.7,563.8 172.7,564.4 173,564.8 173.2,565 174.1,565.4 174.6,565.7
180.5,571.9 180.9,572.7 194.3,586.3 193.6,587.6 193.4,588.5 192.6,594.8 192.1,598.6 191.1,607.4 188.9,609.5 186.6,611
186.4,611 186.2,611 186.1,611.1 186,611.1 185.6,611.6 180.3,622.9 170.8,622.2 169.7,621.6 168.3,621.5 166.6,621.6 166.7,621.6
167.3,621.6 167.4,622.7 167.1,623.2 166.6,624.2 166.6,624.4 166.6,624.7 166.2,625.7 166,626.6 166.5,627.7 168.3,630 172,631.4
175.4,632.4 178.7,633.3 179.8,633.7 181.2,633.6 192.4,630.8 193.4,630.3 193.8,630.1 195.7,629.2 196.1,628.8 197.2,627.9
198.8,627.1 200.7,626.8 202,626.9 206.5,627.1 210.6,627.8 218.3,626.7 224,626.4 229.5,625.5 231.8,625.5 233.1,625.4
234.7,625.1 235.8,624.6 237,624.5 245.4,623.2 251.3,625.5 251.7,626.6 251.8,628.3 253.3,630.8 258,632.5 259.7,632.5
262.3,632.5 264.2,633.2 265.3,634.3 265.2,634.5 265,634.6 264.3,634.9 263.9,635.1 263.8,635.3 263.9,635.3 264.3,635.2
264.4,635.1 264.4,635.3 264.5,635.4 264.7,635.4 264.8,635.3 264.8,635.2 264.7,635.2 "/>
</g>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 18 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- Generator: Adobe Illustrator 22.1.0, SVG Export Plug-In . SVG Version: 6.00 Build 0) -->
<svg version="1.1"
id="Layer_1" inkscape:version="0.92.2 5c3e80d, 2017-08-06" sodipodi:docname="wijnhaven_to_foshan_02.svg" xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:inkscape="http://www.inkscape.org/namespaces/inkscape" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sodipodi="http://sodipodi.sourceforge.net/DTD/sodipodi-0.dtd" xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" x="0px" y="0px" viewBox="0 0 282.4 503.5"
style="enable-background:new 0 0 282.4 503.5;" xml:space="preserve">
<style type="text/css">
.st0{fill:none;stroke:#1D1D1B;stroke-miterlimit:1;}
.st1{fill:#221E20;}
.st2{font-family:'TimesNewRomanPSMT';}
.st3{font-size:14.4px;}
</style>
<sodipodi:namedview bordercolor="#666666" borderopacity="1" gridtolerance="10" guidetolerance="10" id="namedview94" inkscape:current-layer="Layer_1" inkscape:cx="1486.8826" inkscape:cy="176.15686" inkscape:pageopacity="0" inkscape:pageshadow="2" inkscape:window-height="970" inkscape:window-maximized="0" inkscape:window-width="1507" inkscape:window-x="0" inkscape:window-y="0" inkscape:zoom="0.72455144" objecttolerance="10" pagecolor="#ffffff" showgrid="false">
</sodipodi:namedview>
<title id="title77">Artboard 3</title>
<polyline class="st0" points="165.8,26.3 170.3,26.8 168.7,26.3 168.9,26.1 170,25.4 170.2,25.2 171.2,24.8 172,24.7 172.8,24.9
173,25 173.3,25.1 173.9,24.7 174.1,24.7 174.4,24.6 174.8,23.6 174.8,23.3 174.8,23.6 174.9,24.5 174.9,24.9 174.9,25.3
175.1,25.6 175.1,25.9 174.9,25.4 174.9,24.3 175.1,22.8 175.4,21.1 175.1,19 179.7,17.9 183.6,25 183.8,25.8 185.1,27.1
186.4,27.1 185.9,26.2 184.8,25.4 184.2,24.8 183.3,24.2 182.3,23.4 182.5,22.9 182.7,22.6 182.8,22.5 182.9,22.5 183.1,22.7
183.4,23.2 183.1,24.2 182.7,24.7 182.6,24.8 182.6,24.8 182.6,24.9 182.6,24.9 182.4,25.3 184,27.8 175.7,22.6 174.7,23.6
173.8,23.3 175.1,23.1 176.3,22.9 179,22.8 187.4,22.7 189,22.6 189.7,22.5 191.5,22.1 195.4,21.2 199.3,20.5 200.8,19.8
188.8,25.5 189.3,26 189.4,24.8 189.4,23.4 189.4,22.6 190,22.4 189.4,21.5 188.4,21.5 185.8,22.6 185.6,22.7 185.2,22.5 185,22.7
184.5,23.4 184.1,23.6 182.4,23 182.7,21.9 183,21.7 181.4,21.8 181.6,21.8 181.9,21.7 182,22.7 181.9,22.9 181.2,24.4 181.8,26.8
187.1,33.6 187.9,33.4 188.3,33.4 189,33.5 189.8,33.4 190.5,33.3 190.9,33.2 191.1,33.3 187.2,34 181.7,34.5 178.1,35.3 175.2,36
174.2,36 163.9,37.5 162.7,37.5 162.1,37.4 156.6,37.6 153.5,38 151.5,38.6 151.6,38.8 151.6,38.9 151.9,39.2 152.2,40.4
152.4,41.8 154.7,44.8 155.1,45 155.4,45.2 156.4,45.6 156.6,45.7 156.8,45.8 157,45.7 157.2,45.6 156.9,45.3 155.7,45.8
149.4,50.1 149.1,50.3 146,52.2 145.8,52.2 143.4,52.3 141.7,52.5 140.8,53 141.2,55.9 140.6,56.6 140.5,57.6 141,58.5 141.8,59.2
143.2,59.7 147.5,63 147.6,63.7 147.5,64.1 147.1,65.4 147.2,66.3 147.3,69.1 148,71.5 149,75.5 149.5,76.2 149.9,77.2 147.7,79.4
145.3,81 144.3,81.8 144,82.7 143.9,83.8 141.7,84.8 141.3,85.1 140.2,86 136.4,88.2 134.6,90.3 129,92.7 123.9,95.7 120.5,96.4
119,97.5 119.2,98.4 120.2,100.3 126.7,107 127.9,107.5 129.4,108.3 130.7,109.1 131.8,109.5 133.1,109.9 134.8,110.7 143.9,116.3
144.6,117 144.9,117.7 145,117.7 145.1,117.7 145.6,117.7 145.7,117.7 145.4,117.6 144.9,117.9 141.8,120.1 141.5,120.8
141.6,120.9 141.6,121 141.5,120.3 141.6,120.4 141.9,120.5 142.4,120.8 146.4,123.5 146.5,124.7 144.8,126.2 144.5,126.3
144.8,126.2 146.6,126 149.1,127.4 150.4,128.3 150.1,129.1 144.5,132.5 143.8,132.8 143.6,132.8 142.8,133.2 116.2,150.9
110.9,153 110.6,153 110.4,153.1 109.1,153.7 94,165.6 71.1,178 66.4,180.1 45.8,183.2 29.8,183.6 26,183.9 24.4,184.3 23.2,184.8
16.8,188 15.7,189.7 13.1,198.1 16.9,209.8 17.2,209.6 17.2,209.7 17.2,209.9 22.1,222.5 23.2,223.5 23.6,223.7 31.3,229.8
42.3,234.7 46.5,236.2 76.5,248.3 78,248.9 78.2,248.9 78.7,249.2 79.9,249.6 93,255.1 94.8,255.9 101.8,258.5 106,260.1
110.9,261.8 130.6,269.3 135.1,270.9 139.6,272.4 140.2,272.7 142.9,274 154.4,279.3 155.3,279.4 159.9,281.2 167.3,284.4
167.4,284.5 167.8,284.6 193.5,294.4 206.3,298.5 220.8,303.6 223.9,305.1 224.3,306 223.4,307.1 223.4,307.2 223.5,307.5
223.5,307.5 223.7,307.4 223.8,307.4 223.9,307.3 223.8,307.3 223.4,307.3 222.9,308.1 221.1,309.7 212.1,313.9 211.3,316.7
212.4,316.8 213.2,316.7 213.9,316.6 216.1,316.1 216.6,316 216.6,316 217.3,316.3 217.7,316.4 221,319.1 221.3,320 221.4,320.1
221.9,320.2 222.1,320.3 222,320.6 221.7,321.1 220.9,322.4 220.4,323 217.1,330.6 216.6,332.8 216.2,333.9 216.1,334.7
215.5,335.4 214.6,336 214.1,336.2 204.3,342.6 201.6,343.2 199.8,342.9 198.6,342.7 197.3,341.9 196.6,341.4 195.7,341.2
194.5,341.8 192.1,343.5 191.1,344.6 190.8,345 190.7,345.3 189.8,346 189.4,346.1 188.2,346.4 184.8,347.5 184.4,347.6
181.1,349.3 176.9,352.9 176.5,353.2 176.3,353.8 175.8,355.4 174.1,360.6 173.3,362.2 173.4,362.7 173.4,363.3 173.8,364.7
173.9,364.9 173.9,365.2 173.9,365.5 174.1,365.8 174.4,366.5 174.2,367.4 173.8,367.5 172.9,367 172.4,366.7 171.9,366.4
170.4,366.1 162.6,367.6 154.1,370.9 151.2,371.6 146.1,371.7 145,372.1 138.9,373.1 137.7,373.3 135.5,373.9 131.9,374.9
129.9,375 128.6,375 125,376.3 124.9,375.7 124.4,375.6 124.1,375.7 123.6,375.8 119.5,378.2 119.2,378.6 119.3,378.8 119.5,379
118.8,379.7 116.6,380.4 113.7,384.4 113.3,384.9 113.2,386 113.1,386.4 112.5,387 109.8,390.2 107.5,392.4 105.1,393.5 98.2,396.2
95.3,396.7 93.5,397.1 93.1,397.7 92.5,398.2 92.3,398.4 92.3,398.5 93.2,399 93,398.9 91.9,399.2 85.1,402.9 85,403.8 84.5,405.2
82.5,407.6 81.6,408.4 81.5,408.9 81.9,409.4 82.1,409.5 83,409.9 83.4,410.3 89.4,416.4 89.8,417.3 103.2,430.9 102.5,432.2
102.3,433 101.4,439.3 101,443.2 100,452 97.8,454 95.5,455.5 95.3,455.5 95.1,455.6 95,455.6 94.9,455.6 94.5,456.1 89.2,467.4
79.6,466.7 78.6,466.1 77.1,466.1 75.5,466.1 75.6,466.1 76.2,466.2 76.3,467.2 76,467.7 75.5,468.8 75.5,469 75.5,469.3
75.1,470.2 74.9,471.2 75.4,472.2 77.2,474.5 80.9,476 84.3,476.9 87.5,477.9 88.6,478.2 90,478.2 101.3,475.4 102.3,474.9
102.6,474.6 104.6,473.7 105,473.4 106.1,472.5 107.7,471.7 109.6,471.4 110.9,471.4 115.4,471.6 119.5,472.3 127.2,471.2
132.9,470.9 138.4,470.1 140.7,470 142,469.9 143.6,469.7 144.7,469.2 145.8,469.1 154.3,467.7 160.2,470.1 160.6,471.2
160.7,472.9 162.2,475.3 166.9,477 168.6,477.1 171.2,477.1 173,477.8 174.2,478.9 174.1,479 173.9,479.1 173.1,479.4 172.8,479.7
172.7,479.8 172.8,479.8 173.2,479.7 173.3,479.7 173.3,479.8 173.4,479.9 173.5,479.9 173.7,479.8 173.7,479.8 173.6,479.8 "/>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 77.1396 21.936)" class="st1 st2 st3">Wijnhaven 61</text>
</g>
<g>
<text transform="matrix(1 0 0 1 179.6758 490.9252)" class="st1 st2 st3">foshan.1992.pw</text>
</g>
</svg>

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 6.7 KiB

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 7.3 KiB

BIN
pages/img/.DS_Store vendored

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 797 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 777 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 962 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 828 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 687 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 935 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 963 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.0 MiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 870 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 785 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 725 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 889 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 895 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 699 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 754 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>liberation_technology_and_the_arab_spring</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<h1>Liberation Technology and the Arab Spring: From Utopia to Atopia and Beyond<br>
Ulises A. Mejias, SUNY Oswego
</h1>
<br>
First published in <a href="http://twenty.fibreculturejournal.org/2012/06/20/fcj-147-liberation-technology-and-the-arab-spring-from-utopia-to-atopia-and-beyond/" target="blank">The Fibreculture Journal</a>, Issue 20, 2012<br>
<p class="indent">Abstract: While the tendency in the West to refer to the Arab Spring movements as Twitter Revolutions has passed, a liberal discourse of liberation technology (information and communication technologies that empower grassroots movements) continues to influence our ideas about networked participation. Unfortunately, this utopian discourse tends to circumvent any discussion of the capitalist market structure in which these tools operate. In this paper, I suggest that liberation technologies may in fact increase opportunities for political participation, but that they simultaneously create certain kinds of inequalities. I end by proposing a theoretical framework for locating alternative practices of participation and liberation.</p>
<p>After some initial fascination with the concept, there now appears to be more skepticism than support for the idea that tools like Twitter and Facebook are single-handedly responsible for igniting the Arab Spring movements. As we witness the immense effort and human cost that has gone into uprisings in Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Western Sahara and Yemen, we recognise that it takes much more than a social media platform to organise and sustain a grassroots protest movement. And yet, the neoliberal discourse behind the trope of a “Twitter Revolution” (a revolution enabled by “liberation technologies” which empower oppressed groups) continues to function — especially in Western media and academia — as a utopian discourse that conceals the role of communicative capitalism in undermining democracy. The meme of the Twitter Revolution may have come and gone, but the ideology that gave rise to it continues to colour our ideas about participation and democracy.</p>
<p>What follows are some observations about the manner in which discourses around liberation technology are used to imagine a utopian model of activism in which digitally networked communities are capable of changing their political realities through mediated participation facilitated by corporations. Specifically, I want to do three things: 1) to examine how the utopian discourse of liberation technology circumvents any discussion of the market structure of digital information and communication technologies; 2) to explore how this utopian discourse normalises the role of digital networks as platforms that increase participation while simultaneously increasing inequality, and 3) to propose responses to the utopian discourse of liberation technology that provide alternative imaginings of social participation. I should clarify that my objective is not to provide a detailed account of the unfolding of the Arab Spring movements or their continuing repercussions; rather, my goal is to describe how the assumptions behind the rhetoric of liberation technology correlate to the practice of civic disobedience, and to delineate a theoretical framework for understanding the contrast between the two. Hence, I do not believe my argument is limited to a North African or Middle Eastern context. Events since the Arab Spring such as the England riots in August of 2011, or the emergence of the Occupy movement in September (which happened after this text was originally submitted for publication, and are therefore not discussed in detail) serve to extend the validity and application of my argument.</p>
<p>It would be adequate to begin by expanding the constrictive parameters set forth by the concept of utopia. Here, I will take a page from McKenzie Wark (2007) and augment this idea with the concepts of heterotopia and atopia. While a utopia is a nowhere that exists in a theoretical realm, a heterotopia is an actual but different space, an elsewhere where exceptional conditions from those that usually apply exist. Thus, while a utopia can only exist in the imagination, a heterotopia is an “island” (such as a school, a prison, a stadium or a hospital) where people are allowed — or forced — to follow different social rules. Lastly, an atopia is similarly an alternative site with different social norms, except that in this case, the site can be located anywhere or everywhere; it is borderless. In the remainder of this paper, I will be sometimes alluding to how the discourses of digital networks, participatory media, and mobilisation inscribe social participation in the different topological planes of utopia, heterotopia and atopia. Although these concepts are not central to my argument per se, they will help me frame a critique of liberation technology.</p>
<p>There is, indeed, much utopianism around the discourse of social media and recent protest movements. Even before the so-called Twitter Revolution, we can point to a growing trend, particularly within mainstream and even alternative journalism, that suggested that protest movements all over the world were transformed by participatory media (examples include statements about the revolutionary impact of cell phones in the Philippines, YouTube in Iran, Facebook in Moldova, and so on). I am choosing to collect this particular brand of techno-utopianism under the rubric of “liberation technology,” not because this is a term that is readily recognisable in popular or academic discourses, but because of its rich semiotic meaning. One noticeable place where a definition of liberation technology is attempted is the Web site for the <em>Program on Liberation Technology</em> at Stanford University. There, we are informed that the goal of the program is to research how information technology can be used to defend human rights, improve governance, empower the poor, promote economic development, and pursue a variety of other social goods (Program on Liberation Technology).</p>
