|
|
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<html>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.4.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<script src="muisje.js"></script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<style>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@font-face{
|
|
|
|
|
|
font-family:"Roboto Mono";
|
|
|
|
|
|
src: url("font/RobotoMono-Regular.ttf") format("truetype"),
|
|
|
|
|
|
url("https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto Mono")
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p{
|
|
|
|
|
|
text-align: center;
|
|
|
|
|
|
color: fuchsia;
|
|
|
|
|
|
font-family:Roboto Mono;
|
|
|
|
|
|
font-size: 15px;
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</style>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<meta charset="utf-8">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
|
|
|
|
|
|
<title>Resources_05</title>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p class="text">
|
|
|
|
|
|
This week's broadcast will focus on the concepts of:<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorship<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ˈɔːθəʃɪp/<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
noun<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
the state or fact of being the writer of a book, article, or document, or the creator of a work of art.<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
ownership<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ˈəʊnəʃɪp/<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
noun<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
the act, state, or right of possessing something.<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
To what extent are you the author of your work? Does this mean that you own it? <br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
How could ownership and authorship be redefined in the context of contemporary cultural production?<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is everything a remix? <br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
At what point can appropriation become problematic?<br>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where does friction arise between the concepts of authorship and ownership?
|
|
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</html>
|
