You cannot select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
298 lines
14 KiB
ReStructuredText
298 lines
14 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _hacking:
|
|
|
|
==================
|
|
Ways to Contribute
|
|
==================
|
|
|
|
This document aims to give an overview of the ways to contribute to SciPy. It
|
|
tries to answer commonly asked questions and provide some insight into how the
|
|
community process works in practice. Readers who are familiar with the SciPy
|
|
community and are experienced Python coders may want to jump straight to the
|
|
:ref:`contributor-toc`.
|
|
|
|
There are a lot of ways you can contribute:
|
|
|
|
- Contributing new code
|
|
- Fixing bugs, improving documentation, and other maintenance work
|
|
- Reviewing open pull requests
|
|
- Triaging issues
|
|
- Working on the `scipy.org`_ website
|
|
- Answering questions and participating on the scipy-dev and scipy-user
|
|
`mailing lists`_.
|
|
|
|
Contributing new code
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
If you have been working with the scientific Python toolstack for a while, you
|
|
probably have some code lying around of which you think "this could be useful
|
|
for others too". Perhaps it's a good idea then to contribute it to SciPy or
|
|
another open source project. The first question to ask is then, where does
|
|
this code belong? That question is hard to answer here, so we start with a
|
|
more specific one: *what code is suitable for putting into SciPy?*
|
|
Almost all of the new code added to SciPy has in common that it's potentially
|
|
useful in multiple scientific domains and it fits in the scope of existing
|
|
SciPy subpackages (see :ref:`deciding-on-new-features`). In principle new
|
|
subpackages can be added too, but this is far less common. For code that is
|
|
specific to a single application, there may be an existing project that can
|
|
use the code. Some SciKits (`scikit-learn`_, `scikit-image`_, `statsmodels`_,
|
|
etc.) are good examples here; they have a narrower focus and because of that
|
|
more domain-specific code than SciPy.
|
|
|
|
Now if you have code that you would like to see included in SciPy, how do you
|
|
go about it? After checking that your code can be distributed in SciPy under a
|
|
compatible license (see :ref:`license-considerations`), the first step is to
|
|
discuss on the scipy-dev mailing list. All new features, as well as changes to
|
|
existing code, are discussed and decided on there. You can, and probably
|
|
should, already start this discussion before your code is finished. Remember
|
|
that in order to be added to SciPy your code will need to be reviewed by
|
|
someone else, so try to find someone willing to review your work while you're
|
|
at it.
|
|
|
|
Assuming the outcome of the discussion on the mailing list is positive and you
|
|
have a function or piece of code that does what you need it to do, what next?
|
|
Before code is added to SciPy, it at least has to have good documentation, unit
|
|
tests, benchmarks, and correct code style.
|
|
|
|
1. Unit tests
|
|
In principle you should aim to create unit tests that exercise all the code
|
|
that you are adding. This gives some degree of confidence that your code
|
|
runs correctly, also on Python versions and hardware or OSes that you don't
|
|
have available yourself. An extensive description of how to write unit
|
|
tests is given in :doc:`numpy:reference/testing`, and :ref:`runtests`
|
|
documents how to run them.
|
|
|
|
2. Benchmarks
|
|
Unit tests check for correct functionality; benchmarks measure code
|
|
performance. Not all existing SciPy code has benchmarks, but it should:
|
|
as SciPy grows it is increasingly important to monitor execution times in
|
|
order to catch unexpected regressions. More information about writing
|
|
and running benchmarks is available in :ref:`benchmarking-with-asv`.
|
|
|
|
3. Documentation
|
|
Clear and complete documentation is essential in order for users to be able
|
|
to find and understand the code. Documentation for individual functions
|
|
and classes -- which includes at least a basic description, type and
|
|
meaning of all parameters and returns values, and usage examples in
|
|
`doctest`_ format -- is put in docstrings. Those docstrings can be read
|
|
within the interpreter, and are compiled into a reference guide in html and
|
|
pdf format. Higher-level documentation for key (areas of) functionality is
|
|
provided in tutorial format and/or in module docstrings. A guide on how to
|
|
write documentation is given in :ref:`numpy:howto-document`, and
|
|
:ref:`rendering-documentation` explains how to preview the documentation
|
|
as it will appear online.
|
|
|
|
4. Code style
|
|
Uniformity of style in which code is written is important to others trying
|
|
to understand the code. SciPy follows the standard Python guidelines for
|
|
code style, `PEP8`_. In order to check that your code conforms to PEP8,
|
|
you can use the `pep8 package`_ style checker. Most IDEs and text editors
|
|
have settings that can help you follow PEP8, for example by translating
|
|
tabs by four spaces. Using `pyflakes`_ to check your code is also a good
|
|
idea. More information is available in :ref:`pep8-scipy`.
|
|
|
|
A :ref:`checklist<pr-checklist>`, including these and other requirements, is
|
|
available at the end of the example :ref:`development-workflow`.