<p>These are worthy goals. But my first encounter with the term “liberation technology” made me think of a similarly sounding concept, and even now, typing those words in Wikipedia will cause the search algorithm to ask: Did you mean liberation theology? At first glance, perhaps both movements share a certain ethos and idealism. But my critique of liberation technology centers on the fact that, whereas liberation theology sought to lend legitimacy to the struggle of the oppressed by questioning the hierarchical structure of the Catholic church from within, and suggesting that the church itself could be the source of injustice, liberation technology does not seem very interested in questioning the roles and structures of the institutions that own and control social media networks. Instead, liberation technology seems to posit a worldview whereby technologies that emerge in the context of capitalism (precisely at places like Stanford) can be used by those wishing to challenge capitalism itself.</p>
<p>As the history of global unrest intersects with the emerging affordances of information and communication technologies (ICT), no one can deny that these can — often in unforeseen ways — aid in the defence of human rights, improve governance, empower the poor, and so on. But that is not the point. The point is that while presenting these technologies as nothing less than the agents of liberation, a critique of the capitalist institutions and superstructures in which these technologies operate is obscured, and this critique is necessary for understanding the relationship between capitalism and ICT, as well as for opening up new frontiers of liberation.</p>
<p>It has already been convincingly argued that neoliberalism would not have been possible without ICT (cf. Robert Neubauer, 2011), to the extent that these technologies facilitated transnational flexible production and unrestricted capital flows, causing the erosion of organised labour and the promotion of an unregulated, privatised “free” market as the solution to all of societys ills. But here I am more interested in the link between capitalism and communication as an act of participation in society. Jodi Deans concept of communicative capitalism is particularly relevant, since she defines it as the materialisation of ideas of inclusion and participation in information, entertainment, and communication technologies in ways that capture resistance and intensify global capitalism (2009: 2). In communicative capitalism, everyone has the tools and opportunities to express an opinion. “Participation” in society is therefore identified first and foremost as the ability to communicate, to express ones opinion, in particular about the — mostly commercial — choices that give individuals their identity. However, the overabundance of communication in a marketplace in which all statements compete for visibility results in an environment where political change becomes difficult (if all options are equally valid, how can one option be declared superior?). Thus, the more we communicate (through our participation in digital networks, for instance), the more resistance is obstructed, and the more the ideology of capitalism is reinforced. Communicative capitalism — to paraphrase Gilles Deleuze — doesnt stop people from expressing themselves, but forces them to express themselves continuously (1997: 129).</p>
<p>Encouraging compulsive and continuous expression has turned out to be a profitable business model, as evidenced by the growth of the social media industry. Facebook, launched only in 2004, was adding on average 250,000 new members a day by 2007. Currently, it has over 845 million members (Facebook Company Info), who store more than 100 petabytes (100 quadrillion bytes) of photos and videos in the companys servers (Facebook Infrastructure). According to industry reports, the social networking market as a whole grew 87% from February 2006 to February 2007 (Britton and McGonegal, 2007: 80). Currently, the world spends over 110 billion minutes a month on social networks and blog sites, which equates to 22% of all time spent online (Nielsen Wire, 2010). Social media is driven by advertisements targeted to users based on the demographic data they provide, and the amount spent on advertising in social network services was $1.4 billion in 2008, with companies spending $305 and $850 million dollars to advertise their products on Facebook and MySpace, respectively (Eskelsen, Marcus and Ferree, 2009: 102-103). While the launch of new social media companies gives the impression of a competitive market, merger and acquisition trends suggest a move towards conglomeration that mirrors that of (and intersects with) traditional broadcast media. In a notable example, MySpace (which currently has over 185 million members) was acquired for US$580 million in 2005 by Rupert Murdochs News Corporation, one of the eight companies that dominate the global media market (although it was later sold again, once it lost its market share to Facebook).</p>
<p>In essence, communicative capitalism means that communication and social exchange take place not just in any environment, but in a privatised one. The neoliberal impulse to subsume all social communication and participation to market forces can only be achieved if the network is made the dominant episteme or model for organising social realities. This is accomplished by the application of what I call a nodocentric filter to social formations, which renders all human interaction in terms of network dynamics (not just any network, but a digital network with a profit-driven infrastructure). Under a nodocentric view, the goal is to assign to everything its place in the network. Nodocentrism is an epistemic stance where the distance between a node and something outside the network is, for all practical purposes, infinite (Mejias, 2010). Thus, to be anything other than a node is to be invisible, non-existent. The technologies of communicative capitalism are applied towards the creation of a pervasive or ubiquitous computing environment in which every thing and every utterance must be integrated or assimilated as a node in a digital network.</p>
<p>As a way to illustrate the concept of nodocentrism in broader terms, consider the example of search engine results, and how they point to documents, sites or objects that have been indexed in a database. What has not been indexed is not listed as a result, and it might as well not even exist in the universe of knowable things as far as the search engine is concerned. Nodocentrism is also at work in the creation of friend lists like the ones used in social networking programs. These lists are nodocentric because they depict a social network comprised of individuals available (or potentially available) to interact with, but they render invisible the individuals who are not on the list because they do not use the same program, or because they do not have an account with that service. The algorithms of digital networks operationalise decisions about what is included or not included on the list. I am not suggesting that nodocentrism provides a deficient or false image of the world; I am simply pointing out how it embodies a politics of network inclusion and exclusion.</p>
<p>Consider the example of social movements like the Arab Spring. The discourse of liberation technology presents these movements as the work of “wired” activists, although this portrayal excludes the work and participation of activists who are not computer literate, or simply not social media users. Social change is thus imagined as an outcome of information flows within a network, and activists are portrayed as nodes transmitting dissent to other nodes. In order for liberation to happen, everyone must be connected to the same digital networks. Change and resistance are conceived in nodocentric terms.</p>
<p>But privileging a networked view of activism in this way can also serve to obstruct any real critique of social media technologies, and to justify their use without the need to question their terms of use. The discourse of liberation technology accomplishes this by providing two different — although interdependent — versions of the affordances of these technologies: one for the homeland territory, and one for abroad. While communicative capitalism provides citizens at home no real opportunities for resistance (the majority are too occupied compulsively communicating), liberation technology presents a liberal and utopian narrative of the emancipating and empowering potential of technology in places not entirely corrupted by capitalism. In other words, change, while impossible “here,” is realised through liberation technology “over there,” in a heterotopian elsewhere (that in the case of the Arab Spring includes the Middle East and parts of Africa). This is a valuable manoeuvre for liberal sensitivities, because it redeems the technologies of communicative capitalism. Activists “over there” are using these tools not just to talk about commercial choices, but about things that really matter: the overthrow of injustice, the plight of the poor, etc. Liberation technology thus functions as a form of self-focused empathy in which an Other is imagined who is nothing more than a projection that validates our own desires, a user of the same technologies we are using — a user who applies these tools not for the frivolous ends of consumerism, but for the betterment of the world.</p>
<p>This would seem to imply that the discourse of liberation technology can only serve to arrest social change at home. If that were strictly the case, it would be difficult to account for the Wisconsin protests in early 2011, the emergence of the Occupy movements, or for that matter, any subsequent act of protest in the West that uses technology to mobilise people. The fact that these events continue to germinate and spread seems to demonstrate that it is only a matter of time before social movements influence each other in this age of global media, thus making it possible for liberation technologies to fulfil their true potential wherever the social and economic conditions that fuel social unrest are present, even at home.</p>
<p>What is interesting, however, is that coverage of post Arab Spring movements in the West has not really revolved around protesters use of social media, or it has only minimally. Participatory media being used at home for organising protests is apparently not that newsworthy, since it lacks the sensationalist and media-friendly orientalism of the Twitter Revolution stories. And as the use of participatory media in social movements has become normalised and generalised, there seems to be continued support for the belief that these corporate products have fundamentally shifted the balance of power between producers and consumers, and therefore between the owners of the means of production and the audience.</p>
<p>However, I would propose that the discourse of liberation technology conceals, in fact, how production on the new platform continues to exhibit a power imbalance. In theory, the internet (the über liberation technology in the liberal worldview) brought about the end of communication monopolies with their one-to-many models of dissemination; now, in the age of user-generated content, we have communication that is many-to-many. Access to the tools of production and the channels of distribution has been greatly democratised — the theory goes — and monopolies have been replaced by a free market with perfect competition. Everyone has the opportunity to create content, and everyone has the opportunity to engage that content. While the equation of this continuous communication cycle with civic participation is precisely what the concept of communicative capitalism seeks to critique, we need to also question the utopian narrative that describes a seamless evolution from monopolies (one-to-many) to more democratised circuits of communication (many-to-many). Has the empowering of more voices fundamentally altered the market structure of participation?</p>
<p>To answer that question, we need perhaps to take a brief detour through the <em>Hitler Finds Out</em> meme. This phenomenon refers to a series of parody videos on YouTube that began to appear circa 2006 in reaction to a sequence from the German film <em>Downfall</em> (2004), which depicts the last days of Hitler towards the end of World War II. Users took a three minute clip from the film in which Hitler learns he is losing the war, and while leaving the original German soundtrack intact, provided new subtitles to make it appear as if the Führer is ranting about something else (like being kicked out of Xbox Live, the subprime mortgage crisis, the cancellation of the TV show <em>Ugly Betty</em>, and so on). But when the company that produced the film began to receive complaints that the parodies were trivialising the war and the holocaust, they decided to pull the clips from YouTube, claiming that the videos constituted a violation of copyright. The creators of the parodies felt their Fair Use rights were violated, and responded by creating more videos. One of them, in which Hitler rants against the videos being removed from YouTube, contains an interesting moment. When a Nazi general suggests to Hitler that they simply upload the videos to another video hosting service, like DailyMotion or Vimeo, Hitler angrily responds that nobody uses those services, and that YouTube is the de facto standard (Green, 2010).</p>
<p>The point of this anecdote is to highlight the fact that when people have a video they want seen by the largest audience, they will most likely use YouTube (even if it is a video critiquing YouTube). And when people want to join a social networking site, they will join Facebook. And when they want to participate in a micro-blogging community, they will choose Twitter. There are alternatives for each of these services in the marketplace, but the fact that these networks host the most users renders the competitors almost useless. Most individuals will not willingly opt to use a service with a lesser share of the market.</p>
