diff --git a/desc/entries.json b/desc/entries.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6f04f1b --- /dev/null +++ b/desc/entries.json @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +{ + "entries": [ + { + "title": "exex", + "description": "collaborative writing for branching documentation", + "tags": "tool, writing, collaborative", + "gradient": "tool tool tool tool practice practice" + }, + { + "title": "pair documenting", + "description": "like pair programming, but for documentation", + "tags": "practice, writing, collaborative", + "gradient": "practice practice practice" + }, + { + "title": "1dl", + "description": "1dimension ~ flat markup language ", + "tags": "tool, markup, writing", + "gradient": "tool tool tool practice practice" + } + ] +} diff --git a/desc/index.html b/desc/index.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dbf90fa --- /dev/null +++ b/desc/index.html @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ + + +
+ ++A toolkit ---------- set of practices +what's the name for a set of practices? + + +btw + +toolkit: collection of tools +set of practices: collection of practices + +some people could be more at ease using instruments +some others more with developing habits and practical workflows + +workflow is a nice word ++ + + +
Title | +Description | +Tags | +
+mh trying to sort out a gradient way to filter the writing machines +using yet another writing machine such as a gradient +that seems more expressive than a percentage system, + +the very same amount + ( + tool: 60% + practice: 40% + ) + +it can be written in a gradient form as + ( + tool tool tool practice practice + ) + +but also + ( + tool practice tool practice tool + ) + +in a way that adds more qualities to the quantity +in a similar way, just adding another feature +is as easy as adding it to the gradient + ( + tool tool tool practice practice platform + ) +while in a percentage system adding hooowwww where are yanother dimension +would mean to revisit all the previous property to sum up to 100 ++ +
+ but maybe the point is not to filter things ? + could anyway be something interesting to develop: + 1 find components + 2 place them spatially + 2pi / components.lenght = angle for each component + how to place components? + could it be a mix between + + a. chronologic order + cycle through components + insert every new component in a new angle position + + b. positional order + ??? + cycle again through components + get first and last distincts of list + grade them + aaa ok too difficult for now + actually maybe this is multi d vector math + and i dont have the minimal clue about it + ahah ++ + + + +