diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 78b763b..51ee449 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -102,9 +102,7 @@ var LZString={_keyStr:"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz01234 html { font-family: 'DotGothic16', sans-serif; - padding-left: 7%; - padding-right: 7%; - padding-top: 0.5%; + margin: 0; } h1 { @@ -149,30 +147,26 @@ body { } #passage-nest-3{ - white-space: pre; + white-space: pre-wrap; } #passage-nest-5{ - white-space: pre; + white-space: pre-wrap; } #passage-nest-3-submit{ - white-space: pre; + white-space: pre-wrap; } #passage-nest-5-submit{ - white-space: pre; + white-space: pre-wrap; } -#passages { - margin: 0; - max-width: 50em; -} - input { border: 1px solid white; background-color: red; color: white; + width: 100%; } input:not(:disabled):hover{ @@ -184,17 +178,18 @@ input:not(:disabled):focus{ background-color: white; color: red; }[[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > Continue from an existing nest +$(document.head).find('#style-ui-bar').remove();[[SI#18|home]] > Expand -!Hello, $name. -!!Pick a nest: +!//Hello, $name.// +!!//Where would you like to go?// [[→ ⚀|nest 1]] [[→ ⚁|nest 2]] [[→ ⚂|nest 3]] [[→ ⚃|nest 4]] [[→ ⚄|nest 5]] -!Nested narratives: //what is left to discuss?// +[[→ ⚅|nest 6]] +!Nested narratives: //what is left to discuss?// !!Special Issue #18 — Weekly Release #5 What if a group of people writes a piece that starts (or ends) with the same sentence? @@ -208,14 +203,14 @@ The release of this week is a collaboratively written text recorded as audio pie The method chosen for the collective writing is inter-dependent and inter-connected, but at the same time allows everyone to work at their own pace. -The structure is built up on the refrain if we censor art what is left to discuss that produced different scenarios and visions with the same beginning or end. The idea is that every piece can go one after the other and that new pieces of text could be added, producing a never-ending collective writing piece: +The structure is built up on the refrain "if we censor art what is left to discuss" that produced different scenarios and visions with the same beginning or end. The idea is that every piece can go one after the other and that new pieces of text could be added, producing a never-ending collective writing piece: if we censor art what is left to discuss<<cycle "$week5contribs" autoselect>> - <<option "? What does art mean to us?" "contrib1">> <<option ": the reasons, the motivations behind the censorship of art perhaps." "contrib2">> - <<option " expression and representation are not the same thing" "contrib3">> - <<option " And I guess I am not the most qualified to talk" "contrib4">> <<option " but" "contrib5">> + <<option " expression and representation are not the same thing" "contrib3">> + <<option " and I guess I am not the most qualified to talk" "contrib4">> + <<option "? What does art mean to us?" "contrib1">> <</cycle>> While listening to this piece, we invite you to pay heed to the words coming out of the speakers and to doodle/draw on a piece of paper. The result will be part of the documentation for this release. @@ -235,9 +230,8 @@ Emma Prato(*, **) Jian Haake(*) Erica Gargaglione(*) Gersande Schellinx(*) -Chaeyoung Kim(*)<<cacheaudio "five-mix" "music/five-mix.mp3">> [[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > [[Continue from an existing nest|enter]] > [[Nest 1|nest 1]] > Nested text - -!//Congratulations! Your text has been nested:// +Chaeyoung Kim(*)<<cacheaudio "five-mix" "music/five-mix.mp3">> [[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > Nest 1 +!//Thanks for expanding our nest!// __Person A:__ if we censor art what is left to discuss? @@ -304,8 +298,9 @@ __Person A:__ __$name:__ $contrib -[[→ Visit another nest|enter]] -[[→ I'm done nesting|end nest]]!!//Congratulations! Your text has been nested:// +[[→ Visit another nest|re-enter]] +[[→ Go home|home]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > Nest 2 +!//Thanks for expanding our nest!// If we censor art what is left to discuss: the reasons, the motivations behind the censorship of art perhaps. Or would that also be censored? Something like the liar's paradox as mentioned by Dennis the Pillow in Everything is Alive. Is censorship openly discussed when censorship is also taking place? Can censorship be discuss simultaneously while it is happening? "I am lying" says the liar. Would censored art be censored to discuss? A motivation to rename, rebrand, re-contextualise. Be under the radar, under-scrutinized in opposition to overanalysed. If we understand art what is left to discuss? In a book I am currently reading, Weight of the Earth The Tape Journals of David Wojnarowicz, I read the following: "I liked that things carry the possibility for unlimited interpretations." Oh how I like this image. Oh how I rediscover this thought I've had at many occasions: that of a text with million of stories. Well, each set of eyes has a different rhythm, a singular attention span, personal assumptions of certain words and sentences and definitions; some might skip over a sentence, some letters, misconstruct a narration or a structure... so many variables depending of the reader. These different circumstances put together, leave the text to interpretation, leave the "things" with "the possibility for unlimited interpretations." @@ -316,8 +311,9 @@ If we underline censorship what is left to art? The questions above triggered me For now I want to highlight this sentence, "Not to censor, rather to underline". $contrib -[[→ Visit another nest|enter]] -[[→ I'm done nesting|end nest]]!!