<p>This brings us to an important realisation about the market structure of social media: one-to-many is not giving way to many-to-many without first going through many-to-one. In other words, in this age where everyone can be producer and not just a consumer, the communication monopoly has merely been replaced by the monopsony (in economic terms, a monopoly is a market structure characterised by the presence of a single seller, whereas a monopsony is characterised by the presence of a single buyer). We — the sellers — are legion, but the buyers of what we produce are few. What we sell is not a product assembled in a factory, but “content” generated through social interactions which we hand over to the only buyer in town, the Facebooks and Googles of the world.</p>
<p>That monopsony has become the dominant market structure of the Web is not accidental. The architectures of participation of social media are based on a model where profit margins are maximised the more users join the network (which is why access is free or extremely low cost), and the more demographic data those users provide so that advertising can be targeted at them. As the saying goes: if you are not paying for it, you are not the customer, you are the product being sold. Access to “free” social media services exist only because companies have figured out a way to monetize our participation.</p>
<p>My argument is that this exchange is not fair for a variety of reasons, and that while digital networks increase opportunities for participation, they simultaneously increase inequality. In other words, the technologies of communicative capitalism embody practices of social participation and inclusion, but as Dean (2009) suggests, they also perpetuate the ideology of capitalism and obstruct any resistance to it. The way in which they do so — the way in which they create inequality while increasing participation — is through strategies that include the commodification of social labour (bringing activities we used to perform outside the market into the market), the privatisation of social spaces (eradicating public spaces and replacing them with “enhanced” private spaces), and the surveillance of dissenters (through new methods of warrantless wiretapping and social network analysis).</p>
<p>In order to provide a clear picture of the impact of this inequality, we must consider not only arguments that show the immediate benefits of a particular technology, but broader arguments that contrast the increase of access and participation with more comprehensive societal indicators. For instance, a Pew Internet & American Life Project survey from July of 2010 (Smith, 2010) indicated that cell phone ownership in the United States was higher among Latinos and African Americans (87%) than among Whites (80%). This would seem to suggest some progress in terms of inclusion, and perhaps even economic opportunity. However, when we contrast this data with the fact that the median wealth of African Americans has decreased 77% since 2007 (Harpers Index, 2010), it becomes apparent that access to certain technologies does not, by itself, translate into more equality. It might be helpful to speak of the inequality generated thorough participation via digital networks in the manner that Andre Gunder Frank (1967) spoke of underdevelopment: not as the result of being excluded from the economic systems of capitalism, but precisely as the result of being included in them.</p>
<p>That digital networks increase participation while increasing inequality is also evident in the case of the Arab Spring. While we have seen a diminishing in the compulsion to brand these acts of protest as Twitter Revolutions (as if corporate products, not people, deserve the credit), the discourse of liberation technology nonetheless implies that social media is partly responsible for igniting the uprisings — and in cases like Egypt, for their success. That these tools can and should be used for getting more people to participate in democratic movements is not what I am arguing against. Rather, I am interested in the larger consequences and implications for democracy of employing such tools, and I am proposing (along with people like Evgeny Morozov, 2011) that the use of social media by activists increases opportunities for participation and action, but it also makes it easier for governments and corporations to operate a repressive panopticon.</p>
<p>According to a report by the OpenNet Initiative, around 20 million users in the Middle East and North Africa have already experienced the blocking of online political content carried out with the help of Western technologies (Norman and York, 2010). To the extent that grassroots movements all over the world continue to rely on corporate liberation technologies to organise and mobilise, we can expect inequality (through participation) to take various forms.</p>
<p>First, there is the loss of privacy through surveillance. States can monitor activity within online social networks to identify dissenters and learn of (and obstruct) their plans. This is accomplished through deep-packet surveillance, filtering and blocking technologies, provided to repressive regimes like Iran, China, Burma and Egypt by companies like Cisco, Motorola, Boeing, Alcatel-Lucent, McAfee, Netsweeper, and Websense (York, 2011; Mayton, 2011). Recently, a group of Chinese citizens even filed a lawsuit against Cisco, claiming that the technology that allowed the government to set up the Great Firewall of China led to their arrest and torture (Abbott, 2011). That the US government pays lip service to the importance of a Free Internet (MacKinnon, 2011) and finances circumvention technologies (Glanz and Markoff, 2011) while supporting these companies through tax breaks and lax regulation is an unfortunate contradiction.</p>
<p>Second, inequality through participation can also be produced through the use of PSYOPs and propaganda. The US Army, for instance, is developing artificial intelligence agents that would populate social networking platforms and dispense pro-American propaganda (Fielding and Cobain, 2011). Dozens of these sock puppets could be supervised by a single person, and their profiles and conduct would be indistinguishable from that of a real human being. A low-budget version of this strategy has already been put into action by the Syrian government, who apparently released an army of Twitter spambots to spread pro-regime opinions (York, 2011).</p>
<p>Loss of freedom of speech is another example of inequality through participation. Companies, unlike states, are not obliged to guarantee any human rights, and their <em>Terms of Use</em> give them carte blanche to curtail the speech of certain users. For instance, Facebook (one assumes under the direction of the British authorities) recently removed pages and accounts of various protesters belonging to the group <em>UK Uncut</em> just before the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton (Malik, 2011). <em>UK Uncut</em> is not a violent terrorist organisation, but a group that opposes cuts to public services and demands that companies like Vodafone pay their share of taxes.</p>
<p>Suspension of service is another issue to consider. States (in collaboration with corporations) can simply “switch off” internet and mobile phone services for whole regions, in order to terminate access to the resources activists have been relying on. Vodafone, for instance, complied with the Egyptian governments directive to end cell phone service during the Revolution of 25 January (Shenker, 2011).</p>
<p>Inequality though participation will also be evident in new technologies that will facilitate the remote control of mobile devices without the users consent. Modern cell phones have, for some time, provided the authorities with the ability to use them as wiretapping devices without their owners knowledge, even when the power is off (McCullagh and Broache, 2006). And they can also be used to track individuals and report their locations. An indication of what else we can expect in the future is a patent, filed by Apple, that allows for authorities to remotely disable a phones camera (Mack, 2011). While this is intended to prevent illegal recording at concerts, museums, etc., we can imagine how effective it would be at protests.</p>
<p>The last example of inequality through participation I will briefly discuss is crowd-sourced identification. One reason why authorities may want, in fact, not to remotely disable phone cameras is because they can aid in the identification of activists. At the Vancouver riots of June 2011 (which had nothing to do with correcting social injustices, and everything to do with sports hooliganism), Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr users were enlisted in a crowd-sourcing attempt to identify miscreants using digital photos and videos posted by onlookers (Wong, 2011). Similar practices were employed by the Iranian government during the post-election riots of 2009. Websites like http://gerdab.ir were setup to allow regime sympathisers to identify protesters and report them to the authorities (Tehrani, 2009).</p>
<p>All of the practices described above confirm Morozovs observation that social media can be used by both sides, not just the side we agree with, and that the sacrifices in privacy may not be worth the gains (2009). Which perhaps explains why, at least in the Gulf Countries, Facebook usage seems to be diminishing (Khatri, 2011). But as regimes — repressive as well as democratic — learn how to use social media to influence the popularity of certain viewpoints, monitor communication, and detect threats, it seems as if dissent will become possible only in the excluded, non-surveilled spaces of what is outside the network, away from the participation templates of the monopsony. It is to this possibility that I want to turn next.</p>
<p>A typical drawing of a network depicts a series of nodes connected by lines, representing the links. As a mental exercise, I want to call attention to the space between the nodes. This space surrounding the nodes is not blank, and we can even give it a name: the paranodal. Because of nodocentrism we tend to see only the nodes in a network, but the space between nodes is not empty, it is inhabited by multitudes of paranodes that simply do not conform to the organising logic of the network, and cannot be seen through the algorithms of the network. The paranodal is not a utopia — it is not nowhere, but somewhere (beyond the nodes). It is not a heterotopia, since it is not outside the network but within it as well. The paranodal is an atopia, because it constitutes a difference that is everywhere.</p>
<p>Broken Web links pointing to pages that no longer exist, or cached versions of pages no longer active are paranodal, because they represent phantom nodes. Signal obstructers such as RFID (Radio-frequency identification) blockers that prevent network devices from being found are examples of technologies that create paranodality. Public spaces without surveillance cameras are paranodal spaces. Pirate radio operators are paranodal, because they function without network registration. Any kind of space where signal reception cannot be established is paranodal. Digital viruses and parasites that obstruct the operations of a network are also examples of paranodal technologies. Obsolete technology is paranodal, because its usage is no longer required to operate the network. Digital noise and glitches are paranodal, because they interfere with the flow of data in the network. Paranodality is a lost information packet in the internet. Populations in a dataset that are excluded or discriminated against by an algorithm become paranodal. Punk or rouge nodes — nodes who belong to a network only in order to destroy it — are paranodal. The activist who does not use liberation technologies is also an example of a paranode. This does not mean that paranodes are completely off the grid and outside all networks; for instance, someone not on Facebook might still be on email, which means she is a paranode in relation to the former but a participant in relation to the latter. Thus, the concept of the paranodal can help us describe network exclusions as well as allegiances.</p>
<p>The reason paranodes are important in our discussion of liberation technology, monopsonies, and protest movements is because these peripheries represent the only sites from which to disidentify from the network. The paranodal, to paraphrase Jacques Rancière, is the part of those who have no part (1999), and it is the means by which things that are not nodes can claim difference from the network as a whole, refusing to identify with it.</p>
<p>While the study of resistance movements as networks continues and will continue to be useful, a framework for opposing the nodocentric ordering of these movements into privatised templates for participation is necessary. As activists continue to demonstrate to liberation technologists, the struggle must go on after the internet and other digital networks are shut off — if the fight cant continue without Facebook and Twitter, then it is doomed. This means that the struggle is in part against those who own and control the privatised networks of participation (and can thus switch them off). Consequently, we have to turn to the paranodal for the emergence of corresponding models of activism. Since the peripheries represent the only sites from which to unthink the network, it is in the paranodal where new strategies will emerge: strategies of obstruction, interference, and disassembly of privatised networks; strategies of leaking information or circulating misinformation in networks; and strategies of intensification: transforming action that begins in one kind of network into resistance and engagement with alternative forms of networks.</p>
