# Let’s Talk About Unspeakable Things (conclusion)
Re-considering the speech: in ancient world it is considered to be a rational form of address. What does this mean when I talk about the female voice and speech. The feminists were re-appropriating the speech.

collective-female vs individual empowerment in democracy

rethinking this collective voice in the current media ecology

the practices of female voices (ololyga)-second chapter in relation to the technical familiriaty and tools of mediation that I develop further in third chapter


- ?Donna Haraway. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)


## The oxymoron of democracy
Transcriptions
Interviews

 "oxymoron of democracy" technologies and nations that filter the unspeakable

 *"Celebrities, politicians and organizers of events (...) soon discovered that streaming services offered by Ustream and the other leading start-up provider, Livestream, could help expand their audience online. Now, the huge amount of user-generated live video produced by the Occupy Wall Street movement has delivered what could be a watershed moment for these companies, potentially helping them gain the audience needed to become viable businesses" (Preston, 2011). But other businesses found live streaming successful after that, like Facebook, Youtube, Instagram and users distribute easily live videos from terrorist attacks or demonstrations.* (Preston)

"Each bodies can communicate in the resonance. Resonance does not exchange information but synchronizes between bodies." ololyga
_the use of media as an individualistic approach
_individual empowerment
streaming media ecologies
silencing censorship_
"Point A: live streaming as a rabid and urgent communication of public moments"


"Mobile technologies and networks change
our everyday experience of places" streaming media brussels

"Returning back to radio, Kanouse refers to the state regulations imposed on radio and specifically on FRC (Federal Radio Comission) in United States that restricted access to airwaves and permitted licensed transmissions only in low frequencies, so there will be no interferences with commercial frequencies. That had as a result the creation of a “public body” in the name of a homogenous public and the radio’s monopolization by mainstream entertainment and political commentary." (Kanouse, pg. 89?)



##point B: restrictions and surveillance in european countries on public assemblies.?
legal issues and restrictions of radio


The use of communication technologies and social media in movements and public speeches has contributed to their preservasion and their distribution. According to Sassen (2012, p.) in movements like #occupy these technologies were intensively discussed concerning their unrealised potentials. There is a confusion between the logic of the technology designed by the engineers and the ones of the user. Facebook for example is used for spreading the word of very diverse collective events even if they have different aims and ideologies, but they focus in communicating rapidly something. She proposes to see this “electronic interactive domain” as a part of the larger ecologies beyond its technicality and redefine them more conceptually. “Radio and television have brought major political figures as public speakers to a larger public than was ever possible before modern electronic developments. Thus in a sense orality has come into its own more than ever before.” (Ong, p. 135). While a public speech can be "amplified" online, the use of any sound amplification equipment in the physical space (squares, streets) is not always permitted. That makes the public space a primitive space for oral communication.






# The house-wifi-zation of the wifi