|
|
|
|
Another question you may have is: *where exactly do I put my code*? To answer
|
|
this, it is useful to understand how the SciPy public API (application
|
|
programming interface) is defined. For most modules the API is two levels
|
|
deep, which means your new function should appear as
|
|
``scipy.subpackage.my_new_func``. ``my_new_func`` can be put in an existing or
|
|
new file under ``/scipy/<subpackage>/``, its name is added to the ``__all__``
|
|
list in that file (which lists all public functions in the file), and those
|
|
public functions are then imported in ``/scipy/<subpackage>/__init__.py``. Any
|
|
private functions/classes should have a leading underscore (``_``) in their
|
|
name. A more detailed description of what the public API of SciPy is, is given
|
|
in :ref:`scipy-api`.
|
|
|
|
Once you think your code is ready for inclusion in SciPy, you can send a pull
|
|
request (PR) on Github. We won't go into the details of how to work with git
|
|
here, this is described well in :ref:`git-development`
|
|
and on the `Github help pages`_. When you send the PR for a new
|
|
feature, be sure to also mention this on the scipy-dev mailing list. This can
|
|
prompt interested people to help review your PR. Assuming that you already got
|
|
positive feedback before on the general idea of your code/feature, the purpose
|
|
of the code review is to ensure that the code is correct, efficient and meets
|
|
the requirements outlined above. In many cases the code review happens
|
|
relatively quickly, but it's possible that it stalls. If you have addressed
|
|
all feedback already given, it's perfectly fine to ask on the mailing list
|
|
again for review (after a reasonable amount of time, say a couple of weeks, has
|
|
passed). Once the review is completed, the PR is merged into the "master"
|
|
branch of SciPy.
|
|
|
|
The above describes the requirements and process for adding code to SciPy. It
|
|
doesn't yet answer the question though how decisions are made exactly. The
|
|
basic answer is: decisions are made by consensus, by everyone who chooses to
|
|
participate in the discussion on the mailing list. This includes developers,
|
|
other users and yourself. Aiming for consensus in the discussion is important
|
|
-- SciPy is a project by and for the scientific Python community. In those
|
|
rare cases that agreement cannot be reached, the maintainers of the module
|
|
in question can decide the issue.
|
|
|
|
.. _license-considerations:
|
|
|
|
License Considerations
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
*I based my code on existing Matlab/R/... code I found online, is this OK?*
|
|
|
|
It depends. SciPy is distributed under a BSD license, so if the code that you
|
|
based your code on is also BSD licensed or has a BSD-compatible license (e.g.
|
|
MIT, PSF) then it's OK. Code which is GPL or Apache licensed, has no
|
|
clear license, requires citation or is free for academic use only can't be
|
|
included in SciPy. Therefore if you copied existing code with such a license
|
|
or made a direct translation to Python of it, your code can't be included.
|
|
If you're unsure, please ask on the scipy-dev `mailing list <mailing lists>`_.
|
|
|
|
*Why is SciPy under the BSD license and not, say, the GPL?*
|
|
|
|
Like Python, SciPy uses a "permissive" open source license, which allows
|
|
proprietary re-use. While this allows companies to use and modify the software
|
|
without giving anything back, it is felt that the larger user base results in
|
|
more contributions overall, and companies often publish their modifications
|
|
anyway, without being required to. See John Hunter's `BSD pitch`_.
|
|
|
|
For more information about SciPy's license, see :ref:`scipy-licensing`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining existing code
|
|
=========================
|
|
|
|
The previous section talked specifically about adding new functionality to
|
|
SciPy. A large part of that discussion also applies to maintenance of existing
|
|
code. Maintenance means fixing bugs, improving code quality, documenting
|
|
existing functionality better, adding missing unit tests, adding performance
|
|
benchmarks, keeping build scripts up-to-date, etc. The SciPy `issue list`_
|
|
contains all reported bugs, build/documentation issues, etc. Fixing issues
|
|
helps improve the overall quality of SciPy, and is also a good way
|
|
of getting familiar with the project. You may also want to fix a bug because
|
|
you ran into it and need the function in question to work correctly.
|
|
|
|
The discussion on code style and unit testing above applies equally to bug
|
|
fixes. It is usually best to start by writing a unit test that shows the
|
|
problem, i.e. it should pass but doesn't. Once you have that, you can fix the
|
|
code so that the test does pass. That should be enough to send a PR for this
|
|
issue. Unlike when adding new code, discussing this on the mailing list may
|
|
not be necessary - if the old behavior of the code is clearly incorrect, no one
|
|
will object to having it fixed. It may be necessary to add some warning or
|
|
deprecation message for the changed behavior. This should be part of the
|
|
review process.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Pull requests that *only* change code style, e.g. fixing some PEP8 issues in
|
|
a file, are discouraged. Such PRs are often not worth cluttering the git
|
|
annotate history, and take reviewer time that may be better spent in other ways.