<p>As we realise that many-to-many communication is becoming impossible without a for-profit many-to-one infrastructure, we must abandon the utopian fantasy that liberation technology, as currently envisioned, can increase democratic participation. Participation managed by monopsony can only increase inequality. In response, paranodality must provide an atopian way to challenge the network by serving as a method for thinking and acting outside the monopsony. As networks have become not just metaphors for describing sociality, but templates that organise and shape social realities, we must question our investment in corporate technologies as the agents of liberation.</p><br>
<h2>Biographical Note</h2>
<p>Ulises A. Mejias is assistant professor in the Communication Studies Department at SUNY Oswego. His research interests include network studies, critical theory, philosophy and social studies of technology, and political economy of new media. His book on critical network theory is scheduled for publication in 2012 by University of Minnesota Press. For more information, see <a href="http://ulisesmejias.com" target="_blank">http://ulisesmejias.com</a></p>
<br>
<h2 class="pageBreak">References</h2>
<p>Abbott, Ryan. <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/06/10/37266.htm" target="_blank">'Torture Victims Say Cisco Systems Helped China Hound and Surveil'</a>, Courthouse News Service, 10 June (2011)</p>
<p>Britton, Daniel B., and McGonegal, Stephen. The Digital Economy Fact Book, Ninth Edition (Washington DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 2007).</p>
<p>Dean, Jodi. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics (Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2009).</p>
<p>Deleuze, Gilles. Negotiations 1972-1990 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).</p>
<p>Eskelsen, Grant, Marcus, Adam, and Ferree, W. Kenneth. The Digital Economy Fact Book, Tenth Edition (Washington DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation, 2009).</p>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22" target="_blank">Facebook Company Info</a></p>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=138" target="_blank">Facebook Infrastructure</a></p>
<p>Fielding, Nick, and Cobain, Ian. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks." target="_blank">'Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media'</a>, The Guardian. 17 March (2011)</p>
<p>Frank, Andre Gunder. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil (Monthly Review Press, 1967).</p>
<p>Glanz, James, and Markoff, John. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/world/12internet.html" target="_blank">'U.S. Underwrites Internet Detour Around Censors Abroad'</a>, The New York Times, 12 June (2011), sec. World</a></p>
<p>Green, Zacqary Adam. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBO5dh9qrIQ" target="_blank">'Hitler reacts to the Hitler parodies being removed from YouTube'</a>, April 20 (2010)</p>
<p>Harpers Index. Harpers Magazine, August 2010.</p>
<p>Hirschbiegel, Oliver. Downfall (Der Untergang) (Germany, 2004).</p>
<p>Khatri, Shabina. <a href="http://dohanews.co/post/5792813904/facebook-usage-falls-in-gcc-including-in-qatar-saudi" target="_blank">Facebook usage falls in GCC, including in Qatar, Saudi Arabia</a>, Doha News, May (2011)</p>
<p>Mack, Eric. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20068404-1/apple-patent-suggests-infrared-sensors-for-iphone/" target="_blank">Apple patent suggests infrared sensors for iPhone</a>, CNet News, 2 June (2011)</p>
<p>MacKinnon, Rebecca. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20068404-1/apple-patent-suggests-infrared-sensors-for-iphone/" target="_blank">Internet Freedom in the Age of Assange</a>, Foreign Policy, 17 February (2011).</p>
<p>Malik, Shiv. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/29/facebook-accused-removing-activists-pages" target="_blank">'Facebook accused of removing activists pages'</a>, The Guardian, 29 April (2011)</p>
<p>Mayton, Joseph. <a href="http://www.itnewsafrica.com/2011/02/us-company-may-have-helped-egypt-spy-on-citizens/.">'US company may have helped Egypt spy on citizens'</a>, IT News Africa, 10 February (2011)</p>
<p>McCullagh, Declan, and Broache, Anne. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/FBI-taps-cell-phone-mic-as-eavesdropping-tool/2100-1029_3-6140191.html?http://www.dailytech.com.">'FBI taps cell phone mic as eavesdropping tool'</a>, Cnet News, 1 December (2006)</p>
<p>Mejias, Ulises A. The limits of networks as models for organizing the social, New Media & Society 12.4 (2010): 603-617.</p>
<p>Morozov, Evgeny. <a href="http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContentRecords.ViewWitness&ContentRecord_id=1192&ContentType=D&ContentRecordType=D&ParentType=B&CFID=22840109&CFTOKEN=35893979.">'Testimony to the US Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe'</a>, Washington DC, 22 October 22 (2009)</p>
<p>——. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (PublicAffairs, 2011).</p>
<p>Neubauer, Robert. <a href="http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/viewArticle/238">'Neoliberalism in the Information Age, or Vice Versa? Global Citizenship, Technology, and Hegemonic Ideology'</a>, Triple C 9.2 (2011): 190-225</p>
<p>Norman, Helmi, and York, Jillian C. <a href="http://opennet.net/west-censoring-east-the-use-western-technologies-middle-east-censors-2010-2011#footnoteref1_7ua5bg2.">'West Censoring East: The Use of Western Technologies by Middle East Censors, 2010-2011'</a>, OpenNet Initiative (2010)</p>
<p><a href="http://liberationtechnology.stanford.edu/">Program on Liberation Technology</a>, Stanford University</p>
<p>Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).</p>
<p>Shenker, Jack. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/03/vodafone-egypt-advert-claims-revolution.">'Fury over advert claiming Egypt revolution as Vodafones'</a>, The Guardian, 3 June (2011)</p>
<p>Smith, Aaron. <a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Mobile-Access-2010.aspx.">'Mobile Access 2010'</a>, Pew Internet and American Life Project, 7 July (2010)</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/social-media-accounts-for-22-percent-of-time-online/.">'Social Networks/Blogs Now Account for One in Every Four and a Half Minutes Online'</a>, Nielsen Wire, 15 June (2010)</p>
<p>Tehrani, Hamid. <a href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/06/27/iranian-officials-crowd-source-protester-identities-online/.">'Iranian officials crowd-source protester identities'</a>, Global Voices, 27 June 27 (2009)</p>
<p>Wong, Queenie. <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015343735_vancouversocial17m.html.">'Social media play big role in riot probe'</a>, The Seattle Times, 16 June (2011)</p>
<p>York, Jillian C. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/21/syria-twitter-spambots-pro-revolution.">'Syrias Twitter spambots'</a>, The Guardian, 21 April (2011)</p>
<p>———. <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/06/week-internet-censorship.">'This Week in Internet Censorship'</a>, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 15 June (2011)</p>
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
</head>
<body>
<main>
<img id="line" src="../archive/gps_drawings/p_lions_es_to_wijnhaven.svg">
<img id="line" src="gps_drawings/p_lions_es_to_wijnhaven.svg">
<picture class="drawing">
<source media="(max-width: 1280px)" srcset="img/Knot_board_drawing_01_640.jpg">
<!-- image for screens below 1280px wide -->

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
</head>
<body>
<main>
<img id="line" src="../archive/gps_drawings/please_to_foshan.svg">
<img id="line" src="gps_drawings/please_to_foshan.svg">
<div class="text">
<h2>The AEther</h2>
<p>In early modern physics, the AEther (or Ether) was believed to be an invisible space-filling substance or field that was a transmission medium for electromagnetic or gravitational forces.</p>

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
</head>
<body>
<main>
<img id="line" src="../archive/gps_drawings/please_to_wijnhaven.svg">
<img id="line" src="gps_drawings/please_to_wijnhaven.svg">
<div class="text">
</div>
</main>

@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
@font-face {
font-family: Courier_New;
src: url('fonts/courier_new-webfont.woff');
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;
}
body {
font-family: Courier_New;
font-size: 16px;
line-height: 120%;
position: relative;
}
main {
margin: 12px 12px auto 12px;
}
b {
font-family: Courier_New;
text-transform: uppercase;
font-weight: 400;
}
h1 {
font-family: "Helvetica", "Arial", sans-serif;
font-size: 21px;
line-height: 120%;
text-align: left;
font-weight: normal;
}
h2 {
font-family: Courier_New;
font-size: 16px;
line-height: 120%;
text-align: left;
text-transform: uppercase;
font-weight: normal;
}
div {
display: block;
margin-right: auto;
max-width: 640px;
}
img {
display: block;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
/*text formatting*/
/*.bold {
font: 'arial';
display: inline;
text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;
text-rendering: optimizeSpeed;
letter-spacing: -0.4px;
}*/
.indent {
display: block;
padding-left: 2em;
padding-right: 2em;
margin-right: auto;
}
.drawing {
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
}
a:link {
color: black;
text-decoration-line: underline;
}
a:visited {
color: black;
}
a:hover {
color: blue;
text-decoration-line: underline;
}
a:active {
color: pink;
}
.list {
text-decoration: none;
}
#line {
position: absolute;
/*z-index: 2;*/
}
#photo {
position: absolute;
margin-top: 200px;
/*z-index: 1;*/
}
#description {
position: absolute;
}

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 658 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 150 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 844 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 30 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 40 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 64 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 45 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 46 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 64 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 208 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 62 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 143 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.7 MiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1021 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 78 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 84 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 89 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 125 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 132 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 81 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 85 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 30 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 320 KiB

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Readings</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<a class="list" href="beyond_the_internet_and_all_control_diagrams.html"><h1>Beyond the Internet and All Control Diagrams</a><br>
Simone Browne and Zach Blas</h1>
<a class="list" href="biotopology.html"><h1>Biotopology 1972</a><br>
Warren Brodey</h1>
<a class="list" href="cybernetic_guerilla_warfare.html"><h1>Cybernetic Guerilla Warfare</a><br>
Paul Ryan</h1>
<a class="list" href="mejias_liberation_technology.html"><h1>Liberation Technology and the Arab Spring: From Utopia to Atopia and Beyond</a><br>
Ulises A. Mejias</h1>
<a class="list" href="buckminster_fuller_software.html"><h1>SOFTWARE</a><br>
R. Buckmister Fuller</h1>
<a class="list" href="the_psychotopology_of_everyday_life.html"><h1>The Psychotopology of Everyday Life</a><br>
Hakim Bey</h1>
<a class="list" href="theory_of_the_derive.html"><h1>Theory of the Dérive</a><br>
Guy Debord</h1>
<a class="list" href="truckstops_on_the_information_superhighway.html"><h1>Truckstops on the Information Superhighway: Ant Farm, SRI, and the Cloud</a><br>
Tung-Hui Hu</h1>
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -51,6 +51,14 @@
text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Times_New_Roman;
src: url('fonts/Times New Roman.ttf');
font-weight: normal;
font-style: normal;
text-rendering: optimizeLegibility;
}
body {
font-family: 'Courier New', 'Courier', monospace;
font-size: 16px;

@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>the psychotopology of everyday life</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<h1>The Psychotopology of Everyday Life<br>
Hakim Bey</h1>
<br>
<p>Excerpt from <em>T.A.Z.,
The Temporary Autonomous Zone</em>, Autonomedia, 1991<br>
Full text available at <a href="https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/hakim-bey-t-a-z-the-temporary-autonomous-zone-ontological-anarchy-poetic-terrorism" target="_blank"> theanarchistlibrary.org</a></p>
<br>
<p>THE CONCEPT OF THE TAZ arises first out of a critique of Revolution, and an appreciation of the Insurrection. The former labels the latter a failure; but for us uprising represents a far more interesting possibility, from the standard of a psychology of liberation, than all the "successful" revolutions of bourgeoisie, communists, fascists, etc.</p>
<p>The second generating force behind the TAZ springs from the historical development I call "the closure of the map." The last bit of Earth unclaimed by any nation-state was eaten up in 1899. Ours is the first century without terra incognita, without a frontier. Nationality is the highest principle of world governance — not one speck of rock in the South Seas can be left open, not one remote valley, not even the Moon and planets. This is the apotheosis of "territorial gangsterism." Not one square inch of Earth goes unpoliced or untaxed...in theory.</p>
<p>The "map" is a political abstract grid, a gigantic con enforced by the carrot/stick conditioning of the "Expert" State, until for most of us the map becomes the territory — no longer "Turtle Island," but "the USA." And yet because the map is an abstraction it cannot cover Earth with 1:1 accuracy. Within the fractal complexities of actual geography the map can see only dimensional grids. Hidden enfolded immensities escape the measuring rod. The map is not accurate; the map cannot be accurate.</p>
<p>So — Revolution is closed, but insurgency is open. For the time being we concentrate our force on temporary "power surges," avoiding all entanglements with "permanent solutions."
