who knows

master
ada 6 months ago
commit eb9b23dfc4

@ -6,7 +6,10 @@ author: Aglaia
# Talking Documents
---
###
![WDKA- Winjhaven Building- February 2024- reading of act0 and act1](../aglaia/wijnhaven.JPG){.half-image}
This project appeared as a need to explore potential bureaucratic dramaturgies within the educational institution I was part as a student. I was curious about educational bureaucratic mechanisms being driven by smaller-scale paperwork struggles and peers narratives, stories and experiences. However, unexpected emergencies - due to my eviction on the 31st of January 2024 - placed centrally my personal struggles unfolded in parallel with the making period. I ended up conducting accidentally auto-ethnography as the project was dynamically being reshaped due to the material constraints of the bureaucratic timeline.
@ -16,11 +19,9 @@ Talking Documents are performative bureaucratic text inspections that intend to
Central element of this project is a seven-act scenario that construct my personal paperwork story, unraveling the actual struggles of my communication with the government. The body of the text of the “theatrical” script is sourced from the original documents, email threads as well as recordings of the conversations with the municipality of Rotterdam I documented and archived throughout this period. I preserved the sequence of the given sentences and by discarding the graphic design of the initial forms, I structured and repurposed the text into a playable scenario.
![Act 2 "Call with the municipality about the rejection of my application"](../aglaia/call1.png){.full-image}
![ ](../aglaia/call2.png){.full-image}
![Act 7 "Confirmation document of my deregistration"](../aglaia/dereg1.png){.full-image}
![ ](../aglaia/dereg2.png){.full-image}
I perceive the document as a unit and as the fundamental symbolic interface of the bureaucratic network. The transformation of the materiality of a document into a scenario to be enacted collectively in public aims to examine these artifacts and highlight the shrouded performative elements of these processes.
@ -28,19 +29,24 @@ I perceive the document as a unit and as the fundamental symbolic interface of t
I see the collective readings of these scenarios as a way of instant publishing and as a communal tool of inspecting bureaucratic bordering infrastructures. How can these re-enactments be situated in different institutional contexts and examine their structures?
I organized a series of performative readings of my own bureaucratic literature in different spaces and contexts, pubic and semi-public WDKA, Art Meets Radical Openness Festival in Linz, the City Hall of Rotterdam where I invited people to perform the play together, like a tiny theater.
![ ](../aglaia/AMRO_kamo.jpg){.image-80}
---
![Art Meets Radical Openness Festival Linz, Austria - May 2024 - Reading Act 2 and Act3 in the tent](../aglaia/AMRO_all.jpg){.half-image}
![ ](../aglaia/AMRO_kamo.jpg){.image-80}
---
The marginal voices of potential applicants are embodying and enacting a role. “The speech does not only describe but brings things into existence”(Austin, 1975). My intention was to stretch the limits of dramaturgical speech through vocalizing a document and turn individual administrative cases into public ones. How do the inscribed words in the documents are not descriptive but on the contrary “are instrumentalized in getting things done”(Butler,1997). Words as active agents. Bodies as low-tech “human microphones”. A group of people performs the bureaucratic scenario in chorus, out loud, in the corridor of the schools building, in the main hall, at the square right across, outside of the municipality building.
I documented and recorded these public acts and I re-created the collectively voiced scenario. This audio piece is a constellation of different recordings and soundscapes of these public moments, a vocal archive, published in the graduation exhibition of XPUB in 2024.
I documented and recorded these public acts and I re-created the collectively voiced scenario. This audio piece is a constellation of different recordings and soundscapes of these public moments, a vocal archive, published in the graduation exhibition of XPUB in 2024.
---
![City Hall Rotterdam - May 2024 - Reading of Act 5 and Act 6](../aglaia/gemeente_front.jpg)
![The garden of Gemeente](../aglaia/statue_garden.jpg){.full-image}
![The statue in the garden of Gemeente is reading the scenario](../aglaia/statue_garden.jpg){.full-image}