//Congratulations! Your text has been nested:// +[[→ Visit another nest|re-enter]] +[[→ Go home|home]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > Nest 3 +!//Thanks for expanding our nest!// if we censor art what is left to discuss @@ -609,81 +605,12 @@ the clouds in the sky $contrib -[[→ Visit another nest|enter]] -[[→ I'm done nesting|end nest]]//Congratulations! Your contribution has been nested:// - -__Person A:__ -if we censor art what is left to discuss? - -__Person B:__ -what does art mean to us? - -__Person A:__ -A calling -A gut feeling you can’t ignore -(For lack of a better word) a labor of love -A cryptic yet decipherable language -A way to say something without actually saying it (some things can’t be expressed through just words) - -__Person B:__ -the way I can address and express my most pressing thoughts and feelings -the way I can address a topic that I am passionate about - -__Person A:__ -art as a mode of address...is there always an addressee? sometimes i feel like i'm expressing into a void.. - -__Person B:__ -do you ever feel uncomfortable to share what you have created? - -__Person A:__ -sometimes, when something still feels half-baked or isn’t yet in a digestible state. But at the same time, this uncomfortable feeling is part of the process, and accepting and going along with it can take you to unexpected and even more interesting places. - -__Person B:__ -when I doubt myself; sometimes I fear what people will think about it. Perhaps I am afraid of harsh critique or feeling that my work is a joke. Sometimes I don't believe my work is good enough. Sometimes I feel I will be misunderstood. Or whatever I do doesn't matter at all. - -__Person A:__ -does the environment you’re in shape your practice/creation process? - -__Person B:__ -all the time. I am so easy to be influenced by things happening around me. I think I am quite sensitive. I observe and feel things and then I need to digest them and get them out of my system. - -__Person A:__ -i can relate. it can also be difficult when you're trying to go with the motions and haven't properly digested some things yet / are still in the marinating process. - -__Person B:__ -when I am forced to create after a quick snack, I feel like the outcome is not really solid. I need more time to process the things before I am able to reflect and turn them into something valuable. But then, when I know what I want to do, I can do it really fast. - -__Person A:__ -what do you (or would like to) refrain from in your artistic practice? - -__Person B:__ -fear and holding myself back. Easier said than done though. - -__Person A__ -but this push and pull is also where growth happens :) - -__Person B:__ -we're growing up all the time :D - -__Person A:__ -is there a common refrain in your creations? An uncommon one you’d like to see more of or experiment with? for me i feel like there is or is taking shape but hasn't quite crystallized yet.. - -__Person B:__ -I feel like my music is always in different genres. I am constantly trying out new things and aesthetics but then a lot of people still say they recognise my "voice". I guess, the refrain is me. I am looking for one that I can see, but it is actually the one other people see, that matters. - -__Person A:__ -...what is left to discuss? - -__$name:__ -$contrib - -__$name:__ -<<textbox "$contrib" "">> -[[→ submit|nest 1 submit]][[SI#18|home]] > Listen +[[→ Visit another nest|re-enter]] +[[→ Go home|home]][[SI#18|home]] > Listen !If we censor art what is left to discuss? -If we censor art what is left to discuss: the reasons, the motivations behind the censorship of art perhaps. Or would that also be censored? Something like the liar's paradox as mentioned by Dennis the Pillow in Everything is Alive. Is censorship openly discussed when censorship is also taking place? Can censorship be discuss simultaneously while it is happening? "I am lying" says the liar. Would censored art be censored to discuss? A motivation to rename, rebrand, re-contextualise. Be under the radar, under-scrutinized in opposition to overanalysed. +__If we censor art what is left to discuss__: the reasons, the motivations behind the censorship of art perhaps. Or would that also be censored? Something like the liar's paradox as mentioned by Dennis the Pillow in Everything is Alive. Is censorship openly discussed when censorship is also taking place? Can censorship be discuss simultaneously while it is happening? "I am lying" says the liar. Would censored art be censored to discuss? A motivation to rename, rebrand, re-contextualise. Be under the radar, under-scrutinized in opposition to overanalysed. If we understand art what is left to discuss? In a book I am currently reading, Weight of the Earth The Tape Journals of David Wojnarowicz, I read the following: "I liked that things carry the possibility for unlimited interpretations." Oh