And — the map is closed, but the autonomous zone is open. Metaphorically it unfolds within the fractal dimensions invisible to the cartography of Control. And here we should introduce the concept of psychotopology (and -topography) as an alternative "science" to that of the State's surveying and mapmaking and "psychic imperialism." Only psychotopography can draw 1:1 maps of reality because only the human mind provides sufficient complexity to model the real. But a 1:1 map cannot "control" its territory because it is virtually identical with its territory. It can only be used to suggest, in a sense gesture towards, certain features. We are looking for "spaces" (geographic, social, cultural, imaginal) with potential to flower as autonomous zones — and we are looking for times in which these spaces are relatively open, either through neglect on the part of the State or because they have somehow escaped notice by the mapmakers, or for whatever reason. Psychotopology is the art of dowsing for potential TAZs.</p>
<p>The closures of Revolution and of the map, however, are only the negative sources of the TAZ; much remains to be said of its positive inspirations. Reaction alone cannot provide the energy needed to "manifest" a TAZ. An uprising must be for something as well.</p>
<p>1. First, we can speak of a natural anthropology of the TAZ. The nuclear family is the base unit of consensus society, but not of the TAZ. ("Families! — how I hate them! the misers of love!" — Gide) The nuclear family, with its attendant "oedipal miseries," appears to have been a Neolithic invention, a response to the "agricultural revolution" with its imposed scarcity and its imposed hierarchy. The Paleolithic model is at once more primal and more radical: the band. The typical hunter/gatherer nomadic or semi- nomadic band consists of about 50 people. Within larger tribal societies the band-structure is fulfilled by clans within the tribe, or by sodalities such as initiatic or secret societies, hunt or war societies, gender societies, "children's republics," and so on. If the nuclear family is produced by scarcity (and results in miserliness), the band is produced by abundance — and results in prodigality. The family is closed, by genetics, by the male's possession of women and children, by the hierarchic totality of agricultural/industrial society. The band is open — not to everyone, of course, but to the affinity group, the initiates sworn to a bond of love. The band is not part of a larger hierarchy, but rather part of a horizontal pattern of custom, extended kinship, contract and alliance, spiritual affinities, etc. (American Indian society preserves certain aspects of this structure even now.)</p>
<p>In our own post-Spectacular Society of Simulation many forces are working — largely invisibly — to phase out the nuclear family and bring back the band. Breakdowns in the structure of Work resonate in the shattered "stability" of the unit-home and unit-family. One's "band" nowadays includes friends, ex- spouses and lovers, people met at different jobs and pow-wows, affinity groups, special interest networks, mail networks, etc. The nuclear family becomes more and more obviously a trap, a cultural sinkhole, a neurotic secret implosion of split atoms — and the obvious counter-strategy emerges spontaneously in the almost unconscious rediscovery of the more archaic and yet more post-industrial possibility of the band.</p>
<p>2. The TAZ as festival. Stephen Pearl Andrews once offered, as an image of anarchist society, the dinner party, in which all structure of authority dissolves in conviviality and celebration (see Appendix C). Here we might also invoke Fourier and his concept of the senses as the basis of social becoming — "touch-rut" and "gastrosophy," and his paean to the neglected implications of smell and taste. The ancient concepts of jubilee and saturnalia originate in an intuition that certain events lie outside the scope of "profane time," the measuring-rod of the State and of History. These holidays literally occupied gaps in the calendar — intercalary intervals. By the Middle Ages, nearly a third of the year was given over to holidays. Perhaps the riots against calendar reform had less to do with the "eleven lost days" than with a sense that imperial science was conspiring to close up these gaps in the calendar where the people's freedoms had accumulated — a coup d'etat, a mapping of the year, a seizure of time itself, turning the organic cosmos into a clockwork universe. The death of the festival.</p>
<p>Participants in insurrection invariably note its festive aspects, even in the midst of armed struggle, danger, and risk. The uprising is like a saturnalia which has slipped loose (or been forced to vanish) from its intercalary interval and is now at liberty to pop up anywhere or when. Freed of time and place, it nevertheless possesses a nose for the ripeness of events, and an affinity for the genius loci; the science of psychotopology indicates "flows of forces" and "spots of power" (to borrow occultist metaphors) which localize the TAZ spatio-temporally, or at least help to define its relation to moment and locale.</p>
<p>The media invite us to "come celebrate the moments of your life" with the spurious unification of commodity and spectacle, the famous non-event of pure representation. In response to this obscenity we have, on the one hand, the spectrum of refusal (chronicled by the Situationists, John Zerzan, Bob Black et al.) — and on the other hand, the emergence of a festal culture removed and even hidden from the would-be managers of our leisure. "Fight for the right to party" is in fact not a parody of the radical struggle but a new manifestation of it, appropriate to an age which offers TVs and telephones as ways to "reach out and touch" other human beings, ways to "Be There!"</p>
<p>Pearl Andrews was right: the dinner party is already "the seed of the new society taking shape within the shell of the old" (IWW Preamble). The sixties-style "tribal gathering," the forest conclave of eco-saboteurs, the idyllic Beltane of the neo-pagans, anarchist conferences, gay faery circles...Harlem rent parties of the twenties, nightclubs, banquets, old-time libertarian picnics — we should realize that all these are already "liberated zones" of a sort, or at least potential TAZs. Whether open only to a few friends, like a dinner party, or to thousands of celebrants, like a Be-In, the party is always "open" because it is not "ordered"; it may be planned, but unless it "happens" it's a failure. The element of spontaneity is crucial.</p>
<p>The essence of the party: face-to-face, a group of humans synergize their efforts to realize mutual desires, whether for good food and cheer, dance, conversation, the arts of life; perhaps even for erotic pleasure, or to create a communal artwork, or to attain the very transport of bliss — in short, a "union of egoists" (as Stirner put it) in its simplest form — or else, in Kropotkin's terms, a basic biological drive to "mutual aid." (Here we should also mention Bataille's "economy of excess" and his theory of potlatch culture.)</p>
<p>3. Vital in shaping TAZ reality is the concept of psychic nomadism (or as we jokingly call it, "rootless cosmopolitanism"). Aspects of this phenomenon have been discussed by Deleuze and Guattari in Nomadology and the War Machine, by Lyotard in Driftworks and by various authors in the "Oasis" issue of Semiotext(e). We use the term "psychic nomadism" here rather than "urban nomadism," "nomadology," "driftwork," etc., simply in order to garner all these concepts into a single loose complex, to be studied in light of the coming- into-being of the TAZ. "The death of God," in some ways a de- centering of the entire "European" project, opened a multi-perspectived post- ideological worldview able to move "rootlessly" from philosophy to tribal myth, from natural science to Taoism — able to see for the first time through eyes like some golden insect's, each facet giving a view of an entirely other world.
But this vision was attained at the expense of inhabiting an epoch where speed and "commodity fetishism" have created a tyrannical false unity which tends to blur all cultural diversity and individuality, so that "one place is as good as another." This paradox creates "gypsies," psychic travellers driven by desire or curiosity, wanderers with shallow loyalties (in fact disloyal to the "European Project" which has lost all its charm and vitality), not tied down to any particular time and place, in search of diversity and adventure...This description covers not only the X-class artists and intellectuals but also migrant laborers, refugees, the "homeless," tourists, the RV and mobile-home culture — also people who "travel" via the Net, but may never leave their own rooms (or those like Thoreau who "have travelled much — in Concord"); and finally it includes "everybody," all of us, living through our automobiles, our vacations, our TVs, books, movies, telephones, changing jobs, changing "lifestyles," religions, diets, etc., etc.</p>
<p>Psychic nomadism as a tactic, what Deleuze & Guattari metaphorically call "the war machine," shifts the paradox from a passive to an active and perhaps even "violent" mode. "God"'s last throes and deathbed rattles have been going on for such a long time — in the form of Capitalism, Fascism, and Communism, for example — that there's still a lot of "creative destruction" to be carried out by post-Bakuninist post-Nietzschean commandos or apaches (literally "enemies") of the old Consensus. These nomads practice the razzia, they are corsairs, they are viruses; they have both need and desire for TAZs, camps of black tents under the desert stars, interzones, hidden fortified oases along secret caravan routes, "liberated" bits of jungle and bad-land, no-go areas, black markets, and underground bazaars.</p>
<p>These nomads chart their courses by strange stars, which might be luminous clusters of data in cyberspace, or perhaps hallucinations. Lay down a map of the land; over that, set a map of political change; over that, a map of the Net, especially the counter-Net with its emphasis on clandestine information-flow and logistics — and finally, over all, the 1:1 map of the creative imagination, aesthetics, values. The resultant grid comes to life, animated by unexpected eddies and surges of energy, coagulations of light, secret tunnels, surprises.</p>
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>theory of the derive</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<h1>Theory of the Dérive<br>
Guy Debord</h1>
<br>
<p>“Théorie de la dérive” was published in Internationale Situationniste #2 (Paris, December 1958). A slightly different version was first published in the Belgian surrealist journal Les Lèvres Nues #9 (November 1956) along with accounts of two dérives. This translation by Ken Knabb is from the <a href="http://www.bopsecrets.org/cat.htm" target="_blank">Situationist International Anthology</a> (Revised and Expanded Edition, 2006). No copyright.</p>
<br>
<p>One of the basic situationist practices is the <em>dérive,</em><sup><a href="#1.">(1)</a></sup> a technique of rapid passage through varied ambiences. Dérives involve playful-constructive behavior and awareness of psychogeographical effects, and are thus quite different from the classic notions of journey or stroll.</p>
<p>In a dérive one or more persons during a certain period drop their relations, their work and leisure activities, and all their other usual motives for movement and action, and let themselves be drawn by the attractions of the terrain and the encounters they find there. Chance is a less important factor in this activity than one might think: from a dérive point of view cities have psychogeographical contours, with constant currents, fixed points and vortexes that strongly discourage entry into or exit from certain zones.</p>
<p>But the dérive includes both this letting-go and its necessary contradiction: the domination of psychogeographical variations by the knowledge and calculation of their possibilities. In this latter regard, ecological science, despite the narrow social space to which it limits itself, provides psychogeography with abundant data.</p>
<p>The ecological analysis of the absolute or relative character of fissures in the urban network, of the role of microclimates, of distinct neighborhoods with no relation to administrative boundaries, and above all of the dominating action of centers of attraction, must be utilized and completed by psychogeographical methods. The objective passional terrain of the dérive must be defined in accordance both with its own logic and with its relations with social morphology.</p>
<p>In his study <em>Paris et l'agglomération parisienne</em> (Bibliothèque de Sociologie Contemporaine, P.U.F., 1952) Chombart de Lauwe notes that "an urban neighborhood is determined not only by geographical and economic factors, but also by the image that its inhabitants and those of other neighborhoods have of it." In the same work, in order to illustrate "the narrowness of the real Paris in which each individual lives ... within a geographical area whose radius is extremely small," he diagrams all the movements made in the space of one year by a student living in the 16th Arrondissement. Her itinerary forms a small triangle with no significant deviations, the three apexes of which are the School of Political Sciences, her residence and that of her piano teacher.</p>
<p>Such data — examples of a modern poetry capable of provoking sharp emotional reactions (in this particular case, outrage at the fact that anyone's life can be so pathetically limited) — or even Burgess's theory of Chicago's social activities as being distributed in distinct concentric zones, will undoubtedly prove useful in developing dérives. </p>
<p>If chance plays an important role in dérives this is because the methodology of psychogeographical observation is still in its infancy. But the action of chance is naturally conservative and in a new setting tends to reduce everything to habit or to an alternation between a limited number of variants. Progress means breaking through fields where chance holds sway by creating new conditions more favorable to our purposes. We can say, then, that the randomness of a dérive is fundamentally different from that of the stroll, but also that the first psychogeographical attractions discovered by dérivers may tend to fixate them around new habitual axes, to which they will constantly be drawn back.</p>
<p>An insufficient awareness of the limitations of chance, and of its inevitably reactionary effects, condemned to a dismal failure the famous aimless wandering attempted in 1923 by four surrealists, beginning from a town chosen by lot: Wandering in open country is naturally depressing, and the interventions of chance are poorer there than anywhere else. But this mindlessness is pushed much further by a certain Pierre Vendryes (in <em>Médium,</em> May 1954), who thinks he can relate this anecdote to various probability experiments, on the ground that they all supposedly involve the same sort of antideterminist liberation. He gives as an example the random distribution of tadpoles in a circular aquarium, adding, significantly, "It is necessary, of course, that such a population be subject to no external guiding influence." From that perspective, the tadpoles could be considered more spontaneously liberated than the surrealists, since they have the advantage of being "as stripped as possible of intelligence, sociability and sexuality," and are thus "truly independent from one another."</p>