@ -16,23 +16,18 @@ This thesis is an assemblage<sup><span class="margin-note">I live somewhere in t
The eastern Mediterranean borderland<sup><span class="margin-note">I use the word borderland to refer to Greece as a (mostly) transit zone in the migrants and refugees route towards Europe.</span></sup>, I happened to come from, proves to be one of Europes deadly borders towards specific ethnic groups. The embodied experience of borders and practices of (im)mobility change radically depending on the various identities of the people crossing them. As I moved to the Netherlands I started more actively perceiving bureaucracy as another multi-layered border. I was wondering how this situation is shifted and transformed moving towards the European North. What is the role of bureaucracy and how it could be perceived as a mechanism of repulsion for some bodies - a camouflaged border?
But what is my starting point and where does my precarious body fit within the borders that I am touching? The language of the administrative document is rigid and hurtful but myself lies between the margins of these lines.
This thesis does not consist of an excessive inquiry about the profoundly complex concepts of borders and bureaucracy. On the contrary, it is initiated by personal concerns, awareness and my positioning. I choose to structure my argument and talk through a personal process that is being unfolded in parallel with the writing period. Accordingly, these words are dynamically being reshaped due to the material constraints of the bureaucratic timeline. A more distant approach became personal and tangible with auto-ethnographical<sup><span class="margin-note">I perceive auto-ethnography as a way to place myself, my lived experiences, my identities, reflections in the (artistic) research and talk through them about structures and within the structures of social, cultural, political frameworks.</span></sup> elements as I was trying to squish myself and my urgencies under these thresholds and fit the A4 document lines.
But what is my starting point and where does my precarious body fit within the borders that I am touching? The language of the administrative document is rigid and hurtful but myself lies between the margins of these lines. This thesis does not consist of an excessive inquiry about the profoundly complex concepts of borders and bureaucracy. On the contrary, it is initiated by personal concerns, awareness and my positioning. I choose to structure my argument and talk through a personal process that is being unfolded in parallel with the writing period. Accordingly, these words are dynamically being reshaped due to the material constraints of the bureaucratic timeline. A more distant approach became personal and tangible with auto-ethnographical<sup><span class="margin-note">I perceive auto-ethnography as a way to place myself, my lived experiences, my identities, reflections in the (artistic) research and talk through them about structures and within the structures of social, cultural, political frameworks.</span></sup> elements as I was trying to squish myself and my urgencies under these thresholds and fit the A4 document lines.
I would like at this point to acknowledge and state explicitly my privilege recognizing the different levels of otherness produced by the several bordering mechanisms. My European machine-readable passport as a designed artifact dictates and facilitates the easiness of my mobility. In other (many) cases the lack of it creates profoundly a severe barrier<sup><span class="margin-note">“Passports still function as a technology to control movement. Technologies like RFID chips and face recognition are part of a control system for digital state surveillance. Designing a passport is relative to design a surveillance tool. The analysis of passport designs rarely looks at the social consequences of identification, control, and restriction of movement, which can have violent consequences.” (Ruben Pater, 2021)</span></sup>. I do not intend in any respect to compare my case to the lived experiences and struggles of migrants and refugees. I utilize the paperwork interface of my smaller-scale story in order to unravel and foreground the aforementioned questions.
This thesis is very much indebted to some text-vehicles that mobilized my reflections and nourished the writing process. "Illegal Traveller, an autoethnography of borders" and "Waiting, a Project in conversation" both written by Shahram Khosravi as well as "The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy" by the anarchist anthropologist David Graeber. Graeber initiated his research utilizing the horrendous prolonged bureaucratic processes he had to follow in order to place his sick mother in a nursing home. In parallel, Khosravis work is itself the outgrowth of his own 'embodied experience of borders', of ethnographic fieldwork among undocumented migrants. I found valuable and inspiring in both texts the personal filter through which they articulate their positioning and develop critique.
I follow a zoom-in approach in mapping my thoughts beginning from the large-scale rigid border as entity and ending up at the document as the smallest designed artifact of the bureaucratic labyrinth.
In the first chapter, I touch the concept of borders in relation to migration. I begin with a personal inspection and comprehension of material borders as entities. Alongside, I interweave in the text the concept of hospitality as a cultural attitude towards 'strangers' from the states perspective. Conditional and unconditional. How the document I hold in my hands reflects positions on the governments conditional hospitality and what constraints it dictates.
I follow a zoom-in approach in mapping my thoughts beginning from the large-scale rigid border as entity and ending up at the document as the smallest designed artifact of the bureaucratic labyrinth. In the first chapter, I touch the concept of borders in relation to migration. I begin with a personal inspection and comprehension of material borders as entities. Alongside, I interweave in the text the concept of hospitality as a cultural attitude towards 'strangers' from the states perspective. Conditional and unconditional. How the document I hold in my hands reflects positions on the governments conditional hospitality and what constraints it dictates.
In the second chapter, I unpack bureaucracy and focus on its bordering function. From migration ghost bureaucracies to the educational bureaucracies of my surroundings to even smaller components of this apparatus. I end up analyzing the document as a unit within this complex network. Through the "interrogation" of the form as an artifact are emerging issues related to language, graphic design and transparency, universality, and underlying violence.
In the third and last chapter, I bridge the written text with the ongoing project that runs simultaneously as part of my graduation work in Experimental Publishing, where I mainly speak through my prototypes. Talking documents(5) are performative bureaucratic text inspections, vocal and non-vocal, that intend to create temporal public interventions through performative readings. The intention is to underline how the vocalization of bureaucracies as a tool can potentially reveal their territorial exclusive function and provide space for the invisible vulnerability.
---
> “on the other side is the river
> and I cannot cross it
@ -40,7 +35,6 @@ In the third and last chapter, I bridge the written text with the ongoing projec
> I cannot bridge it”
> (Anzaldua, 1987)
---
## borders
@ -98,7 +92,6 @@ According to Hannah Arendt, the right to have rights and claim somebody else
