diff --git a/questions/fonts/EBGaramond12-Regular.ttf b/questions/fonts/EBGaramond12-Regular.ttf
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..d00050e
Binary files /dev/null and b/questions/fonts/EBGaramond12-Regular.ttf differ
diff --git a/questions/fonts/Poppins-Regular.ttf b/questions/fonts/Poppins-Regular.ttf
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..9f0c71b
Binary files /dev/null and b/questions/fonts/Poppins-Regular.ttf differ
diff --git a/questions/fonts/YoungSerif-Regular.otf b/questions/fonts/YoungSerif-Regular.otf
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..521666a
Binary files /dev/null and b/questions/fonts/YoungSerif-Regular.otf differ
diff --git a/questions/fonts/whois-mono.ttf b/questions/fonts/whois-mono.ttf
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..cd63c14
Binary files /dev/null and b/questions/fonts/whois-mono.ttf differ
diff --git a/questions/index.html b/questions/index.html
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..9b85b69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/questions/index.html
@@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Dear Practitioner,
+ What type of questions are part of your publishing practice?
+ What is beyond the what, why, how, where, to whom questions?
+
+
+ **Reflective Thought Process**
+
+ A reflective approach to publishing will focus on each question in a referencial way, it follows a clear path on solving the problem and reduces it to concrete decisions. For example, if you have an archive of photos you would like to publish, when it comes to urgency, you would ask yourself: why do I want to expose this? What are my reasons to circulate this material? In a hypothetical scenario you could answer: because they are the historical memory of a forgotten event, and you would like to remark or highlight what happened.
+
+ **Diffractive Thought Process**
+
+ I imagine that a diffractive approach to the same scenario would not stop itself in answering the question of urgency, and instead it would actually answer with another question. How are those reasons connected with my publishing actions? How could each of these questions relate to each other? A diffractive approach may be frustrating because it tends to stay in-concrete bouncing without finding solutions. But a diffractive approach is not antagonistic to a reflective one. So reflection can be used as needed. Diffraction just focuses on shed light on creativity *blind spots*. Those moments in the project that it has not been seen yet. It calls for *imagination* and *magic thought* where the irrationality of some questions struggles with being concrete. **It is abstract in its resolution but factual in its contingency.**
+
+ This is a work in progress that evolves with the project and aims to be a tool that will help in publishing processes. What you are reading is one example of what I imagine this tool can be.
+
+
+ Thank you for reading.
+
+
+
CLOSE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Questions of Publishing
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Why the preservation of a specie is connected with the local circumstances?+
+
+
+
+
How can audio formats be pedagogical?+
+
+
+
+
What is the content of a map?+
+
+
+
+
How a website could circulate in a little shop?+
+
+
+
What would be a local map?+
+
+
+
How can this research connect with other initiatives in the neighbourhood?+
+
+
+
What does preservation relate with audio recordings?+