<p>At the opposite pole from such imbecilities, the primarily urban character of the dérive, in its element in the great industrially transformed cities that are such rich centers of possibilities and meanings, could be expressed in Marx's phrase: "Men can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive."</p>
<p>One can dérive alone, but all indications are that the most fruitful numerical arrangement consists of several small groups of two or three people who have reached the same level of awareness, since cross-checking these different groups' impressions makes it possible to arrive at more objective conclusions. It is preferable for the composition of these groups to change from one dérive to another. With more than four or five participants, the specifically dérive character rapidly diminishes, and in any case it is impossible for there to be more than ten or twelve people without the dérive fragmenting into several simultaneous dérives. The practice of such subdivision is in fact of great interest, but the difficulties it entails have so far prevented it from being organized on a sufficient scale.</p>
<p>The average duration of a dérive is one day, considered as the time between two periods of sleep. The starting and ending times have no necessary relation to the solar day, but it should be noted that the last hours of the night are generally unsuitable for dérives.</p>
<p>But this duration is merely a statistical average. For one thing, a dérive rarely occurs in its pure form: it is difficult for the participants to avoid setting aside an hour or two at the beginning or end of the day for taking care of banal tasks; and toward the end of the day fatigue tends to encourage such an abandonment. But more importantly, a dérive often takes place within a deliberately limited period of a few hours, or even fortuitously during fairly brief moments; or it may last for several days without interruption. In spite of the cessations imposed by the need for sleep, certain dérives of a sufficient intensity have been sustained for three or four days, or even longer. It is true that in the case of a series of dérives over a rather long period of time it is almost impossible to determine precisely when the state of mind peculiar to one dérive gives way to that of another. One sequence of dérives was pursued without notable interruption for around two months. Such an experience gives rise to new objective conditions of behavior that bring about the disappearance of a good number of the old ones.<a href="#2."><sup>(2)</sup></a></p>
<p>The influence of weather on dérives, although real, is a significant factor only in the case of prolonged rains, which make them virtually impossible. But storms or other types of precipitation are rather favorable for dérives.</p>
<p>The spatial field of a dérive may be precisely delimited or vague, depending on whether the goal is to study a terrain or to emotionally disorient oneself. It should not be forgotten that these two aspects of dérives overlap in so many ways that it is impossible to isolate one of them in a pure state. But the use of taxis, for example, can provide a clear enough dividing line: If in the course of a dérive one takes a taxi, either to get to a specific destination or simply to move, say, twenty minutes to the west, one is concerned primarily with personal disorientation. If, on the other hand, one sticks to the direct exploration of a particular terrain, one is concentrating primarily on research for a psychogeographical urbanism. </p>
<p>In every case the spatial field depends first of all on the point of departure — the residence of the solo dériver or the meeting place selected by a group. The maximum area of this spatial field does not extend beyond the entirety of a large city and its suburbs. At its minimum it can be limited to a small self-contained ambience: a single neighborhood or even a single block of houses if it's interesting enough (the extreme case being a static-dérive of an entire day within the Saint-Lazare train station).</p>
<p>The exploration of a fixed spatial field entails establishing bases and calculating directions of penetration. It is here that the study of maps comes in — ordinary ones as well as ecological and psychogeographical ones — along with their correction and improvement. It should go without saying that we are not at all interested in any mere exoticism that may arise from the fact that one is exploring a neighborhood for the first time. Besides its unimportance, this aspect of the problem is completely subjective and soon fades away.</p>
<p>In the "possible rendezvous," on the other hand, the element of exploration
is minimal in comparison with that of behavioral disorientation. The subject is invited to come alone to a certain place at a specified time. He is freed from the bothersome obligations of the ordinary rendezvous since there is no one to wait for. But since this "possible rendezvous" has brought him without warning to a place he may or may not know, he observes the surroundings. It may be that the same spot has been specified for a "possible rendezvous" for someone else whose identity he has no way of knowing. Since he may never even have seen the other person before, he will be encouraged to start up conversations with various passersby. He may meet no one, or he may even by
chance meet the person who has arranged the "possible rendezvous." In any case, particularly if the time and place have been well chosen, his use of time will take an unexpected turn. He may even telephone someone else who doesn't know where the first "possible rendezvous" has taken him, in order to ask for another one to be specified. One can see the virtually unlimited resources of this pastime.</p>
<p>Our rather anarchic lifestyle and even certain amusements considered dubious that have always been enjoyed among our entourage — slipping by night into houses undergoing demolition, hitchhiking nonstop and without destination through Paris during a transportation strike in the name of adding to the confusion, wandering in subterranean catacombs forbidden to the public, etc. — are expressions of a more general sensibility which is no different from that of the dérive. Written descriptions can be no more than passwords to this great game.</p>
<p>The lessons drawn from dérives enable us to draft the first surveys of the psychogeographical articulations of a modern city. Beyond the discovery of unities of ambience, of their main components and their spatial localization, one comes to perceive their principal axes of passage, their exits and their defenses. One arrives at the central hypothesis of the existence of psychogeographical pivotal points. One measures the distances that actually separate two regions of a city, distances that may have little relation with the physical distance between them. With the aid of old maps, aerial photographs and experimental dérives, one can draw up hitherto lacking maps of influences, maps whose inevitable imprecision at this early stage is no worse than that of the earliest navigational charts. The only difference is that it is no longer a matter of precisely delineating stable continents, but of changing architecture and urbanism.</p>
<p>Today the different unities of atmosphere and of dwellings are not precisely marked off, but are surrounded by more or less extended bordering regions. The
most general change that dérive experiences lead to proposing is the constant diminution of these border regions, up to the point of their complete suppression.</p>
<p>Within architecture itself, the taste for dériving tends to promote all sorts of new forms of labyrinths made possible by modern techniques of construction. Thus in March 1955 the press reported the construction in New York of a building in which one can see the first signs of an opportunity to dérive inside an apartment:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The apartments of the helicoidal building will be shaped like slices of cake. One will be able to enlarge or reduce them by shifting movable partitions. The half-floor gradations avoid limiting the number of rooms, since the tenant can request the use of the adjacent section on either upper or lower levels. With this setup three four-room apartments can be transformed into one twelve-room apartment in less than six hours."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>(To be continued.)</p>
<p align="right">GUY DEBORD<br>
1958</p>
<p align="center">[TRANSLATOR'S NOTES]</p>
<p><a name="1.">1.</a><i>dérive:</i> literally "drift" or "drifting". Like <i>détournement,</i> this term has usually been anglicized as both a noun and a verb.</p>
<p><a name="2.">2. </a>"The <em>dérive</em> (with its flow of acts, its gestures, its strolls, its encounters) was <em>to the totality</em> exactly what psychoanalysis (in the best sense) is to language. Let yourself go with the flow of words, says the psychoanalyst. He listens, until the moment when he rejects or modifies (one could say <em>detourns</em>) a word, an expression or a definition. The dérive is certainly a technique, almost a therapeutic one. But just as analysis unaccompanied with anything else is almost always <em>contraindicated,</em> so continual dériving is dangerous to the extent that the individual, having gone too far (not without bases, but...) without defenses, is threatened with explosion, dissolution, dissociation, disintegration. And thence the relapse into what is termed 'ordinary life,' that is to say, in reality, into 'petrified life.' In this regard I now repudiate my <a href="http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/Chtcheglov.htm" target="_blank">Formulary</a>'s propaganda for a <em>continuous dérive</em>. It could be continuous like the poker game in Las Vegas, but only for a certain period, limited to a weekend for some people, to a week as a good average; a month is really pushing it. In 1953-1954 we dérived for three or four months straight. That's the extreme limit. It's a miracle it didn't kill us" (Ivan Chtcheglov, excerpt from a 1963 letter to Michèle Bernstein and Guy Debord, reprinted in<em>Internationale Situationniste</em> #9, p.38).</p>
</div>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>truckstops on the information superhighway</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="readings.css" media="screen"/>
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div>
<h1>Truckstops on the Information Superhighway: Ant Farm, SRI, and the Cloud<br>
Tung-Hui Hu, Assistant Professor, English, University of Michigan</h1>
<br>
<p>First published at <a href="http://median.newmediacaucus.org/art-infrastructures-hardware/truckstops-on-the-information-superhighway-ant-farm-sri-and-the-cloud/" target="_blank"> http://median.newmediacaucus.org/art-infrastructures-hardware/truckstops-on-the-information-superhighway-ant-farm-sri-and-the-cloud/</a></p>
<br>
<p>To start keeping track of network glitches — to watch, for example, all Chinese network traffic routed through a 1,700 square foot house in suburban Cheyenne, Wyoming on January 21, 2014 — is to quickly realize that the Internets shape is far goofier than we can imagine. The Internet bears little resemblance to the elegant mesh with which RAND Corporation scientist Paul Baran depicted a distributed network in 1964. (fig. 1c). Filled with complex vortices and firewalls and black holes, the Internet might be depicted more accurately as a series of topological contortions (fig. 2)</p>
<img src="readings_images/hu-01-baran-on-distributed-communications-1964.png">
<div class="indent">
<p>Fig. 1. On Distributed Networks, 1964, Paul Baran, diagram for RAND research memoranda 3420, © RAND Corporation. (Used with permission.)</p>
</div>
<img src="readings_images/hu-02-ponsot-klein-worms-1971.png">
<div class="indent">
<p>Fig. 2. Klein Worms, 1971, Claude Ponsot, illustration for Paul Ryan, “Cybernetic Guerilla Warfare,” in Radical Software 1:3.</p>
</div>
<p>Why is it, then, that digital media scholars persist in picturing the Internet as a distributed, grid or mesh-shaped network? In part, this is because Barans diagrams have been misinterpreted as a <em>historical</em> narrative: a move from what Paul Edwards has termed the “closed-world” discourse of the 1950s and early 1960s to decentralized and, later, distributed computer networks. [1] As evidence, these scholars cite the progression from the centralized, command-and-control structures of Air Force computer rooms to ARPAnet and the Internet. [2] Though this is a misreading of Barans article, it remains a seductive mythology because it explains the dispersion of power through the formal qualities of the computer networks that supposedly enable it. This model serves digital studies well because it allows the Internet to stand for network culture as a whole, and uses the technology as a proxy for larger societal changes. But what happens if you take the digital out of the equation?<p>
<p>This essay returns to the moment that this shift away from centralized networks is said to occur to tell an alternate story. It is certainly true that in the 1960s and 1970s, a group of engineers from California were actively trying to find an alternative to centralized networks. Not all of these engineers were working for RAND or other military-funded laboratories, however; many of them were artists. [3] And for them, as for the rest of the country, the networks they were designing did not necessarily involve digital data. Instead, at that moment, <em>television</em> was the centralized system that needed to be subverted or at least radically redesigned. Network television — famously described as a “wasteland” — was a monolithic schedule of programming pumped out by NBC, CBS, ABC, and, until it folded, DuMont: national broadcasters which homogeneized the flow of information. The studios broadcast to the homes; information flow was a one-way arrow — at least until a 1969 Federal Communications Commission decision allowing community access television (CATV), better known as cable. Television delivered the network. But video and cable had the potential to hijack it.</p>
<p>In 1970, the same year that computer scientist John McCarthy asked if home computer networks could lure TV viewers away from the tube with alternative sources of information, an artist group called Raindance Corporation proposed a “Center for Decentralized Television.” [4] A playful parody of the RAND Corporations 1964 design for a decentralized digital network, its name suggested its paradoxically centralizing tendencies. Formed in response to news that RAND Corporation had begun to study cable networks (or, as one contributor speculated, was developing mind-control techniques), the video collective wrote: “We believe culture needs new information structures, not just improved content pumped through existing ones,” and their unrealized “Center” would have served as a re-granting agency for video artists. [5] An early issue of the collectives newsletter, <em>Radical Software</em>, suggests the thrill of imagining new information structures: the typography of Frank Gilettes piece, “Loop-de-Loop,” depicts arrows twisted to form loops that lead nowhere. Claude Ponsot illustrates an article about the structure of cybernetics and guerilla tactics with whimsical mathematical diagrams that I invoked earlier. Dubbed “Klein worms,” after the topologically impossible Klein bottle, we are still within the ballpark of Barans network diagrams, but just barely. (Figure fig. 2)</p>