|
|
Code style cleanups of code that is touched as part of a functional change
|
|
are fine however.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewing pull requests
|
|
=======================
|
|
|
|
Reviewing open pull requests (PRs) is very welcome, and a valuable way to help
|
|
increase the speed at which the project moves forward. If you have specific
|
|
knowledge/experience in a particular area (say "optimization algorithms" or
|
|
"special functions") then reviewing PRs in that area is especially valuable -
|
|
sometimes PRs with technical code have to wait for a long time to get merged
|
|
due to a shortage of appropriate reviewers.
|
|
|
|
We encourage everyone to get involved in the review process; it's also a
|
|
great way to get familiar with the code base. Reviewers should ask
|
|
themselves some or all of the following questions:
|
|
|
|
- Was this change adequately discussed (relevant for new features and changes
|
|
in existing behavior)?
|
|
- Is the feature scientifically sound? Algorithms may be known to work based on
|
|
literature; otherwise, closer look at correctness is valuable.
|
|
- Is the intended behavior clear under all conditions (e.g. unexpected inputs
|
|
like empty arrays or nan/inf values)?
|
|
- Does the code meet the quality, test and documentation expectation outline
|
|
under `Contributing new code`_?
|
|
|
|
If we do not know you yet, consider introducing yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other ways to contribute
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
There are many ways to contribute other than writing code.
|
|
|
|
Triaging issues (investigating bug reports for validity and possible actions to
|
|
take) is also a useful activity. SciPy has many hundreds of open issues;
|
|
closing invalid ones and correctly labeling valid ones (ideally with some first
|
|
thoughts in a comment) allows prioritizing maintenance work and finding related
|
|
issues easily when working on an existing function or subpackage.
|
|
|
|
Participating in discussions on the scipy-user and scipy-dev `mailing lists`_ is
|
|
a contribution in itself. Everyone who writes to those lists with a problem or
|
|
an idea would like to get responses, and writing such responses makes the
|
|
project and community function better and appear more welcoming.
|
|
|
|
The `scipy.org`_ website contains a lot of information on both SciPy the
|
|
project and SciPy the community, and it can always use a new pair of hands.
|
|
The sources for the website live in their own separate repo:
|
|
https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org
|
|
|
|
Getting started
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your interest in contributing to SciPy! If you're interested in
|
|
contributing code, we hope you'll continue on to the :ref:`contributor-toc`
|
|
for details on how to set up your development environment, implement your
|
|
improvements, and submit your first PR!
|
|
|
|
.. _scikit-learn: http://scikit-learn.org
|
|
|
|
.. _scikit-image: http://scikit-image.org/
|
|
|
|
.. _statsmodels: https://www.statsmodels.org/
|
|
|
|
.. _testing guidelines: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/testing.html
|
|
|
|
.. _formatted correctly: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/dev/gitwash/development_workflow.html#writing-the-commit-message
|
|
|
|
.. _bug report: https://scipy.org/bug-report.html
|
|
|
|
.. _PEP8: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
|
|
|
|
.. _pep8 package: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pep8
|
|
|
|
.. _pyflakes: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyflakes
|
|
|
|
.. _Github help pages: https://help.github.com/articles/set-up-git/
|
|
|
|
.. _issue list: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues
|
|
|
|
.. _Github: https://github.com/scipy/scipy
|
|
|
|
.. _scipy.org: https://scipy.org/
|
|
|
|
.. _scipy.github.com: https://scipy.github.com/
|
|
|
|
.. _scipy.org-new: https://github.com/scipy/scipy.org-new
|
|
|
|
.. _documentation wiki: https://docs.scipy.org/scipy/Front%20Page/
|
|
|
|
.. _SciPy Central: https://web.archive.org/web/20170520065729/http://central.scipy.org/
|
|
|
|
.. _doctest: https://pymotw.com/3/doctest/
|
|
|
|
.. _virtualenv: https://virtualenv.pypa.io/
|
|
|
|
.. _virtualenvwrapper: https://bitbucket.org/dhellmann/virtualenvwrapper/
|
|
|
|
.. _bsd pitch: http://nipy.sourceforge.net/nipy/stable/faq/johns_bsd_pitch.html
|
|
|
|
.. _Pytest: https://pytest.org/
|
|
|
|
.. _mailing lists: https://www.scipy.org/scipylib/mailing-lists.html
|
|
|
|
.. _Spyder: https://www.spyder-ide.org/
|
|
|
|
.. _Anaconda SciPy Dev Part I (macOS): https://youtu.be/1rPOSNd0ULI
|
|
|
|
.. _Anaconda SciPy Dev Part II (macOS): https://youtu.be/Faz29u5xIZc
|
|
|
|
.. _SciPy Development Workflow: https://youtu.be/HgU01gJbzMY
|