From a9d3520187c1b4c11ae8c9cdebfa793561a42960 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Angeliki Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 10:53:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] edit Multiplication --- thesis/3. Multiplication Vis a Vis Amplification.md | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/thesis/3. Multiplication Vis a Vis Amplification.md b/thesis/3. Multiplication Vis a Vis Amplification.md index 85947bf..609931b 100644 --- a/thesis/3. Multiplication Vis a Vis Amplification.md +++ b/thesis/3. Multiplication Vis a Vis Amplification.md @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ From my point of view, the Occupy Movement revealed a lot about the relation of ![alt text](occupy-davis-butler.jpg) Multiplication could be seen as a way of parallel and multiple presences in diverse private and public places. Internet, Skype, Youtube, voice messages “[r]adio and television have brought major political figures as public speakers to a larger public than was ever possible before modern electronic developments” (Ong, pg. 135). There are two ways of multiplication in the above examples. The one is through a unified collective voice and the other one through spreading the words as a spider net. The 'human microphone' resembles the first examples of collective voices in public, which is the 'ololyga', the female collective utterance (see 'Monstrosity'). Even though may not be a direct expression of resistance, it was an alternative temporary and informal [not specialized] mode of address that was suppressed and used only for specific occasions that were acceptable by the society at that time (see 'Monstrosity'). The second case reminds me of the very ancient practice of gossiping [example of gossip-based algorithms/ Gossip protocol/ peer-to-peer communication]. It has a negative connotation especially when connected with women [text of Federici]. However sometimes this is more an attempt to claim and exchange knowledge when there is no platform for them that practice it. The Internet and social media have the same baton effect and even though this is misused by mainstream political voices, it also serves the voiceless [examples and images].
- ## The mediation of voice through amplification In some occasions the amplification of the voice, as a mode of prohibition and presence, becomes possible both literally and metaphorically [definition of amplification]. This means that somebody can amplify their voice with the use of microphone so to strengthen the signal on the spot, and at the same time to make themselves loud and present so to be heard over the dominant ones. Suffragettes' speech-making workshops was a way to provide women with tools “with which to take their concerns out into the public domain” (Rose Gibbs, 2016) or in other words to amplify their voices in public. Speech was a civilized way to respond to violence happening inside homes. Feminists focused on the voice because there is a uniqueness in it, that embodies the speaker when entering a dialogue. It is an approach that rejects the abstract and bodiless universal identity of one's person, that has been developed by the western thought. By such identity I mean that one person is represented as a universal entity that shares the same characteristics and problems with all the people. So this person can be represented by somebody else, like a politician or another member of the family (see Transmitting...through men's speech), in a conversation concerning her/his body. But according to the feminist perspective, each one is unique and carries personal and situated problems and principles, so they are the only one that can represent themselves. Arendt () observes that the speech becomes possible with the existence of a group of people. Even more, the voice through speech- that can take the form of songs passing from one to the other or the collective voice of protesting- links one another and at the same time keeps the individuality of the speaker. In contrast to mainstream political spheres the feminists, like anarchists, were looking for horizontal ways of communication were no voice was dominating over others (Gibbs). Listening and wait everyone to speak, even the most shy ones, is a basic element of this kind of practices.
@@ -27,16 +26,12 @@ The second project that she talks about is The Public Broadcast Cart made by Ric [//]: <> () -*max neuhaus people broadcasting different frequencies that compose a piece. -other radio art examples from re-inveting radio* - +*[other examples: max neuhaus people broadcasting different frequencies that compose a piece. +other radio art examples from re-inveting radio]* ##Conclusion - The collective or individual concern of the ones that lack power is spread through different ways of mediation of their voice that overpass the mainstream and dominant modes. In my essay I separated the examples of amplification and multiplication but in conclusion these two terms are easily mixed together. These examples have all the condition I mentioned in the introduction in common. But they also have in common the spirit of oral cultures that are based on presence and vocal expression though they exist in a contemporary western context that differs from them. As Ong (2002, pg.13) says, “[a]t the same time, with telephone, radio, television and various kinds of sound tape, electronic technology has brought us into the age of 'secondary orality'” - - #Notes 1: It is an international movement since 2011 for social and economic justice and new forms of democracy with meetings in public spaces