how I like this image. Oh how I rediscover this thought I've had at many occasions: that of a text with million of stories. Well, each set of eyes has a different rhythm, a singular attention span, personal assumptions of certain words and sentences and definitions; some might skip over a sentence, some letters, misconstruct a narration or a structure... so many variables depending of the reader. These different circumstances put together, leave the text to interpretation, leave the "things" with "the possibility for unlimited interpretations." If we misunderstand art what is left to discuss? I am 126 pages into the book and for the first time I smile and fold the bottom of the page, underline this sentence as not to forget its placement. Not that I didn't enjoy the book until that moment, but there is something in this sentence I recognised. Something I wanted to mark down, as to acknowledge it and be able to come back to it at any given moment. Not to censor, rather to underline. What is left to discuss? The ones that I stroke out. I left them out, for they are too concrete. @@ -691,8 +618,8 @@ Does it trigger your curiosity? If it beeps, does it trigger your imagination? I If we underline censorship what is left to art? The questions above triggered me to overlap the acts of highlighting and censoring and deleting. During the Japanese Colonial Period in Korea and from the 60s to the 80s during the military government, a lot of newspapers were censored, published as blank blocks or with blackened lines, a colourless shout. Highlighting and deleting texts within the line are the same movements. They offer different outcomes, with different intentions. To highlight becomes a form of militantism, to delete presents a twisted kind of activism. A space to enhance words, another to strike absence. For now I want to highlight this sentence, "Not to censor, rather to underline". -if we censor art -what is left to discuss +__if we censor art +what is left to discuss__ @@ -1090,7 +1017,7 @@ what is right not to but supi: -if we censor art what is left to discuss? +__if we censor art what is left to discuss__? al: what does art mean to us? @@ -1262,43 +1189,31 @@ I model the sphere, I model the crowd You wanna hear my wit and my thoughts give me applause, I’m not gonna pause Try to stop me, it’s your loss -If we tryna censor art, -what is left to discuss +__If we tryna censor art, +what is left to discuss__ + +//Want more?// +[[→ Expand|expand]] +[[→ Drag|https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/~flem/FIVE_The%20Drag-able/draggable.html]] -<<audio five-mix play>>[[SI#18|home]] > Expand +<<audio five-mix play>>[[SI#18|home]] > Expand !Expand -!!You can expand on the existing texts here +!!This is a never-ending collective writing piece after all... -[[→ Continue from an existing nest|continue]] -[[→ Start a new nest|start]]Thanks for nesting with us! +[[→ I wanna join|continue]]!Thanks for expanding our nests! +We're still working on where to store these expansions. Check back soon! In the meantime, would you like to -[[→ Home|home][[SI18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > Continue from an existing nest +[[→ Listen|listen]] +[[→ Drag|https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/~flem/FIVE_The%20Drag-able/draggable.html]] +[[→ Leave|home]][[SI18|home]] > Expand -!!To begin, enter your name: +!//Who/what are you?// <<textbox "$name" "">> -[[→ Enter|enter]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > Start a new nest - -!Start a new nest -!!Insert text into your preferred nest: - -__Nest A__ -<<textbox "$contrib-a" "">> if we censor art what is left to discuss - -__Nest B__ -if we censor art <<textbox "$contrib-b" "">> what is left to discuss - -__Nest C__ -If we censor art what is left to discuss <<textbox "$contrib-c" "">> - -__Nest D__ -if we censor <<textbox "$contrib-d1" "">> what is left to discuss - -[[→ Back|enter]] -[[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > [[Continue from an existing nest|enter]] > Nest 1 +[[→ Enter|enter]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|enter]] > Nest 1 -!Nest 1 -!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to continue nesting.// +!//You've arrived at Nest 1// +!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to add your text!// __Person A:__ if we censor art what is left to discuss? @@ -1364,10 +1279,11 @@ __Person A:__ __$name:__ <<textbox "$contrib" "">> -[[→ Nest my text|nest 1 submit]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > [[Continue from an existing nest|enter]] > Nest 2 +[[→ Add|nest 1 submit]] +[[→ I prefer another nest|re-enter]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|enter]] > Nest 2 -!Nest 2 -!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to continue nesting.// +!//You've arrived at Nest 2// +!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to add your text!