From 86adefb758063b1efb5bfbe736b0dfdf9db76466 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Max Lehmann Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:32:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] curl --- index.html | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 659293d..67325f2 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@
+
@@ -98,7 +99,12 @@
  • An archive holds both ontological aspects
    (related to the nature of existence) and nomological
    (law-like) principles.

  • " The citizens who thus held and signified political power were considered to possess the right to make or to represent the law "

  • What comes *first* and therefore is *chief* ?

  • - + +
    + + +
    +
    Public = Property + Edicts

    @@ -118,6 +124,10 @@
  • The "public" archive VS where it is held :
    in private homes.

  • Archives change from a private - as in the homes of certain individuals (archons) - to a public matter.

  • Archons are intrusted with the interpretation of the documents they were collecting - the documents which also determined the law.

  • How transparent is this process ?


  • +
    + + +
    @@ -137,6 +147,10 @@
    "At the intersection of the topological and the nomological, of the place and the law, of the substrate and the authority […]. They all have to do with this topo-nomology, with this archontic dimension of domiciliation… "

  • The ones that interpret these documents are the ones making the rules.

  • The connection between property, knowledge, and power is established.

  • +
    + + +
    @@ -157,7 +171,12 @@
  • Content must be categorized in order to be called an archive. It has a particular set of procedures, it strives for a permanence.

  • The link between the right to archive and power, as well as the right for people in power to select and interpret, doesn’t sound like a good idea.

  • Don't we all strive for permanence?

  • - + +
    + + +
    +