From dbbcf68652a2209f4b721771130eb2fadaa6775e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "kam (from the studio)" Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:11:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] dwarf not dwarf anymore --- txt/.dwarf.swp => .test.tidal.swp | Bin 12288 -> 12288 bytes txt/dwarf | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) rename txt/.dwarf.swp => .test.tidal.swp (81%) diff --git a/txt/.dwarf.swp b/.test.tidal.swp similarity index 81% rename from txt/.dwarf.swp rename to .test.tidal.swp index f1ad0d76b4d6b4b2ceffda9505ddaac618fa31f7..17787911baa128044a69e9c5393ab90b3a6350d5 100644 GIT binary patch delta 172 zcmZojXh={_G6?hZRj|-AVgLdG5CH+_>lhgf4UEmrjVvcBD)Oi1Rv4NXm>C#Yl$#hE zTTE1x)USg|>${{DXP4v`=m!+#m*kgJ7Ni#Imn5d^=42L^=$E7xm*|ybrX=QUYz$`J z{Ek_PXR?HVz-9%3C;Va;`572K0x`&5MyS0X`8O*HT<7OcF;q}dC{|EPN>M1zQ(^!B Dd_XJ| literal 12288 zcmeHNzi%8x6rNB3fjC4-1rp-LDX^nE+kt{80wDwx1R)0!BhfLt`*wGHyEChu*;`)& zbWl-HQGh6Epx`f{L85>TB#>x>sOc#A-uljWwi2L75u{n^^W6M;^WOKqH@cHI*?If5 zH|Xltj>2$i4qj9mNWz}LW6z=yy-V1UcOCP2VB;4k=e8~7FY1^5>D2KW;A0{8^@ z2>1X9Knc7HyaT)iya}uUXMl%+hX9H555)T$@D%VQ`tgYjL7b=E#WM`fLg@y(`+BN<+L|W7 zRHM|=_tnpLh~rNFT+Xmz~jWZ6fu(%@QHtT;UFF_DV^4hPA)K)GwFM}kEOGo+T0`IDoWQ_3a#oCZ(c z*omC&WJB$_n!;ZbpaR5@d8(OQjydCLcXyY3fUIh^;hIvq)Kt2jGACj@=E{pSs1(-g zreYuDLsw}D4qwVwbOmADk+Efh!YgHA1D3N*A%0X( zTIvSe(iK7w!cpIv5KuxIr9puY!e}6A=q?RzDeoxJ>4bEl4gB5^!&rTdhF67!>VRVL zVpbEv=(sWyrb2@>DKbKmJk4B3e9%-5t{I!QoSCGWfv=!Vh1jGzTa%V6vG`5eKy=t3 z@t{oYjHV`Ihl3J_d>Xhc;nxn_=DK#>+>4|ukh%t*%~xiuGr0>ekANxYDYupqPPG&_ zQoA4&j#Q~DT}8tc!KS4~_u%|UOuaZH#Co9@Duer!R;;abm-5+EBDukR=t3gMoUG7` zv!H^J^cD$Q5Q)JGoKLLlhveXXYdU0Z3u?l+u|7yNa9T1bChHj`Mx+a}6E3iVh7_#p zazqB^dOZVY4Me8Xaw(*vyV42G@GIkyC^6BJngu&jOP#+A^T;rRI9zRVs>q1@^&xZE zZ|92Zz^5H5!cYO34ONx8Otu^yh|AW~hNuvdVO>E7Q?6XY?Zr*R4=t>0gXZ>v%!)*!U7cfKun~W+u;(TN?notes: +- refactor without dwarf fortress +- elaborate on the idea of simulation: why is it useful? +- elaborate on the idea of contingencies (take from project proposal) software contingencies +------+. +|`. | `. +| `+--+---+ +| | | | ++---+--+. | + `. | `.| + `+------+ the simulation first we need things to simulate: @@ -26,13 +48,17 @@ aha how do we define actors? it reminds me of this OOO statement: objects sink into themselves - -that is an effective and graphical way to describe technical reference pages, or auto generated API specs, with nested nested nested layers of list. +that is an effective and graphical way to describe technical reference pages and auto generated API specs, with nested nested nested layers of list. to avoid that let's define actors not for what they are but for what they do (that is fun bc then i wrote grandma, that means functional grandma, that means not someone that has grandchildren but someone that does grandparent functions ??? ok this is not fun anymore and i am sorry) +>notes +- expand simplest simulation: few elements, 1:1:1 relation +- more context for the ooo statement, or keep it for later +- the grandma joke is not super fun + - actors - web designer - interaction designer @@ -60,21 +86,61 @@ let's define actors not for what they are but for what they do then we need to combine thigs from the three categories 00 web designer, rust, activism -01 teacher, haskel, work +01 teacher, python, work 02 grandma, rust, fun 03 interaction designer, vvvv, art 04 musician, pure data, work -05 musician, python, research +05 musician, haskel, research 06 student, python, art 07 student, javascript, work 08 student, javascript, fun 09 graphic designer, haskel, research +... side note -NOT is the series on theory in italian by NERO -their first pubblication was Capitalist Realism, Mark Fisher and it was a declaration of intents. -at some point every first is a declaration of intents. -but is that so also in random generated series? + the first in a series + NOT is the series on theory in italian by NERO editions + their first pubblication was Capitalist Realism, Mark Fisher and it was a declaration of intents. + at some point every first is a declaration of intents. + but is that so also in random generated series? + at first one is tempted to write: no + the random generated series is random, and its first element is random as every other. + but taking a step back, zooming out, one wonders: which element is the first? where is the declaration of intents? + could the command that generate the random series be the first, significative, element of the series itself? + +now that the setup is done, the simulation can start. + +to build something meaningful out of these random combinations we can balance between what is defined and what is not. +leveraging on the unknown of the simulation gives room for narrations. + +so for example we have #04 + +a musician what is their background? + which kind of music do they play? + where are they based? + +using pure data an open source visual programming language + works in real-time + focus on interaction and sound design + +for work which kind of occupation? + is it for interactive installations? + to teach sound design? + for live gigs? + +see how there are a lot of open questions in the first and third fields, while the programming language is slightly more defined and fixed. this is a good starting point. obviously a programming language is vast and complex and with dozen of features one could be interested in, but for the sake of our system it is useful to leave these things unsaid. + +we can use the software as a pivot to orientate the relation between the actor and their intentions. + +from where they are coming and where do they want to go? +who took them there? +what do they need? +which particular aspect of pure data resonates with their view of the world? +is it the open source nature and the licensing of the source code? +the welcoming community thriving around the programming language? +or the visual paradigm that facilitates the thinking about and connecting abstractions together? + +