ve ( just as much as it says about what we are conditioned to expect and recognize
irst it made me shy . But the next time we had sex , I noticed how her description
 meant value determining . In that case we ’ d encounter the moment when words and
ce . Language kills continuation . When we describe something , we deny the contin
inuation . When we describe something , we deny the continuity of that which we de
 , we deny the continuity of that which we describe . When we describe something o
inuity of that which we describe . When we describe something or someone , that so
’ d like to draw attention to ? How can we display continuous time while using lan
one per se – but in order to use a word we need to at least remember its meaning ,
talist Ruins [ I ] . [ 5 ] Often , when we speak about progress , progress is not 
 often used to debunk what was before . We see this with children displaying ‘ que
 of ‘ arriving. ’ The expectations that we will later ‘ arrive ’ at a certain insi
later ‘ arrive ’ at a certain insight , we arrive at a better place in our lives ,
omething real , an arrival at ‘ home. ’ We tend to forget that what we understand 
t ‘ home. ’ We tend to forget that what we understand as real [ i ] is [ i ] and [
 [ i ] only is [ i ] the present . When we feel ‘ unheimisch ’ or ‘ unreal , ’ thi
gnized it . Or so the history narrative we are accustomed to , latently ( but blun
 would state , ‘ all is journey. ’ When we think about progress , similar feelings
that one will ‘ arrive ’ in the world . We can not arrive in the world , as worlds
d , as worlds are constantly arriving . We need continuous language . There is no 
or mode awaiting your growth . What can we give to a future that is not awaiting o
 i ] presence [ i ] , continuous life . We need a language that is not old , nor p
 you about him I love him so much with all my heart and my soul With every bone i
elative as no genitals are average and all adjectives that she finds truth in are
 ‘ discovered ’ the Americas , meaning all the life that was there before Columbu
onsidered meaningful or even living at all . It was no life . It only became life
ave – in some way or another – existed all along . Those who arrive – whether at 
 common , inspirational motto ‘ It ’ s all about the journey ’ forgets that the p
d arrival , unless one would state , ‘ all is journey. ’ When we think about prog
air you are given by Thuiszorg . [ 6 ] All of these factors helped me get better 
nd upon my arrival I could forget that all worlds and all sides that are always a
val I could forget that all worlds and all sides that are always already out ther
asonable wealthy and educated family . All would be fine as the society I grew up
 speaking , but an eternal effort from all , allowing everything to be alive – am
eminist practise . Queer because the embrace of what ’ s described can not be a s
straight one , it is a messy sort of embrace in which it is unclear what embraces
at embraces what : does the language embrace the listener , does the listener emb
ace the listener , does the listener embrace the description , does the event des
scription , does the event described embrace the continuous language that is tryi
gage the event ? It ’ s an amorphous embrace with few coordinates . It ’ s an emb
ace with few coordinates . It ’ s an embrace of which it is unsure whether it is 
 which it is unsure whether it is an embrace . It is moving , taking form , formi
ne and seizable , instead of as the continuous thinking she is trying to surface .
w attention to ? How can we display continuous time while using language ? Languag
at is described . It means that the continuous ( well- ) being of what is describe
ecause of your positionality . This continuous noticing is necessary to re-direct 
oes the event described embrace the continuous language that is trying to linguist
, but to acknowledge the world as a continuous place , instead of believing that o
s are constantly arriving . We need continuous language . There is no platform wai
untered with [ i ] presence [ i ] , continuous life . We need a language that is n
 I understood that it was her strong language that displayed , inhabited , shaped 
ted her love and trust for him . Her language wasn ’ t just a true account of her 
 a true account of her worship , the language generated and endorsed the love . Th
the content of this message . I love language . I love language so much that I can
s message . I love language . I love language so much that I can sound very convin
eling submission . In this convinced language , by expressing surrender I would ex
uld experience surrender because the language of worship and submission is not des
words , but I ’ m very much aimed at language ’ s shortcomings . One of the diffic
comings . One of the difficulties of language I have recently been involved with ,
 thinking she is trying to surface . Language kills continuation . When we describ
 display continuous time while using language ? Language itself is constantly draw
ntinuous time while using language ? Language itself is constantly drawing from th
I was experiencing continuousness of language when I was having sex and feeling my
m a moment in time and space . While language kills what is being described , it e
ng a few dominant narratives – using language to create proximity can just as well
nclear what embraces what : does the language embrace the listener , does the list
ent described embrace the continuous language that is trying to linguistically eng
tantly arriving . We need continuous language . There is no platform waiting for y
ing our arrival ? The future needs a language that does not identify the future as
uture as a separate era . It needs a language in which the deadening force of word
 [ i ] , continuous life . We need a language that is not old , nor presents itsel
gitimatize its existence . What does language need ? It needs faith . It needs spe
ivity , who recognize the effects of language , understanding that the expression 
 the conversation . A feminist queer language may well be that : God-language . A