// If we censor art what is left to discuss: the reasons, the motivations behind the censorship of art perhaps. Or would that also be censored? Something like the liar's paradox as mentioned by Dennis the Pillow in Everything is Alive. Is censorship openly discussed when censorship is also taking place? Can censorship be discuss simultaneously while it is happening? "I am lying" says the liar. Would censored art be censored to discuss? A motivation to rename, rebrand, re-contextualise. Be under the radar, under-scrutinized in opposition to overanalysed. If we understand art what is left to discuss? In a book I am currently reading, Weight of the Earth The Tape Journals of David Wojnarowicz, I read the following: "I liked that things carry the possibility for unlimited interpretations." Oh how I like this image. Oh how I rediscover this thought I've had at many occasions: that of a text with million of stories. Well, each set of eyes has a different rhythm, a singular attention span, personal assumptions of certain words and sentences and definitions; some might skip over a sentence, some letters, misconstruct a narration or a structure... so many variables depending of the reader. These different circumstances put together, leave the text to interpretation, leave the "things" with "the possibility for unlimited interpretations." @@ -1377,11 +1293,12 @@ If we underline censorship what is left to art? The questions above triggered me For now I want to highlight this sentence, "Not to censor, rather to underline". <<textbox "$contrib" "">> -[[→ Nest my text|nest 2 submit]] -[[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > [[Continue from an existing nest|enter]] > Nest 3 +[[→ Add|nest 2 submit]] +[[→ I prefer another nest|re-enter]] +[[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|enter]] > Nest 3 -!Nest 3 -!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to continue nesting.// +!//You've arrived at Nest 3// +!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to add your text!// if we censor art what is left to discuss @@ -1672,10 +1589,11 @@ the clouds in the sky would they move on <<textbox "$contrib" "">> -[[→ Nest my text|nest 3 submit]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > [[Continue from an existing nest|enter]] > Nest 4 +[[→ Add|nest 3 submit]] +[[→ I prefer another nest|re-enter]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|enter]] > Nest 4 -!Nest 4 -!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to continue nesting.// +!//You've arrived at Nest 4// +!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to add your text!// //Person A:// @@ -1791,10 +1709,11 @@ If we tryna censor art, what is left to discuss <<textbox "$contrib" "">> -[[→ Nest my text|nest 4 submit]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > [[Continue from an existing nest|enter]] > Nest 5 +[[→ Add|nest 4 submit]] +[[→ I prefer another nest|re-enter]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|enter]] > Nest 5 -!Nest 5 -!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to continue nesting.// +!//You've arrived at Nest 5// +!!//Scroll to the bottom of the page to add your text!// If we censor art what is left to discuss? @@ -1907,7 +1826,9 @@ what is right not to but <<textbox "$contrib" "">> -[[→ Nest my text|nest 5 submit]]!!//Congratulations! Your text has been nested:// +[[→ Add|nest 5 submit]] +[[→ I prefer another nest|re-enter]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > Nest 4 +!//Thanks for expanding our nest!// //Person A:// @@ -2024,8 +1945,9 @@ what is left to discuss $contrib -[[→ Visit another nest|enter]] -[[→ I'm done nesting|end nest]]!!//Congratulations! Your text has been nested:// +[[→ Visit another nest|re-enter]] +[[→ Go home|home]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|expand]] > Nest 5 +!//Thanks for expanding our nest!// If we censor art what is left to discuss? @@ -2139,8 +2061,69 @@ what is right not to $contrib -[[→ Visit another nest|enter]] -[[→ I'm done nesting|end nest]]Double-click this passage to edit it. +[[→ Visit another nest|re-enter]] +[[→ Go home|home]][[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|enter]] > Deconstructed nest + +!//You've found an easter (nest)...// + +If we censor art what is left to discuss <<textbox "$deconstructed1" "">> + +If we censor<<textbox "$deconstructed2" "">>what is left to discuss + +If we<<textbox "$deconstructed3" "">>art what is left to discuss + +If we<<textbox "$deconstructed4" "">>what is left to discuss + +If we<<textbox "$deconstructed5" "">>is left to discuss + +If we<<textbox "$deconstructed6" "">>left to discuss + +If we<<textbox "$deconstructed7" "">>to discuss + +If we<<textbox "$deconstructed8" "">>discuss + +If we<<textbox "$deconstructed9" "">> + +If<<textbox "$deconstructed10" "">> + +[[→ Reconstruct|reconstruct]] +[[→ I prefer another nest|re-enter]][[SI#18|home]] > Expand + +!//Hello again, $name.// +!!//Where to now?// + +[[→ ⚀|nest 1]] +[[→ ⚁|nest 2]] +[[→ ⚂|nest 3]] +[[→ ⚃|nest 4]] +[[→ ⚄|nest 5]] +[[→ ⚅|nest 6]] +[[SI#18|home]] > [[Expand|enter]] > (Re)constructed nest + +!//Thanks for expanding our nest!// + +If we censor art what is left to discuss $deconstructed1 + +If we censor $deconstructed2 what is left to discuss + +If we $deconstructed3 art what is left to discuss + +If we $deconstructed4 what is left to discuss + +If we $deconstructed5 is left to discuss + +If we $deconstructed6 left to discuss + +If we $deconstructed7 to discuss + +If we $deconstructed8 discuss + +If we $deconstructed9 + +If $deconstructed10 + +[[→ Visit another nest|re-enter]] +[[→ Go home|home]]