> “…<sup><span class="margin-note">This is a transcribed recording of my phone during a protest on migration at Dam Square in Amsterdam. I insert part of the speech of a Palestinian woman addressing the matter of undocumentedness. Date and time of the recording 18th of June 2023, 15:05. “✶” means undecipherable</span></sup>I am here for the rights of the children which haven't be in the taking part in the education since they have undocumented mothers and they are more than ✶ years. I am here to represent mothers who are looking for a place to have a sense of belonging or how long are you trying to continue humiliating them and the female gender. I am here to express my frustration with IND<sup><span class="margin-note">Immigratie- en Naturalisatiedienst - Dutch Immigration and Naturalisation Service</span></sup>. So frustrated. And I will not stop talking about democracy. Democracy is the rule of law where everybody feels included. Democracy is a rule of law where everybody feels * We, undocumented people, we don't feel a sense of belonging from the system."
---
## bureaucracy as immaterial border
@ -122,7 +115,7 @@ The contradiction embedded in many cultural and educational institutions lies in
The genuine essence of education is not bureaucratic at all, neither does it have to fit and ground its foundations under a bureaucratic roof. “The pedagogical process runs counter to the hierarchical, impersonal qualities of bureaucracy” (Cunningham, 2017). However, people working in educational institutions acknowledge the fact that entrenched bureaucratic systems impose their material constraints on teaching structures and on how these actors in this process interact with each other.“Students and staff are treated as human capital” (Cunningham, 2017). This determination can dehumanize people involved, like when "faculty-as-labor" and "students-as-consumers" are marginalized and treated as just variables.
> “there is no document of civilisation which is not at the same time a document of barbarism”
> Walter Benjamin
> (Benjamin, cited by Pater, 2021)
### the document
@ -147,7 +140,7 @@ There is a great materiality in bureaucracies. Bureaucratic procedures are often
Underneath every bureaucratic document, there is a good amount of graphic design labor. What kind of visual strategy is embedded in administrative objects that the design aspect of these artifacts appears to be invisible? The material decisions applied as well as the material constraints attributed to the document can transform or produce different textual meanings and consequently understandings.
> “This does not mean that constraints limit meaning, but on the contrary, constitute it; meaning cannot appear where freedom is absolute or nonexistent: the stem of meaning is that of a supervised freedom”
> (Roland Barthes, 1983)
> (Barthes, 1983)
When I encountered the green logo of the municipality of Rotterdam I did not cultivate any feelings of enthusiasm or even boredom. A big calligraphic “R” with the flawless green ribbons that penetrate it on the left corner of a 229x162 mm standardized dimension folder with a transparent rectangle that reveals my inscribed name and surname from the inside part. I did not put any aesthetic critique over this but I rather felt this rush of stress for the expected response to my objection letter or a fine or a tax to be paid within a specific timeline cause another fine would come if I did not comply with this.
@ -161,7 +154,6 @@ In the latter case, the inscription technology used is the sugar blue paste and
![The birthday biscuit that Chae made, re-creating the Dutch government form](../aglaia/chae_form.jpg){.image-95}
---
## vocal archives-talking documents
@ -177,7 +169,6 @@ How performing a collection of small bureaucratic stories can function as an ins
I started working and engaging more with different bureaucratic material that my peers and I encountered regularly or appeared in our (e)mail (in)boxes and are partly related to our identities as foreign students coming from different places. I chose to start touching and looking for various bureaucracies that surround me as a personal filter towards it. From identification documents and application forms to rental contracts, funding applications, visa applications, quality assurance questionnaires related to the university, assessment criteria, supermarket point gathering cards, receipts. A sequence of locked doors to be unlocked more or less easily via multiple bureaucratic keys. The methods and tools used to scrutinize the administrative artifacts are not rigid or distinct. It is mainly a “collection” of small bureaucratic experiments - closely related to language as well as the performative “nature” of these texts themselves. I was intrigued by how transforming the material conditions of a piece of text could influence the potential understandings and perceptions of its meaning.
---
## prototypes
@ -212,6 +203,8 @@ These 'rituals' are components of a larger “culture of evidence”, serving as
**Reflections-Thoughts:** Beyond the information gathered through my bureaucratic-like questionnaires, the most crucial element of this experiment was the understanding and highlighting of the hidden performative elements that entrench these “rituals”. It was amazing seeing the audience becoming instantly actors of the play enacting willingly a administrative ritualistic scene.
The provided context of this “play” was a social library hosting a masters course public event on graduation projects. I am wondering whether this asymphony between the repetitive bureaucratic acts within the space of Leeszaal, where such acts are not expected to be performed, evoked contradictory feelings or thoughts. Over-identifying with a role was being instrumentalized as an “interrogation” of ones own involvement in the reproduction of social discourses, power, authority, hegemony.
---
![Leeszaal West Rotterdam - November 2023 People queuing to receive their documents and sign. I was thinking of queues as a spatial oppressive tool used often by (bureaucratic) authorities. The naturalized image of bodies-in-a-line waiting for “something” to happen at “some point” under the public gaze in an efficiently defined area.](../aglaia/queue.jpg){.half-image}
---
@ -238,8 +231,7 @@ We read the embedded signs, symbols, categories, texts, magical numbers in our p
---
![ ](../aglaia/passport1.png){.full-image}
![Part of the A6 booklet of the transcription of the passport readings session]
![Part of the A6 booklet of the transcription of the passport readings session](../aglaia/passport1.png){.full-image}
---
@ -260,7 +252,6 @@ The first and the last moment of the performance was during a semi-public tryout
![A6 booklet of the first chapter of the “theatrical” scenario created out of the Postal Address Application documents and performed by XPUB peers](../aglaia/postal.png){.full-image}
---
## conclusion
@ -282,7 +273,7 @@ My intention is to facilitate a series of collective performative readings of bu
---
#### “we didnt cross the border, the border crossed us”(20)
#### “we didnt cross the border, the border crossed us”
As I sit in the waiting area at the gate B7 in the airport preparing to come back to the Netherlands, I am writing the last lines of this text. I am thinking of all these borders and gates that my body was able to pass through smoothly, carrying my magical object through which I embody power- at least within this context. However, I yearn for a reality where we stop looking at those bodies that cross the multifaceted borders and get crossed and entrenched by them, but on the contrary we start interrogating and shouting at the contexts and the frameworks that construct them and render them invisible, natural and powerful.