<p>These earlier moments of reconfiguring the network structure hold uncanny parallels to present-day digital networks. The first page of <em>Radical Software</em>s first issue is an excerpt from Gene Youngbloods book, <em>The Videosphere</em>; a later advertisement summarizes his book as a description of a “single unified system, a decentralized feedback communication network” that would unite five different mediums: cable TV, portable video, storage networks, “time-shared computer utilities,” and “the domestic satellite system.” Youngbloods videosphere is often understood metaphorically, as a reiteration of Marshall McLuhan, but here Youngblood turns his attention to specific networks: the FCCs decision to allow MCI (then called Microwave Communications Inc.) to compete with AT&T by renting CATV circuits; a “quasi-laser broadcasting system… [that] transmits up to 15 miles,” a technology pioneered by MCI that will anticipate fiber-optic cable; the US Defense Department satellites, along with Soviet and the commercial Comsat networks. Youngbloods union of heterogeneous networks is eerily similar to the union of satellite, land, and radio networks that was dubbed, five years later, the Internet. Add in storage networks and “time-shared computer utilities,” and you have cloud computing the system that allows computing resources to be accessed seamlessly from cell phones, tablets, and computers.</p>
<p>Excited by the potential of this new technology, the late 1960s and early 1970s became a test bed for questions that would preoccupy computer scientists and artists alike: If you could design a two-way, feedback network, could you even out the structures of power and create a more participatory media environment? And if you could change the media, would its viewers see differently? These are large questions, but ones which have inevitably lost their potency over time, because so many of these structures have come into fruition: viewers feed back images and videos to television shows all the time, as with citizen-generated videos that regularly air on CNN, and YouTube has become an even more eclectic repository for images than cable has ever been. We take distributed networks, and their properties, such as two-way interaction, for granted; the rhetoric of the artists is too utopian to be taken as more than a product of its time. And as David Joselit reminds us, while video and cable may be a “cautionary tale regarding the Internets claims as a site for radical democracy,” it is an embarrassing lesson to learn particularly given how quickly cable, like the Internet, became commercialized and assimilated into the system of power it once claimed to subvert. [6]</p>
<p>These artistic attempts to critique and reconfigure the network of television at the same time as ARPAnet and the Internet suggest that a larger, generalizable discourse about networks was at play at this time that was not limited to computer technology. Essayist Joan Didion aptly summed up the massive social upheaval in the late 1960s by invoking Yeats: “The center was not holding.” [7] Despite a smoothly functioning marketplace and a high GNP, the gravitational pull of these mechanisms no longer seemed enough. Normative culture seemed torn by what Didion described as a sense of unease. And that decentralized networks were created in response — whether as alternatives to the centralized system of information distribution, or for upholding the centers survivability by dispersing its power does not strike me as a coincidence. [8]</p>
<p>I would like to open a window onto this larger discourse by examining one of Radical Softwares collaborators, the San Francisco-based collective Ant Farm (Chip Lord, Doug Michaels, Hudson Marquez, and Curtis Schreier). Ant Farms proposal for a media distribution structure called a “Truckstop Network” allow us to see how fertile the ground was for alternate network structures. The caveat is that my necessarily abbreviated consideration of a single Ant Farm project misses not only the rest of their work, but also contemporaneous examples from the rich history of video; for interested readers, I direct them to references that take up this subject in more depth. [9]</p>
<p>With this caveat in mind, let us move to 1970, when a modified Chevrolet van with a clear plastic bubble and a distinctive antenna hit the road. Serving as Ant Farms temporary home for a year, it contained a TV window, a videotape setup, silver roof-mounted speaker domes, and a dashboard-mounted camera, all hardware “reminiscent of a B-52.” [10] It was quickly named the Media Van, and became an integral part of what they eventually dubbed a “Truckstop Network.” Ant Farm bought several of the new Portapaks and went on tour, stopping at several colleges, shooting video of “dancing chickens, an okra farmer, a ground-breaking in Scottsdale, aspiring pop singer Johnny Romeo belting out a ballad in the Yale School of Architecture…” [11] If the television network refused to broadcast these video images, the Media Van would bring it directly to the audiences door.</p>
<p>This van drove off during a moment of transition for highway culture. Through the 1960s, Jonathan Crary argues, the automobile and the television worked hand-in-hand in popular culture to conceal the growing complexity of capitalist representation. A highway route had an effect much like television, acting as a sort of TV channel that seemed to enable a driver/viewers autonomy by giving him or her the power to choose — even as it cloaked the mechanism of capital behind it. [12] In the 1970s, Crary continues, television “began to be grafted onto other networks… the screens of home computer and word processor,” and the computers window replacing the cars window as the predominant space of the virtual. [13] Though the ideal of car culture had begun to sour — a matter brought to a head by the 1973 oil crisis it was precisely the highways identification with Cold War surplus, rusted roadside attractions, and its lack of newness that made it fertile ground for artistic reappropriation. [14]</p>
<p>Thus <em>Truckstop Network</em>, was more than a road trip tour; it was also a statement about mobility itself. Standing at the hinge between auto window and computer window, it proposed a countrywide network of truckstops for “media nomads.” Placed just off the highway, each truckstop would offer an array of services for those living on the road: housing, electricity, and water; truck repair and a communal kitchen; but also communications services computers and video equipment seen, “like food and gas, as nutrients necessary for survival.” [15]</p>
<img src="readings_images/hu-03-antfarm-TruckstopNetwork-recto-1971.png">
<div class="indent">
<p>Fig. 3. <em>Truckstop Network Placemat</em> (recto), 1971, Ant Farm, offset printing on paper (2-sided); 17 x 11 in.; University of California, Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive. Photo: Benjamin Blackwell. © Ant Farm. (Used with permission.)</p>
</div>
<p>Indeed, the computer aspect was essential to this plan: not only would it link all the truckstops, or “nodes,” in Ant Farms parlance, into a nationwide “communication network,” but it would also direct the visitor to the services available at other truckstops a wood-working shop, or astrology lessons, for example. [16] Truckers could be sent to other nodes via several highway directions; a placemat passed out to audiences on the Ant Farm tour maps several of these cross-country routes. (fig. 3) On the flip side of the placemat, a star identifies potential Cold War surplus sites that could be reused as nodes, an act of reappropriating what Mark Wasiuta describes as the nations “expanding computerized military network and its underground command centers.” [17] A sketch for one of these sites, identified as a former desert missile silo near Wendato (likely Wendover, Utah), contains plans to transform layers of the silo into various layers for maintaining software (film/video) and hardware (auto/bus), all wired via a solar dish to its nervous system/core. [18]</p>
<p>For Ant Farm, the interconnections turned each node into a “physically fragmented city” of media. Distributed across the country in places where “land is cheap and codes are lax in between the cities,” one thinks of the arid wheat field in Amarillo, Texas, where they executed their most famous piece, <em>Cadillac Ranch</em>, or the California deserts where they set up inflatable structures the Truckstop nodes would be connected by the simplest yet most robust piece of Cold War infrastructure, the interstate highway. And by placing the nodes at the side of the highway, it was possible to build an existence where the journey was the destination, and where the motion of the network was the point of the network. Cars traveling between the nodes thus became packets; remaining in constant motion, each packet would not stop at one node for long before traveling to another node. In other words, packet-switching. [19] Without a centralized node (although at one point Ant Farm envisioned a central computer to direct traffic), the network would constantly move information from point to point while avoiding the concentration of information in any one place. Moreover, the nodes were cheap, inflatable, and flexible. In effect, Ant Farm had envisioned an anarchic, distributed network for mobile living.</p>
<p>We may be tempted to dismiss this plan for “mobile living” as so much New Age artist cant. But <em>Truckstop Network</em> articulated an idea of mobility that would soon profoundly shape cloud computing. For the first Internet protocol was not developed through ARPAnet, as one might expect, and as most network historians claim, but through the physical act of driving on the open road. With its fixed nodes, fixed links, and bunker-sized computers, ARPAnet was the quintessential embodiment of “closed-world” infrastructure. Instead, military researchers envisioned soldiers going mobile. Though there is no evidence that researchers at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) saw any of Ant Farms media productions, they nonetheless shared a similar vision: media would need to produced and consumed on the road.</p>
<p>For SRIs engineers, this meant retrofitting a bread truck style van to test the difficulty of broadcasting and receiving network signals on the move. They wanted to see if, for instance, their packet radio connection would remain intact if the van went under a highway overpass. [20] (Packet radio is an early version of todays cellular networks.) Rigged on the inside with a DEC LSI-11 computer and two packet radio transmitters, the SRI van ran its first successful test in August 1976, six years after Ant Farms own media van. The test was of a protocol that would bridge the aerial network — the Packet Radio Network, or PRnet with the ground-based ARPAnet. It was the first time two disparate computer networks were bridged, and as a result, it is considered the first inter-network, or Internet, transmission.</p>
<img src="readings_images/hu-04-SRI-internetwork-diagram-1977.png">
<div class="indent">
<p>Fig. 4. Diagram of first two-network Internet transmission, 1977, SRI International. Originally published in “Progress Report on Packet Radio Experimental Network,” September 1977. © SRI International, Inc. Used with permission.</p>
</div>
<img src="readings_images/hu-05-antfarm-MediaVan-mobile-vt-studio-1971.png">
<div class="indent">
<p>Fig. 5. <em>Media Van: mobile vt studio</em>, 1971, Ant Farm; ink, stamp marks in black ink, sticker, and collage elements on paper; 11 x 17 in.; University of California, Berkeley Art Museum and Pacific Film Archive. Photograph: Benjamin Blackwell. © Ant Farm. Used with permission.</p>
</div>
<p>In this inaugural test, the van is clearly visible in the right side of the network diagram, connected to two clouds labeled PR NET and ARPA NET. (fig. 4) What is perhaps missing from the diagram is the texture of the setting, of the vans driver protocol engineer Jim Mathis trucking down Northern Californias Bayshore Freeway, and the vans final stop, which was chosen because it was a “hostile environment in keeping with relevance to military application”:</p>
<div class="indent">
<p><em>This was the parking lot of Ross[o]ttis biker bar in Palo Alto, still well in reach of the repeater units at Mt. Umunum and Mission Ridge and with good supply of local bikers who gave the appearance of hostility after the requisite number of beers. [21]</em></p>
</div>
<p>There is an improvisatory aspect to SRIs van test. The inter-network they built was by definition an “amalgam of wire and radio networks”; it was a way of allowing a highly mobile, even ethereal network packet radio to tap into a pre-existing, fixed network infrastructure. [22] The van also reveals a third infrastructure that is only implicit: the highways where the researchers in what is now known as Silicon Valley circulated to test their van, which also delighted the bikers and video freaks with whom they mingled. A few miles down the street from Rossottis, you could buy a catalog containing Ant Farms latest inflatable architecture projects or video schematics from the “Whole Earth Truck Store.” The first node on the inter-media network was a truck stop, or, in the case of SRI, a biker bar.</p>
<p>The two media vans soon went into storage, SRIs to a forgotten back lot, Ant Farms to a bunker in Marin County, California. But the inter-networking protocol tested in 1976, TCP, would cement the growth of what would be christened the “Internet” in 1983, and the networks shapes would resemble the possibilities the freedom of the road, a constantly moving, physically fragmented existence once offered by the highway. No matter that American highway culture itself had gone into a decline. The potentialities that the highway once represented the idea of the highway without the highway itself, simultaneously decentralized and yet an infrastructure from the Cold War remained.</p>
<p>The “information superhighway” articulated a new kind of lifestyle, where media processors could go mobile, feeding information (often in the form of video) back into the cloud. Yet the shift from the media of the van to digital media was not difficult to envision. In “Truckstop Fantasy Number One,” Ant Farm had even mused that “EVENTUALLY WE WILL ABANDON PHYSICAL MOVEMENT FOR TELEPATHIC/CYBERNETIC MOVEMENT (TELEVISION) AND OUR NETWORK WILL ADAPT TO THE CHANGE.” [23] For Ant Farm, computer links were merely one of many forms of communication, and the specific medium (telepathy or television!) was somewhat beside the point. In the bottom of their network diagram for Truckstop, Ant Farm asks: “How many ways do you communicate/inter truckstop.” [24] And then they list “linear” mediums, such as the mail, next to “electronic” mediums (radio and telegraph and computer) and land and aerial transportation mediums (cars, trucks, blimps). A single anomalous dotted line in a mesh network appears to indicate, of all things, a telegraph line.</p>
<p>The inspiration for <em>Truckstop</em> was as much the new technology of the Sony Portapak as the well-worn technology of the postal service. As Chip Lord recalls, “[b]efore we went on the road, we were doing mail art and we tapped into this network of people doing mail art.” [25] Kris Paulsen has additionally uncovered a buried history of guerilla television within its lo-fi distribution network: videographers swapped half-inch videotapes by advertisements and mail order. [26] The point is that cloud computing is always an amalgam a “network of networks that can only come into existence when it is not tied to a specific technology. This is why there are multiple clouds in the SRI diagram, and even some internal debate at SRI on how many networks two or three are needed before the project can officially be termed an “inter-network.”</p>
<p>To think about digital networks, I am arguing, one must first think about the network in the absence of individual technologies. This is what I have tried to do with the example of the two media vans. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the rhetoric behind the creation of new information structures was certainly overblown; we ignore the utopianism of their claims because they are so sweeping that they are hard to take seriously (Youngbloods videosphere that envisioned an “Intermedia network” that will unite all media). But we dismiss their rhetoric at our own risk. Strip away the technological layer the artists concern with television, for example and we see something very similar to what we have now: the digital cloud as a place where all media seem to converge; the cloud as an enabler of supposedly decentralized networked communities. [27] The universalist fantasy of the cloud remains as ubiquitous now as it was forty years ago.</p>
<p>There is a second reason why I have brought the vans into the story. If we only imagine the network as a product of the military, working with their contractors, to “invent” ARPA and the Internet, then the network that we take away is a deeply paranoid one — a vision of nuclear strikes and distributed tanks. There is a hole in that narrative. By their own admission, the engineers at SRI were trying to convince the military that their own interests in packet radio could eventually have a military application. Inside the van were several other projects, including a computer program for encoding speech run by the “Network Speech Compression and Network Skiing Club,” that reflected a more utopian heritage within SRI of using computers to augment human capabilities. Yet the story they told to the military is the one that is inevitably retold by computer historians.</p>
<p>Precisely because many of the claims in the late 1960s and early 1970s are strange — precisely because they are unexplainable is grounds for why we should embrace them. SRI used a Mickey Mouse phone inside their van to test phone service over the packet network; this research in digital speech resulted in the decidedly un-military Speak & Spell toy for children. Meanwhile, Ant Farm sketched an ink diagram of Television America, its primetime audience re-imagined as a slice of prime prime meat, that is. In their specificity, in their improvisatory strangeness, they rub against the grain of universalism. A dancing chicken broadcast from the Media Van undercuts any sort of sweeping claims for a new Media America. By their very refusal to be assimilated into useful categories for Internet history, they stake out a space for the autonomy of their production. In contrast to understanding network culture as a paranoid world system, one that encompasses all networks, these weird and unexplainable moments offer the potential for an alternate, reparative reading. [28]</p>
<p>It is unknown whether the video freaks and the network engineers in Portola Valley rubbed shoulders over a beer at Rossottis. But there was a rich relationship between the counterculture and computer scientists of the San Francisco Bay Area. Theodore Roszak and John Markoff have identified a shared interest in political dissent, communalist, and consciousness-expanding practices by members of the counterculture and computer researchers living in San Francisco and the Stanford area, respectively. [29] And as Fred Turner has shown, Stewart Brand served as a key hinge between the two worlds, acting as a cameraman during Douglas Engelbarts 1968 demonstration of personal computing, and a publisher of the seminal Whole Earth Catalog a kind of World Wide Web in print that indirectly led to the establishment of the Berkeley Homebrew Computer Club. [30]</p>
<p>These histories, however, typically trace inventors and researchers within or on the peripheries of computer science. As I have tried to show, network culture properly resides in a vibrant debate one that preceded the 1960s, and continues to this day about the proper configuration between media and power. Computer scientists were a part of this debate, but were not the only ones to weigh in. Years before ARPAnets existence, sociologists, urban planners, government bureaucrats, privacy advocates, epidemiologists, computer scientists, and, of course, the aforementioned artists, were keenly aware of the centralizing tendencies of networks. Would the computer network become a “natural monopoly,” like all of their predecessor utilities, asked Baran in a 1966 Congressional hearing, and if so, what steps should we take to set it on the right track?</p>
<p>The answer to Barans question had already begun to percolate in the fierce debates over television. Only five years earlier, Newton Minow, the incoming FCC commissioner, warned about televisions monopoly over its viewers in his famous “wasteland” speech by describing the flatness of television: “You will see a procession of game shows, formula comedies about totally unbelievable families, blood and thunder, mayhem, violence, sadism, murder, western bad men, western good men, private eyes, gangsters, more violence, and cartoons… And most of all, boredom.” [31] This distaste builds to the commissioners larger point: “I am deeply concerned with concentration of power in the hands of the networks.” The network was then, as it is now, a potent manifestation of aesthetic questions. Aesthetic — which is to say political.<p>
<br>
<br>
<p>References</p>
<p>1. Paul Edwards, <em>The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America</em> (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997).</a></p>
<p>2. For more on this myth, which Kazys Varnelis calls the “foundation myth for the Internet,” see Kazys Varnelis, “The Centripetal City: Telecommunications, the Internet, and the Shaping of the Modern Urban Environment,” <em>Cabinet Magazine</em> 17, Spring 2004/2005 and Kazys Varnelis, “Conclusion: The Rise of Network Culture,” in <em>Networked Publics</em>, ed. Kazys Varnelis (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008).</p>
<p>3. What is not in dispute is the complex accumulation of technological innovations, such as Donald Evanss packet-switching technology and Paul Barans writings on link interference at RAND Corporation, that set the stage for a precursor of the Internet, named ARPAnet, after the Department of Defenses Advanced Research Projects Agency, first deployed in 1969, and the Internet itself, around 1977.</p>
<p>4. John McCarthy, “The Home Information Terminal,” <em>Man and Computer, Proceedings of the International Conference</em>, Bordeaux, 1970, 48-57, Basel: Karger, 1972, reprinted at <a href=http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/hoter2.pdf target="_blank">http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/hoter2.pdf</a>, June 1, 2000 (accessed 10/2013).</p>
<p>5. Raindance Corporation, no title, in Radical Software 1:1, “The Alternate Television Movement” (1970), 19.</p>
<p>6. David Joselit, “Tale of the Tape,” <em>Artforum</em>, May 2002, 196.</p>
<p>7. Joan Didion, “Slouching Towards Bethlehem,” originally published in <em>Saturday Evening Post</em> 240:19, September 23, 1967, 25-94.</p>
<p>8. The advent of new media in the late 1960s and early 1970s was felt primarily as the advent of news media — for instance, as new reportage from the 1972 Democratic and Republican National Conventions by the amateur group TVTV (Top Value Television), wielding the new handheld videorecorders named Portapaks. We tend to lose sight of this because a scholarly focus on the specificity of the networks <em>mediums</em> (its wires or logics or apparatus) has led to its inevitable separation from the networks <em>media</em>, the sense of mass or communications media. A contemporary scholar studying the newspaper industry may have little to say to a contemporary scholar studying network protocols. But at one point, the two senses of the word were inseparable. In the words of German media theorist Hans Magnus Enzensberger, writing in 1970, “the media are making possible mass participation in a social and socialized productive process, the practical means of which are in the hands of the masses themselves… In its present form, equipment like television or film does not serve communication but prevents it.” Hans Magnus Enzensberger, “Constituents of a Theory of the Media (1970)”, in <em>Video Culture</em>, ed. John Hanhardt (Rochester, NY: Visual Studies Workshop Press, 1986), 98.</p>
<p>9. Examples might include artist Dan Grahams “feed-forward” cable network (ca. 1972); Austin Community Television (ACTV, 1972-), which fed directly into the cables “head-end,” or distribution center; Stan VanDerBeeks live performance/call-in piece for WGBH-Boston, <em>Violence Sonata</em> (1970); or the Videofreex pirate TV station in the Catskills, Lanesville TV (1972-1977), that attempted to hack or reconfigure the shape of the network system. For further reading, in addition to scholarly studies such as David Joselits <em>Feedback: Television Against Democracy</em> (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007), Deirdre Boyle, <em>Subject to Change: Guerrilla Television Revisited</em> (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), there are numerous books by the video collectives themselves, including Michael Shamberg and the Raindance Corporation, <em>Guerrilla Television</em> (New York: Henry Holt & Co., Inc., 1971) and Videofreex, <em>Spaghetti City Video Manual</em> (New York: Praeger, 1973).</p>
<p>10. Ant Farm, “Media Van, Ant Farm Video,” 1970, photocopy, three-hole punched, two pages, in <em>Living Archive 7: Ant Farm</em>, ed. Felicity D. Scott (Barcelona: Actar Publishing, 2008), 224.</p>
<p>11. Steve Seid, “Tunneling through the Wasteland: Ant Farm Video,” in <em>Ant Farm 1968-1978</em>, ed. Constance M. Lewallen (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), 25.</p>
<p>12. Jonathan Crary, “Eclipse of the Spectacle,” in <em>Art After Modernism: Rethinking Representation</em>, ed. Brian Wallis (New York: New Museum, 1984), 289.</p>
<p>13. Crary, “Eclipse of the Spectacle,” 290.</p>
<p>14. Kirsten Olds, <em>Networked Collectivities: North American Artists Groups, 19681978</em> (Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, 2009), 125.</p>
<p>15. Scott, <em>Living Archive 7: Ant Farm</em>, 99.</p>
<p>16. Ant Farm, “Truckstop Network,” in Scott, 226-227; also see Scott, 104.</p>
<p>17. Mark Wasiuta, “Ant Farm Underground.” <em>Cabinet 30</em>, Summer 2008.</p>
<p>18. This reference occurs in Ant Farms drawing “3D Truckstop” and is likely a misspelled version of Wendover, Utah, as there is a reference to art being faster if it were situated in neighboring Bonneville Salt Flats, home of the Bonneville Speedway. There is no town named Wendato.</p>
<p>19. Thanks to Finn Brunton for suggesting this idea.</p>
<p>20. Don Nielsen, “The SRI Van and Computer Internetworking,” <em>Core</em> 3:1 (February 2002), a publication of the Computer History Museum, 2-7. Cellular phones use a modified form of packet radio technology to send data. Indeed, some phones continue to use the acronym GPRS, General Packet Radio Service, for this technology.</p>
<p>21. David Retz, “ARPANET, as I Recall,” April 2010, accessed April 15, 2014, <a href="http://comware.us/Content/internetrecollections" target="_blank">http://comware.us/Content/internetrecollections</a></p>
<p>22. Nielsen, “The SRI Van and Computer Internetworking,” 3.</p>
<p>23. Ant Farm, “Truck stop fantasy one,” 1971, in Scott, 174.</p>
<p>24. Ant Farm, “Put Energy into a System You Can Belive In,” 1971, in Scott, 176.</p>
<p>25. Chip Lord and Curtis Schreier, “Media Van Ant Farm Interview by Jimmy Stamp,” in <em>Floater Magazine 2</em>, “System False,” January 2009, accessed April 15, 2014, <a href="http://www.floatermagazine.com/issue02/pdfs/Media_Van.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.floatermagazine.com/issue02/pdfs/Media_Van.pdf</a></p>
<p>26. Kris Paulsen, “Half-Inch Revolution: The Guerilla Video Tape Network,” in <em>Amodern</em> 2, “Network Archaeology,” October 2013, accessed April 15, 2014, <a href="http://amodern.net/article/half-inch-revolution/" target="_blank">http://amodern.net/article/half-inch-revolution/</a></p>
<p>27. For instance, Friedrich Kittler writes that “a digital base will erase the very concept of medium,” an idea echoed and even expanded by other new media scholars, such as Lev Manovich, subscribing to what might be termed the “convergence hypothesis.” Kittler, <em>Gramophone, Film, Typewriter</em>. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999. 1.
<p>28. My reference to “reparative reading” is from Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, Or, Youre So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay Is About You.” In <em>Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity</em> (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003), 123-151.</p>
<p>29. Theodore Roszak, <em>From Satori to Silicon Valley: San Francisco and the American Counterculture</em> (San Francisco: Dont Call it Frisco Press, 1986); John Markoff, <em>What the Dormouse Said: How the Sixties Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer Industry</em> (New York: Penguin, 2006).</p>
<p>30. Fred Turner, <em>From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism</em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).</p>
<p>31. Newton Minow, “Television and the Public Interest,” speech delivered 9 May 1961, National Association of Broadcasters, Washington, DC.</p>
<br>
<p>Bio
<p>Tung-Hui Hu is the author of <em>Cloud: A Pre-History</em>, forthcoming from MIT Press in 2015, from which this essay is taken, as well as three books of poetry, most recently <em>Greenhouses, Lighthouses</em> (Copper Canyon Press, 2013). Recent publications include articles on real time (in <em>Discourse: Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture</em>) and digital poetics (in <em>Acts + Encounters</em>, UCSC Poetry and Politics imprint). He teaches at the University of Michigan, where he co-organizes the Digital Environments Cluster.</p>
</main>
</body>
</html>

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
</head>
<body>
<main>
<img id="line" src="../archive/gps_drawings/wijnhaven_to_foshan_01.svg">
<img id="line" src="gps_drawings/wijnhaven_to_foshan_01.svg">
<div class="text">
<h2>Taking a line for a walk</h2>
<p>I'm making drawings by walking and tracking myself over GPS using an app on my phone. I walk door-to-door between the geographical locations of our network. The app I'm using displays my path as a jagged line, alongside information about the distance, altitude, speed, pace and time elapsed. When I reach my destination I save the walk, export it as a .gpx file to my computer, and then load it into software for plotting geospatial information. In the graphic interface of this software the track points are connected with a series of lines that link them together into a route.</p>

Loading…
Cancel
Save