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
title: Introduction
author:
---
---
# Introduction

@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
---
![Photo by Leslie Robbins](../leslie/xpub2_groiup_hug_10jun24_lr.jpg)
![Photo by Leslie Robbins](../leslie/xpub2_groiup_hug_10jun24_lr.jpeg)

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 5.2 MiB

Binary file not shown.

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 5.3 MiB

@ -14,11 +14,7 @@
<ul>
{% for title in titles %}
{% if loop.index > 0 %}
<li class="toc-title"><a href="#section-{{ loop.index + 1 }}">{{ title }}</a></li>
{% if (loop.index == 1) or (loop.index == 9) %}
<br>
<br>
{% endif %}
<li class="toc-title"><a href="#section-{{ loop.index + 2 }}">{{ title }}</a></li>
{% endif %}
{% endfor %}
</ul>

@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ figure{
margin: -13mm 0 0 -10mm;
position: relative;
object-fit: cover;
break-before: page;
figure{
margin: 0;
}
@ -42,7 +43,12 @@ figure{
}
}
.half-image{
height: unset;
/* height: unset; */
height: initial;
}
.pagedjs_left_page .full-image,
.pagedjs_left_page .half-image{
margin-left: -13mm;
}
.white-caption + figcaption{
color: #fff;

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

@ -189,8 +189,8 @@ ol, ul {
}
.toc {
margin: 10mm 0 0 -10mm;
width: 100mm;
margin: 10mm 0 0 -5mm;
width: 90mm;
}
.toc h1{
display: none;
@ -200,13 +200,14 @@ ol, ul {
list-style: none;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
line-height: 8mm;
line-height: 6.9mm;
text-align: center;
}
.toc-title:first-of-type, .toc-title:nth-of-type(2), .toc-title:nth-of-type(10){
/* .toc-title:first-of-type, .toc-title:nth-of-type(2), .toc-title:nth-of-type(10){
margin-left: 40mm;
}
} */
.toc-title{
font-size: 19pt;
font-size: 23pt;
display: inline;
}
@ -218,6 +219,9 @@ margin-left: 40mm;
display: inline-block;
line-height: 0;
}
#digital-bodies + blockquote{
margin-right: 0;
}
#bibliography{
font-size: 6pt;

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
title: do you ever dream about work?
title: Do you ever dream about work?
author: Stephen
---

Loading…
Cancel
Save